Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of Accelerated Delivery of Supplement to the Options Disclosure Document Reflecting Certain Changes to Disclosure Regarding Relative Performance Options, 3828-3829 [2012-1445]
Download as PDF
3828
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Notices
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.13
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 14 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 15 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing.
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, as it
will allow the pilot program to continue
uninterrupted, thereby avoiding the
investor confusion that could result
from a temporary interruption in the
pilot program. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon
filing.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Jan 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–BYX–2012–001 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–BYX–2012–001. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–BYX–2012–
001 and should be submitted on or
before February 15, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–1485 Filed 1–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
17 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66193; File No. SR–ODD–
2012–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Granting Approval of Accelerated
Delivery of Supplement to the Options
Disclosure Document Reflecting
Certain Changes to Disclosure
Regarding Relative Performance
Options
January 19, 2012.
On August 15, 2011, The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) submitted
to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Rule 9b–1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 five
preliminary copies of a supplement to
amend the options disclosure document
(‘‘ODD’’) to reflect certain changes to
disclosure regarding relative
performance options (‘‘January 2012
Supplement’’).2 On January 5, 2012, the
OCC submitted to the Commission five
definitive copies of the January 2012
Supplement.3
The ODD currently contains general
disclosures on the characteristics and
risks of trading standardized options.
The March 2011 Supplement amended
the ODD to provide disclosure regarding
relative performance options in
response to the Commission’s approval
of NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC’s (‘‘Phlx’’)
proposal to list and trade Alpha Index
options.4 In August 2011, the
Commission approved a proposed rule
change that permitted Phlx to list and
trade certain Alpha Index options where
both components of the Alpha Index are
ETF shares.5 The current proposed
January 2012 Supplement amends the
ODD disclosure to accommodate the
listing of relative performance options
where both components of the
1 17
CFR 240.9b–1.
letter from Jean M. Cawley, Senior Vice
President, Deputy General Counsel and Chief
Compliance Officer, OCC, to Sharon Lawson, Senior
Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets
(‘‘Division’’), Commission, dated August 15, 2011.
3 See letter from Jean M. Cawley, Senior Vice
President, Deputy General Counsel and Chief
Compliance Officer, OCC, to Sharon Lawson, Senior
Special Counsel, Division, Commission, dated
January 5, 2012.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63860
(February 7, 2011), 76 FR 7888 (February 11, 2011)
(SR–Phlx–2010–176) (order approving Phlx’s
proposed rule change to list and trade Alpha Index
options).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65149
(August 17, 2011), 76 FR 52729 (August 23, 2011)
(SR–Phlx–2011–89) (order approving Phlx’s
proposed rule change to list and trade Alpha Index
options where both Alpha Index components are
ETF shares).
2 See
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Notices
underlying relative performance index
could be an ETF share. The supplement
also clarifies that the ETF share
components must be non-leveraged. In
addition, the supplement proposes to
add an example of the calculation of a
relative performance index. The
proposed supplement is intended to be
read in conjunction with the more
general ODD, which discusses the
characteristics and risks of options
generally.6
Rule 9b–1(b)(2)(i) under the Act 7
provides that an options market must
file five copies of an amendment or
supplement to the ODD with the
Commission at least 30 days prior to the
date definitive copies are furnished to
customers, unless the Commission
determines otherwise, having due
regard to the adequacy of the
information disclosed and the public
interest and protection of investors.8 In
addition, five copies of the definitive
ODD, as amended or supplemented,
must be filed with the Commission not
later than the date the amendment or
supplement, or the amended ODD, is
furnished to customers. The
Commission has reviewed the proposed
January 2012 Supplement, and the
amendments to the ODD contained
therein, and finds that, having due
regard to the adequacy of the
information disclosed and the public
interest and protection of investors, the
supplement may be furnished to
customers as of the date of this order.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Rule 9b–1 under the Act,9 that
definitive copies of the January 2012
Supplement to the ODD (SR–ODD–
2012–01), reflecting changes to
disclosure regarding relative
performance options, may be furnished
to customers as of the date of this order.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–1445 Filed 1–24–12; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
6 The Commission notes that the options markets
must continue to ensure that the ODD is in
compliance with the requirements of Rule 9b–
1(b)(2)(i) under the Act, 17 CFR 240.9b–1(b)(2)(i),
including when changes regarding relative
performance options are made in the future. Any
future changes to the rules of the options markets
concerning relative performance options would
need to be submitted to the Commission under
Section 19(b) of the Act. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
7 17 CFR 240.9b–1(b)(2)(i).
8 This provision permits the Commission to
shorten or lengthen the period of time which must
elapse before definitive copies may be furnished to
customers.
9 17 CFR 240.9b–1.
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(39).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Jan 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66192; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2012–02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Amendments to NYSE
Arca Rule 9.4 and NYSE Equities Inc.
Rules 5.3(d) and 9.4 Relating to
Discretionary Proxy Voting on
Executive Compensation Matters and
Election of Directors To Comply With
the Dodd-Frank Act
January 19, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on January
5, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons and is
approving the proposed rule change on
an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Rule 9.4 and to adopt
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Rule 9.4
and, through its wholly-owned
corporation, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’), proposes to
amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.3(d)
and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.4 and to
adopt Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 9.4. These amendments
are being made to comply with the
requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act
with respect to the broker voting rules
of national securities exchanges. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Section 957 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (the ‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’) adopted
new Section 6(b)(10) 4 of the Securities
Exchange Act (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’).5
This new provision requires all national
securities exchanges to adopt rules that
prohibit their members from voting on
the election of a member of the board of
directors of an issuer (except for a vote
with respect to the uncontested election
of a member of the board of directors of
any investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of
1940), executive compensation, or any
other significant matter, as determined
by the Commission, by rule, unless the
member receives voting instructions
from the beneficial owner of the shares.
NYSE Arca Rule 9.4 governs when
OTP Holders and OTP Firms may vote
shares held for customers and NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 9.4 governs when
ETP Holders may votes[sic] shares held
for customers. NYSE Arca Rule 9.4
prohibits OTP Holders and OTP Firms,
and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.4
prohibits ETP Holders, from voting any
uninstructed shares, but also permits
the OTP Holder or OTP Firm (in the
case of NYSE Arca Rule 9.4) or ETP
Holder (in the case of NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 9.4) to follow the rules of
another national securities exchange
instead. In addition to its general
requirements with respect to voting of
uninstructed shares by ETP Holders,
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.4
specifically prohibits ETP Holders from
voting uninstructed shares on any
proposal with respect to the
implementation of any equity
compensation plan, or any material
revision to the terms of any existing
equity compensation plan (whether or
not stockholder approval of such plan is
required by NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.3(d)(1)–(7)), unless the beneficial
owner of the shares has given voting
instructions.
In order to assure compliance, in all
cases, with newly adopted Section
1 15
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
4 15
5 15
Sfmt 4703
3829
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(10).
U.S.C. 78a.
25JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3828-3829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1445]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-66193; File No. SR-ODD-2012-01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Granting Approval of Accelerated Delivery of Supplement to the
Options Disclosure Document Reflecting Certain Changes to Disclosure
Regarding Relative Performance Options
January 19, 2012.
On August 15, 2011, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Rule 9b-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ five preliminary copies of a supplement to amend the
options disclosure document (``ODD'') to reflect certain changes to
disclosure regarding relative performance options (``January 2012
Supplement'').\2\ On January 5, 2012, the OCC submitted to the
Commission five definitive copies of the January 2012 Supplement.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 CFR 240.9b-1.
\2\ See letter from Jean M. Cawley, Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, OCC, to Sharon
Lawson, Senior Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets
(``Division''), Commission, dated August 15, 2011.
\3\ See letter from Jean M. Cawley, Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, OCC, to Sharon
Lawson, Senior Special Counsel, Division, Commission, dated January
5, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ODD currently contains general disclosures on the
characteristics and risks of trading standardized options. The March
2011 Supplement amended the ODD to provide disclosure regarding
relative performance options in response to the Commission's approval
of NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC's (``Phlx'') proposal to list and trade Alpha
Index options.\4\ In August 2011, the Commission approved a proposed
rule change that permitted Phlx to list and trade certain Alpha Index
options where both components of the Alpha Index are ETF shares.\5\ The
current proposed January 2012 Supplement amends the ODD disclosure to
accommodate the listing of relative performance options where both
components of the
[[Page 3829]]
underlying relative performance index could be an ETF share. The
supplement also clarifies that the ETF share components must be non-
leveraged. In addition, the supplement proposes to add an example of
the calculation of a relative performance index. The proposed
supplement is intended to be read in conjunction with the more general
ODD, which discusses the characteristics and risks of options
generally.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63860 (February 7,
2011), 76 FR 7888 (February 11, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2010-176) (order
approving Phlx's proposed rule change to list and trade Alpha Index
options).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65149 (August 17,
2011), 76 FR 52729 (August 23, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-89) (order
approving Phlx's proposed rule change to list and trade Alpha Index
options where both Alpha Index components are ETF shares).
\6\ The Commission notes that the options markets must continue
to ensure that the ODD is in compliance with the requirements of
Rule 9b-1(b)(2)(i) under the Act, 17 CFR 240.9b-1(b)(2)(i),
including when changes regarding relative performance options are
made in the future. Any future changes to the rules of the options
markets concerning relative performance options would need to be
submitted to the Commission under Section 19(b) of the Act. 15
U.S.C. 78s(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 9b-1(b)(2)(i) under the Act \7\ provides that an options
market must file five copies of an amendment or supplement to the ODD
with the Commission at least 30 days prior to the date definitive
copies are furnished to customers, unless the Commission determines
otherwise, having due regard to the adequacy of the information
disclosed and the public interest and protection of investors.\8\ In
addition, five copies of the definitive ODD, as amended or
supplemented, must be filed with the Commission not later than the date
the amendment or supplement, or the amended ODD, is furnished to
customers. The Commission has reviewed the proposed January 2012
Supplement, and the amendments to the ODD contained therein, and finds
that, having due regard to the adequacy of the information disclosed
and the public interest and protection of investors, the supplement may
be furnished to customers as of the date of this order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 240.9b-1(b)(2)(i).
\8\ This provision permits the Commission to shorten or lengthen
the period of time which must elapse before definitive copies may be
furnished to customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Rule 9b-1 under the Act,\9\
that definitive copies of the January 2012 Supplement to the ODD (SR-
ODD-2012-01), reflecting changes to disclosure regarding relative
performance options, may be furnished to customers as of the date of
this order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 240.9b-1.
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(39).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1445 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P