Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Final Results of Full Third Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 70409-70410 [2011-29332]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices live and on-demand, on the BBG’s public Web site at https://www.bbg.gov. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203–4545. Paul Kollmer-Dorsey, Deputy General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2011–29476 Filed 11–9–11; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 8610–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Census Bureau Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (M3) Survey U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). SUMMARY: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on or before January 13, 2012. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Chris Savage, U.S. Census Bureau, Manufacturing and Construction Division, 4600 Silver Hill Rd., Room 7K071, Washington, DC 20233–6913, (301) 763–4834 or via the Internet at john.c.savage@census.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Abstract The U.S. Census Bureau plans to request an extension of the current Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance of the Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories and Orders (M3) survey. The Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (M3) survey requests data from domestic VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:40 Nov 10, 2011 Jkt 226001 manufacturers on form M–3 (SD), which will be mailed at the end of each month. Data requested are shipments, new orders, unfilled orders, total inventory, materials and supplies, work-in-process, and finished goods. It is currently the only survey that provides broad-based monthly statistical data on the economic conditions in the domestic manufacturing sector. The M3 survey is designed to measure current industrial activity and to provide an indication of future production commitments. The value of shipments measures the value of goods delivered during the month by domestic manufacturers. Estimates of new orders serve as an indicator of future production commitments and represent the current sales value of new orders received during the month, net of cancellations. Substantial accumulation or depletion of unfilled orders measures excess or deficient demand for manufactured products. The level of inventories, especially in relation to shipments, is frequently used to monitor the business cycle. We do not plan any changes to the M–3 (SD) form. The estimated total annual burden hours will remain 17,200 due to no increase in the number of respondents. II. Method of Collection Respondents submit data on form M–3 (SD) via mail, facsimile machine, or via the Internet. Analysts call respondents who usually report, to obtain data in time for preparing the monthly estimates. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0607–0008. Form Number: M–3 (SD). You can obtain information on the proposed content at this Web site: http// www.census.gov/mcd/clearance. Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: Businesses, large and small, or other for profit. Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,300. Estimated Time per Response: 20 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,200. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $510,152. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Sections 131 and 182. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70409 practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: November 7, 2011. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2011–29233 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–403–801] Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Final Results of Full Third Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On January 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76 FR 89 (January 3, 2011) (Sunset Initiation). On the basis of adequate substantive responses submitted by domestic and respondent interested parties, the Department determined to conduct a full sunset review of this AD order pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a result of our analysis, the Department finds that revocation of the AD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. DATES: Effective Date: November 14, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1 70410 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On January 3, 2011, the Department initiated the third sunset review of the AD order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. On January 13, 2011, the Government of Norway (GON), Norwegian Seafood Federation (NSF), and Aquaculture Division of the Norwegian Seafood Association (ADNSA) (collectively, the respondents), filed letters of appearance in the review.1 On January 18, 2011, Phoenix Salmon U.S., Inc. (Phoenix Salmon), a domestic producer of fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon, filed a notice of intent to participate in the review.2 On January 21, 2011, NSF and ADNSA supplemented their letter of appearance by submitting to the Department a list of their members. On February 2, 2011, the Department received a substantive response from Phoenix Salmon and a joint substantive response from the respondents within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). Based on a finding that the substantive responses were adequate, we determined to conduct a full sunset review of this AD order. See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Melissa Skinner, Director, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office 3, regarding ‘‘Adequacy Determination: Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway’’ (April 6, 2011). On July 29, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the full third sunset review of the AD order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway. See Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Preliminary Results of Full Third Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 45513 (July 29, 2011) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. We preliminarily found that dumping was likely to continue or recur. 1 These public documents and all other public documents and public versions of proprietary documents with regard to this third full sunset review are available on the public record located in the Department’s Central Records Unit at room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. 2 Phoenix Salmon claimed to be the successor to the two domestic producers who participated in the prior sunset review—Atlantic Salmon of Maine and Heritage Salmon Company, Inc. VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:40 Nov 10, 2011 Jkt 226001 The Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On September 19, 2011, we received a case brief from the GON, and on September 26, 2011, we received a rebuttal brief from Phoenix Salmon. We did not conduct a hearing because a hearing was not requested. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is the species Atlantic salmon (Salmon Salar) marketed as specified herein; the order excludes all other species of salmon: Danube salmon, Chinook (also called ‘‘king’’ or ‘‘quinnat’’), Coho (‘‘silver’’), Sockeye (‘‘redfish’’ or ‘‘blueback’’), Humpback (‘‘pink’’) and Chum (‘‘dog’’).3 Atlantic salmon is a whole or nearly-whole fish, typically (but not necessarily) marketed gutted, bled, and cleaned, with the head on. The subject merchandise is typically packed in fresh-water ice (‘‘chilled’’). Excluded from the subject merchandise are fillets, steaks and other cuts of Atlantic salmon. Also excluded are frozen, canned, smoked or otherwise processed Atlantic salmon. Atlantic salmon is currently provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 0302.12.0003 and 0302.12.0004. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description remains dispositive as to the scope of the product coverage. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Full Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway (Decision Memorandum) from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated concurrently with this final notice, which is hereby adopted by this notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this full sunset review and the corresponding recommendation in this public memorandum which is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit room 7046 of the main Commerce 3 On August 5, 2009, the Department made a final scope ruling determining that whole salmon steaks are within the scope of the order. See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 14138 (March 24, 2010). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review We determine that revocation of the AD duty order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-average margins: Manufacturer/exporter Margin (percent) Salmonor A/S ............................. Sea Star International A/S .......... Skaarfish Mowi A/S .................... Fremstad Group A/S .................. Domstein and Co. ....................... Saga A/S .................................... Chr. Bjelland Seafood A/S ......... Hallvard Leroy A/S ..................... All Others .................................... 18.39 24.61 15.65 21.51 31.81 26.55 19.96 31.81 23.80 Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing the final results of this review in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: November 7, 2011. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–29332 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70409-70410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-403-801]


Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Final Results of 
Full Third Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On January 3, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty (AD) 
order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See 
Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 76 FR 89 (January 3, 2011) 
(Sunset Initiation). On the basis of adequate substantive responses 
submitted by domestic and respondent interested parties, the Department 
determined to conduct a full sunset review of this AD order pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a result of our 
analysis, the Department finds that revocation of the AD order would 
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping.

DATES: Effective Date: November 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-1009.

[[Page 70410]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On January 3, 2011, the Department initiated the third sunset 
review of the AD order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. On 
January 13, 2011, the Government of Norway (GON), Norwegian Seafood 
Federation (NSF), and Aquaculture Division of the Norwegian Seafood 
Association (ADNSA) (collectively, the respondents), filed letters of 
appearance in the review.\1\ On January 18, 2011, Phoenix Salmon U.S., 
Inc. (Phoenix Salmon), a domestic producer of fresh and chilled 
Atlantic salmon, filed a notice of intent to participate in the 
review.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ These public documents and all other public documents and 
public versions of proprietary documents with regard to this third 
full sunset review are available on the public record located in the 
Department's Central Records Unit at room 7046 of the main 
Department of Commerce building.
    \2\ Phoenix Salmon claimed to be the successor to the two 
domestic producers who participated in the prior sunset review--
Atlantic Salmon of Maine and Heritage Salmon Company, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 21, 2011, NSF and ADNSA supplemented their letter of 
appearance by submitting to the Department a list of their members. On 
February 2, 2011, the Department received a substantive response from 
Phoenix Salmon and a joint substantive response from the respondents 
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
    Based on a finding that the substantive responses were adequate, we 
determined to conduct a full sunset review of this AD order. See 
Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Melissa Skinner, 
Director, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office 3, 
regarding ``Adequacy Determination: Third Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Fresh and Chilled 
Atlantic Salmon From Norway'' (April 6, 2011).
    On July 29, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the preliminary results of the full third sunset review of the AD order 
on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway. See Fresh and Chilled 
Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Preliminary Results of Full Third Sunset 
Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 45513 (July 29, 2011) 
(Preliminary Results) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 
We preliminarily found that dumping was likely to continue or recur.
    The Department invited interested parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Results. On September 19, 2011, we received a case brief 
from the GON, and on September 26, 2011, we received a rebuttal brief 
from Phoenix Salmon. We did not conduct a hearing because a hearing was 
not requested.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is the species Atlantic salmon 
(Salmon Salar) marketed as specified herein; the order excludes all 
other species of salmon: Danube salmon, Chinook (also called ``king'' 
or ``quinnat''), Coho (``silver''), Sockeye (``redfish'' or 
``blueback''), Humpback (``pink'') and Chum (``dog'').\3\ Atlantic 
salmon is a whole or nearly-whole fish, typically (but not necessarily) 
marketed gutted, bled, and cleaned, with the head on. The subject 
merchandise is typically packed in fresh-water ice (``chilled''). 
Excluded from the subject merchandise are fillets, steaks and other 
cuts of Atlantic salmon. Also excluded are frozen, canned, smoked or 
otherwise processed Atlantic salmon. Atlantic salmon is currently 
provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings 0302.12.0003 and 0302.12.0004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ On August 5, 2009, the Department made a final scope ruling 
determining that whole salmon steaks are within the scope of the 
order. See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 14138 (March 24, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes. The written description remains dispositive as to the scope 
of the product coverage.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Full Third Sunset Review 
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from 
Norway (Decision Memorandum) from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated 
concurrently with this final notice, which is hereby adopted by this 
notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in 
this full sunset review and the corresponding recommendation in this 
public memorandum which is on file electronically via Import 
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 
Electronic Services System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is 
available in the Central Records Unit room 7046 of the main Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that revocation of the AD duty order on fresh and 
chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-average 
margins:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                    Manufacturer/exporter                      (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salmonor A/S................................................       18.39
Sea Star International A/S..................................       24.61
Skaarfish Mowi A/S..........................................       15.65
Fremstad Group A/S..........................................       21.51
Domstein and Co.............................................       31.81
Saga A/S....................................................       26.55
Chr. Bjelland Seafood A/S...................................       19.96
Hallvard Leroy A/S..........................................       31.81
All Others..................................................       23.80
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing the final results of this review in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: November 7, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-29332 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.