Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Modify its Co-Location Fee Schedule Regarding Low Latency Network Connections, 80999-81000 [2011-33118]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
latency network connectivity through
the Exchange and instead negotiate
connectivity options separately through
other vendors on site.
Regarding the associated fees, the
Exchange represented that they will be
applied uniformly and will not unfairly
discriminate between similarly situated
market participants that use such colocation services.17 The Exchange also
represented that the fees are reasonable
because, among other things, they
enable the Exchange to recoup its share
of the costs associated with the
proposed low latency network
telecommunication connections.18 The
Exchange further represented that the
fees and associated costs of the colocation services are comparable to the
costs and fees associated with
comparable services offered by other
trading venues.19 Finally, the Exchange
noted its expectation that this service
will result in a reduction in fees charged
to market participants due to enhanced
competition.20 In light of the Exchange’s
representations, the Commission
believes that the fees associated with the
low latency network connection
services are consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Exchange Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,21 that the
proposed rule change (SR–BX–2011–
073) be, and it hereby is, approved.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–66011; File No. SR–Phlx–
2011–142]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To
Modify its Co-Location Fee Schedule
Regarding Low Latency Network
Connections
December 20, 2011.
I. Introduction
On October 31, 2011, NASDAQ OMX
PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to modify the Exchange Fee
Schedule, Section X(b) entitled ‘‘CoLocation Services’’ to establish a
program for offering low latency
network connections and to establish
the initial fees for such connections.
The Exchange also proposed
administrative modifications to the
Exchange Fee Schedule, Section X(b).
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on November 10, 2011.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–33119 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
The Exchange proposed to modify the
Exchange Fee Schedule, Section X(b),
entitled ‘‘Co-Location Services,’’ to offer
new options for low latency network
telecommunication connections and to
establish the fees for such connections.
As its initial offering, the Exchange
proposed to offer point-to-point
telecommunication connectivity from
the co-location facility to select major
financial trading and co-location venues
in the New York and New Jersey
metropolitan areas, Toronto, and
Chicago.4
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65689
(November 4, 2011), 76 FR 70187 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Id. at 70188. The Exchange represented that it
currently provides a cross connect from a client’s
cabinet to its requested telecommunication carrier’s
cabinet (known as a ‘‘telco cross connect’’).
According to the Exchange, clients would have the
option to use the enhanced point-to-point
connectivity service to receive low latency network
connectivity from the Exchange’s data center to the
client’s chosen venue(s), in addition to the telco
cross connect. These connections could be utilized
to send market data to and receive orders from the
chosen venues.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 17
17 Id.
18 Id.
19 Id.
20 Id.
at 70187.
21 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80999
According to the Exchange, the
enhanced point-to-point connectivity
would provide the Exchange’s colocation customers with the opportunity
to obtain low latency network
connectivity with greater ease than is
currently the case, and at a competitive
price.5 The Exchange represented that
co-location customers currently obtain
similar services by negotiating fees,
obtaining service level agreements, and
executing service agreements directly
with approved telecommunication
carriers, and that such co-location
customers are currently charged a
monthly negotiated fee by the
telecommunications carrier in addition
to a cross connection fee by the
Exchange.6 The Exchange represented
that for its low latency network
connection services, it would obtain
wholesale rates from the carriers and
then charge a markup to compensate the
Exchange for its efforts to negotiate and
establish the arrangement, for
integrating the connectivity into the
Exchange co-location connectivity
offering, and for administrative costs
associated with establishing and
maintaining each new connection.7
According to the Exchange, colocation customers would have the
opportunity to request these new low
latency network telecommunication
connections through the same process
used to request a new co-located cabinet
and other co-location services.8 Colocation customers would retain the
option of contracting directly with
telecommunication providers, including
either the providers that participate in
the program, the current providers in
the data center who have not yet agreed
to participate, or any new carrier that is
approved to install equipment in the
Exchange’s data center.9
The Exchange proposed one-time fees
for the installation of
telecommunication connectivity to
select major financial trading and colocation venues in the New York and
New Jersey metropolitan areas, Toronto,
and Chicago, as well as per-month
connectivity fees, at connectivity levels
of 100MB, 1G, and 10G, respectively.10
The Exchange represented that the fees
were based on anticipated bandwidth
necessary for the connections and
distances to these select venues. The
Exchange indicated its belief that the
fees are reasonable, because they are
similar and competitive with fees
5 Id.
6 Id.
7 Id.
8 Id.
9 Id.
10 Id.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
81000
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
charged for similar services by other
entities.11
The Exchange also proposed to
eliminate references to certain fee
waivers that expired July 31, 2011.12
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.13 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,14 which requires that
the rules of a national securities
exchange provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members and
issuers and other persons using its
facilities, and with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,15 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In the Notice, the Exchange
represented that the low latency
network connections would be offered
to market participants in a manner that
is not unfairly discriminatory.16 The
Commission believes that this program
to offer low latency network
connectivity, in the manner described in
the proposal, is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) the Exchange Act insofar as
NASDAQ makes these connectivity
options uniformly available to all
members who voluntarily request them
and pay the associated fees.
Additionally, the Commission notes that
members may choose not to obtain low
latency network connectivity through
the Exchange and instead negotiate
connectivity options separately through
other vendors on site.
Regarding the associated fees, the
Exchange represented that they will be
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11 Id.
at 70189.
12 Id.; see also Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 64630 (June 8, 2011), 76 FR 34783 (June 14,
2011) (SR–NASDAQ–2011–074); and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 64858 (July 12, 2011), 76
FR 42152 (July 18, 2011) (SR–NASDAQ–2011–094).
13 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 See Notice, 76 FR at 70189.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
applied uniformly and will not unfairly
discriminate between similarly situated
market participants that use such colocation services.17 The Exchange also
represented that the fees are reasonable
because, among other things, they
enable the Exchange to recoup its share
of the costs associated with the
proposed low latency network
telecommunication connections.18 The
Exchange further represented that the
fees and associated costs of the colocation services are comparable to the
costs and fees associated with
comparable services offered by other
trading venues.19 Finally, the Exchange
noted its expectation that this service
will result in a reduction in fees charged
to market participants due to enhanced
competition.20 In light of the Exchange’s
representations, the Commission
believes that the fees associated with the
low latency network connection
services are consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Exchange Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,21 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2011–
142) be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–33118 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66007; File No. SR–NSX–
2011–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee and Rebate Schedule
December 20, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
15, 2011, National Stock Exchange, Inc.
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
17 Id.
18 Id.
19 Id.
20 Id.
at 70189–90.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
21 15
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comment on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
National Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘NSX®’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) is proposing to
continue to make available, without
charge, the Exchange’s data feed, the
NSX depth-of-book feed (‘‘DOB feed’’),
to authorized recipients.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nsx.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to continue to make available,
without charge, the Exchange’s data
feed, the NSX depth-of-book feed (‘‘DOB
feed’’), to authorized recipients.3 This
rule change also describes the
Exchange’s practices for distributing the
NSX DOB feed to authorized recipients.
The Exchange first established its
DOB feed in November, 2006. The
Exchange does not and has never
charged authorized recipients for receipt
of its DOB feed.4 The NSX DOB feed
3 An authorized recipient of the DOB feed must
execute required documentation with, and be
approved by, the Exchange prior to receiving the
service. Currently, the required documentation
consists of the NSX Market Data Feed License
Agreement, which is available on the Exchange
Web site (https://www.nsx.com/resources/content/2/
4/documents/MarketDataFeed062009.pdf).
4 Although the Exchange does not charge
authorized recipients for receipt of the NSX DOB
feed, an ETP Holder recipient may incur third party
costs associated with such feed, including pursuant
to the Exchange’s ability to pass through third party
costs to ETP Holders pursuant to section III.B of the
Fee Schedule.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80999-81000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33118]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-66011; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-142]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Modify its Co-Location Fee Schedule
Regarding Low Latency Network Connections
December 20, 2011.
I. Introduction
On October 31, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to modify the Exchange Fee Schedule, Section X(b)
entitled ``Co-Location Services'' to establish a program for offering
low latency network connections and to establish the initial fees for
such connections. The Exchange also proposed administrative
modifications to the Exchange Fee Schedule, Section X(b). The proposed
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on
November 10, 2011.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the
proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65689 (November 4,
2011), 76 FR 70187 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposed to modify the Exchange Fee Schedule, Section
X(b), entitled ``Co-Location Services,'' to offer new options for low
latency network telecommunication connections and to establish the fees
for such connections. As its initial offering, the Exchange proposed to
offer point-to-point telecommunication connectivity from the co-
location facility to select major financial trading and co-location
venues in the New York and New Jersey metropolitan areas, Toronto, and
Chicago.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id. at 70188. The Exchange represented that it currently
provides a cross connect from a client's cabinet to its requested
telecommunication carrier's cabinet (known as a ``telco cross
connect''). According to the Exchange, clients would have the option
to use the enhanced point-to-point connectivity service to receive
low latency network connectivity from the Exchange's data center to
the client's chosen venue(s), in addition to the telco cross
connect. These connections could be utilized to send market data to
and receive orders from the chosen venues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, the enhanced point-to-point connectivity
would provide the Exchange's co-location customers with the opportunity
to obtain low latency network connectivity with greater ease than is
currently the case, and at a competitive price.\5\ The Exchange
represented that co-location customers currently obtain similar
services by negotiating fees, obtaining service level agreements, and
executing service agreements directly with approved telecommunication
carriers, and that such co-location customers are currently charged a
monthly negotiated fee by the telecommunications carrier in addition to
a cross connection fee by the Exchange.\6\ The Exchange represented
that for its low latency network connection services, it would obtain
wholesale rates from the carriers and then charge a markup to
compensate the Exchange for its efforts to negotiate and establish the
arrangement, for integrating the connectivity into the Exchange co-
location connectivity offering, and for administrative costs associated
with establishing and maintaining each new connection.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id.
\6\ Id.
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, co-location customers would have the
opportunity to request these new low latency network telecommunication
connections through the same process used to request a new co-located
cabinet and other co-location services.\8\ Co-location customers would
retain the option of contracting directly with telecommunication
providers, including either the providers that participate in the
program, the current providers in the data center who have not yet
agreed to participate, or any new carrier that is approved to install
equipment in the Exchange's data center.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id.
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposed one-time fees for the installation of
telecommunication connectivity to select major financial trading and
co-location venues in the New York and New Jersey metropolitan areas,
Toronto, and Chicago, as well as per-month connectivity fees, at
connectivity levels of 100MB, 1G, and 10G, respectively.\10\ The
Exchange represented that the fees were based on anticipated bandwidth
necessary for the connections and distances to these select venues. The
Exchange indicated its belief that the fees are reasonable, because
they are similar and competitive with fees
[[Page 81000]]
charged for similar services by other entities.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id.
\11\ Id. at 70189.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposed to eliminate references to certain fee
waivers that expired July 31, 2011.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Id.; see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64630
(June 8, 2011), 76 FR 34783 (June 14, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-074);
and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64858 (July 12, 2011), 76 FR
42152 (July 18, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-094).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\13\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ which
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities,
and with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\ which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Notice, the Exchange represented that the low latency
network connections would be offered to market participants in a manner
that is not unfairly discriminatory.\16\ The Commission believes that
this program to offer low latency network connectivity, in the manner
described in the proposal, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) the
Exchange Act insofar as NASDAQ makes these connectivity options
uniformly available to all members who voluntarily request them and pay
the associated fees. Additionally, the Commission notes that members
may choose not to obtain low latency network connectivity through the
Exchange and instead negotiate connectivity options separately through
other vendors on site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Notice, 76 FR at 70189.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the associated fees, the Exchange represented that they
will be applied uniformly and will not unfairly discriminate between
similarly situated market participants that use such co-location
services.\17\ The Exchange also represented that the fees are
reasonable because, among other things, they enable the Exchange to
recoup its share of the costs associated with the proposed low latency
network telecommunication connections.\18\ The Exchange further
represented that the fees and associated costs of the co-location
services are comparable to the costs and fees associated with
comparable services offered by other trading venues.\19\ Finally, the
Exchange noted its expectation that this service will result in a
reduction in fees charged to market participants due to enhanced
competition.\20\ In light of the Exchange's representations, the
Commission believes that the fees associated with the low latency
network connection services are consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Id.
\18\ Id.
\19\ Id.
\20\ Id. at 70189-90.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\21\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2011-142) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-33118 Filed 12-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
