Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Correction to the Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70965-70966 [2011-29620]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Notices producers. The cash-deposit rate assigned to an exporter will apply only to merchandise both exported by the firm in question and produced by a firm that supplied the exporter during the period of investigation.49 Distribution of Copies of the Petition In accordance with section 732(b)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(f), copies of the public versions of the Petition have been provided to the representatives of the Government of the PRC. Because of the large number of producers/exporters identified in the Petition, the Department considers the service of the public version of the Petition to the foreign producers/ exporters satisfied by the delivery of the public version to the Government of the PRC, consistent with 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2). ITC Notification We have notified the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 732(d) of the Act. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Preliminary Determinations by the ITC The ITC will preliminarily determine, no later than December 5, 2011, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of solar cells from the PRC are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to a U.S. industry. A negative ITC determination will result in the investigation being terminated; otherwise, this investigation will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits. Notification to Interested Parties Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634. Parties wishing to participate in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.50 Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/ government officials as well as their representatives in all segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after 49 See 50 See Policy Bulletin at 6 (emphasis added). section 782(b) of the Act. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:45 Nov 15, 2011 Jkt 226001 March 14, 2011.51 The formats for the revised certifications are provided at the end of the Interim Final Rule. The Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments initiated on or after March 14, 2011, if the submitting party does not comply with the revised certification requirements. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act. Dated: November 8, 2011. Paul Piquado Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–29627 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P International Trade Administration [A–549–821] Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials. This investigation covers crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells of thickness equal to or greater than 20 micrometers, having a p/n junction formed by any means, whether or not the cell has undergone other processing, including, but not limited to, cleaning, etching, coating, and/or addition of materials (including, but not limited to, metallization and conductor patterns) to collect and forward the electricity that is generated by the cell. Subject merchandise may be described at the time of importation as parts for final finished products that are assembled after importation, including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels, buildingintegrated modules, building-integrated panels, or other finished goods kits. Such parts that otherwise meet the definition of subject merchandise are included in the scope of this investigation. Excluded from the scope of this investigation are thin film photovoltaic products produced from amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS). Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, not exceeding 10,000mm2 in surface area, that are permanently integrated into a consumer good whose function is other than power generation and that consumes the electricity generated by the integrated crystalline silicon photovoltaic cell. Where more than one cell is permanently integrated into a consumer good, the surface area for purposes of this exclusion shall be the total combined surface area of all cells that are integrated into the consumer good. 51 See Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration during Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011)(‘‘Interim Final Rule’’) amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and (2). Frm 00012 Merchandise covered by this investigation is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020 and 8541.40.6030. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Appendix I PO 00000 70965 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Correction to the Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the amended final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from Thailand for the period August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010. The notice did not include the names and margins of two companies subject to the amended final results of the review. The names and the respective margins are indicated below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3683. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On November 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the amended final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from Thailand. See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68137 (November 3, 2011) (Amended Final Results). The period of review is August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010. Subsequent to the publication of the Amended Final Results we identified an inadvertent error in the notice. The names and margins of the following two E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 70966 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Notices companies not selected for individual examination were omitted: Trinity Pac Co. Ltd. U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd. The weighted-average margin the Department determined for these companies is 28.74 percent. See Memorandum to the File ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand— Amended Final Results, Margin Calculation for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination’’ dated October 27, 2011. Accordingly, the complete list of companies subject to the Amended Final Results with their respective margin rates is as follows: Percent margin Producer/exporter First Pack Co. Ltd ........................... K International Packaging Co., Ltd Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd .......... Praise Home Industry, Co. Ltd ....... Siam Flexible Industries Co., Ltd ... Thai Jirun Co., Ltd .......................... Trinity Pac Co. Ltd .......................... U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd ............... 28.74 28.74 25.73 28.74 28.74 28.74 28.74 28.74 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Cash Deposit Requirements and Assessment Rates The deposit rates will be effective retroactively on any entries made on or after September 28, 2011, the date of publication of the final results of review, for shipments of polyethylene retail carrier bags from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cashdeposit rates for the companies subject to the review will be the rates shown above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this or a previous review or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will be 4.69 percent, the allothers rate from the amended final determination of the LTFV investigation revised as a result of the Section 129 determination published on August 12, 2010. See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010). These deposit VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:45 Nov 15, 2011 Jkt 226001 requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. The Department intends to issue liquidation instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15 days after publication of this correction to the amended final results of review. This correction to the amended final results of administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. November 9, 2011. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–29620 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–980] Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: November 16, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Calvert, Jun Jack Zhao or Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3586, (202) 482– 1396 or (202) 482–0176, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: The Petition On October 19, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) filed in proper form by SolarWorld Industries America Inc. (Petitioner). See Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Against Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China, dated October 19, 2011 (Petition). On October 21, 24 and 31, 2011, and November 4, 2011, the Department issued supplemental questionnaires PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 requesting information and clarification of certain areas of the Petition. On October 24, 2011, the Department issued requests to Petitioner for additional information and for clarification of certain areas of the general issues, antidumping (AD), and CVD sections of the Petition. Based on the Department’s requests, Petitioner filed a supplement to the Petition regarding the CVD section on October 26, 2011 (Supplement I), and requested an extension until October 28, 2011, for the AD and general issues supplemental questionnaire. On October 28, 2011, Petitioner filed the supplement to the Petition regarding the AD and general issues section (Supplement II–A— General Issues and Supplement II–B— AD Issues). On October 31, 2011, the Department issued an additional request for information, which Petitioner filed on November 2, 2011 (Supplement III), November 4, 2011 (Supplement IV) and November 7, 2011 (Supplement V–A— AD Issues and Supplement V–B— General Issues). In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Petitioner alleges that producers/exporters of solar cells from the PRC received countervailable subsidies within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, and that imports from these producers/ exporters materially injure, and threaten further material injury to, an industry in the United States. The Department finds that Petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of the domestic industry because Petitioner is an interested party, as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act, and has demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the investigation that it requests the Department to initiate. See ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for the Petition,’’ below. Period of Investigation The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. Scope of the Investigation The products covered by the scope of this investigation are solar cells from the PRC. For a full description of the scope of the investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in Appendix I of this notice. Comments on Scope of the Investigation During our review of the Petition, we discussed the scope with Petitioner to ensure that it is an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief. Petitioner submitted revised scope language on E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70965-70966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-821]


Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Correction to the 
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On November 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published in the Federal Register the amended final results 
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
polyethylene retail carrier bags from Thailand for the period August 1, 
2009, through July 31, 2010. The notice did not include the names and 
margins of two companies subject to the amended final results of the 
review. The names and the respective margins are indicated below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the amended final results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from 
Thailand. See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Amended 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68137 
(November 3, 2011) (Amended Final Results). The period of review is 
August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010.
    Subsequent to the publication of the Amended Final Results we 
identified an inadvertent error in the notice. The names and margins of 
the following two

[[Page 70966]]

companies not selected for individual examination were omitted:

Trinity Pac Co. Ltd.
U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd.

    The weighted-average margin the Department determined for these 
companies is 28.74 percent. See Memorandum to the File ``Polyethylene 
Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand--Amended Final Results, Margin 
Calculation for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination'' 
dated October 27, 2011. Accordingly, the complete list of companies 
subject to the Amended Final Results with their respective margin rates 
is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
                       Producer/exporter                         margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Pack Co. Ltd............................................     28.74
K International Packaging Co., Ltd............................     28.74
Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd..................................     25.73
Praise Home Industry, Co. Ltd.................................     28.74
Siam Flexible Industries Co., Ltd.............................     28.74
Thai Jirun Co., Ltd...........................................     28.74
Trinity Pac Co. Ltd...........................................     28.74
U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd.....................................     28.74
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements and Assessment Rates

    The deposit rates will be effective retroactively on any entries 
made on or after September 28, 2011, the date of publication of the 
final results of review, for shipments of polyethylene retail carrier 
bags from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash-deposit rates for the companies 
subject to the review will be the rates shown above; (2) for previously 
investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash-deposit 
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the 
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
or a previous review or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of 
the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit rate for all other manufacturers 
or exporters will be 4.69 percent, the all-others rate from the amended 
final determination of the LTFV investigation revised as a result of 
the Section 129 determination published on August 12, 2010. See Notice 
of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay 
Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 75 FR 48940 
(August 12, 2010). These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
    The Department intends to issue liquidation instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection 15 days after publication of this 
correction to the amended final results of review.
    This correction to the amended final results of administrative 
review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) 
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

     November 9, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-29620 Filed 11-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.