Sulfanilic Acid From China and India, 62843 [2011-26114]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Notices
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
filed on behalf of Westinghouse Solar,
Inc. on October 4, 2011. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain integrated solar
systems and components thereof. The
complaint names as respondents Zep
Solar, Inc. of CA; Canadian Solar Inc. of
Canada; and Canadian Solar (USA) Inc.
of CA.
The complainant, proposed
respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited
to file comments, not to exceed five
pages in length, on any public interest
issues raised by the complaint.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation would negatively affect the
public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production
of like or directly competitive articles in
the United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, five
business days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Submissions should
refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No.
2847’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. The
Commission’s rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means only to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the
rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
documents/handbook_on_electronic_
filing.pdf ). Persons with questions
regarding electronic filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10,
210.50(a)(4)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 4, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–26097 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62843
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731–
TA–538 and 561 (Third Review)]
Sulfanilic Acid From China and India
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on sulfanilic acid from India and
antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic
acid from China and India would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on April 1, 2011 (76 FR 18248)
and determined on July 5, 2011 that it
would conduct expedited reviews (76
FR 50756, August 16, 2011).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on October 4,
2011. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4270
(October 2011), entitled Sulfanilic Acid
From China and India: Investigation
Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731–TA–538 and
561 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 4, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–26114 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
United States v. Morgan Stanley;
Proposed Final Judgment and
Competitive Impact Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment, Stipulation and
Competitive Impact Statement have
been filed with the United States
District Court for the Southern District
of New York in United States of
America v. Morgan Stanley, Civil Action
No. 11–Civ–6875. On September 30,
2011, the United States filed a
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Com
mission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 62843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26114]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Third Review)]
Sulfanilic Acid From China and India
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. Sec. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order
on sulfanilic acid from India and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic
acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Com mission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2011 (76 FR
18248) and determined on July 5, 2011 that it would conduct expedited
reviews (76 FR 50756, August 16, 2011).
The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to
the Secretary of Commerce on October 4, 2011. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4270 (October 2011),
entitled Sulfanilic Acid From China and India: Investigation Nos. 701-
TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 4, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-26114 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
