Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 56396-56397 [2011-23379]

Download as PDF 56396 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Notices submitted by parties, including comments on our cost calculation methodology. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is fully extending the time limit for the final results to December 5, 2011. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. Review, 76 FR 26247 (May 6, 2011) (Preliminary Results). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results and received case and rebuttal briefs from interested parties. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Dated: September 7, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order 1 is magnesium metal (also referred to as magnesium), which includes primary and secondary pure and alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The magnesium covered by the order includes blends of primary and secondary magnesium. The subject merchandise includes the following pure and alloy magnesium metal products made from primary and/ or secondary magnesium, including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes, and magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into raspings, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other shapes: (1) Products that contain at least 99.95 percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ‘‘ultra-pure’’ magnesium); (2) products that contain less than 99.95 percent but not less than 99.8 percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’ magnesium); and (3) chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in which the magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less that 99.8 percent, by weight, whether or not conforming to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy.’’ The scope of the order excludes: (1) Magnesium that is in liquid or molten form and (2) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesiumbased reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, [FR Doc. 2011–23381 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–819] Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation. The period of review (POR) is April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010. Based on our analysis of the comments received we have made changes in the margin for one company. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final margin is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2011. AGENCY: Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3477. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On May 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation. See Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:22 Sep 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 1 We revoked the order effective April 15, 2010. See Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to Five-Year Sunset Review, 76 FR 13128 (March 10, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.2 The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable under items 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and 8104.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by the order is dispositive. No-Shipment Determination Based on the information Solikamsk Magnesium Works (SMW) provided on the record, we continue to find that SMW did not have knowledge of exports or involvement in imports of magnesium metal into the United States during the POR. Thus, we did not request SMW to report such sales for purposes of calculating a dumping margin in this administrative review. See Preliminary Results, 76 FR at 26248–49. Therefore, we have determined that SMW did not make shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review of the order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated concurrently with this notice (Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded is in the Decision Memorandum and attached to this notice as an Appendix. The 2 This second exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, Israel, and the Russian Federation. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 (September 27, 2001), Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001), and Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys because they are not chemically combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot. E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 56397 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Notices Decision Memorandum, which is a public document, is on file in the Central Records Unit, main Department of Commerce building, Room 7046, and is accessible on the Web at http:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes From the Preliminary Results As a result of our analysis of the comments we received, we have made certain changes to the margin calculation for PSC VSMPO–AVISMA Corporation (AVISMA) for the final results. Specifically, we have revised AVISMA’s reported costs of production for the April 1 through December 31, 2009, period to reflect the treatment of chlorine gas as a byproduct of raw magnesium production. We then calculated AVISMA’s POR costs as the weighted average of the revised costs for the period April 1 through December 31, 2009, and the costs for the period January 1 through March 31, 2010, that we calculated for the Preliminary Results. For further discussion of this change, see Comment 1.A of the Decision Memorandum. Our comparison of AVISMA’s revised costs to its reported sales establishes that all of AVISMA’s sales in the comparison market were made at prices below cost. In accordance with section 773(b)(1)(B) of the Act, we have relied upon the constructed value of the subject merchandise for purposes of these final results. For further discussion of this change, see Comment 1.B of the Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Review As a result of our review, we determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation exist for the period April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010: Manufacturer/exporter Margin (percent) PSC VSMPO–AVISMA Corporation .................................................................................................................................................... Solikamsk Magnesium Works ............................................................................................................................................................. 2.24 * * No shipments or sales subject to this review. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Assessment Rates The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated an importer-specific assessment rate for AVISMA reflecting these final results of review. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by AVISMA or SMW for which AVISMA or SMW did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries of merchandise produced by AVISMA or SMW at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). The Department intends to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results of review. Cash-Deposit Requirements Because we revoked the order effective April 15, 2010, no cash deposit for estimated antidumping duties on future entries of subject merchandise is required. Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:22 Sep 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: September 6, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix 1. Cost Methodology 2. Affiliation 3. Zeroing [FR Doc. 2011–23379 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–929] Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the First Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Final Rescission of the Administrative Review, in Part Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2011, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes (‘‘SDGE’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), covering the period August 21, 2008, through January 31, 2010. See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the First Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; and Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, in Part, 75 FR 12325 (March 7, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). We invited interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to our margin calculations for the mandatory respondents. The final dumping margins for this review are AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56396-56397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-821-819]


Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce published the 
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation. The period 
of review (POR) is April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010.
    Based on our analysis of the comments received we have made changes 
in the margin for one company. Therefore, the final results differ from 
the preliminary results. The final margin is listed below in the 
section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.''

DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3477.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation. 
See Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 26247 (May 6, 2011) 
(Preliminary Results).
    We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results 
and received case and rebuttal briefs from interested parties. The 
Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order \1\ is magnesium metal (also 
referred to as magnesium), which includes primary and secondary pure 
and alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material 
source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing 
by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is 
produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary 
magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium 
metal. The magnesium covered by the order includes blends of primary 
and secondary magnesium.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We revoked the order effective April 15, 2010. See Magnesium 
Metal From the Russian Federation: Revocation of Antidumping Duty 
Order Pursuant to Five-Year Sunset Review, 76 FR 13128 (March 10, 
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The subject merchandise includes the following pure and alloy 
magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium, 
including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, 
rounds, billets, and other shapes, and magnesium ground, chipped, 
crushed, or machined into raspings, granules, turnings, chips, powder, 
briquettes, and other shapes: (1) Products that contain at least 99.95 
percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ``ultra-pure'' 
magnesium); (2) products that contain less than 99.95 percent but not 
less than 99.8 percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as 
``pure'' magnesium); and (3) chemical combinations of magnesium and 
other material(s) in which the magnesium content is 50 percent or 
greater, but less that 99.8 percent, by weight, whether or not 
conforming to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy.''
    The scope of the order excludes: (1) Magnesium that is in liquid or 
molten form and (2) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in 
granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-
magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures, 
including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, 
calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline 
syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, 
hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, 
cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, 
dolomite lime, and colemanite.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ This second exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures 
is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000-2001 
investigations of magnesium from the People's Republic of China, 
Israel, and the Russian Federation. See Notice of Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in 
Granular Form From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 
(September 27, 2001), Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 
27, 2001), and Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Not Less 
Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 
49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys 
because they are not chemically combined in liquid form and cast 
into the same ingot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable 
under items 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and 8104.90.00 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the 
HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written description of the merchandise covered by the order is 
dispositive.

No-Shipment Determination

    Based on the information Solikamsk Magnesium Works (SMW) provided 
on the record, we continue to find that SMW did not have knowledge of 
exports or involvement in imports of magnesium metal into the United 
States during the POR. Thus, we did not request SMW to report such 
sales for purposes of calculating a dumping margin in this 
administrative review.
    See Preliminary Results, 76 FR at 26248-49. Therefore, we have 
determined that SMW did not make shipments of subject merchandise 
during the POR.

Analysis of the Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review of the order on magnesium metal from the 
Russian Federation are addressed in the ``Issues and Decision 
Memorandum'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated 
concurrently with this notice (Decision Memorandum), which is hereby 
adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have raised 
and to which we have responded is in the Decision Memorandum and 
attached to this notice as an Appendix. The

[[Page 56397]]

Decision Memorandum, which is a public document, is on file in the 
Central Records Unit, main Department of Commerce building, Room 7046, 
and is accessible on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. 
The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Changes From the Preliminary Results

    As a result of our analysis of the comments we received, we have 
made certain changes to the margin calculation for PSC VSMPO-AVISMA 
Corporation (AVISMA) for the final results. Specifically, we have 
revised AVISMA's reported costs of production for the April 1 through 
December 31, 2009, period to reflect the treatment of chlorine gas as a 
byproduct of raw magnesium production. We then calculated AVISMA's POR 
costs as the weighted average of the revised costs for the period April 
1 through December 31, 2009, and the costs for the period January 1 
through March 31, 2010, that we calculated for the Preliminary Results. 
For further discussion of this change, see Comment 1.A of the Decision 
Memorandum.
    Our comparison of AVISMA's revised costs to its reported sales 
establishes that all of AVISMA's sales in the comparison market were 
made at prices below cost. In accordance with section 773(b)(1)(B) of 
the Act, we have relied upon the constructed value of the subject 
merchandise for purposes of these final results. For further discussion 
of this change, see Comment 1.B of the Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of our review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins on magnesium metal from the Russian 
Federation exist for the period April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Margin
                 Manufacturer/exporter                      (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PSC VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation...........................            2.24
Solikamsk Magnesium Works..............................              *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No shipments or sales subject to this review.

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated an 
importer-specific assessment rate for AVISMA reflecting these final 
results of review.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by AVISMA or SMW for which AVISMA 
or SMW did not know their merchandise was destined for the United 
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries of merchandise produced by AVISMA or SMW at the all-others rate 
if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 
transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of 
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
    The Department intends to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after 
the publication of the final results of review.

Cash-Deposit Requirements

    Because we revoked the order effective April 15, 2010, no cash 
deposit for estimated antidumping duties on future entries of subject 
merchandise is required.

Notifications

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 6, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

1. Cost Methodology
2. Affiliation
3. Zeroing

[FR Doc. 2011-23379 Filed 9-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P