Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 72225 [2011-30072]

Agencies

• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 72225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17f-2; SEC File No. 270-233; OMB Control No. 3235-0223.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 350l et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the 
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to 
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of 
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17f-2 (17 CFR 270.17f-2) under the Investment Company Act of 
1940 (the ``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 80a-1) is entitled: ``Custody of 
Investments by Registered Management Investment Company.'' Rule 17f-2 
establishes safeguards for arrangements in which a registered 
management investment company (``fund'') is deemed to maintain custody 
of its own assets, such as when the fund maintains its assets in a 
facility that provides safekeeping but not custodial services. The rule 
includes several recordkeeping or reporting requirements. The fund's 
directors must prepare a resolution designating not more than five fund 
officers or responsible employees who may have access to the fund's 
assets. The designated access persons (two or more of whom must act 
jointly when handling fund assets) must prepare a written notation 
providing certain information about each deposit or withdrawal of fund 
assets, and must transmit the notation to another officer or director 
designated by the directors. Independent public accountants must verify 
the fund's assets at least three times a year and two of the 
examinations must be unscheduled.
    The requirement that directors designate access persons is intended 
to ensure that directors evaluate the trustworthiness of insiders who 
handle fund assets. The requirements that access persons act jointly in 
handling fund assets, prepare a written notation of each transaction, 
and transmit the notation to another designated person are intended to 
reduce the risk of misappropriation of fund assets by access persons, 
and to ensure that adequate records are prepared, reviewed by a 
responsible third person, and available for examination by the 
Commission's examination staff. The requirement that auditors verify 
fund assets without notice twice each year is intended to provide an 
additional deterrent to the misappropriation of fund assets and to 
detect any irregularities.
    The Commission staff estimates that each fund makes 974 responses 
and spends an average of 252 hours annually in complying with the 
rule's requirements.\1\ Commission staff estimates that on an annual 
basis it takes: (i) 0.5 hours of fund accounting personnel at a total 
cost of $82.50 to draft director resolutions; \2\ (ii) 0.5 hours of the 
fund's board of directors at a total cost of $2,000 to adopt the 
resolution; (iii) 244 hours for the fund's accounting personnel at a 
total cost of $60,388 to prepare written notations of transactions; \3\ 
and (iv) 7 hours for the fund's accounting personnel at a total cost of 
$1,155 to assist the independent public accountants when they perform 
verifications of fund assets.\4\ Approximately 243 funds rely upon rule 
17f-2 annually.\5\ Thus, the total annual hour burden for rule 17f-2 is 
estimated to be 61,236 hours.\6\ Based on the total costs per fund 
listed above, the total cost of the Rule 17f-2's collection of 
information requirements is estimated to be $15.5 million.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The 971 responses are: 1 (one) response to draft and adopt 
the resolution and 973 notations. Estimates of the number of hours 
are based on conversations with individuals in the mutual fund 
industry. The actual number of hours may vary significantly 
depending on individual fund assets.
    \2\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 0.5 
(burden hours per fund) x $165 (fund senior accountant's hourly 
rate) = $82.50.
    \3\ Respondents estimated that each fund makes 974 responses on 
an annual basis and spent a total of 0.25 hours per response. The 
fund personnel involved are Fund Payable Manager ($157 hourly rate), 
Fund Operations Manager ($331 hourly rate) and Fund Accounting 
Manager ($257 hourly rate). The weighted hourly rate of these 
personnel is $248. The estimated cost of preparing notations is 
based on the following calculation: 974 x 0.25 x $248 = $60,388.
    \4\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 7 x 
$165 (fund senior accountant hourly rate) = $1,155.
    \5\ Based on a review of Form N-17f-2 filings for calendar years 
2008-2010, each year approximately 243 funds file Form N-17f-2 with 
the Commission.
    \6\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 243 
(funds) x 252 (total annual hourly burden per fund) = 61,236 hours 
for rule. The annual burden for rule 17f-2 does not include time 
spent preparing Form N-17f-2. The burden for Form N-17f-2 is 
included in a separate collection of information.
    \7\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 
$63,625.50 (total annual cost per fund) x 243 funds = $15,460,997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a 
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of 
Commission rules and forms. Complying with the collections of 
information required by rule 17f-2 is mandatory for those funds that 
maintain custody of their own assets. Responses will not be kept 
confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Commission, including whether the information has practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of 
the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to 
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this 
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an 
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.

     Dated: November 16, 2011.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-30072 Filed 11-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P