Healthlink, a Wellpoint, Inc. Company, Accounts Receivable and Collections Division, St. Louis, MO; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 54801 [2011-22552]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2011 / Notices
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
International Business Machines (IBM),
Software Group Business Unit, Quality
Assurance Group, San Jose, California.
Signed in Washington, DC on this 22nd
day of August, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–22562 Filed 9–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–80,213]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Healthlink, a Wellpoint, Inc. Company,
Accounts Receivable and Collections
Division, St. Louis, MO; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application received July 14, 2011,
a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers HealthLink, a
Wellpoint, Inc. Company, Accounts
Receivable and Collections Division, St.
Louis, Missouri (HealthLink-Accounts
Receivable Collections Division). The
negative determination was issued on
June 21, 2011. The Department’s Notice
of Determination was published in the
Federal Register on July 8, 2011 (76 FR
40402). The workers of HealthLinkAccounts Receivable Collections
Division are engaged in activities related
to the supply of health insurance
services: Accounts payable and
collections services.
The petition was filed on behalf of
‘‘finance’’ workers at HealthLink, St.
Louis, Missouri (HealthLink). The
petition states that the service supplied
by HealthLink is a ‘‘network of
providers through contracts to payors—
insurers and third party administrators’’
and that ‘‘production has been/is being
sent to India and services are being
outsourced to India.’’
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings that
HealthLink does not produce an article
within the meaning of Section 222(a) or
Section 222(b) of the Act. In order to be
considered eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker
group seeking certification (or on whose
behalf certification is being sought)
must work for a ‘‘firm’’ or appropriate
subdivision that produces an article.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:37 Sep 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner asserts that subject worker
group separations were due to a shift to
India and stated that ‘‘other Wellpoint
petitions for several other locations of
Financial Operation departments’’ have
worker groups eligible to apply for TAA.
The determinations referenced in the
request for reconsideration are
Wellpoint, Inc., Financial Operations
Recovery Department (TA–W–74,661
through TA–W–74,661H; issued on
January 7, 2011).
Workers covered by TA–W–74,661
were eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance because the
worker group eligibility requirements of
the Trade and Globalization Adjustment
Assistance Act of 2009 (Trade Act of
2009) was satisfied. Specifically, the
Department determined that there was a
shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign
country in the supply of services like or
directly competitive with those
supplied by the workers’ firm and that
the shift of services abroad contributed
importantly to worker group
separations.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
administrative reconsideration may be
granted under the following
circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
After the Trade Act of 2009 expired in
February 2011, petitions for TAA were
instituted under the Trade Adjustment
Assistance Reform Act of 2002 (Trade
Act of 2002). Therefore, the statute
applicable to TA–W–80,213 is the Trade
Act of 2002. The applicable regulation
is codified in 29 CFR 90, subpart B.
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 2002
establishes the worker group eligibility
requirements. The requirements include
either ‘‘imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have increased’’ or ‘‘a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision.’’
The request for reconsideration
asserts that workers separated at the
HealthLink, St. Louis, Missouri facility
are similar to workers covered by ‘‘other
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54801
locations of Financial Operation
departments that have been approved.’’
The certification for TA–W–74,661
was issued based on the Department’s
findings that the workers’ firm supplied
a service and that the supply of services
was shifted to a foreign country. The
shift of services that was the basis for
certification under the Trade Act of
2009 cannot be the basis for certification
under the Trade Act of 2002 because the
two statutes have different worker group
eligibility criteria.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, previously submitted
materials, the applicable statute, and
relevant regulation, the Department
determines that there is no new
information, mistake in fact, or
misinterpretation of the facts or of the
law.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of
August, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–22552 Filed 9–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–75,183]
Reynolds Food Packaging LLC, a
Subsidiary of Reynolds Group Holding
Limited, Grove City, PA; Notice of
Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On June 6, 2011, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued a Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) applicable to workers and former
workers of Reynolds Food Packaging
LLC, a subsidiary of Reynolds Group
Holding Limited, Grove City,
Pennsylvania (subject firm). Workers at
the subject firm are engaged in
employment related to the production of
disposable food service containers and
bulk sheet.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department received
new information that revealed that there
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22552]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-80,213]
Healthlink, a Wellpoint, Inc. Company, Accounts Receivable and
Collections Division, St. Louis, MO; Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application received July 14, 2011, a worker requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers HealthLink, a Wellpoint, Inc.
Company, Accounts Receivable and Collections Division, St. Louis,
Missouri (HealthLink-Accounts Receivable Collections Division). The
negative determination was issued on June 21, 2011. The Department's
Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on July
8, 2011 (76 FR 40402). The workers of HealthLink-Accounts Receivable
Collections Division are engaged in activities related to the supply of
health insurance services: Accounts payable and collections services.
The petition was filed on behalf of ``finance'' workers at
HealthLink, St. Louis, Missouri (HealthLink). The petition states that
the service supplied by HealthLink is a ``network of providers through
contracts to payors--insurers and third party administrators'' and that
``production has been/is being sent to India and services are being
outsourced to India.''
The negative determination was based on the Department's findings
that HealthLink does not produce an article within the meaning of
Section 222(a) or Section 222(b) of the Act. In order to be considered
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, the worker group seeking certification (or on whose
behalf certification is being sought) must work for a ``firm'' or
appropriate subdivision that produces an article.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner asserts that
subject worker group separations were due to a shift to India and
stated that ``other Wellpoint petitions for several other locations of
Financial Operation departments'' have worker groups eligible to apply
for TAA.
The determinations referenced in the request for reconsideration
are Wellpoint, Inc., Financial Operations Recovery Department (TA-W-
74,661 through TA-W-74,661H; issued on January 7, 2011).
Workers covered by TA-W-74,661 were eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance because the worker group eligibility requirements
of the Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009 (Trade
Act of 2009) was satisfied. Specifically, the Department determined
that there was a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the
supply of services like or directly competitive with those supplied by
the workers' firm and that the shift of services abroad contributed
importantly to worker group separations.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), administrative reconsideration may be
granted under the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
After the Trade Act of 2009 expired in February 2011, petitions for
TAA were instituted under the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of
2002 (Trade Act of 2002). Therefore, the statute applicable to TA-W-
80,213 is the Trade Act of 2002. The applicable regulation is codified
in 29 CFR 90, subpart B.
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 2002 establishes the worker group
eligibility requirements. The requirements include either ``imports of
articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such
firm or subdivision have increased'' or ``a shift in production by such
workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision.''
The request for reconsideration asserts that workers separated at
the HealthLink, St. Louis, Missouri facility are similar to workers
covered by ``other locations of Financial Operation departments that
have been approved.''
The certification for TA-W-74,661 was issued based on the
Department's findings that the workers' firm supplied a service and
that the supply of services was shifted to a foreign country. The shift
of services that was the basis for certification under the Trade Act of
2009 cannot be the basis for certification under the Trade Act of 2002
because the two statutes have different worker group eligibility
criteria.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, previously
submitted materials, the applicable statute, and relevant regulation,
the Department determines that there is no new information, mistake in
fact, or misinterpretation of the facts or of the law.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of August, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-22552 Filed 9-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P