Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of China: Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 1463-1464 [2012-248]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Notices
determine the appropriateness of our
preliminary margin assignments for
these companies. We will invite parties
to consider any such information in
their comments for purposes of our final
results of this review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Request for Public
Hearing and Comments
The Department will disclose the
calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
An interested party may request a
hearing within thirty days of
publication. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Any
hearing, if requested, will be held 37
days after the date of publication, or the
first business day thereafter, unless the
Department alters the date pursuant to
19 CFR 351.310(d). Interested parties
may submit case briefs or written
comments no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of these preliminary
results of review. Rebuttal briefs and
rebuttals to written comments, limited
to issues raised in the case briefs and
comments may be filed no later than 35
days after the date of publication of this
notice. Parties who submit arguments in
these proceedings are requested to
submit with the argument: (1) A
statement of the issues, (2) a brief
summary of the argument, and (3) a
table of authorities. Further, parties
submitting case briefs, rebuttal briefs,
and written comments should provide
the Department with an additional copy
of the public version of any such
argument on diskette. The Department
will issue final results of this
administrative review, including the
results of our analysis of the issues in
any such case briefs, rebuttal briefs, and
written comments or at a hearing,
within 120 days of publication of these
preliminary results.
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where
entered values were reported, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rates for the merchandise
based on the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales made during the POR to
the total customs value of the sales used
to calculate those duties. Where entered
values were not reported, we calculated
importer- or customer- (where the
importer was unknown) specific perunit assessment rates for the
merchandise based on the ratio of the
total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales made
during the POR to the total quantity of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
the sales used to calculate those duties.
These rates will be assessed uniformly
on all of CIPSA’s and TransHoney’s
entries made during the POR. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by companies included in
these final results of review for which
the reviewed companies did not know
their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
To calculate the cash deposit rates for
TransHoney and CIPSA, we divided
their total dumping margins by the total
net value of each of their sales during
the review period. For the companies
which were not selected for individual
review, we have calculated a cash
deposit rate based on the simple average
of the rates determined for TransHoney
and CIPSA for the period December 1,
2009, through November 31, 2010.
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
completion of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of honey from Argentina entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for each specific company
listed above will be that established in
the final results of this review, except if
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for any previously-reviewed or
investigated company not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1463
conducted by the Department, the cash
deposit rate will be the all-others rate
from the investigation (30.24 percent).
See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order;
Honey From Argentina, 66 FR at 63673.
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 3, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–234 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 6, 2011, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
intent to rescind the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP–
23) from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC).1 This administrative review
covers Toyo Ink Mfg. America, LLC and
Toyo Ink Mfg. Co., Ltd. (collectively,
Toyo) for the December 1, 2009, through
November 30, 2010, period of review
(POR). Toyo provided a certification of
no sales. As the Department’s review of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) import data confirmed that there
AGENCY:
1 See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Intent To
Rescind Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
76 FR 55003 (September 6, 2011) (Preliminary
Results).
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1464
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Notices
were no reviewable entries of the
subject merchandise during the POR, we
preliminarily determined that Toyo did
not have reviewable entries during the
POR. Therefore, because there were no
entries on which to assess duties, the
Department preliminarily determined to
rescind this review and gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment. We
did not receive comments on the
Preliminary Results. We are therefore
rescinding the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on CVP–23
from the PRC.
DATES:
Effective Date: January 10, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482–
0469, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As noted above, on September 6,
2011, the Department published in the
Federal Register the Preliminary Results
of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CVP–23
from the PRC. The Department did not
receive comments from interested
parties on our Preliminary Results.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is carbazole violet pigment 23
identified as Color Index No. 51319 and
Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with
the chemical name of diindolo [3,2–
b:3’,2’-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and
molecular formula of C 34 H 22 C l2 N
4 O 2.2 The subject merchandise
includes the crude pigment in any form
(e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and
finished pigment in the form of
presscake and dry color. Pigment
dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments
dispersed in oleoresins, flammable
solvents, water) are not included within
the scope of this order. The
merchandise subject to this order is
classifiable under subheading
3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
2 The
brackets do not indicate ‘‘business
proprietary information’’ but rather are part of the
chemical formula.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
Rescission of the Review
Based on its analysis of the record
information, the Department
preliminarily determined that the
merchandise in the CBP data and the
entry documentation on the record was
not subject to the scope of the
antidumping duty order on CVP–23
from the PRC. Accordingly, in the
Preliminary Results, the Department
indicated that it intended to rescind this
administrative review because there was
no information on the record which
indicated that Toyo made sales,
shipments, or entries to the United
States of subject merchandise during the
POR. We did not receive comments
concerning the Preliminary Results.
Therefore, the Department continues to
find that the merchandise reflected in
the CBP data and entry documentation
on the record is not subject to the scope
of the antidumping duty order on CVP–
23 from the PRC. Furthermore, because
Toyo is the only company subject to this
administrative review, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and
consistent with our practice,3 we are
rescinding this review of the
antidumping duty order on CVP–23
from the PRC for the December 1, 2009,
through November 30, 2010 POR. The
Department intends to instruct CBP
fifteen days after the publication of this
notice to liquidate such entries with
respect to the PRC-wide entity.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
3 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 53408 (August 26,
2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 3, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–248 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–891]
Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2012.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is currently
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on hand
trucks and certain parts thereof (hand
trucks) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) covering the period of
review (POR) of December 1, 2009,
through November 30, 2010. We
preliminarily determine that sales made
by New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co.,
Ltd. (New-Tec), were below normal
value (NV) at a de minimis level. We
invite interested parties to comment on
these preliminary results.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Baker, Scott Hoefke, or Robert James,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2924, (202) 482–
4947 or (202) 482–0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 2, 2004, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on hand trucks
from the PRC. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Hand Trucks
and Certain Parts Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China, 69 FR 70122
(December 2, 2004). On December 1,
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1463-1464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-248]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of China:
Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary intent to rescind the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet
pigment 23 (CVP-23) from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ This
administrative review covers Toyo Ink Mfg. America, LLC and Toyo Ink
Mfg. Co., Ltd. (collectively, Toyo) for the December 1, 2009, through
November 30, 2010, period of review (POR). Toyo provided a
certification of no sales. As the Department's review of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) import data confirmed that there
[[Page 1464]]
were no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise during the POR,
we preliminarily determined that Toyo did not have reviewable entries
during the POR. Therefore, because there were no entries on which to
assess duties, the Department preliminarily determined to rescind this
review and gave interested parties an opportunity to comment. We did
not receive comments on the Preliminary Results. We are therefore
rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
CVP-23 from the PRC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Intent To Rescind Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 55003 (September 6, 2011) (Preliminary
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6312 or (202) 482-0469, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As noted above, on September 6, 2011, the Department published in
the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. The
Department did not receive comments from interested parties on our
Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is carbazole violet pigment
23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-
30-1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m]
triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and
molecular formula of C 34 H 22 C l2 N 4 O 2.\2\ The subject merchandise
includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet
cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color.
Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments dispersed in
oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the
scope of this order. The merchandise subject to this order is
classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The brackets do not indicate ``business proprietary
information'' but rather are part of the chemical formula.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of the Review
Based on its analysis of the record information, the Department
preliminarily determined that the merchandise in the CBP data and the
entry documentation on the record was not subject to the scope of the
antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. Accordingly, in the
Preliminary Results, the Department indicated that it intended to
rescind this administrative review because there was no information on
the record which indicated that Toyo made sales, shipments, or entries
to the United States of subject merchandise during the POR. We did not
receive comments concerning the Preliminary Results. Therefore, the
Department continues to find that the merchandise reflected in the CBP
data and entry documentation on the record is not subject to the scope
of the antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. Furthermore,
because Toyo is the only company subject to this administrative review,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our
practice,\3\ we are rescinding this review of the antidumping duty
order on CVP-23 from the PRC for the December 1, 2009, through November
30, 2010 POR. The Department intends to instruct CBP fifteen days after
the publication of this notice to liquidate such entries with respect
to the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 53408
(August 26, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended and
19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 3, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-248 Filed 1-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
