In the Matter of Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 56796-56797 [2011-23439]

Download as PDF 56796 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2011 / Notices cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Patrick Andrus, Acting Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program. CALIFORNIA Humboldt County WISCONSIN Door County Englebert, Frank and Clara, House, 9390 Cemetery Rd., Brussels, 04000397 Price County Bloom’s Tavern, Store and House, 396 S. Avon Ave., Phillips, 85000490 [FR Doc. 2011–23418 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am] Chapman, John G., House, 974 10th St., Arcata, 11000713 BILLING CODE 4312–51–P Sacramento County Boulevard Park (Historic Residential Suburbs in the United States, 1830–1960 MPS), Roughly bounded by B, H, 20th, 22nd & 23rd Sts., Sacramento, 11000705 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION NEW YORK In the Matter of Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation Niagara County Comstock, Nathan, Jr., House (Stone Buildings of Lockport, New York MPS), 299 Old Niagara Rd., Lockport, 11000707 Rockland County [Inv. No. 337–TA–805] McCready, Robert W. and Mary F., House, 139 Orange Tnpk., Sloatsburg, 11000708 Rockland Road Bridge Historic District, Ferdon Ave., Rockland Rd. & S. Piermont Ave., Piermont, 11000709 Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. Ulster County SUMMARY: Elliot-Buckley House, 204 Old Post Rd., Marlboro, 11000710 OHIO Franklin County Athletic Club of Columbus, 136 Broad St., Columbus, 11000711 PUERTO RICO San Juan Municipality Residencia Luis Munoz Marin, PR 877, km 0.4, San Juan, 11000712 VERMONT Washington County Beck and Beck Granite Shed, 30 Granite St., Barre, 11000714 VIRGINIA Amherst County Hanshill, 142 Leftwich Rd., Madison Heights, 11000715 WISCONSIN Clark County mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Sniteman, Charles C. and Katharyn, House, 319 Hewett St., Nellisville, 11000716 In the interest of preservation, the comment period for the following resource has been shortened to (3) three days. INDIANA The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone ADDRESSES: Elkhart County Morehouse Residential Historic District, Roughly bounded by E. Indiana, Morehouse, E. Hubbard & the W. side of Frances Aves., Elkhart, 11000706 Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resources: VerDate Mar<15>2010 Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 10, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Industrial Technology Research Institute of Taiwan and ITRI International Inc. of San Jose, California. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on August 22, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain devices for improving uniformity used in a backlight module and components thereof and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,883,932 (‘‘the ‘932 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 19:00 Sep 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 8, 2011, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain devices for improving uniformity used in a backlight module and components thereof and products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 6, 9, and 10 of the ‘932 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: Industrial Technology Research Institute, 195, Sec. 4, Chung Hsing Road, Chutung, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040; ITRI International Inc., 2880 Zanker Road, Suite 109, San Jose, CA 95134. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: LG Corporation, LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150–721, South Korea; LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150–721, South Korea; E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2011 / Notices LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 8, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela M. W. Newell (202–708–5409), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 18, 2011, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the subject five-year reviews (76 FR 22725, April 22, 2011). Due to scheduling conflicts, the Commission is issuing a revised schedule. Specifically, the Commission will hold its hearing on October 19, 2011, beginning at 10 a.m. Posthearing briefs will be due on October 28, 2011. For further information concerning this proceeding see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and F (19 CFR part 207). Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P [FR Doc. 2011–23439 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–388–391 and 731–TA–817–821 ;Second Review] Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea; Revised schedule for the subject reviews. United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: September 7, 2011. VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:00 Sep 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 Meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations. DATES: The meeting will be held on October 21, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The meeting will be held at Deloitte, 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1200, Phoenix, AZ 85012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at Deloitte, 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1200, Phoenix, AZ, on October 21, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B). A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public participation. ADDRESSES: Dated: September 8, 2011. Patrick W. McDonough, Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries. [FR Doc. 2011–23453 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Cumulus Media Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement By order of the Commission. Issued: September 8, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–23438 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am] INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION 56797 Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America v. Cumulus Media Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11–cv–01619. On September 8, 2011, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that Cumulus Media Inc.’s proposed acquisition of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final Judgment, filed the same time as the Complaint, requires Cumulus to divest certain broadcast radio stations in Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, Pennsylvania and Flint, Michigan, along with certain tangible and intangible assets. E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56796-56797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23439]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-805]


In the Matter of Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in 
a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the 
Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation

    Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 10, 2011, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Industrial Technology Research Institute of Taiwan and ITRI 
International Inc. of San Jose, California. A letter supplementing the 
complaint was filed on August 22, 2011. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain devices for improving uniformity used in a 
backlight module and components thereof and products containing the 
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
6,883,932 (``the `932 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also 
be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the 
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on September 8, 2011, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain devices for 
improving uniformity used in a backlight module and components thereof 
and products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 6, 
9, and 10 of the `932 patent, and whether an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are: Industrial Technology Research Institute, 
195, Sec. 4, Chung Hsing Road, Chutung, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040; ITRI 
International Inc., 2880 Zanker Road, Suite 109, San Jose, CA 95134.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:
    LG Corporation, LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 
Seoul, 150-721, South Korea;
    LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong, 
Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-721, South Korea;

[[Page 56797]]

    LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, 
NJ 07632.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
     Issued: September 8, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-23439 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.