In the Matter of Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change, 60082-60083 [2011-24862]

Download as PDF sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 60082 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2845’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/handbook_ on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205– 2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:20 Sep 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 23, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–24954 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–784] In the Matter of Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 4) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate name change in the above-referenced investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on July 11, 2011, based on a complaint filed by OSRAM GmbH of Munich, Germany. 76 FR 40745 (Jul. 11, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain light-emitting diodes and products containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,812,500; 7,078,732; 7,126,162; 7,345,317; 7,629,621; 6,459,130; 6,927,469; 7,199,454; and 7,427,806. The respondents named in the Commission’s notice of investigation are LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co., Ltd., both of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California. On August 31, 2011, complainant moved to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a recent change of its corporate name from OSRAM GmbH to OSRAM AG. According to complainant, good cause exists to permit the amendment and no party will be prejudiced. No responses to the motion were filed. On September 2, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 4). The ALJ explained that Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)) provides for amendment of the complaint only by leave of the Commission for good cause, when and upon such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties to the investigation. The ALJ found that good cause exists for the requested amendment and that it is unlikely that the amendment would prejudice the other parties or the public. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices Issued: September 22, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR [FR Doc. 2011–24862 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements—Supply and Service Office of the Secretary BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 (Second Review)] ACTION: Notice. [FR Doc. 2011–24953 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) sponsored revised information collection request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements—Supply and Service,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for use in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). DATES: Submit comments on or before October 28, 2011. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site, https://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain, on the day following publication of this notice or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or sending an e-mail to DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202–395–6929/Fax: 202–395–6881 (these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail at DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Japan and Romania Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan and Romania would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2011 (76 FR 18251) and determined on July 5, 2011 that it would conduct expedited reviews (76 FR 44608, July 26, 2011). The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on September 22, 2011. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4262 (September 2011), entitled Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 (Second Review). sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES By order of the Commission. Issued: September 22, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). 2 Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissent with respect to the determination regarding smalldiameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Romania. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:20 Sep 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 SUMMARY: This is a request for a revision to the Supply and Service ICR, including revisions to the Scheduling Letter. The OFCCP Scheduling Letter is used to schedule Federal contractors and subcontractors for Compliance Evaluations in accordance with Executive Order 11246, as amended; section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended); PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60083 and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as amended, 38 U.S.C. 4212. These mandates prohibit Federal contractors and subcontractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, or veterans’ status. The OFCCP is revising the Scheduling Letter to reduce contractor burden and make Compliance Evaluations more efficient. This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if the collection of information does not display a valid OMB Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection under OMB Control Number 1250–0003. The current OMB approval is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2011; however, it should be noted that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. New or revised information collection requirements would only take effect after OMB approval. For additional information, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on May 12, 2011 (76 FR 27670). Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the ADDRESSES section within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should reference OMB Control Number 1250– 0003. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60082-60083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-784]


In the Matter of Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the 
Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name 
Change

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 4) issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation to reflect a corporate name change in the 
above-referenced investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on July 11, 2011, based on a complaint filed by OSRAM GmbH of Munich, 
Germany. 76 FR 40745 (Jul. 11, 2011). The complaint alleged violations 
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, 
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, 
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain 
light-emitting diodes and products containing the same by reason of 
infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,812,500; 
7,078,732; 7,126,162; 7,345,317; 7,629,621; 6,459,130; 6,927,469; 
7,199,454; and 7,427,806. The respondents named in the Commission's 
notice of investigation are LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co., 
Ltd., both of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of 
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, 
California.
    On August 31, 2011, complainant moved to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation to reflect a recent change of its corporate 
name from OSRAM GmbH to OSRAM AG. According to complainant, good cause 
exists to permit the amendment and no party will be prejudiced. No 
responses to the motion were filed. On September 2, 2011, the ALJ 
issued the subject ID (Order No. 4). The ALJ explained that Commission 
Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)) provides for amendment of the 
complaint only by leave of the Commission for good cause, when and upon 
such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public 
interest and the rights of the parties to the investigation. The ALJ 
found that good cause exists for the requested amendment and that it is 
unlikely that the amendment would prejudice the other parties or the 
public. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).


    By order of the Commission.

[[Page 60083]]

    Issued: September 22, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-24862 Filed 9-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.