Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66690-66692 [2011-27446]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
66690
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2011 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
use in water depths of 1,500 feet or
more; (2) intended for use in and is
actually used for a specific deepwater
project; (3) rated for a specified
minimum yield strength of not less than
60,000 psi; and (4) not identified or
certified through the use of a monogram,
stencil, or otherwise marked with an
API specification (e.g., ‘‘API 5L’’).
With regard to the excluded products
listed above, the Department will not
instruct CBP to require end-use
certification until such time as
petitioner or other interested parties
provide to the Department a reasonable
basis to believe or suspect that the
products are being utilized in a covered
application. If such information is
provided, we will require end-use
certification only for the product(s) (or
specification(s)) for which evidence is
provided that such products are being
used in a covered application as
described above. For example, if, based
on evidence provided by petitioner, the
Department finds a reasonable basis to
believe or suspect that seamless pipe
produced to the A–335 specification is
being used in an A–106 application, we
will require end-use certifications for
imports of that specification. Normally
we will require only the importer of
record to certify to the end use of the
imported merchandise. If it later proves
necessary for adequate implementation,
we may also require producers who
export such products to the United
States to provide such certification on
invoices accompanying shipments to
the United States.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As we stated in the preliminary
results, our practice concerning noshipment respondents had been to
rescind the administrative review if the
respondent certifies that it had no
shipments and we have confirmed
through our examination of CBP data
that there were no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR. See 19
CFR 351.213(d)(3); see also Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Japan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission of Review, 70 FR 53161,
53161–53163 (September 7, 2005),
unchanged in Oil Country Tubular
Goods from Japan: Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 95
(January 3, 2006). In such
circumstances, we normally instructed
CBP to liquidate any entries from the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Oct 26, 2011
Jkt 226001
no-shipment company at the deposit
rate in effect on the date of entry.
In our May 6, 2003, ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ clarification, we explained
that, where respondents in an
administrative review demonstrate that
they had no knowledge of sales through
resellers to the United States, we would
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the all-others rate applicable to the
proceeding. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (‘‘Assessment
Policy Notice’’).
As we stated in the preliminary
results, because ‘‘as entered’’ liquidation
instructions do not alleviate the
concerns which the May 6, 2003,
clarification was intended to address,
we find it appropriate in this case to
instruct CBP to liquidate any existing
entries of merchandise produced by
Nippon, JFE, SMI, or NKK, and exported
by other parties at the all-others rate. In
addition, we continue to find it is more
consistent with the May 6, 2003,
clarification not to rescind the review in
these circumstances but, rather, to
complete the review with respect to
Nippon, JFE, SMI, and NKK, and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review. See
the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section of this
notice below.
Assessment Rates
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of this review.
As noted above, the Department
clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’
regulation on May 6, 2003. See
Assessment Policy Notice. This
clarification will apply to POR entries
by all respondent companies because
they certified that they made no POR
shipments of subject merchandise for
which they had knowledge of U.S.
destination. We will instruct CBP to
liquidate these entries at the all-others
rate established in the less-than-fairvalue investigation (68.88 percent) if
there is no rate for the intermediary
involved in the transaction. See
Assessment Policy Notice for a full
discussion of this clarification.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative
review and notice are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 20, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–27872 Filed 10–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–821–801]
Solid Urea From the Russian
Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 17, 2011, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on solid
urea from the Russian Federation. The
solid urea subject to this review was
produced and exported by MCC
EuroChem (EuroChem). The period of
review (POR) is July 1, 2009, through
June 30, 2010.
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we have not made any changes
in the margin calculation for EuroChem.
The final weighted-average dumping
margin for EuroChem is listed below in
the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the
Administrative Review.’’
DATES: Effective Date: October 27, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dustin Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2011 / Notices
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0747 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 17, 2011, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on solid urea
from the Russian Federation. See Solid
Urea From the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
35405 (June 17, 2011) (Preliminary
Results).
On August 9, 2011, we received a case
brief from the petitioners 1 and a letter
in lieu of a case brief from EuroChem.
On August 18, 2011, we received
rebuttal briefs from the petitioners and
from EuroChem. There were no requests
for a hearing.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order is solid urea, a
high-nitrogen content fertilizer which is
produced by reacting ammonia with
carbon dioxide. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
item number 3102.10.00.00. Previously
such merchandise was classified under
item number 480.3000 of the Tariff
Schedules of the United States.
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the petitioners’
case brief and EuroChem’s letter in lieu
of a case brief are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as Appendix I. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Import Administration’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is
available in the Central Records Unit
(CRU), room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Issues and
1 The Ad Hoc Committee of Domestic Nitrogen
Producers and its individual urea-producing
members, CF Industries, Inc., and PCS Nitrogen.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Oct 26, 2011
Jkt 226001
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
We determine that the weightedaverage margin on solid urea from the
Russian Federation produced and
exported by EuroChem for the period
July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010, is
1.17 percent.
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have
calculated an importer-specific
assessment rate for EuroChem reflecting
these final results of review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by EuroChem
for which EuroChem did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries of merchandise produced by
EuroChem at the all-others rate if there
is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
The Department intends to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication of these final results of
review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash-deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this review,
as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act): (1) The cash-deposit rate for
EuroChem will be 1.17 percent; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cashdeposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66691
exporters will continue to be 64.93
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation. See Urea
From the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics; Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, 52 FR 19557,
19561 (May 26, 1987). Following the
break-up of the Soviet Union, the
antidumping duty order on solid urea
from the Soviet Union was transferred
to the individual members of the
Commonwealth of Independent States.
See Solid Urea From the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics; Transfer of the
Antidumping Order on Solid Urea From
the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
to the Commonwealth of Independent
States and the Baltic States and
Opportunity to Comment, 57 FR 28828
(June 29, 1992). The rate established in
the LTFV investigation for the Soviet
Union was applied to each new
independent state, including the
Russian Federation. These cash-deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 17, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Affiliation of EuroChem’s
Franchisees
Comment 2: Freight and Transportation
Revenue
Comment 3: Imputed Credit Expenses
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
66692
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2011 / Notices
Comment 4: Publication of Final Results
Comment 5: Zeroing
[FR Doc. 2011–27446 Filed 10–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Executive-Led Trade Mission to
Afghanistan
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Mission Description
The United States Department of
Commerce’s International Trade
Administration is organizing a business
development trade mission to Kabul,
Afghanistan in February 2012. This
mission will be led by a Senior
Commerce Department official. Targeted
sectors include: Construction (including
engineering, architecture, transportation
and logistics, and infrastructure);
mining (including equipment,
technology, and services); agribusiness;
and information and communications
technology. The mission’s goal is to
help U.S. companies explore long-term
business opportunities in Afghanistan
and enhance U.S.—Afghan commercial
relations by providing U.S. participants
with first-hand market information,
access to government decision makers
as well as one-on-one meetings with
business contacts, including potential
agents, distributors, and partners, to
position themselves to enter or expand
their presence in the targeted sectors.
Commercial Setting
The Government of the Islamic
Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) is
taking steps to develop its market
economy and increase both domestic
and foreign private investment. GIRoA
continues to develop legal and
administrative regulatory frameworks
that will lead to a market more
conducive to trade, investment and
private sector development. For
example, Afghanistan adopted an
investment law that allows investments
to be 100% foreign-owned.
Additionally, on October 28, 2010,
Afghanistan and Pakistan signed the
Afghanistan Pakistan Transit Trade
Agreement (APTTA), allowing Afghan
container trucks to drive through
Pakistan to the Indian border, and also
to port cities such as Karachi.
After of 30 years of war require
reconstruction and development efforts
are required to grow and stabilize
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Oct 26, 2011
Jkt 226001
Afghanistan’s economy. The GIRoA is
committed to promoting economic
development, increasing production and
earnings, promoting technology transfer,
improving national prosperity and
advancing Afghans’ standard of living in
partnership with international donor
agencies. GIRoA recognizes that U.S.
services, equipment and technology
would enhance development of
Afghanistan’s industrial sector and lead
to increased productivity and greater
technical skills for Afghan citizens.
International donors continue to
support Afghanistan’s development;
however, long-term sustainable growth
will take place through private sector
development.
To support Afghanistan’s private
sector and promote reconstruction
efforts, GIRoA has identified domestic
priority sectors needing investment and
development in both equipment and
services. These priority sectors are:
Construction and infrastructure,
logistics and transportation, mining,
agribusiness, and information and
communications technology providers.
The economy is beginning to move
from one based on state owned
enterprises and the informal economy to
a more formal market economy. A
notable sign of this transition for the
U.S. business community is the
establishment of an American Chamber
of Commerce in Kabul in 2010.
Kabul is the capital of Afghanistan,
situated in Kabul Province. With a total
metropolitan population of 2.6 million,
it is also the largest city in Afghanistan.
It is the commercial center for the
country, with national Afghan
businesses, associations, and GIRoA
ministries maintaining a presence in
Kabul. Afghanistan’s GDP per capita is
approximately $500, and has
experienced double digit growth in
recent years.
The Commerce Department has
supported commercial and private
sector development in Afghanistan
since 2002, and posted a Senior
Commercial Officer in Kabul in June
2010.
Mission Goals
The goal of the mission is to provide
U.S. participants with first-hand market
information, access to government
decision makers and one-on-one
meetings with business contacts,
including potential agents, distributors,
and partners, so that they can position
themselves to enter the Afghan market
or expand their business presence in
Afghanistan. Thus, the mission seeks to:
• Improve U.S. companies’
understanding of commercial
opportunities in Afghanistan.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Facilitate business meetings
between U.S. and Afghan businesses to
promote the development of U.S.
commercial opportunities in
Afghanistan.
• Introduce U.S. industry to the
Afghan business community and
government leaders.
• Provide GIRoA policymakers with
U.S. industry feedback on the direction
of its commercial reforms.
Mission Scenario
The business development mission
will take place in Kabul, Afghanistan.
Participants will meet with Afghan
leaders in the public and private sector,
learn about the market by participating
in Embassy briefings, and explore
additional opportunities at networking
receptions. Activities will include oneon-one meetings with pre-screened
business prospects. (Note that the
regular workweek in Afghanistan is
Sunday through Thursday.)
Proposed Timetable
(The State Department will follow
RSO procedure in reference to security
within and around the mission event.)
Day One (weekend) Travel Day—Depart
U.S. on evening flight
Day Two Travel Day—Participants
arrive in transit city (tbd) and
overnight in pre-arranged departure
from transit city
Day Three Travel Day, Arrive in Kabul,
Afghanistan (afternoon) Evening
Event
Day Four Security Briefing, Market
Briefing, One-on-One Business
Appointments, Reception
Day Five Market Briefing, Industry
Sector Briefing, Meetings with
Government and Industry Officials,
One-on-One Business
Appointments, Reception
Day Six One-on-One Business
Appointments (optional), Travel
Day—Depart for the U.S. (evening)
Day Seven Travel Day—Arrive in U.S.
(morning)
Participation Requirements
This business development mission is
designed for a minimum of 10 qualified
companies and can accommodate a
maximum of 20 participants from the
companies accepted. All parties
interested in participating in this
business development mission to Kabul,
Afghanistan, must submit a completed
application package for consideration by
the U.S. Department of Commerce. All
applicants will be evaluated on their
ability to meet certain conditions and to
best satisfy the selection criteria as
outlined below. U.S. companies already
doing business in the target sectors as
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66690-66692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27446]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-821-801]
Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 17, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on solid urea from the Russian Federation. The
solid urea subject to this review was produced and exported by MCC
EuroChem (EuroChem). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2009,
through June 30, 2010.
Based on our analysis of comments received, we have not made any
changes in the margin calculation for EuroChem. The final weighted-
average dumping margin for EuroChem is listed below in the section
entitled ``Final Results of the Administrative Review.''
DATES: Effective Date: October 27, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dustin Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
[[Page 66691]]
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-0747 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 17, 2011, the Department published the Preliminary Results
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solid
urea from the Russian Federation. See Solid Urea From the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 76 FR 35405 (June 17, 2011) (Preliminary Results).
On August 9, 2011, we received a case brief from the petitioners
\1\ and a letter in lieu of a case brief from EuroChem. On August 18,
2011, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioners and from
EuroChem. There were no requests for a hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Ad Hoc Committee of Domestic Nitrogen Producers and its
individual urea-producing members, CF Industries, Inc., and PCS
Nitrogen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is solid
urea, a high-nitrogen content fertilizer which is produced by reacting
ammonia with carbon dioxide. The product is currently classified under
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item number
3102.10.00.00. Previously such merchandise was classified under item
number 480.3000 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Although
the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the petitioners' case brief and EuroChem's
letter in lieu of a case brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues
raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS
is available in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet
at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
We determine that the weighted-average margin on solid urea from
the Russian Federation produced and exported by EuroChem for the period
July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010, is 1.17 percent.
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated an
importer-specific assessment rate for EuroChem reflecting these final
results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by EuroChem for which EuroChem did
not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries of
merchandise produced by EuroChem at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For
a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
The Department intends to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after
the publication of these final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash-deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The
cash-deposit rate for EuroChem will be 1.17 percent; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash-deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 64.93 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation. See Urea From the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 52 FR 19557, 19561 (May 26, 1987). Following the break-up
of the Soviet Union, the antidumping duty order on solid urea from the
Soviet Union was transferred to the individual members of the
Commonwealth of Independent States. See Solid Urea From the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics; Transfer of the Antidumping Order on Solid
Urea From the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to the Commonwealth
of Independent States and the Baltic States and Opportunity to Comment,
57 FR 28828 (June 29, 1992). The rate established in the LTFV
investigation for the Soviet Union was applied to each new independent
state, including the Russian Federation. These cash-deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 17, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Affiliation of EuroChem's Franchisees
Comment 2: Freight and Transportation Revenue
Comment 3: Imputed Credit Expenses
[[Page 66692]]
Comment 4: Publication of Final Results
Comment 5: Zeroing
[FR Doc. 2011-27446 Filed 10-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
