Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety, 72888-72891 [2011-30277]
Download as PDF
72888
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
November 1, 2011, about 10,785 (97%)
of 11,127 commercial radio stations
have revenue of $7 million or less and
thus qualify as small entities under the
SBA definition. Therefore, the majority
of such entities are small entities. We
note, however, that in assessing whether
a business concern qualifies as small
under the above size standard, business
affiliations must be included. Many
radio stations are affiliated with much
larger corporations having much higher
revenue. Our estimate, therefore, likely
overstates the number of small entities
that might be affected by any ultimate
changes to the rules and forms.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
In the Second IBOC Order, the
Commission declined to establish a
deadline for radio stations to convert to
digital broadcasting, 22 FCC Rcd at
10351. Presently, radio stations may
choose to commence IBOC digital
operation pursuant to § 73.404 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 73.404,
which requires that licensees provide
notification to the Commission within
10 days of commencing IBOC digital
operation. The January 29, 2010, Order
allows eligible authorized FM stations
to commence operation of FM digital
facilities with digital effective radiated
power (ERP) up to ¥14 dBc upon notice
to the Commission on FCC Form 335–
FM—Digital Notification. In addition,
licensees must electronically notify the
Media Bureau of any power increase in
their FM digital ERP within 10 days of
commencement using the same Form
335—Digital Notification. However, use
of the Form 335–FM for notification of
commencement of FM hybrid digital
operation, or notification of
modification of FM digital operation, is
currently limited to non-super-powered
FM stations with digital ERP not
exceeding ¥14 dBc and super-powered
stations with digital ERP not exceeding
¥20 dBc.
Non-super-powered FM stations
requesting authorization to operate with
digital ERP between ¥14 dBc and ¥10
dBc, or super-powered FM stations
requesting digital ERP in excess of ¥20
dBc are required to file an informal
request using the Engineering STA Form
prior to commencement of the increased
power FM digital operation. Licensees
submitting such a request must use the
simplified method set forth in the
January 29, 2010, Order to determine
the station’s maximum permissible FM
digital ERP. In situations where the
simplified method is not applicable due
to unusual terrain or other technical
considerations, the Bureau will accept
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
applications for FM digital ERP in
excess of ¥14 dBc on a case-by-case
basis, when accompanied by a showing
detailing the prediction methodology,
data, maps and sample calculations.
The proposed rule changes may, in
some cases, impose different reporting
or recordkeeping requirements on FM
radio stations, insofar as they would
allow certain licensees to voluntarily
operate with asymmetric digital
sideband power. However, the
information that would be reported is
already familiar to broadcasters, and is
similar to the current IBOC digital
operation notification or authorization
reporting requirements, so any
additional burdens would be minimal.
The Public Notice tentatively concludes
that it would be expedient to modify
Form 335–FM, currently used for Digital
Notifications, to accommodate requests
for increased digital power and/or
operation with asymmetric digital
sideband power.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities (5 U.S.C. 603(b)).
Operation of hybrid digital facilities
by Commission licensees and permittees
is voluntary. Likewise, use of
asymmetric FM digital sideband powers
would be limited to those licensees and
permittees expressly seeking
authorization for such operation. The
proposal to permit use of asymmetric
FM digital sideband powers thus would
not impose any additional burden on
FM broadcasters. In fact, for those FM
broadcasters that choose to operate
hybrid FM facilities, the proposal would
confer a benefit. Currently, a significant
number of FM stations are precluded
from operating maximum permissible
hybrid FM digital facilities. This occurs
in the case of an FM station operating
hybrid digital facilities that has a nearby
FM station on one, but not both, of its
two first-adjacent channels, thus
limiting allowable digital power in both
sidebands to a level that protects the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sole limiting station. By permitting
asymmetric FM digital sideband
operation, such a station could increase
to maximum permissible digital power
on the sideband opposite the limiting
FM station, thus achieving improved
digital facilities and signal coverage.
Because operation under the proposed
rule is voluntary, and would only be
undertaken by licensees and permittees
that would realize a benefit from such
operation, consideration of alternatives
was not required.
F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the
Commission’s Proposals
None.
Federal Communications Commission.
Kris A. Monteith,
Deputy Chief, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2011–30598 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0160]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Small Business Impacts of
Motor Vehicle Safety
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review;
Request for comments.
AGENCY:
NHTSA seeks comments on
the economic impact of its regulations
on small entities. As required by Section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we
are attempting to identify rules that may
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
We also request comments on ways to
make these regulations easier to read
and understand. The focus of this notice
is rules that specifically relate to school
buses and other buses.
DATES: You should submit comments
early enough to ensure that Docket
Management receives them not later
than January 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2011–0160] by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
72889
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information see the Comments heading
of the Supplementary Information
section of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the
Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of
Regulatory Analysis, Office of
Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone (202) 366–2584, fax (202)
366–3189).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354),
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), requires
agencies to conduct periodic reviews of
final rules that have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small business entities. The
purpose of the reviews is to determine
whether such rules should be continued
without change, or should be amended
or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to
minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial
number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation
(DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22,
1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each
operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12
months. Appendix D contained DOT’s
10-year review plan for all of its existing
regulations. On November 24, 2008,
NHTSA published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 71401) a revised 10-year
review plan for its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA, ‘‘we’’) has
divided its rules into 10 groups by
subject area. Each group will be
reviewed once every 10 years,
undergoing a two-stage process—an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For
purposes of these reviews, a year will
coincide with the fall-to-fall publication
schedule of the Semiannual Regulatory
Agenda. The newly revised 10-year plan
will assess years 9 and 10 of the old
plan in years 1 and 2 of the new plan.
Year 1 (2008) began in the fall of 2008
and will end in the fall of 2009; Year 2
(2009) will begin in the fall of 2009 and
will end in the fall of 2010; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will
request public comment on and analyze
each of the rules in a given year’s group
to determine whether any rule has a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities and, thus,
requires review in accordance with
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. In each fall’s Regulatory Agenda,
we will publish the results of the
analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have
subparts, or other discrete sections of
rules that do have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, we will announce that we will
be conducting a formal section 610
review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will
determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen
its impact on small entities. We will
consider: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) the nature of complaints or
comments received from the public; (3)
the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent
to which the rule overlaps, duplicates,
or conflicts with other federal rules or
with state or local government rules;
and (5) the length of time since the rule
has been evaluated or the degree to
which technology, economic conditions,
or other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule. At the end of the
Review Year, we will publish the results
of our review. The following table
shows the 10-year analysis and review
schedule:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 REVIEWS
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
49
23
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
571.223 through 571.500, and parts 575 and 579 .............................................
parts 1200 and 1300 ...........................................................................................
parts 501 through 526 and 571.213 ...................................................................
571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 ...........................................
571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.138 and 571.139 .........................
parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 .............................................
571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588 .......................................
571.201 through 571.212 ....................................................................................
571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 .........................................................
parts 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts ..........................................
C. Regulations Under Analysis
Jkt 226001
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Title
Section
Title
571.131 ....
School bus pedestrian safety devices.
Bus emergency exits and window retention and release.
School bus rollover protection.
571.221 ....
571.222 ....
School bus body joint strength.
School bus passenger seating
and crash protection.
571.217 ....
571.220 ....
15:28 Nov 25, 2011
Review year
Section
During Year 4, we will continue to
conduct a preliminary assessment of the
following: 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217,
571.220, 571.221, and 571.222.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Analysis year
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
72890
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules
We are seeking comments on whether
any requirements in 49 CFR 571.131,
571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
‘‘Small entities’’ include small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000.
Business entities are generally defined
as small businesses by Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for
the purposes of receiving Small
Business Administration (SBA)
assistance. Size standards established by
SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed
either in number of employees or
annual receipts in millions of dollars,
unless otherwise specified. The number
of employees or annual receipts
indicates the maximum allowed for a
concern and its affiliates to be
considered small. If your business or
organization is a small entity and if any
of the requirements in 49 CFR 571.131,
571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222
have a significant economic impact on
your business or organization, please
submit a comment to explain how and
to what degree these rules affect you,
the extent of the economic impact on
your business or organization, and why
you believe the economic impact is
significant.
If the agency determines that there is
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, it
will ask for comment in a subsequent
notice during the Review Year on how
these impacts could be reduced without
reducing safety.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
II. Plain Language
A. Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the
President’s memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all
rules in plain language. Application of
the principles of plain language
includes consideration of the following
questions:
• Have we organized the material to
suit the public’s needs?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
• Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rule easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
If you have any responses to these
questions, please include them in your
comments on this document.
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610
reviews, we will be performing plain
language reviews over a ten-year period
on a schedule consistent with the
section 610 review schedule. We will
review 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217,
571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 to
determine if these regulations can be
reorganized and/or rewritten to make
them easier to read, understand, and
use. We encourage interested persons to
submit draft regulatory language that
clearly and simply communicates
regulatory requirements, and other
recommendations, such as for putting
information in tables that may make the
regulations easier to use.
Comments
How do I prepare and submit
comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) We
established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a
concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data
Quality Act, in order for substantive
data to be relied upon and used by the
agency, it must meet the information
quality standards set forth in the OMB
and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines.
Accordingly, we encourage you to
consult the guidelines in preparing your
comments. OMB’s guidelines may be
accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT’s
guidelines may be accessed at https://
dmses.dot.gov/submit/
DataQualityGuidelines.pdf.
How can I be sure that my comments
were received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit two copies,
from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you
should include a cover letter setting
forth the information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the agency consider late
comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted
by other people?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES. The
hours of the Docket are indicated above
in the same location.
You may also see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at https://
regulations.gov.
(2) FDMS provides two basic methods
of searching to retrieve dockets and
docket materials that are available in the
system: (a) ‘‘Quick Search’’ to search
using a full-text search engine, or (b)
‘‘Advanced Search,’’ which displays
various indexed fields such as the
docket name, docket identification
number, phase of the action, initiating
office, date of issuance, document title,
document identification number, type of
document, Federal Register reference,
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the
advanced search may be searched
independently or in combination with
other fields, as desired. Each search
yields a simultaneous display of all
available information found in FDMS
that is relevant to the requested subject
or topic.
(3) You may download the comments.
However, since the comments are
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules
imaged documents, instead of word
processing documents, the ‘‘pdf’’
versions of the documents are word
searchable.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for the National
Center for Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2011–30277 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
[Docket No. 111025652–1657–01]
RIN 0648–XA798
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife;
90-Day Finding on a Petition To List
the Scalloped Hammerhead Shark as
Threatened or Endangered Under the
Endangered Species Act
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: 90-day petition finding, request
for information, and initiation of status
review.
AGENCY:
We, NMFS, announce a 90day finding on a petition to list the
scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna
lewini) or, in the alternative, multiple
distinct population segments (DPSs) of
the scalloped hammerhead shark as
threatened or endangered under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), and to
designate critical habitat concurrently
with the listing. We find that the
petition and information in our files
present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted.
We will conduct a status review of the
species to determine if the petitioned
action is warranted. To ensure that the
status review is comprehensive, we are
soliciting scientific and commercial
information pertaining to this species
from any interested party.
DATES: Information and comments on
the subject action must be received by
January 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
information, or data, identified by
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2011–0261’’ by any one
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2011–0261’’
in the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
• Mail or hand-delivery: Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and may
be posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personally
identifiable information (for example,
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, Corel
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maggie Miller, NMFS, Office of
Protected Resources, (301) 427–8403.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 14, 2011, we received a
petition from WildEarth Guardians and
Friends of Animals to list the scalloped
hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) as
threatened or endangered under the
ESA throughout its entire range, or, as
an alternative, to delineate the species
into five DPSs (Eastern Central and
Southeast Pacific, Eastern Central
Atlantic, Northwest and Western
Central Atlantic, Southwest Atlantic,
and Western Indian Ocean) and list any
or all of these DPSs as threatened or
endangered. The petitioners also
requested that critical habitat be
designated for the scalloped
hammerhead under the ESA. Copies of
the petition are available upon request
(see ADDRESSES, above).
ESA Statutory, Regulatory, and Policy
Provisions and Evaluation Framework
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the ESA of 1973,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
requires, to the maximum extent
practicable, that within 90 days of
receipt of a petition to list a species as
threatened or endangered, the Secretary
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72891
of Commerce make a finding on whether
that petition presents substantial
scientific or commercial information
indicating that the petitioned action
may be warranted, and to promptly
publish such finding in the Federal
Register (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(A)). When
it is found that substantial scientific or
commercial information in a petition
indicates the petitioned action may be
warranted (a ‘‘positive 90-day finding’’),
we are required to promptly commence
a review of the status of the species
concerned during which we will
conduct a comprehensive review of the
best available scientific and commercial
information. In such cases, we conclude
the review with a finding as to whether,
in fact, the petitioned action is
warranted within 12 months of receipt
of the petition. Because the finding at
the 12-month stage is based on a more
thorough review of the available
information, as compared to the narrow
scope of review at the 90-day stage, a
‘‘may be warranted’’ finding does not
prejudge the outcome of the status
review.
Under the ESA, a listing
determination may address a species,
which is defined to also include
subspecies and, for any vertebrate
species, any DPS that interbreeds when
mature (16 U.S.C. 1532(16)). A joint
NMFS–U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) (jointly, ‘‘the Services’’) policy
clarifies the agencies’ interpretation of
the phrase ‘‘distinct population
segment’’ for the purposes of listing,
delisting, and reclassifying a species
under the ESA (61 FR 4722; February 7,
1996). A species, subspecies, or DPS is
‘‘endangered’’ if it is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range, and ‘‘threatened’’ if
it is likely to become endangered within
the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range (ESA
sections 3(6) and 3(20), respectively, 16
U.S.C. 1532(6) and (20)). Pursuant to the
ESA and our implementing regulations,
we determine whether species are
threatened or endangered based on any
one or a combination of the following
five section 4(a)(1) factors: (1) The
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of habitat
or range; (2) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (3) disease or
predation; (4) inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; and (5) any
other natural or manmade factors
affecting the species’ existence (16
U.S.C. 1533(a)(1), 50 CFR 424.11(c)).
ESA-implementing regulations issued
jointly by NMFS and USFWS (50 CFR
424.14(b)) define ‘‘substantial
information’’ in the context of reviewing
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72888-72891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30277]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0160]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of
Motor Vehicle Safety
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations
on small entities. As required by Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we are attempting to identify rules that may have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
We also request comments on ways to make these regulations easier to
read and understand. The focus of this notice is rules that
specifically relate to school buses and other buses.
DATES: You should submit comments early enough to ensure that Docket
Management receives them not later than January 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2011-0160] by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
[[Page 72889]]
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information see the Comments heading of the Supplementary
Information section of this document. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of
Regulatory Analysis, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone (202) 366-2584, fax (202) 366-3189).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), requires agencies to conduct periodic
reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the
reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22, 1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D contained DOT's
10-year review plan for all of its existing regulations. On November
24, 2008, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (73 FR 71401) a
revised 10-year review plan for its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, ``we'')
has divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will
be reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process--an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year
will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. The newly revised 10-year plan will
assess years 9 and 10 of the old plan in years 1 and 2 of the new plan.
Year 1 (2008) began in the fall of 2008 and will end in the fall of
2009; Year 2 (2009) will begin in the fall of 2009 and will end in the
fall of 2010; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and
analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether
any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall's Regulatory Agenda, we
will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections
of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal
section 610 review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We
will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of
complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of
the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or
conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government
rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or
the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors
have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the end of the Review
Year, we will publish the results of our review. The following table
shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Section 610 Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Regulations to be reviewed Analysis year Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................... 49 CFR 571.223 through 571.500, 2008 2009
and parts 575 and 579.
2....................................... 23 CFR parts 1200 and 1300........ 2009 2010
3....................................... 49 CFR parts 501 through 526 and 2010 2011
571.213.
4....................................... 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 2011 2012
571.221, and 571.222.
5....................................... 49 CFR 571.101 through 571.110, 2012 2013
and 571.135, 571.138 and 571.139.
6....................................... 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, 2013 2014
except parts 571 and 575.
7....................................... 49 CFR 571.111 through 571.129 and 2014 2015
parts 580 through 588.
8....................................... 49 CFR 571.201 through 571.212.... 2015 2016
9....................................... 49 CFR 571.214 through 571.219, 2016 2017
except 571.217.
10...................................... 49 CFR parts 591 through 595 and 2017 2018
new parts and subparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Regulations Under Analysis
During Year 4, we will continue to conduct a preliminary assessment
of the following: 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and
571.222.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
571.131........................... School bus pedestrian safety
devices.
571.217........................... Bus emergency exits and window
retention and release.
571.220........................... School bus rollover protection.
571.221........................... School bus body joint strength.
571.222........................... School bus passenger seating and
crash protection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 72890]]
We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in 49 CFR
571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small
entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that
are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000.
Business entities are generally defined as small businesses by Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for the purposes of receiving
Small Business Administration (SBA) assistance. Size standards
established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed either in number of
employees or annual receipts in millions of dollars, unless otherwise
specified. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the
maximum allowed for a concern and its affiliates to be considered
small. If your business or organization is a small entity and if any of
the requirements in 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and
571.222 have a significant economic impact on your business or
organization, please submit a comment to explain how and to what degree
these rules affect you, the extent of the economic impact on your
business or organization, and why you believe the economic impact is
significant.
If the agency determines that there is a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, it will ask for
comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these
impacts could be reduced without reducing safety.
II. Plain Language
A. Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the President's memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language.
Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration
of the following questions:
Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
If you have any responses to these questions, please include them
in your comments on this document.
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing
plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent
with the section 610 review schedule. We will review 49 CFR 571.131,
571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 to determine if these
regulations can be reorganized and/or rewritten to make them easier to
read, understand, and use. We encourage interested persons to submit
draft regulatory language that clearly and simply communicates
regulatory requirements, and other recommendations, such as for putting
information in tables that may make the regulations easier to use.
Comments
How do I prepare and submit comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.)
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your comments, including the
attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under
ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet
the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT's
guidelines may be accessed at https://dmses.dot.gov/submit/DataQualityGuidelines.pdf.
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit two copies, from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing
information claimed to be confidential business information, you should
include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our
confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the agency consider late comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are
indicated above in the same location.
You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments
on the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://regulations.gov.
(2) FDMS provides two basic methods of searching to retrieve
dockets and docket materials that are available in the system: (a)
``Quick Search'' to search using a full-text search engine, or (b)
``Advanced Search,'' which displays various indexed fields such as the
docket name, docket identification number, phase of the action,
initiating office, date of issuance, document title, document
identification number, type of document, Federal Register reference,
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the advanced search may be
searched independently or in combination with other fields, as desired.
Each search yields a simultaneous display of all available information
found in FDMS that is relevant to the requested subject or topic.
(3) You may download the comments. However, since the comments are
[[Page 72891]]
imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf''
versions of the documents are word searchable.
Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2011-30277 Filed 11-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P