JCA Corporation, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 73005-73006 [2011-30562]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
Task No. 08–06—(Completed) Hours
of Service Recordkeeping and
Reporting. Develop revised
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for hours of service of
railroad employees. Final rule
published May 27, 2009, with an
effective date of July 16, 2009. (74 FR
25330).
Task No. 08–05—(Completed)
Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance.
Develop a rule encompassing the
requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance), of
RSIA bridge failure. Final rule
published July 15, 2010 (75 FR–41282).
Task 06–02—(Completed) Track
Safety Standards and CWR. Issue
requirements for inspection of joint bars
in CWR to detect cracks that could affect
the integrity of the track structure
published a final rule on August 25,
2009, with correcting amendment
published on October 21, 2009.
Please refer to the notice published in
the Federal Register on March 11, 1996,
(61 FR 9740) for more information about
the RSAC.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
21, 2011.
Brenda J. Moscoso,
Director, Office of Safety Analysis, Risk
Reduction, and Crossing/Trespasser
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–30476 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket Number MARAD 2011 0152]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
DAUNTLESS; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
December 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2011–0152.
Written comments may be submitted by
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Spittle, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W21–203,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone (202)
366–5979, Email Joann.Spittle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel DAUNTLESS is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
‘‘Coastal sightseeing.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘ME, NH, MA, RI,
CT, NY.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2011–0152 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR Part 388.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73005
Dated: November 17, 2011.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–30609 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0143; Notice 2]
JCA Corporation, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Petition Grant.
AGENCY:
JCA Corporation (JCA)1, has
determined that certain Trail America
brand Special Trailer ‘‘ST’’ tires that it
imported failed to meet the
requirements of paragraph S6.5(d) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires
for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of
more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000
Pounds) and Motorcycles. JCA has filed
an appropriate report pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports (dated October 19, 2009).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), JCA has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of JCA’s petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on November 9, 2010,
in the Federal Register (75 FR 68854).
No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2010–
0143.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. George Gillespie,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5299, facsimile (202) 366–
7002.
JCA estimates that approximately
899,804 Trail America brand Special
Trailer ‘‘ST’’ tires that were
SUMMARY:
1 JCA Corporation (JCA) is a State of Washington
corporation that imports replacement motor vehicle
equipment.
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73006
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
manufactured from January 1, 2008,
through October 15, 2009, by Tianjin
Kings Glory Tire Company, LTD. of
Qiaosandao, Yangliuqing, Xiqing
Tianjin, China 300380, and imported by
JCA are affected.
JCA states that the noncompliance is
that the maximum single load labeling
and maximum inflation pressures on the
sidewalls of the tires are in English
units of ‘‘lb’’ and ‘‘psi’’ only; no Metric
units are included as required by
paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119.
JCA explained that no property
damage or accidents have been reported
to it or its customers as a result of the
subject noncompliance.
JCA further explains that it has taken
steps to correct the noncompliance in
future production.
JCA also states that it believes the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because the
affected tires fulfill all other relevant
requirements of FMVSS No. 119.
In summation, JCA believes that the
described noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition, to exempt it from
providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120, should be granted.
NHTSA Decision: The agency agrees
with JCA that the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
The agency believes that the true
measure of inconsequentiality to motor
vehicle safety in this case is that there
is no effect on the operational safety of
vehicles on which these tires are
mounted.
While the correct tire inflation
pressure is included on the subject tire
sidewalls, it is not marked in both
English and Metric unit systems on each
sidewall as required by S6.5(d).
However, because the tire inflation
pressure is available and stated correctly
on each tire in English units, it is
unlikely that a consumer will not find
or will misread pressure units due to the
noncompliance. Therefore, the tires, as
labeled, are likely to achieve the safety
purpose of the standard. In the agency’s
judgment, the subject incorrect labeling
of the tire inflation pressure information
will have an inconsequential effect on
motor vehicle safety.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118 (d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the 899,804 2
tires that JCA no longer controlled at the
time that it determined that a
noncompliance existed in the subject
tires.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that JCA has met
its burden of persuasion that the subject
FMVSS No. 119 labeling
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, JCA’s
petition is granted and the petitioner is
exempted from the obligation of
providing notification of, and a remedy
for, the subject noncompliance under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8)
Issued on: November 18, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2011–30562 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0137; Notice 2]
General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Petition Grant.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: General Motors, LLC (GM),1
has determined that certain 2008
through 2010 Model Year Chevrolet
Malibu passenger cars equipped with
automatic transmissions and
manufactured May 2007 through March
2010 do not fully meet the requirements
of paragraph S3.1.4.1 of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
102, Transmission Shift Position
Sequence, Starter Interlock, and
Transmission Braking Effect. GM filed
an appropriate report pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573 Defect and
2 JCA’s petition, which was filed under 49 CFR
part 556, requests an agency decision to exempt JCA
as a manufacturer from the notification and recall
responsibilities of 49 CFR Part 573 for 899,804 of
the affected tires. However, the decision on this
petition does not relieve distributors and dealers of
the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of the noncompliant tires
under their control after JCA notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
1 General Motors, LLC (GM) is a Michigan
corporation that manufactures motor vehicles.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports, dated March 30, 2010.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), GM has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of GM’s petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on October 21, 2010,
in the Federal Register (75 FR 65054).
No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2010–
00137.’’
Contact Information: For further
information on this decision, contact
Mr. Vincent J. Williams, Office of
Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), telephone (202) 366–2319,
facsimile (202) 366–7002.
Summary of GM’s Petition: A total of
462,227 model year 2008, 2009 and
2010 Chevrolet Malibu passenger cars
manufactured during the period May
2007 through March 2010 are
potentially affected by the subject
noncompliance.
GM described the noncompliance as
the absence of the required transmission
shift position display for a certain
ignition key cylinder position. GM
explained that while the key is in the
ignition there is a narrow ignition key
cylinder position between the ‘‘ACC’’
and ‘‘OFF’’ positions within which the
transmission shift lever can be moved
and the indicator light that illuminates
the transmission shift position display
is inoperative. The Company added that
this noncompliance only occurs when
the engine is not running.
GM additionally stated that in all
other ignition activation and operation
positions, all of the subject vehicles
comply with paragraph S3.1.4.1 of
FMVSS No. 102.
GM argued its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because:
As NHTSA recognized in proposing the
standard (53 FR 32409–32411 (August 25,
1988)), the purpose of the display
requirement for PRNDM information is to
‘‘provide the driver with transmission
position information for the vehicle
conditions where such information can
reduce the likelihood of shifting errors.’’
Thus, in all but the rarest circumstances, the
primary function of the PRNDM display is to
inform the driver of gear selection and
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73005-73006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30562]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0143; Notice 2]
JCA Corporation, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Petition Grant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: JCA Corporation (JCA)\1\, has determined that certain Trail
America brand Special Trailer ``ST'' tires that it imported failed to
meet the requirements of paragraph S6.5(d) of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles
with a GVWR of more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) and
Motorcycles. JCA has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports (dated
October 19, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ JCA Corporation (JCA) is a State of Washington corporation
that imports replacement motor vehicle equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), JCA has petitioned for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
Notice of receipt of JCA's petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period, on November 9, 2010, in the Federal Register (75
FR 68854). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System Web
site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search
instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2010-0143.''
For further information on this decision, contact Mr. George
Gillespie, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5299,
facsimile (202) 366-7002.
JCA estimates that approximately 899,804 Trail America brand
Special Trailer ``ST'' tires that were
[[Page 73006]]
manufactured from January 1, 2008, through October 15, 2009, by Tianjin
Kings Glory Tire Company, LTD. of Qiaosandao, Yangliuqing, Xiqing
Tianjin, China 300380, and imported by JCA are affected.
JCA states that the noncompliance is that the maximum single load
labeling and maximum inflation pressures on the sidewalls of the tires
are in English units of ``lb'' and ``psi'' only; no Metric units are
included as required by paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119.
JCA explained that no property damage or accidents have been
reported to it or its customers as a result of the subject
noncompliance.
JCA further explains that it has taken steps to correct the
noncompliance in future production.
JCA also states that it believes the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety because the affected tires
fulfill all other relevant requirements of FMVSS No. 119.
In summation, JCA believes that the described noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to
exempt it from providing recall notification of noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA Decision: The agency agrees with JCA that the noncompliance
is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The agency believes that
the true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle safety in this
case is that there is no effect on the operational safety of vehicles
on which these tires are mounted.
While the correct tire inflation pressure is included on the
subject tire sidewalls, it is not marked in both English and Metric
unit systems on each sidewall as required by S6.5(d). However, because
the tire inflation pressure is available and stated correctly on each
tire in English units, it is unlikely that a consumer will not find or
will misread pressure units due to the noncompliance. Therefore, the
tires, as labeled, are likely to achieve the safety purpose of the
standard. In the agency's judgment, the subject incorrect labeling of
the tire inflation pressure information will have an inconsequential
effect on motor vehicle safety.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118 (d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the 899,804 \2\ tires that JCA no longer controlled at
the time that it determined that a noncompliance existed in the subject
tires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ JCA's petition, which was filed under 49 CFR part 556,
requests an agency decision to exempt JCA as a manufacturer from the
notification and recall responsibilities of 49 CFR Part 573 for
899,804 of the affected tires. However, the decision on this
petition does not relieve distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or
delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the
noncompliant tires under their control after JCA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that JCA has
met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 119 labeling
noncompliances are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, JCA's petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted
from the obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, the
subject noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8)
Issued on: November 18, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2011-30562 Filed 11-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P