Order Making Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates, 55139-55148 [2011-22652]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
Availability; Web site posting. The
Commission has posted the appeal and
supporting material on its Web site at
https://www.prc.gov. Additional filings
in this case and participants’
submissions also will be posted on the
Commission’s Web site, if provided in
electronic format or amenable to
conversion, and not subject to a valid
protective order. Information on how to
use the Commission’s Web site is
available online or by contacting the
Commission’s webmaster via telephone
at 202–789–6873 or via electronic mail
at prc-webmaster@prc.gov.
The appeal and all related documents
are also available for public inspection
in the Commission’s docket section.
Docket section hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., eastern time, Monday through
Friday, except on Federal government
holidays. Docket section personnel may
be contacted via electronic mail at prcdockets@prc.gov or via telephone at
202–789–6846.
Filing of documents. All filings of
documents in this case shall be made
using the Internet (Filing Online)
pursuant to Commission rules 9(a) and
10(a) at the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.prc.gov, unless a waiver is
obtained. See 39–CFR–3001.9(a) and
3001.10(a). Instructions for obtaining an
account to file documents online may be
found on the Commission’s Web site or
by contacting the Commission’s docket
section at prc-dockets@prc.gov or via
telephone at 202–789–6846.
The Commission reserves the right to
redact personal information which may
infringe on an individual’s privacy
rights from documents filed in this
proceeding.
Intervention. Persons, other than
Petitioner and respondent, wishing to be
heard in this matter are directed to file
a notice of intervention. See 39 CFR
3001.111(b). Notices of intervention in
this case are to be filed on or before
September 26, 2011. A notice of
intervention shall be filed using the
Internet (Filing Online) at the
Commission’s Web site unless a waiver
is obtained for hardcopy filing. See 39
CFR 3001.9(a) and 3001.10(a).
Further procedures. By statute, the
Commission is required to issue its
decision within 120 days from the date
it receives the appeal. See 39 U.S.C.
404(d)(5). A procedural schedule has
been developed to accommodate this
statutory deadline. In the interest of
55139
expedition, in light of the 120-day
decision schedule, the Commission may
request the Postal Service or other
participants to submit information or
memoranda of law on any appropriate
issue. As required by the Commission
rules, if any motions are filed, responses
are due 7 days after any such motion is
filed. See 39 CFR 3001.21.
It is ordered:
1. The Postal Service shall file the
applicable administrative record
regarding this appeal no later than
September 12, 2011.
2. Any responsive pleading by the
Postal Service to this notice is due no
later than September 12, 2011.
3. The procedural schedule listed
below is hereby adopted.
4. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Malin
Moench is designated officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this notice and order in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
August 26, 2011 .......................................................................
September 12, 2011 .................................................................
September 12, 2011 .................................................................
September 26, 2011 .................................................................
September 30, 2011 .................................................................
October 20, 2011 .....................................................................
November 4, 2011 ....................................................................
November 14, 2011 ..................................................................
December 16, 2011 ..................................................................
[FR Doc. 2011–22661 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Release Nos. 33–9255; 34–65231/August
31, 2011]
Order Making Fiscal Year 2012 Annual
Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates
I. Background
The Commission collects fees under
various provisions of the securities
laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act
of 1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’) requires the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Filing of Appeal.
Deadline for the Postal Service to file the applicable administrative record in this
appeal.
Deadline for the Postal Service to file any responsive pleading.
Deadline for notices to intervene (see 39 CFR 3001.111(b)).
Deadline for Petitioner’s Form 61 or initial brief in support of petition (see 39 CFR
3001.115(a) and (b)).
Deadline for answering brief in support of the Postal Service (see 39 CFR
3001.115(c)).
Deadline for reply briefs in response to answering briefs (see 39 CFR
3001.115(d)).
Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument; the Commission will
schedule oral argument only when it is a necessary addition to the written filings (see 39 CFR 3001.116).
Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule (see 39 U.S.C.
404(d)(5)).
Commission to collect fees from issuers
on the registration of securities.1 Section
13(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) requires the
Commission to collect fees on specified
repurchases of securities.2 Section 14(g)
of the Exchange Act requires the
Commission to collect fees on proxy
solicitations and statements in corporate
control transactions.3
The Investor and Capital Markets Fee
Relief Act of 2002 (‘‘Fee Relief Act’’) 4
has required the Commission to make
1 15
U.S.C. 77f(b).
U.S.C. 78m(e).
3 15 U.S.C. 78n(g).
4 Pub. L. 107–123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002).
annual adjustments to the fee rates
applicable under these sections for each
of the fiscal years 2003 through 2011 in
an attempt to generate collections equal
to yearly targets specified in the
statute.5 Under the Fee Relief Act, each
year’s fee rate has been announced on
the preceding April 30, and has taken
effect five days after the date of
enactment of the Commission’s regular
appropriation.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (‘‘DoddFrank Act’’) changes many of the
provisions related to these fees. The
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5 See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5),
78m(e)(6), 78n(g)(5), and 78n(g)(6).
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
55140
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
Dodd-Frank Act created new annual
collection targets for FY 2012 and
thereafter. It also changed the date by
which the Commission must announce
a new fiscal year’s fee rate (August 31)
and the date on which the new rate
takes effect (October 1).
II. Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Adjustment
to the Fee Rate
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act,
as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act,
requires the Commission to make an
annual adjustment to the fee rate
applicable under Section 6(b).6 The
annual adjustment to the fee rate under
Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also
sets the annual adjustment to the fee
rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of
the Exchange Act.7
Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method
for determining the annual adjustment
to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for
fiscal year 2012. Specifically, the
Commission must adjust the fee rate
under Section 6(b) to a ‘‘rate that, when
applied to the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for
[fiscal year 2012], is reasonably likely to
produce aggregate fee collections under
[Section 6(b)] that are equal to the target
fee collection amount for [fiscal year
2012].’’ That is, the adjusted rate is
determined by dividing the ‘‘target fee
collection amount’’ for fiscal year 2012
by the ‘‘baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices’’ for
fiscal year 2012.
Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the
‘‘target fee collection amount’’ for fiscal
year 2012 is $425,000,000. Section
6(b)(6)(B) defines the ‘‘baseline estimate
of the aggregate maximum offering
price’’ for fiscal year 2012 as ‘‘the
baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price at which
securities are proposed to be offered
pursuant to registration statements filed
with the Commission during [fiscal year
2012] as determined by the
Commission, after consultation with the
Congressional Budget Office and the
Office of Management and Budget
* * *.’’
6 The annual adjustments are designed to adjust
the fee rate in a given fiscal year so that, when
applied to the aggregate maximum offering price at
which securities are proposed to be offered for the
fiscal year, it is reasonably likely to produce total
fee collections under Section 6(b) equal to the
‘‘target fee collection amount’’ specified in Section
6(b)(6)(A) for that fiscal year.
7 See Sections 13(e)(6) and 14(g)(6) of the
Exchange Act. On October 1, 2011, Sections 13(e)(4)
and 14(g)(6) of the Exchange Act, as amended by
the Dodd-Frank Act, will require an annual
adjustment to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and
14(g) of the Exchange Act to the same level as the
new the fee rate under Section 6(b) of the Securities
Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
To make the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price for
fiscal year 2012, the Commission used
a methodology similar to that developed
in consultation with the Congressional
Budget Office (‘‘CBO’’) and Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) to
project the aggregate offering price for
purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustment.8 Using this methodology,
the Commission determines the
‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year
2012 to be $3,708,294,634,490.9 Based
on this estimate, the Commission
calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2012 to
be $114.60 per million. This adjusted
fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act, as well as to Sections
13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act.
III. Effective Dates of the Annual
Adjustments
The fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustments to the fee rates applicable
under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act
and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the
Exchange Act will be effective on
October 1, 2011, under the changes
made by the Dodd-Frank Act.10
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b)
of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e)
and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,11
It Is Hereby Ordered that the fee rates
applicable under Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and
14(g) of the Exchange Act shall be
$114.60 per million effective on October
1, 2011.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
Appendix A
With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
8 For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the
Commission used a ten-year series of monthly
observations ending in March 2010. For fiscal year
2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending
in July 2011.
9 Appendix A explains how we determined the
‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum
offering price’’ for fiscal year 2012 using our
methodology, and then shows the purely
arithmetical process of calculating the fiscal year
2012 annual adjustment based on that estimate. The
appendix includes the data used by the
Commission in making its ‘‘baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year
2012.
10 On October 1, 2011, Section 6(b)(4) of the
Securities Act and Sections 13(e)(6) and 14(g)(6) of
the Exchange Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank
Act, will require the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustments to the fee rates applicable under
Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e)
and 14(g) of the Exchange Act to be effective on
October 1, 2011.
11 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e), and 78n(g).
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Congress has, among other things,
established a target amount of monies to be
collected from fees charged to issuers based
on the value of their registrations. This
appendix provides the formula for
determining such fees, which the
Commission adjusts annually. Congress has
mandated that the Commission determine
these fees based on the ‘‘aggregate maximum
offering prices,’’ which measures the
aggregate dollar amount of securities
registered with the Commission over the
course of the year. In order to maximize the
likelihood that the amount of monies targeted
by Congress will be collected, the fee rate
must be set to reflect projected aggregate
maximum offering prices. As a percentage,
the fee rate equals the ratio of the target
amounts of monies to the projected aggregate
maximum offering prices.
For 2012, the Commission has estimated
the aggregate maximum offering prices by
projecting forward the trend established in
the previous decade. More specifically, an
ARIMA model was used to forecast the value
of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
months subsequent to July 2011, the last
month for which the Commission has data on
the aggregate maximum offering prices.
The following sections describe this
process in detail.
A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate
Maximum Offering Prices for Fiscal Year
2012
First, calculate the aggregate maximum
offering prices (AMOP) for each month in the
sample (July 2001–July 2011). Next, calculate
the percentage change in the AMOP from
month to month.
Model the monthly percentage change in
AMOP as a first order moving average
process. The moving average approach
allows one to model the effect that an
exceptionally high (or low) observation of
AMOP tends to be followed by a more
‘‘typical’’ value of AMOP.
Use the estimated moving average model to
forecast the monthly percent change in
AMOP. These percent changes can then be
applied to obtain forecasts of the total dollar
value of registrations. The following is a
more formal (mathematical) description of
the procedure:
1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP.
The sample spans ten years, from July 2001
to July 2011.
2. Divide each month’s AMOP (column C)
by the number of trading days in that month
(column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP
(AAMOP, column D).
3. For each month t, the natural logarithm
of AAMOP is reported in column E.
4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP)
from the previous month as Dt = log
(AAMOPt)¥log(AAMOPt-1). This
approximates the percentage change.
5. Estimate the first order moving average
model Dt = a + bet-1 + et, where et denotes
the forecast error for month t. The forecast
error is simply the difference between the
one-month ahead forecast and the actual
realization of Dt. The forecast error is
expressed as et = Dt ¥ a ¥ bet-1. The model
can be estimated using standard
commercially available software. Using least
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
squares, the estimated parameter values are
a = 0.0005219 and b = ¥0.87539.
6. For the month of August 2011 forecast
Dt = 8/11 = a + bet = 8/11. For all subsequent
months, forecast Dt = a.
7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For
example, the forecast of log(AAMOP) for
October 2011 is given by FLAAMOPt = 10/11
= log(AAMOPt = 7/11) + Dt = 8/11 +Dt = 9/11 +
Dt = 10/11.
8. Under the assumption that et is normally
distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of
AAMOP is given by exp(FLAAMOPt + sn2/2),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
where sn denotes the standard error of the nstep ahead forecast.
9. For October 2011, this gives a forecast
AAMOP of $14.6 Billion (Column I), and a
forecast AMOP of $307.6 Billion (Column J).
10. Iterate this process through September
2012 to obtain a baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for fiscal
year 2012 of $3,708,294,634,490.
B. Using the Forecasts From A To Calculate
the New Fee Rate.
1. Using the data from Table A, estimate
the aggregate maximum offering prices
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55141
between 10/1/11 and 9/30/12 to be
$3,708,294,634,490.
2. The rate necessary to collect the target
$425,000,000 in fee revenues set by Congress
is then calculated as: $425,000,000 ÷
$3,708,294,634,490 = 0.000114608.
3. Round the result to the seventh decimal
point, yielding a rate of 0.0001146 (or
$114.60 per million).
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
EN06SE11.018
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55142
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
55143
EN06SE11.019
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
EN06SE11.020
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55144
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
55145
EN06SE11.021
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
EN06SE11.022
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55146
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
55147
EN06SE11.023
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
55148
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2011–22652 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–C
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65225; File No. SR–BATS–
2011–018]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Rules
for the Qualification, Listing and
Delisting of Companies on the
Exchange
August 30, 2011.
I. Introduction
On May 12, 2011, BATS Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BATS’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to adopt rules for the
qualification, listing, and delisting of
companies on the Exchange. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
June 1, 2011.3 The Commission received
no comment letters regarding the
proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes rules to adopt
a program for the qualification, listing,
and delisting of companies on the
Exchange (‘‘Listing Rules’’).4 The
Exchange proposes to eliminate its
current rules related to securities traded
on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted
trading privileges, and to replace such
rules with the Listing Rules, which the
Exchange notes are primarily based on
and substantially similar to the rules of
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’).5 The Exchange proposes
to adopt two distinct tiers of securities
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64546
(May 25, 2011), 76 FR 31660 (June 1, 2011)
(‘‘Notice’’).
4 The Listing Rules are comprised of definitions,
the Exchange’s general regulatory authority, the
procedures and prerequisites for gaining a listing on
the Exchange, the listing standards for units, the
disclosure obligations of listed companies, Direct
Registration Program requirements, the quantitative
listing requirements and standards for listing on the
Exchange in Tiers I and II, the corporate governance
standards applicable to all listed companies; special
listing standards for securities other than common
or preferred stock and warrants; the consequences
of a failure to meet the Exchange’s listing standards;
and the Exchange’s listing fees.
5 See Notice, supra note 3, 76 FR at 31661. The
Exchange is not proposing any changes to the rules
of the Exchange’s options market. Id.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
to be listed on the Exchange: Tier I and
Tier II. The Exchange represents that the
proposed standards for a security’s
initial and continued listing on Tier I
are nearly identical to the existing
standards applicable to listing on The
Nasdaq Global Market (‘‘NGM’’), and
that the proposed standards for a
security’s initial and continued listing
on Tier II are nearly identical to the
existing standards applicable to listing
on The Nasdaq Capital Market
(‘‘NCM’’).6 While the quantitative
standards for Tier I and II differ, the
Exchange notes that the qualitative
standards for both tiers are the same and
are nearly identical to NGM’s existing
qualitative standards.7
A. General Regulatory Authority of the
Exchange
The Exchange proposes to have
general, broad discretionary authority
over the initial and continued listing of
securities on the Exchange in order to
maintain the quality of and public
confidence in its market, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange notes that it may use such
discretion to deny initial listing, to
apply additional or more stringent
standards for the initial or continued
listing of particular securities, or to
suspend or delist particular securities
based on any event, condition, or
circumstance that exists or occurs that
makes initial or continued listing of the
securities on the Exchange inadvisable
or unwarranted in the opinion of the
Exchange, even though the securities
meet all enumerated standards for
initial or continued listing.8
The Exchange also proposes guidance
regarding the circumstances in which it
would invoke discretionary authority
and the types of factors it would
consider when making determinations
pursuant to such authority. In addition,
the Exchange proposes guidance on its
use of discretionary authority as it
relates to a Company 9 whose business
plan is to complete an initial public
offering and engage in a merger or
acquisition with one or more
unidentified Companies within a
6 The Notice identifies to which market’s
quantitative standards (either NGM or NCM) and
the NASDAQ rules the proposed BATS standards
are comparable. Id. The Exchange is not proposing
to adopt a tier equivalent to the NASDAQ Global
Select Market. Id.
7 Id.
8 Id.
9 For purposes of the Listing Rules, a ‘‘Company’’
would be any issuer of a security listed or applying
to list on the Exchange, including an issuer that is
not incorporated (e.g., a limited partnership).
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specific period of time. The Exchange
would permit the listing of such a
Company if the Company were to meet
all applicable initial listing standards, as
well as the factors considered pursuant
to its discretionary authority. The
Exchange further proposes guidance on
the use of its discretionary authority
when a Company files for protection
under any provision of the federal
bankruptcy laws or comparable foreign
laws.
B. General Procedures and Prerequisites
for Listing
The Exchange proposes an
application process that a Company
must complete in order to be listed on
the Exchange. To apply for listing on the
Exchange, a Company would have to
execute a Listing Agreement and a
Listing Application on forms made
available by the Exchange in order to
provide the information required by
Section 12(b) of the Act.10 A Company’s
qualifications would be determined on
the basis of financial statements that are
either: (1) Prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles; (2) reconciled to U.S.
generally accepted accounting
principles as required by the
Commission’s rules; or (3) prepared in
accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards, as issued by the
International Accounting Standards
Board, for Companies that are permitted
to file financial statements using those
standards consistent with the
Commission’s rules.
The Exchange also proposes
prerequisites for an applicant Company
to become listed on the Exchange: (1)
The security would have to be registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act 11
or subject to an applicable exemption;
(2) the Company would have to be
audited by a registered independent
public accountant; (3) the securities
would have to be eligible for a Direct
Registration Program operated by a
clearing agency registered under Section
17A of the Act,12 subject to certain
exceptions; (4) the Company would
have to pay the Exchange’s listing fees;
(5) the securities would have to be in
good standing with the Commission or
Other Regulatory Authority; 13 (6) the
Exchange would have to certify to the
10 15
U.S.C. 78l(b).
11 Id.
12 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. ‘‘ ‘Direct Registration Program’
means any program by a Company, directly or
through its transfer agent, whereby a shareholder
may have securities registered in the shareholder’s
name on the books of the Company or its transfer
agent without the need for a physical certificate to
evidence ownership.’’ Proposed BATS Rule
14.1(a)(6).
13 See proposed BATS Rule 14.1(t).
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55139-55148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22652]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release Nos. 33-9255; 34-65231/August 31, 2011]
Order Making Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Adjustments to Registration
Fee Rates
I. Background
The Commission collects fees under various provisions of the
securities laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933
(``Securities Act'') requires the Commission to collect fees from
issuers on the registration of securities.\1\ Section 13(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') requires the
Commission to collect fees on specified repurchases of securities.\2\
Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act requires the Commission to collect
fees on proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control
transactions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(e).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Investor and Capital Markets Fee Relief Act of 2002 (``Fee
Relief Act'') \4\ has required the Commission to make annual
adjustments to the fee rates applicable under these sections for each
of the fiscal years 2003 through 2011 in an attempt to generate
collections equal to yearly targets specified in the statute.\5\ Under
the Fee Relief Act, each year's fee rate has been announced on the
preceding April 30, and has taken effect five days after the date of
enactment of the Commission's regular appropriation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Pub. L. 107-123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002).
\5\ See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5), 78m(e)(6),
78n(g)(5), and 78n(g)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(``Dodd-Frank Act'') changes many of the provisions related to these
fees. The
[[Page 55140]]
Dodd-Frank Act created new annual collection targets for FY 2012 and
thereafter. It also changed the date by which the Commission must
announce a new fiscal year's fee rate (August 31) and the date on which
the new rate takes effect (October 1).
II. Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Adjustment to the Fee Rate
Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank
Act, requires the Commission to make an annual adjustment to the fee
rate applicable under Section 6(b).\6\ The annual adjustment to the fee
rate under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also sets the annual
adjustment to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the
Exchange Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The annual adjustments are designed to adjust the fee rate
in a given fiscal year so that, when applied to the aggregate
maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be
offered for the fiscal year, it is reasonably likely to produce
total fee collections under Section 6(b) equal to the ``target fee
collection amount'' specified in Section 6(b)(6)(A) for that fiscal
year.
\7\ See Sections 13(e)(6) and 14(g)(6) of the Exchange Act. On
October 1, 2011, Sections 13(e)(4) and 14(g)(6) of the Exchange Act,
as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, will require an annual adjustment
to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act
to the same level as the new the fee rate under Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method for determining the annual
adjustment to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for fiscal year 2012.
Specifically, the Commission must adjust the fee rate under Section
6(b) to a ``rate that, when applied to the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for [fiscal year 2012], is reasonably
likely to produce aggregate fee collections under [Section 6(b)] that
are equal to the target fee collection amount for [fiscal year 2012].''
That is, the adjusted rate is determined by dividing the ``target fee
collection amount'' for fiscal year 2012 by the ``baseline estimate of
the aggregate maximum offering prices'' for fiscal year 2012.
Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the ``target fee collection
amount'' for fiscal year 2012 is $425,000,000. Section 6(b)(6)(B)
defines the ``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering
price'' for fiscal year 2012 as ``the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be
offered pursuant to registration statements filed with the Commission
during [fiscal year 2012] as determined by the Commission, after
consultation with the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of
Management and Budget * * *.''
To make the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering
price for fiscal year 2012, the Commission used a methodology similar
to that developed in consultation with the Congressional Budget Office
(``CBO'') and Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') to project the
aggregate offering price for purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustment.\8\ Using this methodology, the Commission determines the
``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for
fiscal year 2012 to be $3,708,294,634,490.\9\ Based on this estimate,
the Commission calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2012 to be $114.60
per million. This adjusted fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act, as well as to Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the Commission used a
ten-year series of monthly observations ending in March 2010. For
fiscal year 2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending in
July 2011.
\9\ Appendix A explains how we determined the ``baseline
estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for fiscal year
2012 using our methodology, and then shows the purely arithmetical
process of calculating the fiscal year 2012 annual adjustment based
on that estimate. The appendix includes the data used by the
Commission in making its ``baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price'' for fiscal year 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Effective Dates of the Annual Adjustments
The fiscal year 2012 annual adjustments to the fee rates applicable
under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g)
of the Exchange Act will be effective on October 1, 2011, under the
changes made by the Dodd-Frank Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ On October 1, 2011, Section 6(b)(4) of the Securities Act
and Sections 13(e)(6) and 14(g)(6) of the Exchange Act, as amended
by the Dodd-Frank Act, will require the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustments to the fee rates applicable under Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act to
be effective on October 1, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and
Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e), and 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It Is Hereby Ordered that the fee rates applicable under Section
6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange
Act shall be $114.60 per million effective on October 1, 2011.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
Appendix A
With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, Congress has, among other things,
established a target amount of monies to be collected from fees
charged to issuers based on the value of their registrations. This
appendix provides the formula for determining such fees, which the
Commission adjusts annually. Congress has mandated that the
Commission determine these fees based on the ``aggregate maximum
offering prices,'' which measures the aggregate dollar amount of
securities registered with the Commission over the course of the
year. In order to maximize the likelihood that the amount of monies
targeted by Congress will be collected, the fee rate must be set to
reflect projected aggregate maximum offering prices. As a
percentage, the fee rate equals the ratio of the target amounts of
monies to the projected aggregate maximum offering prices.
For 2012, the Commission has estimated the aggregate maximum
offering prices by projecting forward the trend established in the
previous decade. More specifically, an ARIMA model was used to
forecast the value of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
months subsequent to July 2011, the last month for which the
Commission has data on the aggregate maximum offering prices.
The following sections describe this process in detail.
A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate Maximum Offering Prices for
Fiscal Year 2012
First, calculate the aggregate maximum offering prices (AMOP)
for each month in the sample (July 2001-July 2011). Next, calculate
the percentage change in the AMOP from month to month.
Model the monthly percentage change in AMOP as a first order
moving average process. The moving average approach allows one to
model the effect that an exceptionally high (or low) observation of
AMOP tends to be followed by a more ``typical'' value of AMOP.
Use the estimated moving average model to forecast the monthly
percent change in AMOP. These percent changes can then be applied to
obtain forecasts of the total dollar value of registrations. The
following is a more formal (mathematical) description of the
procedure:
1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP. The sample spans ten
years, from July 2001 to July 2011.
2. Divide each month's AMOP (column C) by the number of trading
days in that month (column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP
(AAMOP, column D).
3. For each month t, the natural logarithm of AAMOP is reported
in column E.
4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP) from the previous month as
[Delta]t = log (AAMOPt)-
log(AAMOPt-1). This approximates the percentage change.
5. Estimate the first order moving average model
[Delta]t = [alpha] + [beta]et-1 +
et, where et denotes the forecast error for
month t. The forecast error is simply the difference between the
one-month ahead forecast and the actual realization of
[Delta]t. The forecast error is expressed as
et = [Delta]t - [alpha] -
[beta]et-1. The model can be estimated using standard
commercially available software. Using least
[[Page 55141]]
squares, the estimated parameter values are [alpha] = 0.0005219 and
[beta] = -0.87539.
6. For the month of August 2011 forecast
[Delta]t = 8/11 = [alpha] + [beta]et = 8/11.
For all subsequent months, forecast [Delta]t = [alpha].
7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For example, the forecast
of log(AAMOP) for October 2011 is given by
FLAAMOPt = 10/11 = log(AAMOPt = 7/11) +
[Delta]t = 8/11 +[Delta]t = 9/11 +
[Delta]t = 10/11.
8. Under the assumption that et is normally
distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of AAMOP is given by
exp(FLAAMOPt + [sigma]n\2\/2), where
[sigma]n denotes the standard error of the n-step ahead
forecast.
9. For October 2011, this gives a forecast AAMOP of $14.6
Billion (Column I), and a forecast AMOP of $307.6 Billion (Column
J).
10. Iterate this process through September 2012 to obtain a
baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
fiscal year 2012 of $3,708,294,634,490.
B. Using the Forecasts From A To Calculate the New Fee Rate.
1. Using the data from Table A, estimate the aggregate maximum
offering prices between 10/1/11 and 9/30/12 to be
$3,708,294,634,490.
2. The rate necessary to collect the target $425,000,000 in fee
revenues set by Congress is then calculated as: $425,000,000 /
$3,708,294,634,490 = 0.000114608.
3. Round the result to the seventh decimal point, yielding a
rate of 0.0001146 (or $114.60 per million).
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[[Page 55142]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.018
[[Page 55143]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.019
[[Page 55144]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.020
[[Page 55145]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.021
[[Page 55146]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.022
[[Page 55147]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06SE11.023
[[Page 55148]]
[FR Doc. 2011-22652 Filed 9-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-C