Certain Steel Grating From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of the 2010-2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76368-76369 [2011-31447]
Download as PDF
76368
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review,
the cash deposit rate will be the all
others rate for this proceeding, 4.05
percent.2 These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
We will disclose the calculations used
in our analysis to parties in this review
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Any interested
party may request a hearing within 30
days of the publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.3 If a hearing is
requested, the Department will notify
interested parties of the hearing
schedule.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results of
this review. Unless extended by the
Department, interested parties must
submit case briefs within 30 days of the
date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited
to issues raised in the case briefs, must
be filed not later than five days after the
time limit for filing case briefs. See 19
CFR 351.309(c) and (d) (additional
discussion on case briefs and rebuttal
briefs, respectively). Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
review are requested to submit with
each argument: (1) A statement of the
issue, (2) a brief summary of the
argument, and (3) a table of authorities.
Executive summaries should be limited
to five pages total, including footnotes.
We intend to issue the final results of
this administrative review, including
the results of our analysis of issues
raised in the written comments, within
120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless otherwise extended.
See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
2 See
Order, 73 FR at 66597.
19 CFR 351.309(c); Parties submitting
written comments must submit them pursuant to
the Department’s e-filing regulations. See https://
iaaccess.trade.gov/help/
IA%20ACCESS%20User%20Guide.pdf.
3 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
These preliminary results of
administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–31428 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–947]
Certain Steel Grating From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Rescission of the 2010–2011
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
grating from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review
(‘‘POR’’) of January 6, 2010, through
June 30, 2011, with respect to Ningbo
Haitian International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo
Haitian’’), Shanghai Minmetals
Materials & Products Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Shanghai Minmetals’’), Yantai Xinke
Steel Structure Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yantai
Xinke’’), Sinosteel Yantai Steel Grating
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sinosteel Yantai’’), Ningbo
Jiulong Machinery Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Jiulong’’), Accurate
Screen, Ltd. (‘‘Accurate Screen’’), Wuxi
Juhua Import/Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuxi
Juhua’’), and Well Forge Industries
(‘‘Well Forge’’). This rescission is based
on the timely withdrawal of the requests
for review by the only interested party
that requested the review of these
companies.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482–
3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2011, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
grating from the PRC. See Antidumping
or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding,
or Suspended Investigation;
Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 1,
2011). In response, on August 1, 2011,
Fisher & Ludlow and Alabama Metal
Industries Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Petitioners’’) timely
requested an administrative review of
entries of the subject merchandise
during the POR from Ningbo Haitian,
Shanghai Minmetals, Yantai Xinke,
Sinosteel Yantai, Ningbo Jiulong,
Accurate Screen, Wuxi Juhua, and Well
Forge. On August 26, 2011, the
Department initiated a review of these
companies. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404
(August 26, 2011).
In a letter dated September 21, 2011,
Petitioners withdrew their request for
review of the aforementioned
companies, and requested that the
Department rescind the review with
respect to these companies. No other
parties requested a review.
Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
who requested the review withdraws
the request within 90 days of the date
of publication of the notice of initiation
of the requested review. Accordingly,
given that Petitioners’ withdrawal
requests were timely, and because no
other party requested a review, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department
is rescinding the entire administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain steel grating from the PRC for
the period January 6, 2010, through June
30, 2011.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 1, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–31447 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[A–580–809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
conducting an administrative review of
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
the antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe (‘‘CWP’’)
from the Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’),
covering the period November 1, 2009,
through October 31, 2010. We
preliminarily determine the exporters/
producers covered by this review made
sales of the subject merchandise at
prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’). If
these preliminary results are adopted in
our final results, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg, or Jennifer Meek, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–
2778, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 2, 1992, the Department
published an antidumping duty order
on CWP from Korea. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
from Brazil, the Republic of Korea
(Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and
Amendment to Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2,
1992) (‘‘CWP Order’’).
On November 30, 2010, both Hyundai
HYSCO (‘‘HYSCO’’) and SeAH Steel
Corporation (‘‘SeAH’’) timely requested
an administrative review of this order
for the period November 1, 2009,
through October 31, 2010. Also, on
November 30, 2010, United States Steel
Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’), a
manufacturer of the domestic like
product, requested a review of the
following producers/exporters of subject
merchandise: SeAH; HYSCO; Husteel
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Husteel’’); Nexteel Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Nexteel’’); Kumkang Industrial Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Kumkang’’); and A–JU Besteel
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Besteel’’). Likewise, on
November 30, 2010, Wheatland Tube
Company, a domestic producer of
circular welded pipe, requested a
review of the subject merchandise sales
made by SeAH, HYSCO, Husteel,
Nexteel, Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Dongbu’’), and Kumkang. On
December 28, 2010, we initiated an
administrative review. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76369
Revocation in Part, 75 FR 81565
(December 28, 2010) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’).
In our initiation notice, we indicated
that we would select mandatory
respondents for review based upon CBP
data, and that we would limit the
respondents selected for individual
review in accordance with section
777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation
Notice, 75 FR at 81565. On January 10,
2011, we received comments on the
issue of respondent selection from
HYSCO.
On February 4, 2011, after considering
the resources available to the
Department, we determined that it was
not practicable to examine all
producers/exporters of subject
merchandise for which a review was
requested. As a result, we selected the
two largest producers/exporters of CWP
from Korea during the POR for
individual review in this segment of this
proceeding, pursuant to section
777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. These
mandatory respondents were HYSCO
and SeAH. See Memorandum from
Mary Kolberg and Jennifer Meek,
International Trade Analysts, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, to Susan H.
Kuhbach, Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, ‘‘Respondent Selection:
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of
Korea,’’ dated February 4, 2011.
On January 25, 2011, Wheatland
submitted a request for a duty
absorption determination for a number
of producers or exporters subject to this
review, including SeAH, HYSCO,
Husteel, Nexteel, Dongbu, Kumkang,
and Besteel. The Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit found that the
Department lacks authority to conduct
two-and four-year duty absorption
inquiries for transitional orders (orders
in effect before January 1, 1995). See
FAG Italia S.p.A. v. United States, 291
F.3d 806, 819 (Fed. Cir. 2002). Since the
order for this case is from 1992, we have
not conducted a duty absorption inquiry
in this proceeding.
On February 9, 2011, we issued the
antidumping questionnaire to HYSCO
and SeAH.
On July 11, 2011, we published in the
Federal Register an extension of the
time limit for the completion of the
preliminary results of this review until
no later than November 30, 2011, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). See
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea: Extension
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76368-76369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-947]
Certain Steel Grating From the People's Republic of China: Notice
of Rescission of the 2010-2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is rescinding
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
steel grating from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') for the
period of review (``POR'') of January 6, 2010, through June 30, 2011,
with respect to Ningbo Haitian International Co., Ltd. (``Ningbo
Haitian''), Shanghai Minmetals Materials & Products Co., Ltd.
(``Shanghai Minmetals''), Yantai Xinke Steel Structure Co., Ltd.
(``Yantai Xinke''), Sinosteel Yantai Steel Grating Co., Ltd.
(``Sinosteel Yantai''), Ningbo Jiulong Machinery Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. (``Ningbo Jiulong''), Accurate Screen, Ltd. (``Accurate Screen''),
Wuxi Juhua Import/Export Co., Ltd. (``Wuxi Juhua''), and Well Forge
Industries (``Well Forge''). This rescission is based on the timely
withdrawal of the requests for review by the only interested party that
requested the review of these companies.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3936
or (202) 482-3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel grating from the PRC. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR
38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). In response, on August 1, 2011, Fisher &
Ludlow and Alabama Metal Industries Corporation (hereafter referred to
as ``Petitioners'') timely requested an administrative review of
entries of the subject merchandise during the POR from Ningbo Haitian,
Shanghai Minmetals, Yantai Xinke, Sinosteel Yantai, Ningbo Jiulong,
Accurate Screen, Wuxi Juhua, and Well Forge. On August 26, 2011, the
Department initiated a review of these companies. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011).
In a letter dated September 21, 2011, Petitioners withdrew their
request for review of the aforementioned companies, and requested that
the Department rescind the review with respect to these companies. No
other parties requested a review.
Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
Accordingly, given that Petitioners' withdrawal requests were timely,
and because no other party requested a review, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the entire administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel grating from the
PRC for the period January 6, 2010, through June 30, 2011.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.
Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit
of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19
[[Page 76369]]
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 1, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-31447 Filed 12-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P