Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing the Same; Determination Not To Review Initial Determination Concerning Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 807-808 [2012-13]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2012 / Notices
DATES:
Effective Date: December 29,
2011.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Merrill (202) 205–3188) or
Stefania Pozzi Porter (202) 205–3177),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on
(202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these investigations may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—These investigations
are being instituted in response to a
petition filed on December 29, 2011, by
M&B Metal Products Company, Inc.,
Leeds, AL; Innovation Fabrication LLC/
Indy Hanger, Indianapolis, IN; and US
Hanger Company, LLC, Gardena, CA.
Participation in the investigations and
public service list.—Persons (other than
petitioners) wishing to participate in the
investigations as parties must file an
entry of appearance with the Secretary
to the Commission, as provided in
sections 201.11 and 207.10 of the
Commission’s rules, not later than seven
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Industrial users
and (if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level)
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to these investigations
upon the expiration of the period for
filing entries of appearance.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these investigations
available to authorized applicants
representing interested parties (as
defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9)) who are
parties to the investigations under the
APO issued in the investigations,
provided that the application is made
not later than seven days after the
publication of this notice in the Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Register. A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Conference.—The Commission’s
Director of Investigations has scheduled
a conference in connection with these
investigations for 9:30 a.m. on January
20, 2012, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC. Requests to appear at
the conference should be filed with the
Office of the Secretary
(William.Bishop@usitc.gov and
Sharon.Bellamy@usitc.gov) on or before
January 18, 2012. Parties in support of
the imposition of countervailing and
antidumping duties in these
investigations and parties in opposition
to the imposition of such duties will
each be collectively allocated one hour
within which to make an oral
presentation at the conference. A
nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission’s deliberations may
request permission to present a short
statement at the conference.
Written submissions.—As provided in
sections 201.8 and 207.15 of the
Commission’s rules, any person may
submit to the Commission on or before
January 25, 2012, a written brief
containing information and arguments
pertinent to the subject matter of the
investigations. Parties may file written
testimony in connection with their
presentation at the conference no later
than three days before the conference. If
briefs or written testimony contain BPI,
they must conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3,
and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules.
Please be aware that the Commission’s
rules with respect to electronic filing
have been amended. The amendments
took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76
FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly
revised Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the investigations
must be served on all other parties to
the investigations (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These investigations are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.12 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
807
Issued: December 30, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–17 Filed 1–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–784]
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing the Same;
Determination Not To Review Initial
Determination Concerning Motion To
Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 9) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting in part and denying in part
complainant’s motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3106. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on July 11, 2011,
based on two complaints filed by
OSRAM GmbH of Munich, Germany
(‘‘OSRAM’’), alleging, inter alia, a
violation of section 337 in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain light-emitting
diodes and products containing same by
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
808
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2012 / Notices
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,849,881 (‘‘the ‘881
patent’’); 6,975,011; 7,106,090 (‘‘the ‘090
patent’’); 7,151,283; and 7,271,425. 76
FR 40746 (Jul. 11, 2011). The
respondents are LG Electronics, Inc. of
Seoul, South Korea; LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics
U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey; and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of
San Diego, California (collectively,
‘‘LG’’). Id.
Complainant OSRAM moved to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to withdraw all allegations
with respect to the ‘881 and ‘090
patents, and to add allegations of a
violation of Section 337 by all
respondents as to claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9–
12, 15–17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, and
33–35 of U.S. Patent No. 7,341,925 (‘‘the
‘925 patent’’). Respondent LG filed a
response supporting the withdrawal of
allegations with respect to the ‘881 and
‘090 patents, and opposing OSRAM’s
request to add allegations with respect
to the ‘925 patent.
On December 8, 2011, the presiding
ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 9). The ALJ
granted OSRAM’s motion in part to the
extent that it sought termination of the
‘881 patent and the ‘090 patent from the
investigation, and denied the portion of
OSRAM’s motion that sought to add the
‘925 patent to this investigation. No
party petitioned for review. The
Commission has determined not to
review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section
210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
210.42(h).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 30, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–13 Filed 1–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation No. 337–TA–738]
Certain Components for Installation of
Marine Autopilots With GPS or IMU;
Termination of Investigation on the
Basis of Settlement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 26) granting a joint motion
to terminate the investigation as to the
last remaining respondents on the basis
of a settlement agreement, and
terminating the investigation in its
entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 28, 2010, based on a
complaint filed by American GNC of
Simi Valley, California (‘‘AGNC’’),
alleging a violation of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for
importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain
components for installation of marine
autopilots with GPS or IMU (i.e.,
devices for pointing and stabilizing
marine navigation equipment) by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,596,976. The complaint
named eight respondents: Furuno
Electronics Co. of Nishinomiya City,
Japan and Furuno U.S.A. Inc. of Camas,
Washington (collectively ‘‘Furuno’’);
Navico Holdings AS of Lysaker,
Norway, Navico UK, Ltd. of Romsey
Hampshire, United Kingdom, and
Navico, Inc. of Nashua, New Hampshire
(collectively ‘‘Navico’’); and Raymarine
UK Ltd. of Portsmouth, Hampshire,
United Kingdom; Raymarine Inc. of
Merrimack, New Hampshire; and FLIR
Systems, Inc. of Wilsonville, Oregon
(collectively ‘‘Raymarine’’).
On June 8, 2011, the Commission
determined not to review the ALJ’s IDs
terminating the investigation as to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Furuno and Raymarine on the basis of
settlement agreements.
On November 28, 2011, AGNC and
Navico jointly moved to terminate the
investigation as to the Navico
respondents on the basis of a settlement
agreement. The Commission
investigative attorney supported the
motion. On December 6, 2011, the ALJ
granted the motion. Order No. 26.
Because the Navico parties are the last
remaining respondents, termination
against Navico results in termination of
the investigation.
No petitions for review of the ID were
filed. The Commission has determined
not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.21 and 210.42 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 30, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–14 Filed 1–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–795]
Certain Video Analytics Software,
Systems, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same;
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Motion To
Amend Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 16) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainant’s motion to amend
complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3106. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 807-808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-784]
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing the Same;
Determination Not To Review Initial Determination Concerning Motion To
Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') granting in part and denying in part complainant's motion to
amend the complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3106. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on July
11, 2011, based on two complaints filed by OSRAM GmbH of Munich,
Germany (``OSRAM''), alleging, inter alia, a violation of section 337
in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain light-emitting diodes and products
containing same by
[[Page 808]]
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,849,881
(``the `881 patent''); 6,975,011; 7,106,090 (``the `090 patent'');
7,151,283; and 7,271,425. 76 FR 40746 (Jul. 11, 2011). The respondents
are LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, South Korea; LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of
Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey; and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California
(collectively, ``LG''). Id.
Complainant OSRAM moved to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to withdraw all allegations with respect to the `881 and
`090 patents, and to add allegations of a violation of Section 337 by
all respondents as to claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9-12, 15-17, 20, 22, 24,
25, 27, 28, 30, and 33-35 of U.S. Patent No. 7,341,925 (``the `925
patent''). Respondent LG filed a response supporting the withdrawal of
allegations with respect to the `881 and `090 patents, and opposing
OSRAM's request to add allegations with respect to the `925 patent.
On December 8, 2011, the presiding ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 9).
The ALJ granted OSRAM's motion in part to the extent that it sought
termination of the `881 patent and the `090 patent from the
investigation, and denied the portion of OSRAM's motion that sought to
add the `925 patent to this investigation. No party petitioned for
review. The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in section 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42(h).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 30, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-13 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P