In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices Having a Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation; Termination of the Investigation, 54496 [2011-22359]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 54496 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 2, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Sony Corporation of Japan. 76 FR 5824–25. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile telephones and modems by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,311,092; 5,907,604; 6,263,205; 6,507,611; 6,674,464; 7,839,477; and 6,674,732. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named the following respondents: LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea; LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; and LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc. of San Diego, California. On February 28, 2011, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ’s ID setting a target date of August 2, 2012, for completion of the investigation. On August 10, 2011, complainant and respondents jointly moved to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in this investigation. The ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 17) on August 11, 2011, granting the motion for termination. He found that the motion for termination satisfies Commission rule 210.21(b). He further VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:16 Aug 31, 2011 Jkt 223001 found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this investigation by settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID, and the investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 26, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–22358 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–774] In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices Having a Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 5) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on June 6, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Zenith Electronics LLC of Lincolnshire, Illinois. 76 FR. 32373–74. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices having a digital television receiver and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,598,220; 5,629,958; and 5,636,251. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named the following respondents: Sony Corporation of Japan; Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York; and Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California. On August 10, 2011, complainant and respondents jointly moved to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in this investigation. The ALJ issued the subject ID on August 11, 2011, granting the motion for termination. He found that the motion for termination satisfies Commission rule 210.21(b). He further found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this investigation by settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID, and the investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. Issued: August 26, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–22359 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-774]


 In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices Having a Digital 
Television Receiver and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Investigation; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 5) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation based on a 
settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on June 6, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Zenith Electronics LLC 
of Lincolnshire, Illinois. 76 FR. 32373-74. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain electronic devices having a digital television receiver and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 5,598,220; 5,629,958; and 5,636,251. The complaint further 
alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission's notice 
of investigation named the following respondents: Sony Corporation of 
Japan; Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York; and Sony 
Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California.
    On August 10, 2011, complainant and respondents jointly moved to 
terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in this 
investigation.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID on August 11, 2011, granting the 
motion for termination. He found that the motion for termination 
satisfies Commission rule 210.21(b). He further found, pursuant to 
Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this investigation by 
settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for 
review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID, 
and the investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-22359 Filed 8-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.