Certain Flat Panel Display Devices, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 63657 [2011-26445]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2011 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–793] Certain Flat Panel Display Devices, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) granting Complainant’s unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on July 28, 2011, based on a complaint filed by AU Optronics Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan and AU Optronics Corporation America of Milpitas, California (collectively, ‘‘AU Optronics’’). 76 FR 45296 (July 28, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain flat panel display devices, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,281,955; sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Oct 12, 2011 Jkt 226001 7,697,093; 7,286,192; 6,818,967; 7,199,854; and 7,663,729. The complaint named as respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; AT&T, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (‘‘AT&T’’); Best Buy Co., Inc. of Richfield, Minnesota (‘‘Best Buy’’); and BrandsMart USA, Inc. of Hollywood, Florida (‘‘BrandsMart’’). On August 31, 2011, AU Optronics filed an unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add as respondents: AT&T Mobility LLC of Atlanta, Georgia; Best Buy Stores, L.P. of Richfield, Minnesota; BestBuy.com, LLC of Eden Prairie, Minnesota; Best Buy Purchasing, LLC of Richfield, Minnesota; and Interbond Corporation of America of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A. (collectively, ‘‘New Respondents’’), and to terminate the investigation as to AT&T, Best Buy, and BrandsMart. On September 15, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the motion. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), good cause exists to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Accordingly, the New Respondents are added as respondents to this investigation and AT&T, Best Buy, and BrandsMart are terminated from the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: October 6, 2011. By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–26445 Filed 10–12–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–809] Certain Devices for Mobile Data Communication; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63657 Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 31, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Openwave Systems Inc. of Redwood City, California. Supplements to the complaint were received on September 1, 16, and 19, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain devices for mobile data communication by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,233,608 (‘‘the ‘608 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,289,212 (‘‘the ‘212 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,405,037 (‘‘the ‘037 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,430,409 (‘‘the ‘409 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 6,625,447 (‘‘the ‘447 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. SUMMARY: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: the Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 63657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26445]



[[Page 63657]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-793]


Certain Flat Panel Display Devices, and Products Containing the 
Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion for Leave To 
Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 6) 
granting Complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on July 28, 2011, based on a complaint filed by AU Optronics 
Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan and AU Optronics Corporation America of 
Milpitas, California (collectively, ``AU Optronics''). 76 FR 45296 
(July 28, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain flat panel display devices, and products 
containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of 
United States Patent Nos. 6,281,955; 7,697,093; 7,286,192; 6,818,967; 
7,199,854; and 7,663,729. The complaint named as respondents Samsung 
Electronics Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Korea; Samsung Electronics America, 
Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; AT&T, Inc. of Dallas, Texas 
(``AT&T''); Best Buy Co., Inc. of Richfield, Minnesota (``Best Buy''); 
and BrandsMart USA, Inc. of Hollywood, Florida (``BrandsMart'').
    On August 31, 2011, AU Optronics filed an unopposed motion for 
leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add as 
respondents: AT&T Mobility LLC of Atlanta, Georgia; Best Buy Stores, 
L.P. of Richfield, Minnesota; BestBuy.com, LLC of Eden Prairie, 
Minnesota; Best Buy Purchasing, LLC of Richfield, Minnesota; and 
Interbond Corporation of America of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, d/b/a 
BrandsMart U.S.A. (collectively, ``New Respondents''), and to terminate 
the investigation as to AT&T, Best Buy, and BrandsMart.
    On September 15, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the 
motion. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 
CFR 210.14(b)), good cause exists to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Accordingly, 
the New Respondents are added as respondents to this investigation and 
AT&T, Best Buy, and BrandsMart are terminated from the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    Issued: October 6, 2011.

    By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-26445 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P