In the Matter of Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 56796-56797 [2011-23439]
Download as PDF
56796
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2011 / Notices
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Patrick Andrus,
Acting Chief, National Register of Historic
Places/National Historic Landmarks Program.
CALIFORNIA
Humboldt County
WISCONSIN
Door County
Englebert, Frank and Clara, House, 9390
Cemetery Rd., Brussels, 04000397
Price County
Bloom’s Tavern, Store and House, 396 S.
Avon Ave., Phillips, 85000490
[FR Doc. 2011–23418 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am]
Chapman, John G., House, 974 10th St.,
Arcata, 11000713
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
Sacramento County
Boulevard Park (Historic Residential Suburbs
in the United States, 1830–1960 MPS),
Roughly bounded by B, H, 20th, 22nd &
23rd Sts., Sacramento, 11000705
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
NEW YORK
In the Matter of Certain Devices for
Improving Uniformity Used in a
Backlight Module and Components
Thereof and Products Containing the
Same; Notice of Institution of
Investigation
Niagara County
Comstock, Nathan, Jr., House (Stone
Buildings of Lockport, New York MPS),
299 Old Niagara Rd., Lockport, 11000707
Rockland County
[Inv. No. 337–TA–805]
McCready, Robert W. and Mary F., House,
139 Orange Tnpk., Sloatsburg, 11000708
Rockland Road Bridge Historic District,
Ferdon Ave., Rockland Rd. & S. Piermont
Ave., Piermont, 11000709
Institution of investigation pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
Ulster County
SUMMARY:
Elliot-Buckley House, 204 Old Post Rd.,
Marlboro, 11000710
OHIO
Franklin County
Athletic Club of Columbus, 136 Broad St.,
Columbus, 11000711
PUERTO RICO
San Juan Municipality
Residencia Luis Munoz Marin, PR 877, km
0.4, San Juan, 11000712
VERMONT
Washington County
Beck and Beck Granite Shed, 30 Granite St.,
Barre, 11000714
VIRGINIA
Amherst County
Hanshill, 142 Leftwich Rd., Madison Heights,
11000715
WISCONSIN
Clark County
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Sniteman, Charles C. and Katharyn, House,
319 Hewett St., Nellisville, 11000716
In the interest of preservation, the
comment period for the following resource
has been shortened to (3) three days.
INDIANA
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
ADDRESSES:
Elkhart County
Morehouse Residential Historic District,
Roughly bounded by E. Indiana,
Morehouse, E. Hubbard & the W. side of
Frances Aves., Elkhart, 11000706
Request for REMOVAL has been made for
the following resources:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 10, 2011, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Industrial
Technology Research Institute of
Taiwan and ITRI International Inc. of
San Jose, California. A letter
supplementing the complaint was filed
on August 22, 2011. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain devices for
improving uniformity used in a
backlight module and components
thereof and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,883,932 (‘‘the ‘932 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
19:00 Sep 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 8, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain devices for
improving uniformity used in a
backlight module and components
thereof and products containing the
same that infringe one or more of claims
6, 9, and 10 of the ‘932 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are: Industrial
Technology Research Institute, 195, Sec.
4, Chung Hsing Road, Chutung,
Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040; ITRI
International Inc., 2880 Zanker Road,
Suite 109, San Jose, CA 95134.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
LG Corporation, LG Twin Towers, 20
Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu,
Seoul, 150–721, South Korea;
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers,
20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu,
Seoul 150–721, South Korea;
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2011 / Notices
LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc., 1000
Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
07632.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 8, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela M. W. Newell (202–708–5409),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
18, 2011, the Commission established a
schedule for the conduct of the subject
five-year reviews (76 FR 22725, April
22, 2011). Due to scheduling conflicts,
the Commission is issuing a revised
schedule.
Specifically, the Commission will
hold its hearing on October 19, 2011,
beginning at 10 a.m. Posthearing briefs
will be due on October 28, 2011.
For further information concerning
this proceeding see the Commission’s
notice cited above and the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and F (19 CFR part 207).
Authority: This proceeding is being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
[FR Doc. 2011–23439 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JOINT BOARD FOR THE
ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–388–391 and
731–TA–817–821 ;Second Review]
Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel
Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy,
Japan, and Korea; Revised schedule
for the subject reviews.
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: September 7,
2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:00 Sep 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Meeting of the Federal Advisory
Committee
Joint Board for the Enrollment
of Actuaries.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Executive Director of the
Joint Board for the Enrollment of
Actuaries gives notice of a closed
meeting of the Advisory Committee on
Actuarial Examinations.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
October 21, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The meeting will be held at
Deloitte, 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite
1200, Phoenix, AZ 85012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick W. McDonough, Executive
Director of the Joint Board for the
Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the Advisory
Committee on Actuarial Examinations
will meet at Deloitte, 2901 N. Central
Avenue, Suite 1200, Phoenix, AZ, on
October 21, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m.
The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss topics and questions that may
be recommended for inclusion on future
Joint Board examinations in actuarial
mathematics, pension law and
methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C.
1242(a)(1)(B).
A determination has been made as
required by section 10(d) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.,
that the subject of the meeting falls
within the exception to the open
meeting requirement set forth in Title 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public
interest requires that such meeting be
closed to public participation.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: September 8, 2011.
Patrick W. McDonough,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the
Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 2011–23453 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
United States v. Cumulus Media Inc., et
al.; Proposed Final Judgment and
Competitive Impact Statement
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 8, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–23438 Filed 9–13–11; 8:45 am]
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
56797
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment and Competitive Impact
Statement have been filed with the
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia in United States of
America v. Cumulus Media Inc., et al.,
Civil Action No. 1:11–cv–01619. On
September 8, 2011, the United States
filed a Complaint alleging that Cumulus
Media Inc.’s proposed acquisition of
Citadel Broadcasting Corporation would
violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15
U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final
Judgment, filed the same time as the
Complaint, requires Cumulus to divest
certain broadcast radio stations in
Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle,
Pennsylvania and Flint, Michigan, along
with certain tangible and intangible
assets.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56796-56797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-805]
In the Matter of Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in
a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the
Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 10, 2011, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Industrial Technology Research Institute of Taiwan and ITRI
International Inc. of San Jose, California. A letter supplementing the
complaint was filed on August 22, 2011. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain devices for improving uniformity used in a
backlight module and components thereof and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,883,932 (``the `932 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 8, 2011, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain devices for
improving uniformity used in a backlight module and components thereof
and products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 6,
9, and 10 of the `932 patent, and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are: Industrial Technology Research Institute,
195, Sec. 4, Chung Hsing Road, Chutung, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040; ITRI
International Inc., 2880 Zanker Road, Suite 109, San Jose, CA 95134.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
LG Corporation, LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu,
Seoul, 150-721, South Korea;
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20 Yeouido-dong,
Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-721, South Korea;
[[Page 56797]]
LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ 07632.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 8, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-23439 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P