North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews, 56156-56157 [2011-23160]

Download as PDF 56156 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Notices percent; 53 and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4), and 19 CFR 351.214. Dated: August 31, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–23148 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States. Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be postmarked on or before October 3, 2011. Address written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 53 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005), for an explanation on the derivation of the PRC-wide rate. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:36 Sep 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 3720. Docket Number: 11–056. Applicant: Battelle Energy Alliance, 2525 North Freemont Ave., Idaho Falls, ID 83415. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to analyze nuclear fuels and materials for energy production. The experiments will involve structural and chemical analyses of materials on the atomic resolution scale. Current U.S. manufactured instruments do not reach the sensitivity level of this instrument. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 16, 2011. Docket Number: 11–057. Applicant: Battelle Energy Alliance, 2525 North Freemont Ave., Idaho Falls, ID 83415. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to analyze nuclear fuels and materials for energy production. The experiments will involve structural and chemical analyses of materials on the electron based nanometer scale. Current U.S. manufactured instruments do not reach the sensitivity level of this instrument. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 15, 2011. Docket Number: 11–058. Applicant: University of Texas at Austin, Texas Materials Institute, 1 University Station C2201, Austin, TX 78712. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to study materials such as polymers, metals, ceramics, and biological specimens like tissues, viruses, and bacteria, to determine the morphology of multiphase materials, determine the particle size and size distribution, probe the sample’s surface topography, and determine the chemical composition of materials at nanometer scale. Scanning electron microscopy is the only technique that allows direct imaging of material features within the nanometer size range. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 9, 2011. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: September 2, 2011. Gregory Campbell, Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office. [FR Doc. 2011–23256 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel. AGENCY: On August 19, 2011, the binational panel issued its decision in the review of the final results of the 2004/2005 antidumping administrative review made by the U.S. Department of Commerce, respecting Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, NAFTA Secretariat File Number USA– MEX–2007–1904–01. The binational panel affirmed in part and remanded in part the Commerce’s determination. Copies of the panel decision are available from the U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Bohon, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a mechanism to replace domestic judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination. Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’). These Rules were published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with these Rules. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Notices Panel Decision: On April 14, 2010, the initial decision was issued by this panel remanding to the U.S. Department of Commerce to: (1) Recalculate Mexinox’s dumping margins without zeroing, and (2) to recalculate the indirect selling expense ratio (ISE) in a manner not inconsistent with the panel’s opinion and affirming Commerce’s determinations on all other issues being contested. The Department’s decision in the final results of the 2004/2005 antidumping review was, in all other respects, upheld. On August 19, 2011, with two dissenting views, the panel majority remanded to Commerce its Remand Determination to comply with its instructions in the April 2010 initial decision. The panel directed Commerce to issue its Final Re-determination on this second remand within thirty (30) days from the date of this panel decision. Dated: September 6, 2011. Ellen M. Bohon, U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Docket Number: 11–051. Applicant: DOD Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814–4799. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument. Dated: September 2, 2011. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–23160 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P [FR Doc. 2011–23277 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Brandeis University, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES International Trade Administration International Trade Administration This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 11–042. Applicant: Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454. Instrument: Technai G2 F20 Twin Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Docket Number: 11–043. Applicant: Mississippi State University, Pearl, MS 39208. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 47148, August 4, 2011. Docket Number: 11–049. Applicant: University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 11–030. Applicant: University of Chicago, Institute for Genomic Systems and Biology, Chicago, IL 60637. Instrument: Digital Scanned Laser Microscope. Manufacturer: Emblem GMBH, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument will be used to study the functions and properties of biological materials, such as biomedical VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:36 Sep 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 University of Chicago, et al.; Notice of Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56157 specimens, through microscopy imaging and recording of fluorescently labeled, light-sensitive samples. The DSLM is a new prototype not available commercially. Docket Number: 11–044. Applicant: University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Magneto-optical Kerr Microscope System. Manufacturer: Evico Magnetics GmgH, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 47148, August 4, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument will be used for real-time imaging of magnetic domains, as well as provide Kerr effect magnetic hysteresis loops, thereby providing important information on the reversal behavior in ferromagnetic films. Docket Number: 11–045. Applicant: University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106–5050. Instrument: Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing Equipment. Manufacturer: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Austria. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument is a highly specialized system for studying a wide range of materials used in very high cycle, high temperature applications, such as light metals, composite metal/ ceramics, titanium alloys and superalloys. Docket Number: 11–046. Applicant: University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Instrument: Luminescence Reader. Manufacturer: Technical University of Denmark, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 48803, August 9, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument will be used to study the age of rock and sediment samples using thermoluminescence, optically stimulated luminescence and infrared luminescence. E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56156-56157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 19, 2011, the binational panel issued its decision 
in the review of the final results of the 2004/2005 antidumping 
administrative review made by the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
respecting Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, NAFTA 
Secretariat File Number USA-MEX-2007-1904-01. The binational panel 
affirmed in part and remanded in part the Commerce's determination. 
Copies of the panel decision are available from the U.S. Section of the 
NAFTA Secretariat.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Bohon, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with 
these Rules.

[[Page 56157]]

    Panel Decision: On April 14, 2010, the initial decision was issued 
by this panel remanding to the U.S. Department of Commerce to: (1) 
Recalculate Mexinox's dumping margins without zeroing, and (2) to 
recalculate the indirect selling expense ratio (ISE) in a manner not 
inconsistent with the panel's opinion and affirming Commerce's 
determinations on all other issues being contested. The Department's 
decision in the final results of the 2004/2005 antidumping review was, 
in all other respects, upheld.
    On August 19, 2011, with two dissenting views, the panel majority 
remanded to Commerce its Remand Determination to comply with its 
instructions in the April 2010 initial decision. The panel directed 
Commerce to issue its Final Re-determination on this second remand 
within thirty (30) days from the date of this panel decision.

    Dated: September 6, 2011.
Ellen M. Bohon,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-23160 Filed 9-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.