Sulfanilic Acid From China and India, 62843 [2011-26114]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Notices Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has received a complaint filed on behalf of Westinghouse Solar, Inc. on October 4, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated solar systems and components thereof. The complaint names as respondents Zep Solar, Inc. of CA; Canadian Solar Inc. of Canada; and Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. of CA. The complainant, proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed five pages in length, on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:47 Oct 07, 2011 Jkt 226001 with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2847’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/handbook_on_electronic_ filing.pdf ). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 4, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–26097 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62843 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731– TA–538 and 561 (Third Review)] Sulfanilic Acid From China and India Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2011 (76 FR 18248) and determined on July 5, 2011 that it would conduct expedited reviews (76 FR 50756, August 16, 2011). The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on October 4, 2011. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4270 (October 2011), entitled Sulfanilic Acid From China and India: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731–TA–538 and 561 (Third Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 4, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–26114 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Morgan Stanley; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in United States of America v. Morgan Stanley, Civil Action No. 11–Civ–6875. On September 30, 2011, the United States filed a 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Com mission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 62843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Third Review)]


Sulfanilic Acid From China and India

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. Sec.  1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order 
on sulfanilic acid from India and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic 
acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Com mission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2011 (76 FR 
18248) and determined on July 5, 2011 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (76 FR 50756, August 16, 2011).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on October 4, 2011. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4270 (October 2011), 
entitled Sulfanilic Acid From China and India: Investigation Nos. 701-
TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 4, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-26114 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P