Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 56003 [2011-23075]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2011 / Notices
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by October
24, 2011 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning
these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business
hours (9 a.m.– 5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public
docket are also available for inspection
and copying on the Internet at the
docket facility’s Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78), or
online at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 6,
2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–23126 Filed 9–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on April 15, 2011
(76 FR 21422–21423).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Sep 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Cicchino, PhD, Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative,
Office of Behavioral Safety Research
(NTI–131), National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., W46–491, Washington, DC
20590. Dr. Cicchino’s phone number is
202–366–2752 and her e-mail address is
jessica.cicchino@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Evaluation of Impaired Riding
Interventions.
Type of Request: New information
collection request.
Abstract: The heavy toll that impaired
driving exacts on the Nation in
fatalities, injuries, and economic costs is
well documented. Impaired motorcycle
riding has also been an increasing
concern on our Nation’s roads.
Motorcycle fatalities in the US
decreased in 2009 for the first time after
steadily increasing for 11 years;
however, even with this decline, the
number of motorcycle fatalities in 2009
was nearly double that from a decade
earlier. Alcohol impairment is a factor
that contributes to a substantial
proportion of fatal motorcycle crashes.
In 2009, 30% of motorcycle riders
fatally injured in crashes had a blood
alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above
.08 g/dL, which is per se evidence of
impaired riding in all States. Forty-two
percent of riders who died in singlevehicle crashes in 2009, and 63% of
riders who died in single-vehicle
crashes on weekend nights, had a BAC
of .08 g/dL or higher.
In 2012, NHTSA anticipates
sponsoring demonstration projects in
multiple locations to conduct
interventions with the purpose of
reducing impaired motorcycle riding.
NHTSA plans to evaluate these
interventions to determine their
effectiveness. A key component of this
evaluation effort will use brief
interviews to assess motorcycle riders’
knowledge of the intervention, selfreported drinking and riding behavior,
and belief that alcohol-impaired driving
laws are enforced for all motorists,
including motorcycle riders in the areas
in which the interventions will occur.
In-person interviews will be
conducted with motorcycle riders in up
to 4 program locations, and in up to 3
comparison locations not carrying out
an intervention. Motorcycle riders will
be interviewed at sites within the
program and comparison locations
where riders congregate. Interview
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
56003
length will average 5 minutes and will
collect information on attitudes,
awareness, knowledge, and behavior
related to the intervention.
The interviews will follow a pre-post
design where they are administered
prior to the implementation of the
intervention and after its conclusion.
For interventions where a pre-post
design would not be possible (i.e.,
interventions that are conducted in
conjunction with an infrequentlyoccurring event), the interviews will
follow a test-comparison design where
they are administered during the
intervention in the program location,
and in a comparison location that did
not experience an intervention. The
proposed interviews will be
anonymous. Participation by
respondents will be voluntary.
Affected Public: NHTSA plans to
recruit up to 500 riders per interview
administration. Up to 2 waves of
program activity are planned in each
program location, and thus interviews
will be administered a maximum of 4
times (before and after each wave of
program activity) in each of the 7 study
locations (4 program locations and 3
comparison locations). Thus, a total
maximum of 14,000 motorcycle riders
will be interviewed.
Estimated Total Burden: Estimated
time for each interview is 5 minutes.
Hence, the total estimated burden is
1,166.67 hours. Respondents would not
incur any recordkeeping burden or
recordkeeping cost from the information
collection.
Comments are invited on the
following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection;
(iii) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2011–23075 Filed 9–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 56003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23075]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collection and the expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on April 15, 2011 (76 FR 21422-21423).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Cicchino, PhD, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-131), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., W46-491, Washington, DC 20590. Dr.
Cicchino's phone number is 202-366-2752 and her e-mail address is
jessica.cicchino@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Evaluation of Impaired Riding Interventions.
Type of Request: New information collection request.
Abstract: The heavy toll that impaired driving exacts on the Nation
in fatalities, injuries, and economic costs is well documented.
Impaired motorcycle riding has also been an increasing concern on our
Nation's roads. Motorcycle fatalities in the US decreased in 2009 for
the first time after steadily increasing for 11 years; however, even
with this decline, the number of motorcycle fatalities in 2009 was
nearly double that from a decade earlier. Alcohol impairment is a
factor that contributes to a substantial proportion of fatal motorcycle
crashes. In 2009, 30% of motorcycle riders fatally injured in crashes
had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above .08 g/dL, which is
per se evidence of impaired riding in all States. Forty-two percent of
riders who died in single-vehicle crashes in 2009, and 63% of riders
who died in single-vehicle crashes on weekend nights, had a BAC of .08
g/dL or higher.
In 2012, NHTSA anticipates sponsoring demonstration projects in
multiple locations to conduct interventions with the purpose of
reducing impaired motorcycle riding. NHTSA plans to evaluate these
interventions to determine their effectiveness. A key component of this
evaluation effort will use brief interviews to assess motorcycle
riders' knowledge of the intervention, self-reported drinking and
riding behavior, and belief that alcohol-impaired driving laws are
enforced for all motorists, including motorcycle riders in the areas in
which the interventions will occur.
In-person interviews will be conducted with motorcycle riders in up
to 4 program locations, and in up to 3 comparison locations not
carrying out an intervention. Motorcycle riders will be interviewed at
sites within the program and comparison locations where riders
congregate. Interview length will average 5 minutes and will collect
information on attitudes, awareness, knowledge, and behavior related to
the intervention.
The interviews will follow a pre-post design where they are
administered prior to the implementation of the intervention and after
its conclusion. For interventions where a pre-post design would not be
possible (i.e., interventions that are conducted in conjunction with an
infrequently-occurring event), the interviews will follow a test-
comparison design where they are administered during the intervention
in the program location, and in a comparison location that did not
experience an intervention. The proposed interviews will be anonymous.
Participation by respondents will be voluntary.
Affected Public: NHTSA plans to recruit up to 500 riders per
interview administration. Up to 2 waves of program activity are planned
in each program location, and thus interviews will be administered a
maximum of 4 times (before and after each wave of program activity) in
each of the 7 study locations (4 program locations and 3 comparison
locations). Thus, a total maximum of 14,000 motorcycle riders will be
interviewed.
Estimated Total Burden: Estimated time for each interview is 5
minutes. Hence, the total estimated burden is 1,166.67 hours.
Respondents would not incur any recordkeeping burden or recordkeeping
cost from the information collection.
Comments are invited on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection;
(iii) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-23075 Filed 9-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P