Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 63902-63904 [2011-26654]

Download as PDF 63902 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices and practical pre-harvest practices, the identification of incentives for producers and processors to adopt such measures, and the establishment of an ongoing dialogue regarding pre-harvest food safety. Also, FSIS will present a summary of the recent input from the National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection on pre-harvest issues. FSIS, APHIS, and ARS have developed the following questions for discussion at the meeting: What factors influence shedding of Salmonella and Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 and other Shiga toxinproducing E. coli (STEC) (e.g., age of cattle, stress conditions)? What effective and practical treatments or mitigation measures are available to reduce the pathogen load in general, and Salmonella and STECs specifically? How can producers, processors, and government work together to incentivize pre-harvest food safety practices and interventions? A key outcome of this meeting will be to provide the agencies with the information to develop a ‘‘best practice’’ guidance document. The draft guidance document would be made available for comment-and ultimately for use by all stakeholders. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES USDA Nondiscrimination Statement USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, and audiotape) should contact USDA’s Target Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TTY). To file a written complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Additional Public Notification FSIS will announce this notice online through the FSIS Web page located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/ regulations_&_policies/ Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp. FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 regulations, Federal Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that could affect or would be of interest to constituents and stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free electronic mail subscription service for industry, trade groups, consumer interest groups, health professionals, and other individuals who have asked to be included. The Update is also available on the FSIS Web page. In addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and information. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/ News_&_Events/Email_Subscription/. Options range from recalls to export information to regulations, directives and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves, and have the option to password protect their accounts. Done at Washington, DC, on: October 6, 2011. Alfred V. Almanza, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2011–26541 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–008] Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 8, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. See Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan, 76 FR 33210 (June 8, 2011) (Preliminary Results). This review covers one company, Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes from the Preliminary Results. We have listed the final dumping margin below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: October 14, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/ AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1131 and (202) 482–0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 8, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan for the period of review (POR) of May 1, 2009, to April 30, 2010. See Preliminary Results. In response to the Department’s invitation to comment on the preliminary results of this review, respondent Yieh Phui filed its case brief on July 15, 2011. Domestic producer U.S. Steel Corporation filed its rebuttal brief on July 22, 2011. No parties requested a hearing. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan, which are defined as: Welded carbon steel pipes and tubes, of circular cross section, with walls not thinner than 0.065 inch, and 0.375 inch or more but not over 4.5 inches in outside diameter, currently classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this order is dispositive. Cost of Production As discussed in the Preliminary Results, we found that Yieh Phui made home market sales of the foreign like product during the POR at prices below its costs of production (COP) within the meaning of section 773(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Preliminary Results, 76 FR at 33211. Those results apply to these final results, given that no changes have been made from the calculations made in the Preliminary Results. We found 20 percent or more of the respondent’s sales of a given product during the reporting period were at prices less than the weighted-average COP for this period. Thus, we determined that these below-cost sales were made in ‘‘substantial quantities’’ within an extended period of time and at prices which did not permit the recovery of all costs within a reasonable E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices period of time in the normal course of trade. See sections 773(b)(1) and (2) of the Act. Therefore, for purposes of these final results, we continue to find that Yieh Phui made below-cost sales not in the ordinary course of trade. Consequently, we disregarded these sales for Yieh Phui and used the remaining sales as the basis for determining normal value (NV) pursuant to section 773(b)(1) of the Act. For those U.S. sales of subject merchandise for which there were no matches to home market sales in the ordinary course of trade, we compared export prices to constructed value in accordance with section 773(a)(4) of the Act. See Preliminary Results, 76 FR 33212. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties in this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum (Decision Memorandum) from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated October 6, 2011, which is hereby adopted by this notice. All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit in room 7046 of the main Department building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/ ia/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes in the margin calculations. Final Results of Review We determine the following percentage margin exists for the period May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 Manufacturer/Exporter WeightedAverage margin (percentage) Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. ................................ 11.47 Assessment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has calculated an assessment rate on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions for the company subject to this review directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. Because Yieh Phui did not report the entered value of its sales, we calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales of each importer (or customer) and dividing each of these amounts by the respective quantities (by weight) associated with those sales. To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importerspecific (or customer-specific) ad valorem ratios based on estimated entered values. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review for each importer (or customer) for which the importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad valorem ratio is above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad valorem ratio is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by the company included in the final results where the reviewed companies did not know the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there was no rate calculated in this review for the intermediary involved in the transaction. See id., 68 FR at 23954. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63903 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results of administrative review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the reviewed company will be the rate listed above; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, but was covered in a previous review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984). These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1 63904 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 6, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix I—List of Issues in Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Date of Sale for U.S. Sales. Comment 2: Zeroing. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Coral Reef Conservation Program Administration National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 13, 2011. SUMMARY: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Jenny Waddell at (301) 713– 3155, extension 150, or Jenny.Waddell@noaagov. ADDRESSES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Abstract The Coral Reef Conservation Act of 2000 (Act) was enacted to provide a framework for conserving coral reefs. The Coral Reef Conservation Grant Program, under the Act, provides funds to broad-based applicants with experience in coral reef conservation to conduct activities to protect and conserve coral reef ecosystems. The information submitted is used to 15:20 Oct 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 II. Method of Collection The information may be submitted via e-mail, mail or fax. III. Data [FR Doc. 2011–26654 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am] VerDate Mar<15>2010 determine: (1) Whether the applicant qualifies for a waiver of matching funds, and (2) if a proposed project is consistent with the coral reef conservation priorities of authorities with jurisdiction over the area where the project will be carried out. OMB Control Number: 0648–0448. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a currently approved collection). Affected Public: Non-profit institutions; federal government, state, local, or tribal government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 53. Estimated Time per Response: Matching funds waiver request, 30 minutes; proposal comment, 1 hour and 30 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 106. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $250 in recordkeeping/reporting costs. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: October 11, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2011–26616 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XA761 Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meetings. AGENCY: The Pacific Council and its advisory entities will hold public meetings. SUMMARY: The Pacific Council and its advisory entities will meet November 1– 7, 2011. The Pacific Council meeting will begin on Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., reconvening each day through Monday, November 7, 2011. All meetings are open to the public, except a closed session to be held at the end of the scheduled agenda on Thursday, November 3 to address litigation and personnel matters. The Pacific Council will meet as late as necessary each day to complete its scheduled business. ADDRESSES: Meetings of the Pacific Council and its advisory entities will be held at the Hilton Orange County Costa Mesa Hotel, 3050 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626; telephone: (714) 540– 7000. Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Donald O. McIsaac, Executive Director; telephone: (503) 820–2280 or (866) 806– 7204 toll free; or access the Pacific Council website, https:// www.pcouncil.org for the current meeting location, proposed agenda, and meeting briefing materials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following items are on the Pacific Council agenda, but not necessarily in this order: DATES: A. Call to Order 1. Opening Remarks and Introductions 2. Roll Call 3. Executive Director’s Report 4. Approve Agenda B. Open Comment Comments on Non-Agenda Items C. Salmon Management 1. 2012 Methodology Review 2. Preseason Salmon Management Schedule for 2012 E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63902-63904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26654]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-008]


Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 8, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes 
from Taiwan. See Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan, 76 FR 
33210 (June 8, 2011) (Preliminary Results). This review covers one 
company, Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui). Based on our 
analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes from the 
Preliminary Results. We have listed the final dumping margin below in 
the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''

DATES: Effective Date: October 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1131 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 8, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan 
for the period of review (POR) of May 1, 2009, to April 30, 2010. See 
Preliminary Results. In response to the Department's invitation to 
comment on the preliminary results of this review, respondent Yieh Phui 
filed its case brief on July 15, 2011. Domestic producer U.S. Steel 
Corporation filed its rebuttal brief on July 22, 2011. No parties 
requested a hearing.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is certain circular welded 
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan, which are defined as: Welded 
carbon steel pipes and tubes, of circular cross section, with walls not 
thinner than 0.065 inch, and 0.375 inch or more but not over 4.5 inches 
in outside diameter, currently classified under Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS 
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise subject to this order is 
dispositive.

Cost of Production

    As discussed in the Preliminary Results, we found that Yieh Phui 
made home market sales of the foreign like product during the POR at 
prices below its costs of production (COP) within the meaning of 
section 773(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See 
Preliminary Results, 76 FR at 33211. Those results apply to these final 
results, given that no changes have been made from the calculations 
made in the Preliminary Results.
    We found 20 percent or more of the respondent's sales of a given 
product during the reporting period were at prices less than the 
weighted-average COP for this period. Thus, we determined that these 
below-cost sales were made in ``substantial quantities'' within an 
extended period of time and at prices which did not permit the recovery 
of all costs within a reasonable

[[Page 63903]]

period of time in the normal course of trade. See sections 773(b)(1) 
and (2) of the Act. Therefore, for purposes of these final results, we 
continue to find that Yieh Phui made below-cost sales not in the 
ordinary course of trade. Consequently, we disregarded these sales for 
Yieh Phui and used the remaining sales as the basis for determining 
normal value (NV) pursuant to section 773(b)(1) of the Act. For those 
U.S. sales of subject merchandise for which there were no matches to 
home market sales in the ordinary course of trade, we compared export 
prices to constructed value in accordance with section 773(a)(4) of the 
Act. See Preliminary Results, 76 FR 33212.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested 
parties in this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum (Decision Memorandum) from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, dated October 6, 2011, which is hereby adopted by this 
notice. All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 
A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. 
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA 
ACCESS''). Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit 
in room 7046 of the main Department building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Issues and 
Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no 
changes in the margin calculations.

Final Results of Review

    We determine the following percentage margin exists for the period 
May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted- Average
                Manufacturer/Exporter                        margin
                                                          (percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd........................             11.47
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has calculated an 
assessment rate on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to 
issue appropriate assessment instructions for the company subject to 
this review directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
the final results of this review.
    Because Yieh Phui did not report the entered value of its sales, we 
calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) per-unit duty 
assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties 
calculated for the examined sales of each importer (or customer) and 
dividing each of these amounts by the respective quantities (by weight) 
associated with those sales. To determine whether the duty assessment 
rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer-specific (or customer-
specific) ad valorem ratios based on estimated entered values.
    We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review for each importer (or 
customer) for which the importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad 
valorem ratio is above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent). 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the 
importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad valorem ratio is de minimis 
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent).
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment 
Policy Notice). This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by the company included in the 
final results where the reviewed companies did not know the merchandise 
it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 
exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there was no rate calculated in this review for the 
intermediary involved in the transaction. See id., 68 FR at 23954.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these final results for all shipments of the subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the publication date of these final results of administrative 
review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash 
deposit rate for the reviewed company will be the rate listed above; 
(2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, but was 
covered in a previous review or the original less-than-fair-value 
(LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the 
original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Certain 
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Antidumping 
Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984). These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

[[Page 63904]]

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: October 6, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I--List of Issues in Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Date of Sale for U.S. Sales.
Comment 2: Zeroing.

[FR Doc. 2011-26654 Filed 10-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.