Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 64105 [2011-26669]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Notices
• Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 6 to
8 p.m., Hilton Salt Lake City Center, 255
South West Temple, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84101.
• Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 6
to 8 p.m., Ramada Las Vegas, 325 East
Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, Nevada
89169.
• Thursday, November 17, 2011, 6 to
8 p.m., Sheraton Denver West Hotel, 360
Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado
80228.
Public Disclosure
Before including a name, address,
telephone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information
in the comment, please be advised that
the entire comment—including personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
Anne J. Castle,
Assistant Secretary—Water and Science.
Rachel Jacobson,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Fish and Wildlife
and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2011–26651 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Third
Review)]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India;
Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year
Review Concerning the Antidumping
Duty Order on Stainless Steel Wire
Rod From India
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on stainless steel wire rod
from India would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Petronzio (202–205–3176),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On October 6, 2011,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (76
FR 38686, July 1, 2011) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
November 10, 2011 and made available
to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this
review. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson concluded that
both the domestic group response and the
respondent group response for this review were
adequate and voted for a full review.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Carpenter Technology Corporation,
North American Stainless, and Mukand Ltd. to be
individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64105
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before
November 16, 2011 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
review nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
November 16, 2011. However, should
the Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please consult the Commission’s
rules, as amended, 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6,
2011) and the Commission’s Handbook
on Filing Procedures, 76 FR 62092 (Oct.
6, 2011) available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 11, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–26669 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–410 (Third
Review)]
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe From
Taiwan; Scheduling of an Expedited
Five-Year Review Concerning the
Antidumping Duty Order on LightWalled Rectangular Pipe From Taiwan
United States International
Trade Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 200 (Monday, October 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 64105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26669]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-638 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India; Scheduling of an Expedited
Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless
Steel Wire Rod From India
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod from India
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application,
consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201,
subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E,
and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Petronzio (202-205-3176),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On October 6, 2011, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(76 FR 38686, July 1, 2011) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to
section 751(c)(3) of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
\2\ Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson concluded that both the
domestic group response and the respondent group response for this
review were adequate and voted for a full review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
November 10, 2011 and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\3\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before November 16, 2011 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by November 16, 2011. However, should the Department of Commerce extend
the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review,
the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. Please
consult the Commission's rules, as amended, 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011)
and the Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures, 76 FR 62092 (Oct.
6, 2011) available on the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by
Carpenter Technology Corporation, North American Stainless, and
Mukand Ltd. to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 11, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-26669 Filed 10-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P