Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 1504 [2012-176]
Download as PDF
1504
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Notices
organizations, and the public.
Throughout the process, we will have
formal comment periods and hold
public meetings to gather comments,
issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions
for the future management of Massasoit
NWR. You may also send comments
anytime during the planning process by
mail, email, or fax (see ADDRESSES).
We will conduct the environmental
review of this project and develop an
EA in accordance with the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), NEPA regulations
(40 CFR parts 1500–1508), other
appropriate Federal laws and
regulations, and our policies and
procedures for compliance with those
laws and regulations.
Massasoit National Wildlife Refuge
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Massasoit NWR is one of eight refuges
that comprise the Eastern Massachusetts
NWR Complex. Massasoit NWR was
established in 1983 to conserve the
federally endangered northern redbellied cooter (Pseudemys rubriventris
bangsi), as well as other native wildlife
and plant species. The 209-acre refuge
is located in Plymouth, Massachusetts,
and is part of a larger 3,269-acre area
designated as critical habitat for the
cooter. Research, monitoring, and
recovery efforts for this turtle take place
on the refuge. To protect the turtle from
harassment, harm, and poaching, the
refuge is closed to public access.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns,
and Opportunities
We have identified several
preliminary issues, concerns, and
opportunities that we intend to address
in more detail in the CCP. These
include:
• The refuge’s closure to public use;
• The refuge’s prescribed burning
program;
• The opportunity to protect the
entire extant population of the northern
red-bellied cooter in Plymouth County,
as described in the species’ recovery
plan;
• The opportunity to provide and
manage New England cottontail habitat;
• The opportunity to evaluate a
possible expansion of the refuge’s
approved boundary;
• The impacts of climate change on
refuge resources;
• The potential to improve
community relations and increase
outreach; and
• The opportunity to increase local
awareness of the refuge and the NWRS.
We expect that during public scoping,
members of the public, our conservation
partners, Federal and State agencies,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
and Tribal governments may identify
additional issues.
Public Meetings
During the planning process, we will
hold public meetings for the public to
provide comments, issues, concerns,
ideas, and suggestions about refuge
management. When we schedule formal
comment periods and public meeting(s),
we will announce them in the Federal
Register, local news media, and on our
refuge planning Web site at https://www.
fws.gov/northeast/planning/
Eastern%20Mass%203/ccphome.html.
You can also obtain the schedule from
the planning team leader or project
leader (see ADDRESSES).
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: December 14, 2011.
Henry Chang,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley,
Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. 2012–297 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Third
Review)]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on stainless steel wire rod From
India would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner David S. Johanson did not
participate in this determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on July 1, 2011 (76 FR 38686)
and determined on October 4, 2011, that
it would conduct an expedited review
(76 FR 64105, October 17, 2011).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 4,
2012. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4300
(January 2012), entitled Stainless Steel
Wire Rod From India: Investigation No.
731–TA–638 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 4, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–176 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–823]
Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Institution of Investigation; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 2, 2011, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Standard
Innovation Corporation of Ottawa,
Canada and Standard Innovation (US)
Corp. of Wilmington, Delaware.
Supplements to the complaint were
filed on December 19, 2011, and
December 27, 2011. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain kinesiotherapy devices and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,931,605 (‘‘the ‘605
patent’ ’’) and U.S. Patent No. D605,779
(‘‘the ‘779 patent’ ’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-176]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-638 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
stainless steel wire rod From India would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
\2\ Commissioner David S. Johanson did not participate in this
determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2011 (76 FR 38686)
and determined on October 4, 2011, that it would conduct an expedited
review (76 FR 64105, October 17, 2011).
The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 4, 2012. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication 4300 (January 2012), entitled
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Investigation No. 731-TA-638
(Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 4, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-176 Filed 1-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P