Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of the 2010-2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76944-76945 [2011-31688]

Download as PDF 76944 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2011 / Notices srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of Changes Since the Preliminary Results PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for Based on our analysis of the consumption on or after the date of comments received, we did not make publication of the final results of this any adjustments to our margin administrative review, as provided for calculations for Ester. We revised the by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act adjustment to U.S. price in our margin of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The calculations for Ester’s export subsidy cash deposit rate for the company under rate calculated for the final results of review will be the rate established in the review in the concurrent countervailing final results of this review (except, if the duty administrative review, causing a rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than change in the antidumping duty margin 0.50 percent, no cash deposit will be calculated for these final results. required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, Final Results of Review the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for As a result of our review, we the most recent period; (3) if the determine that the following weightedexporter is not a firm covered in this average margins exist for the period of review, a prior review, or the less-thanJuly 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010: fair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Weightedaverage will be the rate established for the most Manufacturer/exporter margin recent period for the manufacturer of (percent) the merchandise; and, (4) if neither the Ester Industries, Ltd ................. 6.81 exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all Assessment Rates others rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent. These deposit requirements, The Department shall determine, and when imposed, shall remain in effect U.S. Customs and Border Protection until further notice. (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We Notification Regarding Administrative will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of Protective Orders merchandise produced and/or exported This notice is the only reminder to by Ester. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their days after the date of publication of the responsibility concerning the return or final results of review. For assessment destruction of proprietary information purposes, where the respondent disclosed under the APO in accordance reported the entered value for its sales, with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely we calculated importer-specific (or written notification of the return or customer-specific) ad valorem destruction of APO materials or assessment rates based on the ratio of conversion to judicial protective order is the total amount of the dumping duties hereby requested. Failure to comply calculated for the examined sales to the with the regulations and the terms of an total entered value of those same sales. See 19 CFR 351.212(b). However, where APO is a sanctionable violation. the respondent did not report the Notification to Importers entered value for its sales, we will This notice also serves as a final calculate importer-specific (or customerspecific) per unit duty assessment rates. reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) We will instruct CBP to assess to file a certificate regarding the antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any per reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant unit duty assessment rate calculated in entries during this review period. the final results of this review is above Failure to comply with this requirement de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 could result in the Department’s percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we intend to instruct CBP presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the to liquidate without regard to subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties any entries for antidumping duties. which the assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). We are issuing and publishing these See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). final results and this notice in VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:35 Dec 08, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 5, 2011. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–31693 Filed 12–8–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–910] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of the 2010–2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon quality steel pipe (‘‘CWP’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) of July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, with respect to twenty-nine companies. This rescission is based on the timely withdrawal of the requests for review by the only interested party that requested review of these companies. DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482– 3434, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 1, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from the PRC. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). In response, on August 1, 2011, the Ad Hoc Coalition For Fair Pipe Imports and its individual members, Allied Tube & Conduit, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Sharon Tube Company, Western Tube & Conduit Corporation, and Wheatland Tube Company (hereafter referred to as E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2011 / Notices ‘‘Petitioners’’) timely requested an administrative review of entries of the subject merchandise during the POR from the following companies: Adler Steel Ltd. (‘‘Adler Steel’’), Al Jazeera Steel Products Co SAOG (‘‘Al Jazeera Steel’’), Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Baoshan’’), Benxi Northern Steel Pipes, Co. Ltd. (‘‘Benxi Northern’’), CNOOC Kingland Pipeline Co., Ltd. (‘‘CNOOC Kingland’’), ETCO (China) International Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘ETCO’’), Great River Trading International Co. (‘‘Great River Trading’’), Guangzhou Juyi Steel Pipes Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangzhou Juyi’’), Hebei Zhongyuan Steel Pipe Manufacturer (‘‘Hebei Zhongyuan’’), Hefei Zijin Steel Tube Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hefei Zijin’’), Huludao City Steel Pipe Industrial (‘‘Huludao City Steel Pipe’’), Hunan Great Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hunan Great’’), Hunan Hengyang Steel Tube (Group) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hunan Hengyang’’), Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiangsu Changbao’’), Jiangsu Yulong Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiangsu Yulong’’), Liaoning Northern Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Liaoning Northern’’), Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo Steel (‘‘Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo’’), Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO’’), Sichuan YNJ Industries Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sichuan YNJ’’), SteelFORCE Far East Ltd. (‘‘SteelFORCE’’), Tianjin Baolai International Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Baolai’’), Tianjin Huilitong Steel Tube Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Huilitong’’), Tianjin Longshenghua Import & Export (‘‘Tianjin Longshenghua’’), Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Shuangjie’’), Tianjin Uniglory International Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Uniglory’’), Weifang East Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Weifang East’’), Wuxi Fastube Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuxi Fastube’’), Zhejiang Kingland Pipeline Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhejiang Kingland’’), and Zhuji Tri-Union Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhuji Tri-Union’’). The Department initiated an administrative review of these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011). In a letter dated November 22, 2011, Petitioner withdrew its request for review of all of the companies for which it requested review, and requested that the Department rescind the review with respect to these companies. No other parties requested a review. Rescission of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:35 Dec 08, 2011 Jkt 226001 who requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Accordingly, Petitioners timely withdrew its requests for review of Adler Steel, Al Jazeera Steel, Baoshan, Benxi Northern, CNOOC Kingland, ETCO, Great River Trading, Guangzhou Juyi, Hebei Zhongyuan, Hefei Zijin, Huludao City Steel Pipe, Hunan Great, Hunan Hengyang, Jiangsu Changbao, Jiangsu Yulong, Liaoning Northern, Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo, Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO, Sichuan YNJ, SteelFORCE, Tianjin Baolai, Tianjin Huilitong, Tianjin Longshenghua, Tianjin Shuangjie, Tianjin Uniglory, Weifang East, Wuxi Fastube, Zhejiang Kingland, and Zhuji Tri-Union. Because no other party requested a review, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the entire administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from the PRC for the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011. Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76945 notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: December 5, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–31688 Filed 12–8–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–832] Pure Magnesium From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 2009–2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 8, 2011, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results in the 2009–2010 antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from the PRC with respect to Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’). We determined that TMI did not make sales in the United States at prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’) in the Preliminary Results. We invited interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for TMI. The final dumping margin for this review is listed in the ‘‘Final Results Margins’’ section below. DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6231. AGENCY: 1 See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2009–2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 33194 (June 8, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76944-76945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-910]


Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People's 
Republic of China: Rescission of the 2010-2011 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is rescinding 
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular 
welded carbon quality steel pipe (``CWP'') from the People's Republic 
of China (``PRC'') for the period of review (``POR'') of July 1, 2010, 
through June 30, 2011, with respect to twenty-nine companies. This 
rescission is based on the timely withdrawal of the requests for review 
by the only interested party that requested review of these companies.

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
3936 or (202) 482-3434, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 1, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register a 
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on CWP from the PRC. See Antidumping or 
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; 
Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 
1, 2011). In response, on August 1, 2011, the Ad Hoc Coalition For Fair 
Pipe Imports and its individual members, Allied Tube & Conduit, IPSCO 
Tubulars, Inc., Sharon Tube Company, Western Tube & Conduit 
Corporation, and Wheatland Tube Company (hereafter referred to as

[[Page 76945]]

``Petitioners'') timely requested an administrative review of entries 
of the subject merchandise during the POR from the following companies: 
Adler Steel Ltd. (``Adler Steel''), Al Jazeera Steel Products Co SAOG 
(``Al Jazeera Steel''), Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (``Baoshan''), 
Benxi Northern Steel Pipes, Co. Ltd. (``Benxi Northern''), CNOOC 
Kingland Pipeline Co., Ltd. (``CNOOC Kingland''), ETCO (China) 
International Trading Co., Ltd. (``ETCO''), Great River Trading 
International Co. (``Great River Trading''), Guangzhou Juyi Steel Pipes 
Co., Ltd. (``Guangzhou Juyi''), Hebei Zhongyuan Steel Pipe Manufacturer 
(``Hebei Zhongyuan''), Hefei Zijin Steel Tube Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 
(``Hefei Zijin''), Huludao City Steel Pipe Industrial (``Huludao City 
Steel Pipe''), Hunan Great Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Hunan Great''), 
Hunan Hengyang Steel Tube (Group) Co., Ltd. (``Hunan Hengyang''), 
Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co., Ltd. (``Jiangsu Changbao''), Jiangsu 
Yulong Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Jiangsu Yulong''), Liaoning Northern 
Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Liaoning Northern''), Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo 
Steel (``Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo''), Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO Steel Pipe 
Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO''), Sichuan YNJ Industries Co., 
Ltd. (``Sichuan YNJ''), SteelFORCE Far East Ltd. (``SteelFORCE''), 
Tianjin Baolai International Trade Co., Ltd. (``Tianjin Baolai''), 
Tianjin Huilitong Steel Tube Co., Ltd. (``Tianjin Huilitong''), Tianjin 
Longshenghua Import & Export (``Tianjin Longshenghua''), Tianjin 
Shuangjie Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Tianjin Shuangjie''), Tianjin 
Uniglory International Trade Co., Ltd. (``Tianjin Uniglory''), Weifang 
East Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Weifang East''), Wuxi Fastube Industry 
Co., Ltd. (``Wuxi Fastube''), Zhejiang Kingland Pipeline Industry Co., 
Ltd. (``Zhejiang Kingland''), and Zhuji Tri-Union Import & Export Co., 
Ltd. (``Zhuji Tri-Union''). The Department initiated an administrative 
review of these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation 
in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011).
    In a letter dated November 22, 2011, Petitioner withdrew its 
request for review of all of the companies for which it requested 
review, and requested that the Department rescind the review with 
respect to these companies. No other parties requested a review.

Rescission of Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party who requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. 
Accordingly, Petitioners timely withdrew its requests for review of 
Adler Steel, Al Jazeera Steel, Baoshan, Benxi Northern, CNOOC Kingland, 
ETCO, Great River Trading, Guangzhou Juyi, Hebei Zhongyuan, Hefei 
Zijin, Huludao City Steel Pipe, Hunan Great, Hunan Hengyang, Jiangsu 
Changbao, Jiangsu Yulong, Liaoning Northern, Shanghai Zhongyou Tipo, 
Shanghai Zhongyou TIPO, Sichuan YNJ, SteelFORCE, Tianjin Baolai, 
Tianjin Huilitong, Tianjin Longshenghua, Tianjin Shuangjie, Tianjin 
Uniglory, Weifang East, Wuxi Fastube, Zhejiang Kingland, and Zhuji Tri-
Union. Because no other party requested a review, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the entire administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from the PRC for the period 
July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011.

Assessment

    The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit 
of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate 
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the 
Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: December 5, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-31688 Filed 12-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.