Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule To Modify the Fees Relating to Qualified Contingent Cross Orders, 71410-71411 [2011-29676]
Download as PDF
71410
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–29678 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am]
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65730; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2011–79]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule To Modify the
Fees Relating to Qualified Contingent
Cross Orders
November 10, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on
November 1, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) to modify the fees relating to
Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’)
orders. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and www.nyse.com.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
27 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposal is to
modify the fees relating to QCC orders.
Specifically, the Exchange intends to
adopt a rebate of $.10 per contract for
executed QCC orders. The rebate will be
credited to the executing Floor Broker.
The Exchange notes that the terms of
a QCC order are negotiated and agreed
to prior to being brought to an exchange
for possible execution. In bringing a
QCC order to the Exchange for
execution, OTP Holders have two
primary means of doing so. They can
configure their systems to deliver the
QCC order to the Exchange matching
engines for validation and execution.
Alternatively they can utilize the
services of another OTP Holder acting as
a Floor Broker. In turn, the Floor Broker
who is in receipt of such an order can
enter the order through an Exchangeprovided system 3 to be delivered to the
Exchange matching engine for
validation and potential execution. In
light of the fact that the Exchange does
not offer a front-end for order entry,
unlike some of the competing
exchanges,4 the Exchange believes it is
necessary from a competitive standpoint
to offer this rebate to the executing Floor
Broker on a QCC order. The Exchange
expects that the rebate offered to
executing Floor Brokers will allow them
to price their services at a level that will
enable them to attract QCC order flow
from participants who would otherwise
utilize an existing front-end order entry
mechanism offered by the Exchange’s
competitors instead of incurring the cost
in time and money to develop their own
internal systems to be able to deliver
QCC orders directly to the Exchange
systems. To the extent that Floor
Brokers are able to attract these QCC
orders, they will gain important
information that will allow them to
solicit the parties to the QCC orders for
3 Floor Brokers are required by NYSE Arca
Options Rule 6.67 to have systematized orders prior
to representing them in open outcry. Using the
same Electronic Order Capture System, Floor
Brokers will be able to enter QCC orders for
validation by the Exchange matching engines and
potential execution.
4 The International Securities Exchange offers
PRECISE TRADE as a means for users to enter
orders and Chicago Board Options Exchange has a
similar front-end order entry system called PULSE.
Such systems do not require users to develop their
own internal front-end order entry systems and may
provide savings to users in terms of development
time and costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participation in other trades, which will
in turn benefit all other Exchange
participants through the additional
liquidity and price discovery that may
occur as a result. The Exchange notes
that at least two other exchanges offer a
similar rebate.5
The proposed change will be
operative on November 1, 2011.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6(b) 6 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’), in general, and Section 6(b)(4) 7
of the Act, in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and
other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange believes the proposed
$.10 per contract rebate for Floor
Brokers who enter QCC orders that
execute is reasonable because it will
allow Floor Brokers the opportunity to
compete for QCC orders that would
otherwise be entered into front-end
order entry systems of competing
exchanges.8 The proposed rebate is
comparable to that found on other
exchanges 9 in that it is being offered to
Floor Brokers as an inducement that
may allow them to competitively price
their services offered to all participants.
To the extent that the rebate is
successful in attracting additional order
flow to the Exchange, all participants
should benefit. As such, the Exchange
believes that the rebate is appropriate
and reasonable.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
adopt a $.10 per contract rebate is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would
uniformly apply to all QCC orders
entered by a Floor Broker for validation
by the system and potential execution.
The rebate is not unfairly discriminatory
to firms that enter QCC orders directly
into the NYSE Arca System through
electronic connection, because the fee
for the QCC order is the same whether
it is entered electronically or through a
Floor Broker. In addition, under
Commentary .01 to Arca Options Rule
6.90, only Floor Brokers may enter a
QCC order from the Floor; therefore,
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65472
(October 3, 2011), 76 FR 62887 (October 11, 2011)
(SR–NYSEAmex–2011–72) and NASDAQ OMX
PHLX fee schedule dated September 12, 2011, page
21 (describing a Floor Broker Subsidy that can
range as high as $.09 per contract), available at
https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/
marketregulation/membership/phlx/feesched.pdf.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
8 See supra note 4.
9 See supra note 5.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Notices
providing the rebate to Floor Brokers
does not discriminate against other QCC
orders entered into the NYSE Arca
System from on the Floor. Any
participant will be able to engage a
rebate-receiving Floor Broker in a
discussion surrounding the appropriate
level of fees that they may be charged
for entrusting the entry of the QCC order
to the Floor Broker into the Exchange
systems for validation and execution.
The additional order flow attracted by
this rebate should benefit all
participants. The rebate is meant to
assist Floor Brokers to recruit business
on an agency basis from both OTP
Holders and non-OTP Holder firms. The
Floor Broker may use all or part of the
rebate to offset the Floor Brokerage
charges billed to the Firm. For this
reason the Exchange believes the
adoption of the proposed rebate is both
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 10 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 11
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
NYSE Arca.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR–NYSEArca–2011–79 on
the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2011–79. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2011–79 and should be
submitted on or before December 8,
2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–29676 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 16, 2011
12 17
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71411
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65728, File No. SR–BATS–
2011–035]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1, To Amend
and Restate the Amended and
Restated Bylaws of BATS Global
Markets, Inc.
November 10, 2011.
I. Introduction
On September 7, 2011, BATS
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend the Bylaws of the
Exchange’s sole stockholder, BATS
Global Markets, Inc. (‘‘Corporation’’), in
connection with the Corporation’s
anticipated initial public offering of
shares of its Class A Common Stock (the
‘‘IPO’’). The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 26, 2011.3 On
November 3, 2011, the Exchange filed
Partial Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.4 The Commission
received no comment letters regarding
the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1.
II. Description of the Proposal
On May 13, 2011, the Corporation
filed a registration statement on Form
S–1 with the Commission to register
shares of Class A common stock and to
disclose its intention to conduct an IPO
offering those shares and to list those
shares for trading on the Exchange. In
connection with its IPO, the Exchange
filed this proposed rule change to
amend and restate the Corporation’s
current Bylaws and adopt these changes
as its Second Amended and Restated
Bylaws (‘‘New Bylaws’’). The proposal
would primarily amend and restate
various provisions of the Bylaws in a
manner that the Exchange believes
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65353
(September 19, 2011), 76 FR 59472 (September 26,
2011) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Partial Amendment No. 1 corrects an
inconsistency between the Third Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation and the Corporation’s proposed
amended bylaws concerning actions of stockholders
without a meeting. This is a technical amendment
and is not subject to notice and comment as it does
not materially affect the substance of the rule filing.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71410-71411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29676]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-65730; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-79]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule To Modify the Fees Relating to Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders
November 10, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 1, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to modify the fees relating to Qualified Contingent
Cross (``QCC'') orders. The text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposal is to modify the fees relating to QCC
orders. Specifically, the Exchange intends to adopt a rebate of $.10
per contract for executed QCC orders. The rebate will be credited to
the executing Floor Broker.
The Exchange notes that the terms of a QCC order are negotiated and
agreed to prior to being brought to an exchange for possible execution.
In bringing a QCC order to the Exchange for execution, OTP Holders have
two primary means of doing so. They can configure their systems to
deliver the QCC order to the Exchange matching engines for validation
and execution. Alternatively they can utilize the services of another
OTP Holder acting as a Floor Broker. In turn, the Floor Broker who is
in receipt of such an order can enter the order through an Exchange-
provided system \3\ to be delivered to the Exchange matching engine for
validation and potential execution. In light of the fact that the
Exchange does not offer a front-end for order entry, unlike some of the
competing exchanges,\4\ the Exchange believes it is necessary from a
competitive standpoint to offer this rebate to the executing Floor
Broker on a QCC order. The Exchange expects that the rebate offered to
executing Floor Brokers will allow them to price their services at a
level that will enable them to attract QCC order flow from participants
who would otherwise utilize an existing front-end order entry mechanism
offered by the Exchange's competitors instead of incurring the cost in
time and money to develop their own internal systems to be able to
deliver QCC orders directly to the Exchange systems. To the extent that
Floor Brokers are able to attract these QCC orders, they will gain
important information that will allow them to solicit the parties to
the QCC orders for participation in other trades, which will in turn
benefit all other Exchange participants through the additional
liquidity and price discovery that may occur as a result. The Exchange
notes that at least two other exchanges offer a similar rebate.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Floor Brokers are required by NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.67 to
have systematized orders prior to representing them in open outcry.
Using the same Electronic Order Capture System, Floor Brokers will
be able to enter QCC orders for validation by the Exchange matching
engines and potential execution.
\4\ The International Securities Exchange offers PRECISE TRADE
as a means for users to enter orders and Chicago Board Options
Exchange has a similar front-end order entry system called PULSE.
Such systems do not require users to develop their own internal
front-end order entry systems and may provide savings to users in
terms of development time and costs.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65472 (October 3,
2011), 76 FR 62887 (October 11, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-72) and
NASDAQ OMX PHLX fee schedule dated September 12, 2011, page 21
(describing a Floor Broker Subsidy that can range as high as $.09
per contract), available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/marketregulation/membership/phlx/feesched.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change will be operative on November 1, 2011.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \6\ of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ``Act''), in general, and Section 6(b)(4) \7\ of the Act,
in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed $.10 per contract rebate for
Floor Brokers who enter QCC orders that execute is reasonable because
it will allow Floor Brokers the opportunity to compete for QCC orders
that would otherwise be entered into front-end order entry systems of
competing exchanges.\8\ The proposed rebate is comparable to that found
on other exchanges \9\ in that it is being offered to Floor Brokers as
an inducement that may allow them to competitively price their services
offered to all participants. To the extent that the rebate is
successful in attracting additional order flow to the Exchange, all
participants should benefit. As such, the Exchange believes that the
rebate is appropriate and reasonable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra note 4.
\9\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposal to adopt a $.10 per contract
rebate is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would
uniformly apply to all QCC orders entered by a Floor Broker for
validation by the system and potential execution. The rebate is not
unfairly discriminatory to firms that enter QCC orders directly into
the NYSE Arca System through electronic connection, because the fee for
the QCC order is the same whether it is entered electronically or
through a Floor Broker. In addition, under Commentary .01 to Arca
Options Rule 6.90, only Floor Brokers may enter a QCC order from the
Floor; therefore,
[[Page 71411]]
providing the rebate to Floor Brokers does not discriminate against
other QCC orders entered into the NYSE Arca System from on the Floor.
Any participant will be able to engage a rebate-receiving Floor Broker
in a discussion surrounding the appropriate level of fees that they may
be charged for entrusting the entry of the QCC order to the Floor
Broker into the Exchange systems for validation and execution. The
additional order flow attracted by this rebate should benefit all
participants. The rebate is meant to assist Floor Brokers to recruit
business on an agency basis from both OTP Holders and non-OTP Holder
firms. The Floor Broker may use all or part of the rebate to offset the
Floor Brokerage charges billed to the Firm. For this reason the
Exchange believes the adoption of the proposed rebate is both equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \10\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \11\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the NYSE Arca.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-79 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-79. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-79 and should
be submitted on or before December 8, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-29676 Filed 11-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P