Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order, 60108-60110 [2011-24866]
Download as PDF
60108
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices
• When the price of the underlying stock
is equal to or less than $20, permit $1 strike
price intervals with an exercise price up to
100% above and 100% below the price of the
underlying stock.6
Æ However, the above restriction would
not prohibit the listing of at least five strike
prices above and below the price of the
underlying stock per expiration month in an
option class.7
Æ For example, if the price of the
underlying stock is $2, the Exchange would
be permitted to list the following series: $1,
$2, $3, $4, $5, $6 and $7.8
• When the price of the underlying stock
is greater than $20, permit $1 strike price
intervals with an exercise price up to 50%
above and 50% below the price of the
underlying security up to $50.9
• For the purpose of adding strikes under
the Program, the ‘‘price of the underlying
stock’’ shall be measured in the same way as
‘‘the price of the underlying security’’ is as
set forth in Rule 5.5A(b)(i).10
• Prohibit the listing of additional series in
$1 strike price intervals if the underlying
stock closes at or above $50 in its primary
market and provide that additional series in
$1 strike price intervals may not be added
until the underlying stock closes again below
$50.11
The early 2011 expansion of the
Program permitted for some limited
listing of LEAPS in $1 strike price
intervals for classes that participate in
the Program. The Exchange is proposing
to simplify the language and provide
clearer examples. These changes are set
forth in proposed Rule 5.5.01(b)(2)(v).
For stocks in the Program, the
Proposal permits the Exchange to list
one $1 strike price interval between
each standard $5 strike interval, with
6 See
proposed Rule 5.5.01(a)(2)(i).
7 Id.
8 Id.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9 See
proposed Rule 5.5.01(a)(2)(ii).
10 See proposed Rule 5.5.01(a)(2)(iii). Rule
5.5A(b)(i) provides, ‘‘[t]he price of a security is
measured by: (1) For intra-day add-on series and
next-day series additions, the daily high and low of
all prices reported by all national securities
exchanges; (2) for new expiration months, the daily
high and low of all prices reported by all national
securities exchanges on the day the Exchange
determines it preliminary notification of new series;
and (3) for option series to be added as a result of
pre-market trading, the most recent share price
reported by all national securities exchanges
between 7:45 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. (Chicago time).’’
11 See proposed Rule 5.5.01(a)(2)(iv). The
Exchange believes that it is important to codify this
additional series criterion because there have been
conflicting interpretations among the exchanges
that have adopted similar programs. The $50 price
criterion for additional series was intended when
the Program was originally established (as a pilot)
in 2003. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
47991 (June 5, 2003), 68 FR 35243 (June 12, 2003)
(SR–CBOE–2001–60) (‘‘CBOE may list an additional
expiration month provide that the underlying stock
closes below $20 on its primary market on
expiration Friday. If the underlying stock closes at
or above $20 on expiration Friday, CBOE will not
list an additional month for a $1 strike series until
the stock again closes below $20.’’)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Sep 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
the $1 strike price interval being $2
above the standard strike for each
interval above the price of the
underlying stock, and $2 below the
standard strike for each interval below
the price of the underlying stock. The
proposed rule text defines these strikes
as ‘‘$2 wings.’’ For example, if the price
of the underlying stock is $24.50, the
Exchange may list the following
standard strikes in $5 intervals: $15,
$20, $25, $30 and $35. Between these
standard $5 strikes, the Exchange may
list the following $2 wings: $18, $27 and
$32.12
In addition, the proposal permits the
Exchange to list the $1 strike price
interval that is $2 above the standard
strike just below the underlying price at
the time of listing. In the above
example, since the standard strike just
below the underlying price ($24.50) is
$20, the Exchange may list a $22 strike.
The proposal also contains certain
non-substantive amendments to rule
text.
III. Discussion
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.13 Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,14 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The proposed rule change seeks to
simplify the Program, and thereby to
12 The Exchange notes that a $2 wing is not
permitted between the standard $20 and $25 strikes
in the above example. This is because the $2 wings
are added based on reference to the price of the
underlying and as being between the standard
strikes above and below the price of the underlying
stock. Since the price of the underlying stock
($24.50) straddles the standard strikes of $20 and
$25, this provision does not permit a $2 wing to be
listed between these standard strikes. Instead, a
separate provision, discussed in the next paragraph,
permits listing of a strike price between the
standard strikes that bracket the current underlying
price.
13 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reduce the possibility of confusion
among investors and market
participants. At the same time, the
Commission notes that the changes
proposed by CBOE would allow a
relatively modest increase to the total
number of series that may be listed
under the $1 Strike Interval Program,
and would not alter the range for which
$1 interval strikes are permitted to be
listed. The Commission also notes that
CBOE has represented that it has the
necessary systems capacity to support
the increase in new options series that
will result from the proposed
streamlining changes to the Program.
IV. Conclusion
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,15 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2011–
040) be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–24918 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Adopt a Market-Maker
Trade Prevention Order
September 22, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 15, 2011, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
15 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order.
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.org/legal), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
Market-Maker Trade Prevention
(‘‘MMTP’’) Order. The proposed MMTP
Order is an immediate-or-cancel order
containing a designation that prevents
incoming orders for a Market-Maker
from executing against resting quotes
and orders for the same Market-Maker.
The MMTP Order type designation is
intended to prevent a Market-Maker
from trading on both sides of the same
transaction. Orders would be marked
with the MMTP designation on an
order-by-order basis. An incoming
MMTP Order cannot interact with
interest resting on the book from the
same Market-Maker. An MMTP Order
that would trade against a resting quote
or order for the same Market-Maker will
be cancelled, as will the resting quote or
order. The MMTP Order will trade
against other tradable orders and quotes
entered by or on behalf of another
market participant (other than those
entered by or on behalf of the same
Market-Maker) in accordance with the
execution process described in
Exchange Rules 6.45 (Priority of Bids
and Offers—Allocation of Trades),
6.45A (Priority and Allocation of Equity
Option Trades on the CBOE Hybrid
System) and 6.45B (Priority and
Allocation of Trades in Index Options
and Options on ETFs on the CBOE
Hybrid System).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Sep 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
However, if the MMTP is received
while an order for the same MarketMaker is subject to Rule 6.13A, Simple
Auction Liaison (SAL), Rule 6.14,
Hybrid Agency Liaison (HAL)/Rule
6.14A, Hybrid Agency Liaison 2 (HAL2),
Rule 6.74A, Automated Improvement
Mechanism (‘‘AIM’’), and Rule 6.74B,
Solicitation Auction Mechanism (each
an ‘‘auction’’), only the MMTP Order
will be canceled. The order being
represented in the auction will not be
cancelled. This is because the order
being represented in the auction will
still be able to execute via the auction
mechanism against orders originating
from other market participants. As
auctions are designed to achieve price
improvement, the Exchange does not
want to interfere with the auction
process and cancel an order that is
already up for auction, since it can
achieve price improvement with an
order from another market participant.
For example, assume the Exchange’s
best bid and offer is $1.00–$1.20, 100
contracts on each side. A Market-Maker
marks an order to buy 100 contracts at
$1.20 with the MMTP distinction,
making it an MMTP Order. The MMTP
Order is submitted to the Exchange and
it would trade with a resting quote from
the same Market-Maker for 100
contracts offered at $1.20, then both the
order to buy and the resting offer quote
would be canceled. However, if the
resting offer quote from the same
Market-Maker was for only 60 contracts,
then 60 contracts from the order to buy
would be canceled (as would the resting
quote), but the other 40 contracts could
trade with the resting offer interest of
the other market participants.
As another example, assume a sell
order entered on behalf of a MarketMaker is subject to a HAL auction. A
Market-Maker marks an order to buy
with the MMTP distinction, making it
an MMTP Order. If this incoming
MMTP Order is received while the
auction is in progress and the MMTP
Order would otherwise trade with the
order that is subject to the HAL auction,
then only the MMTP Order would be
cancelled. The order being represented
in the auction would not be canceled.
At this time, the Exchange intends to
identify an incoming MMTP Order as
being for the same Market-Maker if the
MMTP Order and resting quote or order
share any of the following: (1) User
acronym, (2) login ID, or (3) sub-account
code. Each Market-Maker is assigned its
own acronym (sometimes multiple
acronyms). However, a Market-Maker
may have multiple different login IDs or
sub-account codes. A login ID is the
session through which a Market-Maker
routes orders to the Exchange. A
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60109
Market-Maker may elect to use different
login IDs to route different types of
communications to the Exchange. For
example, a Market-Maker may choose to
use login ID #1 for all orders it sends to
the Exchange and login ID #2 for all
quotes it sends to the Exchange. Or the
Market-Maker may be much more
specific, and use different login IDs for
different types of orders and quotes. A
sub-account code is simply a field on
each order or quote that lists the
account into which a trade clears at the
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’).
A Market-Maker may have different subaccount codes for each trader it
employs, so that the Market-Maker may
track each trader’s activity. Finally,
Market-Makers sometimes use different
acronyms but clear into the same
accounts (thereby using the same subaccounts codes).
Allowing Market-Makers to designate
orders as MMTP Orders is intended to
allow firms to better manage order flow
and prevent unwanted executions
resulting from the interaction of
executable buy and sell trading interest
for the same Market-Maker, as well as
prevent the potential for (or appearance
of) ‘‘wash sales’’ that may occur as a
result of the velocity of trading in
today’s high speed marketplace. When a
Market-Maker is preparing to submit an
order, the Market-Maker may not know
whether or not his order is going to
trade against his own resting quote.
Further, many Market-Makers have
multiple connections into the Exchange
due to capacity- and speed-related
demands. Orders routed by the same
Market-Makers via different connections
may, in certain circumstances, trade
against each other. Finally, the
Exchange notes that offering the MMTP
modifiers will streamline certain
regulatory functions by reducing false
positive results that may occur on
Exchange-generated wash trading
surveillance reports when orders are
executed by the same Market-Maker. For
these reasons, the Exchange believes the
MMTP Order provides Market-Makers
enhanced order processing functionality
to prevent potentially unwanted trades
from occurring.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act 5
and the rules and regulations
thereunder and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.6
Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
5 15
6 15
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78f(b).
28SEN1
60110
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices
the Section 6(b)(5) 7 requirements that
the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change advances these objectives by
making available to Market-Makers a
type of order that will assist MarketMakers in preventing unwanted
executions against themselves.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is filed for
immediate effectiveness pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) 8 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 9 thereunder because it effects a
change that (i) Does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(iii) by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–079 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–079. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of CBOE.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–079 and
should be submitted on or before
October 19, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–24866 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65378; File No. SR–CME–
2011–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change To Accept Additional Credit
Default Index Swaps for Clearing
September 22, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 9, 2011, the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange Inc. (‘‘CME’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change described in Items
I and II below, which items have been
prepared primarily by CME. The
Commission is publishing this Notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
The text of the proposed rule change
is below. Italicized text indicates
additions; bracketed text indicates
deletions.
*
*
*
*
*
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. Rulebook
Rule 100—80203—No Change.
*
*
*
*
*
CME Chapter 802 Rules: Appendix 1
Appendix 1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CDX INDICES
CDX Index
CDX North America Investment Grade (CDX.NA.IG) ....................................................................................
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Sep 27, 2011
9 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
10 17
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Termination date
(scheduled
termination)
Series
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
10
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
28SEN1
20 Jun 2013.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60108-60110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24866]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order
September 22, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 15, 2011, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change
as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60109]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a Market-Maker Trade Prevention
Order. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt a Market-Maker Trade Prevention
(``MMTP'') Order. The proposed MMTP Order is an immediate-or-cancel
order containing a designation that prevents incoming orders for a
Market-Maker from executing against resting quotes and orders for the
same Market-Maker.
The MMTP Order type designation is intended to prevent a Market-
Maker from trading on both sides of the same transaction. Orders would
be marked with the MMTP designation on an order-by-order basis. An
incoming MMTP Order cannot interact with interest resting on the book
from the same Market-Maker. An MMTP Order that would trade against a
resting quote or order for the same Market-Maker will be cancelled, as
will the resting quote or order. The MMTP Order will trade against
other tradable orders and quotes entered by or on behalf of another
market participant (other than those entered by or on behalf of the
same Market-Maker) in accordance with the execution process described
in Exchange Rules 6.45 (Priority of Bids and Offers--Allocation of
Trades), 6.45A (Priority and Allocation of Equity Option Trades on the
CBOE Hybrid System) and 6.45B (Priority and Allocation of Trades in
Index Options and Options on ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System).
However, if the MMTP is received while an order for the same
Market-Maker is subject to Rule 6.13A, Simple Auction Liaison (SAL),
Rule 6.14, Hybrid Agency Liaison (HAL)/Rule 6.14A, Hybrid Agency
Liaison 2 (HAL2), Rule 6.74A, Automated Improvement Mechanism
(``AIM''), and Rule 6.74B, Solicitation Auction Mechanism (each an
``auction''), only the MMTP Order will be canceled. The order being
represented in the auction will not be cancelled. This is because the
order being represented in the auction will still be able to execute
via the auction mechanism against orders originating from other market
participants. As auctions are designed to achieve price improvement,
the Exchange does not want to interfere with the auction process and
cancel an order that is already up for auction, since it can achieve
price improvement with an order from another market participant.
For example, assume the Exchange's best bid and offer is $1.00-
$1.20, 100 contracts on each side. A Market-Maker marks an order to buy
100 contracts at $1.20 with the MMTP distinction, making it an MMTP
Order. The MMTP Order is submitted to the Exchange and it would trade
with a resting quote from the same Market-Maker for 100 contracts
offered at $1.20, then both the order to buy and the resting offer
quote would be canceled. However, if the resting offer quote from the
same Market-Maker was for only 60 contracts, then 60 contracts from the
order to buy would be canceled (as would the resting quote), but the
other 40 contracts could trade with the resting offer interest of the
other market participants.
As another example, assume a sell order entered on behalf of a
Market-Maker is subject to a HAL auction. A Market-Maker marks an order
to buy with the MMTP distinction, making it an MMTP Order. If this
incoming MMTP Order is received while the auction is in progress and
the MMTP Order would otherwise trade with the order that is subject to
the HAL auction, then only the MMTP Order would be cancelled. The order
being represented in the auction would not be canceled.
At this time, the Exchange intends to identify an incoming MMTP
Order as being for the same Market-Maker if the MMTP Order and resting
quote or order share any of the following: (1) User acronym, (2) login
ID, or (3) sub-account code. Each Market-Maker is assigned its own
acronym (sometimes multiple acronyms). However, a Market-Maker may have
multiple different login IDs or sub-account codes. A login ID is the
session through which a Market-Maker routes orders to the Exchange. A
Market-Maker may elect to use different login IDs to route different
types of communications to the Exchange. For example, a Market-Maker
may choose to use login ID 1 for all orders it sends to the
Exchange and login ID 2 for all quotes it sends to the
Exchange. Or the Market-Maker may be much more specific, and use
different login IDs for different types of orders and quotes. A sub-
account code is simply a field on each order or quote that lists the
account into which a trade clears at the Options Clearing Corporation
(``OCC''). A Market-Maker may have different sub-account codes for each
trader it employs, so that the Market-Maker may track each trader's
activity. Finally, Market-Makers sometimes use different acronyms but
clear into the same accounts (thereby using the same sub-accounts
codes).
Allowing Market-Makers to designate orders as MMTP Orders is
intended to allow firms to better manage order flow and prevent
unwanted executions resulting from the interaction of executable buy
and sell trading interest for the same Market-Maker, as well as prevent
the potential for (or appearance of) ``wash sales'' that may occur as a
result of the velocity of trading in today's high speed marketplace.
When a Market-Maker is preparing to submit an order, the Market-Maker
may not know whether or not his order is going to trade against his own
resting quote. Further, many Market-Makers have multiple connections
into the Exchange due to capacity- and speed-related demands. Orders
routed by the same Market-Makers via different connections may, in
certain circumstances, trade against each other. Finally, the Exchange
notes that offering the MMTP modifiers will streamline certain
regulatory functions by reducing false positive results that may occur
on Exchange-generated wash trading surveillance reports when orders are
executed by the same Market-Maker. For these reasons, the Exchange
believes the MMTP Order provides Market-Makers enhanced order
processing functionality to prevent potentially unwanted trades from
occurring.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act \5\ and the rules and regulations thereunder and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with
[[Page 60110]]
the Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to and to
perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The proposed rule change advances these objectives by making available
to Market-Makers a type of order that will assist Market-Makers in
preventing unwanted executions against themselves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is filed for immediate effectiveness
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \8\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \9\ thereunder because it effects a change
that (i) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or
the public interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) by its terms, does not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2011-079 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-079. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of CBOE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-079 and should be
submitted on or before October 19, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-24866 Filed 9-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P