Honey From Argentina: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results, 76374-76375 [2011-31442]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
76374
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
submitting arguments in this proceeding
are requested to submit with the
argument: (1) A statement of the issue,
(2) a brief summary of the argument,
and (3) a table of authorities, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2).
Further, parties submitting case and/or
rebuttal briefs are requested to provide
the Department with an additional
electronic copy of the public version of
any such comments on a computer
diskette. Case and rebuttal briefs must
be served on interested parties in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f).
The Department will issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any such
comments within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
unless extended. See section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The
Department will issue appropriate
appraisement instructions for the
companies subject to this review
directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review.
For HYSCO and SeAH, we will
calculate importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
to the total entered value of the sales, as
reported by HYSCO and SeAH. See 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping
duties any entries for which the
assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.50 percent).
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (‘‘Assessment
Policy Notice’’). This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
companies included in these final
results of review for which the reviewed
companies did not know that the
merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading
company, or exporter) was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediary
involved in the transaction. See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Assessment Policy Notice for a full
discussion of this clarification.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit rates will be
effective upon publication of the final
results of this administrative review for
all shipments of CWP from Korea
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rates for the companies listed
above will be the rates established in the
final results of this review, except if the
rate is less than 0.5 percent and,
therefore, de minimis, the cash deposit
will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed
or investigated companies not listed
above, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent final
results in which that manufacturer or
exporter participated; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original less-thanfair-value (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent final results for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and
(4) if neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in this or
any previous review conducted by the
Department, the cash deposit rate will
be 4.80 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate
established in the LTFV investigation.
See CWP Order. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–31432 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–357–812]
Honey From Argentina: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is extending the
preliminary results of this
administrative review to no later than
December 15, 2011.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Room 7850, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195, or
(202) 482–3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 28, 2011, the Department
initiated a review of the 20 companies
for which an administrative review was
requested. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 76 FR 5137
(January 28, 2011) (Initiation Notice).1
On September 7, 2011, the
Department extended the time limit for
the preliminary results until December
1 On February 24, 2011, the Department
published a subsequent initiation notice which
included corrections to the Initiation Notice with
respect to honey from Argentina. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 76 FR 10329 (February 24, 2011) (Second
Initiation Notice). In the review request for Nexco
S.A. (Nexco), it also requested revocation from the
antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina
(in part). However, Nexco’s request for revocation
in part from the order was inadvertently omitted
from the Initiation Notice. Furthermore, certain
company names were misspelled in the same
Initiation Notice. All errors were corrected in the
Second Initiation Notice.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
1, 2011, and rescinded the
administrative review with respect to
ten companies: (1) Alimentos NaturalesNatural Foods Lavalle, (2) Alma Pura,
(3) Apidouro Comercial Exportadora E
Importadora Ltda., (4) Bomare S.A., (5)
HoneyMax, (6) Interrupcion S.A., (7)
Miel Ceta SRL, (8) Nexco, (9) Productos
Afer S.A., and (10) Seabird Argentina
S.A. See Notice of Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 55349
(September 7, 2011). This review covers
the following companies: TransHoney
˜´
S.A. (TransHoney), Companıa Inversora
Platense S.A. (CIPSA), AGLH S.A.,
Algodonera Avellaneda S.A.,.Compania
Apicola Argentina S.A., El Mana S.A.,
Industrial Haedo S.A., Mielar S.A.,
Patagonik S.A., and Villamora S.A. We
selected TransHoney and CIPSA for
individual examination. See
Memorandum to Richard O. Weible,
‘‘Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Honey
from Argentina: Respondent Selection
Memorandum,’’ dated May 9, 2011.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to complete the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested.
The Department has determined it is
not practicable to complete this review
within the statutory time limit due to
the selection of two new mandatory
respondents for this review after the
requests for review for the original
respondents were withdrawn. The
Department requires additional time to
analyze sufficiently information
submitted by the current respondents in
this administrative review. Accordingly,
the Department is further extending the
time limit for completion of the
preliminary results of this
administrative review by 14 days (i.e., to
December 15, 2011).
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 351.213(d)(4) of
the Department’s regulations and
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: December 1, 2011
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–31442 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the 2009–2010 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (Department) is conducting
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from People’s Republic of China (PRC)
covering the period of review (POR) of
November 1, 2009, through October 31,
2010.
The Department preliminarily finds
that two fully participating mandatory
respondents have demonstrated their
eligibility for a separate rate, and sold
subject merchandise to the United
States at prices below normal value
(NV). The Department preliminarily
grants a separate rate to five additional
companies which demonstrated
eligibility for separate rate status; the
rates assigned to each of these seven
companies can be found in the
‘‘Preliminary Results’’ section.
The Department invites interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results. If these preliminary results are
adopted in the final results, the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
antidumping duties on entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for which
assessment rates are above de minimis.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Lindsay or Lingjun Wang, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0780 and
(202) 482–2316.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 16, 1994, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76375
fresh garlic from the PRC.1 On
November 1, 2010, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the PRC for the period November
1, 2009 through October 31, 2010.2 On
December 28, 2010, the Department
published a notice of initiation of
administrative review with respect to
112 companies.3 On October 20, 2011,
the Department published partial
preliminary results, rescission of, and
intent to rescind, in part, the
administrative review.4
In February 2011, each of the
following five companies timely
submitted a separate rate status
certification: (1) Hebei Golden Bird
Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden Bird); (2)
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.
(Xinboda); (3) Henan Weite Industrial
Co., Ltd. (Henan Weite); (4) Jinan
Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd. (Farmlady);
(5) Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Co., Ltd.
(QXF). On March 4, 2011, Chengwu
County Yuanxiang Industry &
Commerce Co., Ltd. (Yuanxiang)
submitted a separate rate status
certification and explained that its
submission was delayed due to a
medical issue with one of its attorneys.
The Department found this explanation
to be reasonable and therefore accepted
the certificate. On August 17, 2011, the
Department moved documents related
to Yantai Jinyan Trading Inc.’s (Jinyan)
separate rate status, submitted by Jinyan
during the most recently complete new
shipper review, to the record of this
administrative review.5
On March 4, 2011, the Department
selected the five largest exporters by
volume as mandatory respondents: (1)
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic From
the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209
(November 16, 1994) (Order).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation: Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 67079
(November 1, 2010).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 81565,
81568–81569 (December 28, 2010) (Initiation
Notice). The Department also initiated a review of
Zhengzhou Dadi. However, the responses of
Shenzhen Xinboda, a mandatory respondent,
indicate that Zhengzhou Dadi is its affiliated
producer. As such, we will address Zhenghou Dadi
in the context of our analysis of Shenzhen Xinboda.
We do not include Zhengzhou Dadi in our company
counts in this notice.
4 See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of
China: Partial Preliminary Results, Rescission of,
and Intent To Rescind, in Part, the 2009–2010
Administrative Review, 76 FR 65172 (October 20,
2011) (Partial Preliminary Results).
5 See Memorandum to The File, Through Dana S.
Mermelstein, From Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Re:
Moving Yantai Jinyan’s Separate Rates Application
to the November 1, 2009 through October 31, 2010
(16th) Administrative Review (August 17, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76374-76375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31442]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-357-812]
Honey From Argentina: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the
preliminary results of this administrative review to no later than
December 15, 2011.
DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 7850, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-0195, or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 28, 2011, the Department initiated a review of the 20
companies for which an administrative review was requested. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 76 FR 5137 (January 28, 2011) (Initiation Notice).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On February 24, 2011, the Department published a subsequent
initiation notice which included corrections to the Initiation
Notice with respect to honey from Argentina. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 10329 (February 24, 2011)
(Second Initiation Notice). In the review request for Nexco S.A.
(Nexco), it also requested revocation from the antidumping duty
order on honey from Argentina (in part). However, Nexco's request
for revocation in part from the order was inadvertently omitted from
the Initiation Notice. Furthermore, certain company names were
misspelled in the same Initiation Notice. All errors were corrected
in the Second Initiation Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 7, 2011, the Department extended the time limit for
the preliminary results until December
[[Page 76375]]
1, 2011, and rescinded the administrative review with respect to ten
companies: (1) Alimentos Naturales-Natural Foods Lavalle, (2) Alma
Pura, (3) Apidouro Comercial Exportadora E Importadora Ltda., (4)
Bomare S.A., (5) HoneyMax, (6) Interrupcion S.A., (7) Miel Ceta SRL,
(8) Nexco, (9) Productos Afer S.A., and (10) Seabird Argentina S.A. See
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 55349
(September 7, 2011). This review covers the following companies:
TransHoney S.A. (TransHoney), Compa[ntilde][iacute]a Inversora Platense
S.A. (CIPSA), AGLH S.A., Algodonera Avellaneda S.A.,.Compania Apicola
Argentina S.A., El Mana S.A., Industrial Haedo S.A., Mielar S.A.,
Patagonik S.A., and Villamora S.A. We selected TransHoney and CIPSA for
individual examination. See Memorandum to Richard O. Weible,
``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Honey from
Argentina: Respondent Selection Memorandum,'' dated May 9, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires the Department to complete the preliminary results of an
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the review within this time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend
the time limit for the preliminary results to a maximum of 365 days
after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a
review is requested.
The Department has determined it is not practicable to complete
this review within the statutory time limit due to the selection of two
new mandatory respondents for this review after the requests for review
for the original respondents were withdrawn. The Department requires
additional time to analyze sufficiently information submitted by the
current respondents in this administrative review. Accordingly, the
Department is further extending the time limit for completion of the
preliminary results of this administrative review by 14 days (i.e., to
December 15, 2011).
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
351.213(d)(4) of the Department's regulations and sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 1, 2011
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-31442 Filed 12-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
