Certain Orange Juice From Brazil; Notice of Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 65496-65497 [2011-27295]
Download as PDF
65496
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Notices
establishment of special-purpose
subzones when existing zone facilities
cannot serve the specific use involved,
and when the activity results in a
significant public benefit and is in the
public interest;
Whereas, Dane County, grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 266, has made
application to the Board for authority to
establish a special-purpose subzone at
the warehouse and distribution facility
of Cabela’s Inc., located in Prairie Du
Chien, Wisconsin, (FTZ Docket 17–
2011, filed 3–7–2011);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 13354–13355, 3–11–
2011) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
grants authority for subzone status for
activity related to hunting, fishing,
camping and related outdoor
merchandise warehousing and
distribution at the facility of Cabela’s
Inc., located in Prairie Du Chien,
Wisconsin (Subzone 266A), as described
in the application and Federal Register
notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations, including Section
400.28.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
October 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–27298 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987,
01/22/09; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/
10) as an option for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Greater Metropolitan
Area Foreign-Trade Zone Commission,
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 119,
submitted an application to the Board
(FTZ Docket 40–2011, filed 6/8/2011)
for authority to reorganize under the
ASF with a service area of Isanti,
Chisago, Sherburne, Wright, Anoka,
Washington, Ramsey, Hennepin,
McLeod, Carver, Scott, Dakota, Sibley,
LeSueur, and Rice Counties, Minnesota,
within and adjacent to the Minneapolis
Customs and Border Protection port of
entry, and FTZ 119’s existing Sites 1–3
and 7–10 would be categorized as
magnet sites;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 34649–34650, 6/14/
2011) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 119
under the alternative site framework is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the
overall general-purpose zone project,
and to a five-year ASF sunset provision
for magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2–3 and 7–10 if not
activated by October 4, 2016.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
October 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
Attest:
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1790]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
119 Under Alternative Site Framework,
Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. 2011–27299 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–840]
Certain Orange Juice From Brazil;
Notice of Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blaine Wiltse or Hector Rodriguez, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6345 or (202) 482–
0629, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 27, 2011, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published a
notice of initiation of administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain orange juice from Brazil. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 76 FR 23545 (Apr. 27, 2011). The
period of review is March 1, 2010,
through February 28, 2011, and the
preliminary results are currently due no
later than December 1, 2011. The review
covers three producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise to the United
States.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping order within 245 days after
the last day of the anniversary month of
the date of publication of the order.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further
provides, however, that the Department
may extend the 245-day period up to
365 days if it determines it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the foregoing time period. We
determine that it is not practicable to
complete this administrative review
within the time limits mandated by
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because
we require more time to issue
supplemental questionnaires to certain
of the respondents and analyze their
responses. Therefore, we have fully
extended the deadline for completing
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Notices
the preliminary results until March 30,
2012. The deadline for the final results
of the review continues to be 120 days
after the publication of the preliminary
results.
This extension notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 14, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–27295 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–848]
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Intent
To Rescind Review in Part
Correction
In notice document 2011–26069
appearing on pages 62349 through
62356 in the issue of Friday, October 7,
2011 make the following correction:
On page 62349, in the second column,
the subject heading should read as set
forth above.
[FR Doc. C1–2011–26069 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
remands). On November 9, 2010, Essar
Steel Limited (Essar) appealed the CIT’s
decision. See United States Steel
Corporation, et al. v. United States et al.
and Essar Steel Limited v. United States
et al., Consol. Court No. 08–0239
Appeal (November 9, 2010). On July 7,
2011, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
sustained the Department’s
redetermination. See United States Steel
Corporation, et al. v. United States et al.
and Essar Steel Limited v. United States
et al., CAFC 11–1074 Affirmed, Rule 36
(July 7, 2011).
The Department is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
the countervailing duty order on certain
hot-rolled carbon steel flat products
(HRCS) from India covering the January
1, 2006, through December 31, 2006,
period of review (2006 POR) with
respect to Essar, to reflect the CIT’s
decision in Essar. See Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from
India: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
40295 (July 14, 2008) (Final Results),
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (I&D Memorandum).
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–3338.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Background
International Trade Administration
On July 14, 2008, the Department
published its final results in the
countervailing duty administrative
review of HRCS from India covering the
2006 POR. See Final Results. Following
publication of the Final Results,
respondent Essar, filed a lawsuit with
the CIT challenging the Department’s
Final Results. See Essar. At issue in the
litigation was the Department’s
calculation of the government price for
iron ore lumps and fines as well as
Essar’s purchases of lumps and fines
with respect to the program ‘‘Sale of
High-Grade Iron Ore for less Than
Adequate Remuneration.’’ See Final
Results, and accompanying I&D
Memorandum at ‘‘Sale of High-Grade
Iron Ore for Less Than Adequate
Remuneration’’ section and Comment 4.
After a court ordered remand, the
Department issued its final results of
redetermination on July 15, 2010. See
Final Results of Redetermination
Pursuant to Court Remand, dated July
15, 2010 (found at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/
remands); and Essar. In its remand
[C–533–821]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products From India: Amended Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review Pursuant to
Court Decision
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 13, 2010, the
United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) sustained the Department of
Commerce’s (the Department’s)
redetermination pursuant to the CIT’s
remand in United States Steel
Corporation, et al. v. United States et al.
and Essar Steel Limited v. United
States. See United States Steel
Corporation, et al. v. United States et al.
and Essar Steel Limited v. United States
et al., Slip Op. 10–104 (Essar); see also
Final Results of Redetermination
Pursuant to Court Remand, dated July
15, 2010 (found at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65497
redetermination, the Department made
redeterminations with respect to the
calculation of the government price for
iron ore lumps and fines as well as
Essar’s purchase of iron ore lumps and
high-grade iron ore fines from the
National Mineral Development
Corporation (NMDC). Specifically, we
adjusted our iron ore calculations to
measure the adequacy of remuneration
of sales of lumps and fines by the
Government of India (GOI) to Essar to
include the Central Sales Tax for Essar’s
purchase of iron ore lumps and highgrade iron ore fines from the NMDC and
to include import duties payable on iron
ore with regard to the corresponding
benchmark prices. Then, we corrected
the government price for iron ore lumps
and fines to address erroneous freight
calculations for Essar’s purchases of
iron ore from NMDC. Lastly, for fines
purchases from NMDC made on or after
the date the slurry pipeline became
operational, we replaced the per metric
ton (MT) rail cost with the per MT
slurry transportation costs. See Certain
Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products
From India: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review, 75 FR 59689
(September 28, 2010). The Department’s
redetermination resulted in changes to
the Final Results for Essar’s net subsidy
rate concerning the sale of iron ore for
less than adequate remuneration
program from 13.21 percent to 19.35
percent. Therefore, Essar’s total net
countervailable subsidy rate from the
Final Results, 17.50 percent, increased
by 6.14 percentage points, to a total net
countervailable subsidy rate of 23.64
percent. Id.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, the total net countervailable
subsidy for Essar for the period January
1, 2006, through December 31, 2006, is
23.64 percent. Because the cash deposit
rate of 22.19 percent, which was
determined for Essar in the amended
final results of the administrative review
covering the period January 1, 2007,
through December 31, 2007 (2007 POR)
supersedes the cash deposit rate for the
2006 POR, there is no change in Essar’s
cash deposit rate. See Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From
India: Notice of Court Decision not in
Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review and Notice of
Amended final Results of
Administrative Review Pursuant to
Court Decision, 76 FR 7820 (February
11, 2011). The Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to continue to collect cash
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65496-65497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27295]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-840]
Certain Orange Juice From Brazil; Notice of Extension of Time
Limits for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Wiltse or Hector Rodriguez, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6345 or (202) 482-0629, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 27, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published a notice of initiation of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain orange juice from Brazil. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 23545 (Apr. 27,
2011). The period of review is March 1, 2010, through February 28,
2011, and the preliminary results are currently due no later than
December 1, 2011. The review covers three producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise to the United States.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the Department shall make a preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an antidumping order within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of the date of publication of the
order. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further provides, however, that
the Department may extend the 245-day period up to 365 days if it
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the
foregoing time period. We determine that it is not practicable to
complete this administrative review within the time limits mandated by
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because we require more time to issue
supplemental questionnaires to certain of the respondents and analyze
their responses. Therefore, we have fully extended the deadline for
completing
[[Page 65497]]
the preliminary results until March 30, 2012. The deadline for the
final results of the review continues to be 120 days after the
publication of the preliminary results.
This extension notice is published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 14, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-27295 Filed 10-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P