Sunshine Act Meeting, 78054-78055 [2011-32219]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
78054
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices
a security, or in connection with
activities as an underwriter, broker or
dealer, from acting, among other things,
as an investment adviser or depositor of
any registered investment company or
BDC or a principal underwriter for any
registered open-end investment
company, registered UIT, or registered
face-amount certificate company or as
investment adviser of an ESC. Section
9(a)(3) of the Act makes the prohibition
in section 9(a)(2) applicable to a
company, any affiliated person of which
has been disqualified under the
provisions of section 9(a)(2). Section
2(a)(3) of the Act defines ‘‘affiliated
person’’ to include, among others, any
person directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common
control, with the other person.
Applicants state that Wells Fargo Bank
is an affiliated person of each of the
other Applicants within the meaning of
section 2(a)(3) of the Act. Applicants
state that, as a result of the Injunction,
they would be subject to the
prohibitions of section 9(a) of the Act.
2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission shall grant an
application for exemption from the
disqualification provisions of section
9(a) of the Act if it is established that
these provisions, as applied to the
Applicants, are unduly or
disproportionately severe or that the
conduct of the Applicants has been such
as not to make it against the public
interest or the protection of investors to
grant the exemption. Applicants have
filed an application pursuant to section
9(c) seeking a temporary and permanent
order exempting them and other
Covered Persons from the
disqualification provisions of section
9(a).
3. Applicants believe they meet the
standard for exemption specified in
section 9(c). Applicants state that the
prohibitions of section 9(a) as applied to
them would be unduly and
disproportionately severe and that the
conduct of the Applicants has been such
as not to make it against the public
interest or the protection of investors to
grant the exemption from section 9(a).
4. Applicants state that the alleged
conduct giving rise to the Injunction did
not involve any of the Applicants
engaging in Fund Service Activities.
Applicants also state (i) None of the
current or former directors, officers, or
employees of the Applicants (other than
Wells Fargo Bank) had any knowledge
of, or had any involvement in, the
conduct alleged in the Complaint to
have constituted the violations that
provided a basis for the Injunction; (ii)
the personnel at Wells Fargo Bank who
were involved in the conduct that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
constituted the violations that provided
a basis for the Injunction have had no,
and will not have any future,
involvement in providing Fund Service
Activities to the Funds on behalf of the
Applicants or other Covered Persons;
and (iii) because the personnel of the
Applicants (other than Wells Fargo
Bank) did not have any involvement in
the alleged misconduct, shareholders of
Funds that received Fund Service
Activities from the Applicants were not
affected any differently than if those
Funds had received services from any
other non-affiliated investment adviser,
depositor or principal underwriter.
5. Applicants state that the inability of
the Applicants to engage in Fund
Service Activities would result in
potentially severe financial hardships
for the Funds they serve and the Funds’
shareholders. Applicants state that they
will distribute written materials,
including an offer to meet in person to
discuss the materials, to the boards of
directors of the Funds (the ‘‘Boards’’),
including the directors who are not
‘‘interested persons,’’ as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of such
Funds, and their independent legal
counsel as defined in rule 0–1(a)(6)
under the Act, if any, describing the
circumstances that led to the Injunction,
any impact on the Funds, and the
application. Applicants state that they
will provide the Boards with the
information concerning the Injunction
and the application that is necessary for
the Funds to fulfill their disclosure and
other obligations under the federal
securities laws.
6. Applicants also state that, if they
were barred from providing Fund
Service Activities to registered
investment companies, BDCs and ESCs,
the effect on their businesses and
employees would be severe. Applicants
state that they have committed
substantial resources to establish an
expertise in providing Fund Service
Activities. Applicants further state that
prohibiting them from providing Fund
Service Activities would not only
adversely affect their businesses, but
would also adversely affect more than
1600 employees that are involved in
those activities.
7. Applicants state that Applicants
and certain other affiliated persons of
the Applicants have previously received
orders under section 9(c) of the Act, as
the result of conduct that triggered
section 9(a), as described in greater
detail in the application.
Applicants’ Condition
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following condition:
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Any temporary exemption granted
pursuant to the application shall be
without prejudice to, and shall not limit
the Commission’s rights in any manner
with respect to, any Commission
investigation of, or administrative
proceedings involving or against,
Covered Persons, including without
limitation, the consideration by the
Commission of a permanent exemption
from section 9(a) of the Act requested
pursuant to the application or the
revocation or removal of any temporary
exemptions granted under the Act in
connection with the application.
Temporary Order
The Commission has considered the
matter and finds that the Applicants
have made the necessary showing to
justify granting a temporary exemption.
Accordingly,
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to
section 9(c) of the Act, that Applicants
and any other Covered Persons are
granted a temporary exemption from the
provisions of section 9(a), solely with
respect to the Injunction, subject to the
condition in the application, from
December 9, 2011, until the Commission
takes final action on their application
for a permanent order.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–32169 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law. 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting
on Monday, December 19, 2011 at 2
p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii)
and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Paredes, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed
session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Monday,
December 19, 2011 will be:
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings;
Other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings; and
An adjudicatory matter.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact: The Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
Dated: December 12, 2011.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–32219 Filed 12–20–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65689A; File No. SR–Phlx–
2011–142]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify Its Co-Location Fee Schedule
Regarding Low Latency Network
Connections; Correction
Securities And Exchange
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice; correction.
The Securities and Exchange
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of November 10,
2011 concerning a Proposed Rule
Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC to
Modify its Co-Location Fee Schedule
Regarding Low Latency Network
Connections; The document contained a
typographical error in the heading.
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel T. Gien, Special Counsel,
Division of Trading and Markets,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, (202) 551–5747.
Correction:
In the Federal Register of November
10, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011–29110, on
page 70187, correct the heading to read
as noted above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: December 9, 2011.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–32132 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65924; File No. SR–Phlx–
2011–167]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Permit Fee
December 9, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
28, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s Fee Schedule to waive
Permit Fees for existing Exchange
members or member organizations that
were members on the Exchange prior to
the initiation of PSX and have since
determined to commence an equities
business.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.sec.gov and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78055
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to extend the waiver of Permit
Fees to Exchange members or member
organizations that were members on the
Exchange prior to the initiation of PSX
and have since determined to
commence an equities business. The
Exchange continues to seek to
encourage members to trade on
NASDAQ OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’) 3 under a
market participant identifier (‘‘MPID’’) 4
registered to the member or member
organization.
Currently, the Exchange assesses
members and member organizations
who are transacting business on the
Exchange a Permit Fee of $1,100 per
month.5 A member or member
organization is assessed the $1,100
monthly Permit Fee if that member or
member organization: (1) Transacts its
option orders in its assigned Phlx house
account in a particular month; (2) is a
clearing member of The Options
Clearing Corporation or a Floor Broker;
or (3) for those member organizations
which are under common ownership,
transacts at least one options trade in a
Phlx house account that is assigned to
one of the member organizations under
common ownership.6 Members who are
not transacting business on the
Exchange are assessed a Permit Fee of
$7,500 per month. A member or member
organization is assessed the $7,500
Permit Fee for not transacting business
on the Exchange if that member is
either: (i) Not a PSX Participant;7 or not
engaged in an options business at the
Exchange in a particular month. In
3 PSX is the Exchange’s cash equities market
electronic trading platform.
4 An MPID is a four-letter code used by a member
to categorize its trading activity for a specific
purpose.
5 The Exchange recently filed to amend its Permit
Fees to $2,000 for members transacting business on
the Exchange. The rule text of Exhibit 5 reflects the
text of that currently effective filing which will be
operative on January 3, 2012, in part. See SR–Phlx–
2011–166.
6 For purposes of the Permit Fee, ‘‘common
ownership’’ shall be defined as at least 75%
common ownership between the member
organizations.
7 Applicants that apply for membership solely to
participate in the NASDAQ OMX PSX equities
market are not assessed a Permit Fee, Application
Fee, Initiation Fee, or Account Fee. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61863 (April 7, 2010), 75
FR 20021 (April 16, 2010) (SR–Phlx–2010–54).
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78054-78055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32219]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law. 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Monday, December
19, 2011 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
[[Page 78055]]
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday,
December 19, 2011 will be:
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and
An adjudicatory matter.
At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.
Dated: December 12, 2011.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32219 Filed 12-20-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P