In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation; Issuance of General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders, 60871-60872 [2011-25281]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–740]
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–391A–393A
(Third Review)]
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
France, Germany, and Italy;
Termination of Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The subject five-year reviews
were initiated in August 2011 to
determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on ball
bearings and parts thereof from France,
Germany, and Italy would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. The Department of
Commerce published notice that it was
revoking the order effective September
15, 2011, because ‘‘no domestic
interested party filed a notice of intent
to participate in response to the notice
of initiation of the sunset reviews by the
applicable deadline.’’ (76 FR 57019).
Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), the subject reviews are
terminated.
Effective Date: September 21,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov).
Authority: These reviews are being
terminated under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.69 of the
Commission’s rules (19 CFR 207.69).
Issued: September 26, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–25206 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
In the Matter of Certain Toner
Cartridges and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Final
Determination of Violation of Section
337; Termination of Investigation;
Issuance of General Exclusion Order
and Cease and Desist Orders
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of
Section 337 in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission has
determined to issue a general exclusion
order and cease and desist orders. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on October 12, 2010, based on a
complaint filed by Lexmark
International, Inc. of Lexington,
Kentucky (‘‘Lexmark’’). 75 FR 62564–65
(Oct. 12, 2010). The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(‘‘Section 337’’), in the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain toner cartridges and components
thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
5,337,032 (‘‘the ‘032 patent’’); 5,634,169
(‘‘the ‘169 patent’’); 5,758,233 (‘‘the ‘233
patent’’); 5,768,661 (‘‘the ‘661 patent’’);
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60871
5,802,432 (‘‘the ‘432 patent’’); 5,875,378
(‘‘the ‘378 patent’’); 6,009,291 (‘‘the ‘291
patent’’); 6,078,771 (‘‘the ‘771 patent’’);
6,397,015 (‘‘the ‘015 patent’’); 6,459,876
(‘‘the ‘876 patent’’); 6,816,692 (‘‘the ‘692
patent’’); 6,871,031 (‘‘the ‘031 patent’’);
7,139,510 (‘‘the ‘510 patent’’); 7,233,760
(‘‘the ‘760 patent’’); and 7,305,204 (‘‘the
‘204 patent’’). The complaint further
alleges the existence of a domestic
industry.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Ninestar Image Co. Ltd., (a/k/a Ninestar
Technology Co., Ltd.) of Guangdong,
China (‘‘Ninestar’’); Ninestar Image Int’l,
Ltd. of Guangdong, China (‘‘Ninestar
Image Int’l’’); Seine Image International
Co. Ltd. of New Territories, Hong Kong
(‘‘Seine Image’’); Ninestar Technology
Company, Ltd. of Piscataway, New
Jersey (‘‘Ninestar Tech’’); Ziprint Image
Corporation of Walnut, California
(‘‘Ziprint’’); Nano Pacific Corporation of
South San Francisco, California (‘‘Nano
Pacific’’); IJSS Inc. (d/b/a
TonerZone.com Inc. and Inkjet
Superstore) of Los Angeles, California
(‘‘IJSS’’); Chung Pal Shin (d/b/a Ink
Master) of Cerritos, California (‘‘Ink
Master’’); Nectron International, Inc. of
Sugarland, Texas (‘‘Nectron’’); Quality
Cartridges Inc. of Brooklyn, New York
(‘‘QCI’’); Direct Billing International
Incorporated (d/b/a Office Supply
Outfitter and d/b/a The Ribbon
Connection) of Carlsbad, California
(‘‘Direct Billing’’); E-Toner Mart, Inc. of
South El Monte, California (‘‘E-Toner’’);
Alpha Image Tech of South El Monte,
California (‘‘Alpha Image’’); ACM
Technologies, Inc. of Corona, California
(‘‘ACM’’); Virtual Imaging Products Inc.
of North York, Ontario; Acecom Inc.—
San Antonio (d/b/a Inksell.com) of San
Antonio, Texas (‘‘Acecom’’); Ink
Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC (d/
b/a Ink Technologies LLC) of Dayton,
Ohio (‘‘Ink Tech’’); Jahwa Electronics
Co., Ltd of Chungchongbuk-do, South
Korea; Huizhou Jahwa Electronics Co.,
Ltd. of Guangdong Province, China;
Copy Technologies, Inc. of Atlanta,
Georgia (‘‘Copy Tech’’); Laser Toner
Technology, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia
(‘‘LTT’’); C&R Service, Incorporated of
Corinth, Texas (‘‘C&R’’); Print-Rite
Holdings Ltd., of Chai Wan, Hong Kong
(‘‘Print-Rite’’); and Union Technology
Int’l (M.C.O.) Co., Ltd. of Rodrigo
Rodrigues, Macao.
The Commission determined not to
review an initial determination
terminating the investigation as to PrintRite based on a settlement agreement.
Commission Notice (Jan. 10, 2011)
(Order No. 11). The Commission
determined to review and affirm several
initial determinations finding several
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
60872
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Notices
respondents in default under
Commission Rules 210.16(a)(2) and
(b)(2) based on those respondents’
elections to default. Commission Notice
(Mar. 3, 2011) (Order Nos. 15–16);
Commission Notice (Mar. 11, 2011)
(Order Nos. 17–18); Commission Notice
(Mar. 11, 2011) (Order No. 19). The
Commission determined not to review
two other initial determinations finding
the remaining respondents in default.
Commission Notice (Mar. 23, 2011)
(Order No. 23); Commission Notice
(April 6, 2011) (Order No. 24).
On April 25, 2011, Lexmark filed a
motion pursuant to Commission Rule
210.18 (19 CFR 210.18) for summary
determination of violation of Section
337 and requesting issuance of a general
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders against defaulting respondents.
On May 5, 2011, the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a
response supporting the motion, on the
condition that Lexmark submit the
following: (1) A declaration from its
expert, Charles Reinholtz, averring that
the statements in his expert report are
true and correct, and (2) a declaration
from Andrew Gardner that the accused
products do not have any substantial
non-infringing uses. Lexmark filed the
submissions per the IA’s request.
On June 1, 2011, the ALJ issued an
initial determination (Order No. 26)
(‘‘ID’’) granting Lexmark’s motion for
summary determination of violation of
Section 337. The ID also contained the
ALJ’s recommended determination on
remedy and bonding. Specifically, the
ALJ recommended issuance of a general
exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’) and cease and
desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’) against the
defaulting respondents. The ALJ further
recommended that the Commission set
a bond of 100 percent during the period
of Presidential review.
On July 12, 2011, the Commission
determined not to review the ID and
called for briefing on remedy, the public
interest, and bonding. 76 FR 41822–24
(July 15, 2011). On August 1, 2011,
Lexmark submitted an initial brief on
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding, requesting that the
Commission issue a GEO and CDOs and
set a bond of 100 percent during the
period of Presidential review. The brief
included a proposed GEO and a
proposed CDO. Also on August 1, 2011,
the IA submitted an initial brief on
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding, supporting Lexmark’s request
for a GEO and CDOs, as well as a bond
of 100 percent. The IA’s brief also
included a proposed GEO and a
proposed CDO.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief is the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
following: (1) A GEO under 19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(2), prohibiting the unlicensed
entry of toner cartridges and
components thereof that infringe one or
more of claim 1 of the ‘032 patent;
claims 1–3, 32, 33, 36, and 42 of the
‘169 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the ‘233
patent; claims 1 and 2 of the ‘661 patent;
claims 1–3 of the ‘432 patent; claims 1,
2, and 14 of the ‘378 patent; claims 1
and 2 of the ‘291 patent; claims 1, 2, 5,
6, 10, and 15 of the ‘771 patent; claims
1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, and 24 of
the ‘015 patent; claims 1–3 and 28 of the
‘876 patent; claim 1 of the ‘692 patent;
claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 of the ‘031
patent; claims 1 and 6 of the ‘510 patent;
claims 11, 12, and 14 of the ‘760 patent;
and claims 1, 7, 14, and 15 of the ‘204
patent; and (2) CDOs directed to
defaulting domestic respondents EToner, Alpha Image, Copy Tech, LTT,
C&R, ACM, Ink Master, Direct Billing,
Ink Tech, QCI, IJSS, Acecom, Ninestar
Tech, Ziprint, Nano Pacific, and
Nectron and defaulting foreign
respondents Ninestar, Ninestar Image
Int’l, and Seine Image.
The Commission has further
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in Section 337(d)
and (f) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f)) do not
preclude issuance of the GEO and the
CDOs. The Commission has determined
that the bond for temporary importation
during the period of Presidential review
(19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be in the
amount of 100 percent of the value of
the imported articles that are subject to
the order. The Commission’s orders
were delivered to the President and the
United States Trade Representative on
the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–50 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–25281 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–763]
In the Matter of Certain Radio Control
Hobby Transmitters and Receivers and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Issuance of Limited
Exclusion Order Against Infringing
Products of Respondents Found In
Default; Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has terminated the abovecaptioned investigation under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and has
issued a limited exclusion order against
infringing products of respondents
previously found in default, Koko
Technology, Ltd. (‘‘Koko’’) and Cyclone
Toy & Hobby (‘‘Cyclone’’) of China.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 9, 2011, based on a complaint
filed by Horizon Hobby, Inc.
(‘‘Horizon’’) of Champaign, Illinois. 76
FR 12995–96 (March 9, 2011). The
complaint, as amended, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain radio control
hobby transmitters and receivers and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60871-60872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-740]
In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337;
Termination of Investigation; Issuance of General Exclusion Order and
Cease and Desist Orders
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of Section 337 in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission has determined to issue a general
exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The investigation is
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on October 12, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Lexmark
International, Inc. of Lexington, Kentucky (``Lexmark''). 75 FR 62564-
65 (Oct. 12, 2010). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``Section 337''),
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
toner cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,337,032 (``the `032 patent'');
5,634,169 (``the `169 patent''); 5,758,233 (``the `233 patent'');
5,768,661 (``the `661 patent''); 5,802,432 (``the `432 patent'');
5,875,378 (``the `378 patent''); 6,009,291 (``the `291 patent'');
6,078,771 (``the `771 patent''); 6,397,015 (``the `015 patent'');
6,459,876 (``the `876 patent''); 6,816,692 (``the `692 patent'');
6,871,031 (``the `031 patent''); 7,139,510 (``the `510 patent'');
7,233,760 (``the `760 patent''); and 7,305,204 (``the `204 patent'').
The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry.
The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents
Ninestar Image Co. Ltd., (a/k/a Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd.) of
Guangdong, China (``Ninestar''); Ninestar Image Int'l, Ltd. of
Guangdong, China (``Ninestar Image Int'l''); Seine Image International
Co. Ltd. of New Territories, Hong Kong (``Seine Image''); Ninestar
Technology Company, Ltd. of Piscataway, New Jersey (``Ninestar Tech'');
Ziprint Image Corporation of Walnut, California (``Ziprint''); Nano
Pacific Corporation of South San Francisco, California (``Nano
Pacific''); IJSS Inc. (d/b/a TonerZone.com Inc. and Inkjet Superstore)
of Los Angeles, California (``IJSS''); Chung Pal Shin (d/b/a Ink
Master) of Cerritos, California (``Ink Master''); Nectron
International, Inc. of Sugarland, Texas (``Nectron''); Quality
Cartridges Inc. of Brooklyn, New York (``QCI''); Direct Billing
International Incorporated (d/b/a Office Supply Outfitter and d/b/a The
Ribbon Connection) of Carlsbad, California (``Direct Billing''); E-
Toner Mart, Inc. of South El Monte, California (``E-Toner''); Alpha
Image Tech of South El Monte, California (``Alpha Image''); ACM
Technologies, Inc. of Corona, California (``ACM''); Virtual Imaging
Products Inc. of North York, Ontario; Acecom Inc.--San Antonio (d/b/a
Inksell.com) of San Antonio, Texas (``Acecom''); Ink Technologies
Printer Supplies, LLC (d/b/a Ink Technologies LLC) of Dayton, Ohio
(``Ink Tech''); Jahwa Electronics Co., Ltd of Chungchongbuk-do, South
Korea; Huizhou Jahwa Electronics Co., Ltd. of Guangdong Province,
China; Copy Technologies, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (``Copy Tech'');
Laser Toner Technology, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (``LTT''); C&R
Service, Incorporated of Corinth, Texas (``C&R''); Print-Rite Holdings
Ltd., of Chai Wan, Hong Kong (``Print-Rite''); and Union Technology
Int'l (M.C.O.) Co., Ltd. of Rodrigo Rodrigues, Macao.
The Commission determined not to review an initial determination
terminating the investigation as to Print-Rite based on a settlement
agreement. Commission Notice (Jan. 10, 2011) (Order No. 11). The
Commission determined to review and affirm several initial
determinations finding several
[[Page 60872]]
respondents in default under Commission Rules 210.16(a)(2) and (b)(2)
based on those respondents' elections to default. Commission Notice
(Mar. 3, 2011) (Order Nos. 15-16); Commission Notice (Mar. 11, 2011)
(Order Nos. 17-18); Commission Notice (Mar. 11, 2011) (Order No. 19).
The Commission determined not to review two other initial
determinations finding the remaining respondents in default. Commission
Notice (Mar. 23, 2011) (Order No. 23); Commission Notice (April 6,
2011) (Order No. 24).
On April 25, 2011, Lexmark filed a motion pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.18 (19 CFR 210.18) for summary determination of violation of
Section 337 and requesting issuance of a general exclusion order and
cease and desist orders against defaulting respondents. On May 5, 2011,
the Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') filed a response
supporting the motion, on the condition that Lexmark submit the
following: (1) A declaration from its expert, Charles Reinholtz,
averring that the statements in his expert report are true and correct,
and (2) a declaration from Andrew Gardner that the accused products do
not have any substantial non-infringing uses. Lexmark filed the
submissions per the IA's request.
On June 1, 2011, the ALJ issued an initial determination (Order No.
26) (``ID'') granting Lexmark's motion for summary determination of
violation of Section 337. The ID also contained the ALJ's recommended
determination on remedy and bonding. Specifically, the ALJ recommended
issuance of a general exclusion order (``GEO'') and cease and desist
orders (``CDOs'') against the defaulting respondents. The ALJ further
recommended that the Commission set a bond of 100 percent during the
period of Presidential review.
On July 12, 2011, the Commission determined not to review the ID
and called for briefing on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 76
FR 41822-24 (July 15, 2011). On August 1, 2011, Lexmark submitted an
initial brief on remedy, the public interest, and bonding, requesting
that the Commission issue a GEO and CDOs and set a bond of 100 percent
during the period of Presidential review. The brief included a proposed
GEO and a proposed CDO. Also on August 1, 2011, the IA submitted an
initial brief on remedy, the public interest, and bonding, supporting
Lexmark's request for a GEO and CDOs, as well as a bond of 100 percent.
The IA's brief also included a proposed GEO and a proposed CDO.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief
is the following: (1) A GEO under 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(2), prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of toner cartridges and components thereof that
infringe one or more of claim 1 of the `032 patent; claims 1-3, 32, 33,
36, and 42 of the `169 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the `233 patent;
claims 1 and 2 of the `661 patent; claims 1-3 of the `432 patent;
claims 1, 2, and 14 of the `378 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the `291
patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, and 15 of the `771 patent; claims 1, 2,
7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, and 24 of the `015 patent; claims 1-3 and 28
of the `876 patent; claim 1 of the `692 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and
10 of the `031 patent; claims 1 and 6 of the `510 patent; claims 11,
12, and 14 of the `760 patent; and claims 1, 7, 14, and 15 of the `204
patent; and (2) CDOs directed to defaulting domestic respondents E-
Toner, Alpha Image, Copy Tech, LTT, C&R, ACM, Ink Master, Direct
Billing, Ink Tech, QCI, IJSS, Acecom, Ninestar Tech, Ziprint, Nano
Pacific, and Nectron and defaulting foreign respondents Ninestar,
Ninestar Image Int'l, and Seine Image.
The Commission has further determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in Section 337(d) and (f) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f))
do not preclude issuance of the GEO and the CDOs. The Commission has
determined that the bond for temporary importation during the period of
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be in the amount of 100
percent of the value of the imported articles that are subject to the
order. The Commission's orders were delivered to the President and the
United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.42-50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-25281 Filed 9-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
