Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic From China, 54487-54490 [2011-22275]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices
The effective date of the Buy
American Waiver approval was
August 16, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wilson Orvis, Grants Management
Analyst—Acquisition and Assistance
Management Division, Bureau of
Reclamation, Denver Federal Center,
Building 56, Room 1006, P.O. Box
25007 (84–27850), Denver, CO 80225–
0007; telephone: (303) 445–2444; or via
e-mail at worvis@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
The total estimated cost of the ELIPS
project is $33,000,000, of which
$21,400,000 is the Federal cost-share of
the ARRA funded grant. The ductile
iron flanges are not available in the
United States and are necessary for the
construction of the ELIPS project. The
SDBOC engineers conducted market
research for the domestic ductile iron
flange production industry and
determined there is currently no
domestic availability for ductile iron
flanges for use with HDPE and PVC
pipe.
Congress has enacted a Buy American
provision which requires manufactured
goods permanently incorporated into a
project funded with ARRA funds to be
produced in the United States. The
application of Buy American is triggered
by the obligation of Federal ARRA funds
to a project. Once ARRA funds are
obligated to a project, then all iron,
steel, and manufactured goods
incorporated into the project must be
produced in the United States. The
specific statutory requirement reads as
follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 1605 of the Recovery Act prohibits
the use of recovery funds for a project for the
construction, alteration, maintenance, or
public work unless all of the iron, steel, and
manufactured goods are produced in the
United States.
2 CFR 176.80
Under 2 CFR 176.80(a), the head of
the Federal department or agency may
waive the Buy American requirements
for specific products on an ARRA
funded construction project when Buy
American is inconsistent with the
public interest; such materials and
products are not produced in the United
States in sufficient and reasonably
available quantities and of satisfactory
quality; or inclusion of domestic
material will increase the cost of the
overall project contract by more than 25
percent.
The waiver process is initiated by a
requesting organization when it believes
that a waiver is warranted pursuant to
any of the three waiver provisions under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
2 CFR 176.80(a). The SDBOC submitted
a Buy American waiver request based
on the waiver provision under 2 CFR
176.80(a)(1)—Nonavailability. The
project requirements specified the use of
ductile iron flanges that were
determined through industry research
conducted by SDBOC to not be
domestically available. Based on the
confirmation that these ductile iron
flanges used with HDPE pipe are not
currently available, Reclamation
approved the Buy American waiver
request.
Reclamation’s publication of its Buy
American decision is required pursuant
to the Buy American Act, 2 CFR
176.80(b)(2). The specific statutory
requirement reads as follows:
The head of the Federal department or
agency shall publish a notice in the Federal
Register within two weeks after the
determination is made, unless the item has
been already determined to be domestically
non-available. A list of items that are not
domestically available is at 48 CFR 25.104(a).
The Federal Register notice or information
from the notice may be posted by OMB to
Recovery.gov. The notice shall include—(i)
The title ‘‘Buy American Exception under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009’’; (ii) The dollar value and brief
description of the project; and (iii) A detailed
written justification as to why the restriction
is being waived.
Upon publication of this Federal
Register notice, Reclamation is notifying
the public of the decision to approve the
Buy American waiver requested by the
SDBOC to purchase foreign ductile iron
flanges as part of the ARRA grant for the
SDBOC ELIPS project located in
Sunnyside, Washington.
Dated: August 26, 2011.
Karl E. Wirkus,
Pacific Northwest Regional Director, Bureau
of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2011–22385 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Charter Renewal, Glen Canyon Dam
Adaptive Management Work Group
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of renewal.
AGENCY:
Following consultation with
the General Services Administration,
notice is hereby given that the Secretary
of the Interior (Secretary) is renewing
the charter for the Glen Canyon Dam
Adaptive Management Work Group. The
purpose of the Adaptive Management
Work Group is to advise and to provide
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54487
recommendations to the Secretary with
respect to the operation of Glen Canyon
Dam and the exercise of other
authorities pursuant to applicable
Federal law.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Whetton, 801–524–3880.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in accordance with
Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92–463,
as amended). The certification of
renewal is published below.
Certification
I hereby certify that Charter renewal
of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive
Management Work Group is in the
public interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the
Department of the Interior.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011–22382 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–683; Third
Review]
Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of
a Five-Year Review Concerning the
Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh
Garlic From China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the
Act) to determine whether revocation of
the antidumping duty order on fresh
garlic from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission; 1 to be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is October 3, 2011.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
SUMMARY:
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–257,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54488
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices
November 10, 2011. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently
amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16,
2009).
DATES: Effective Date: September 1,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On November 16, 1994,
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping
duty order on imports of fresh garlic
from China (59 FR 59209). Following
first five-year reviews by Commerce and
the Commission, effective March 13,
2001, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on
imports of fresh garlic from China (66
FR 14544). Following second five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective October 19, 2006,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
fresh garlic from China (71 FR 61708).
The Commission is now conducting a
third review to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. It
will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited
review. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited review
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination, the Commission found
three separate Domestic Like Products
consisting of fresh garlic, dehydrated
garlic, and seed garlic corresponding
with the broader scope of the original
investigation. However, the Commission
found that the domestic industries
producing garlic for dehydration and
seed garlic were neither materially
injured nor threatened with material
injury by reason of the subject imports
from China. One Commissioner defined
the Domestic Like Product differently in
the original determination. In its full
first five-year review determination, the
Commission defined the Domestic Like
Product as all fresh garlic. Consistent
with its Domestic Like Product
definition in the original investigation
and first five-year review, the
Commission found in its expedited
second five-year review determination a
single Domestic Like Product consisting
of all fresh garlic, coextensive with
Commerce’s scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination,
the Commission found three Domestic
Industries consisting of the domestic
producers of fresh garlic, the domestic
producers of dehydrated garlic, and the
domestic producers of seed garlic to
coincide with the three Domestic Like
Products. The Commission also found
that crop tenders were not members of
the Domestic Industry. One
Commissioner defined the Domestic
Industry differently in the original
determination. In its full first five-year
review determination, consistent with
Commerce’s narrower scope and the
Commission’s Domestic Like Product
definition of a single Domestic Like
Product consisting of all fresh garlic, the
Commission found a single Domestic
Industry consisting of all producers of
fresh garlic. In its expedited second fiveyear review determination, the
Commission once again found a single
Domestic Industry consisting of all
domestic producers of fresh garlic.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the review and public
service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the review as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the
Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the review.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The
Commission’s designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year
review is not considered the ‘‘same
particular matter’’ as the corresponding
underlying original investigation for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 207, the post
employment statute for Federal
employees, and Commission rule
201.15(b) (19 CFR § 201.15(b)), 73 FR
24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was
developed in consultation with the
Office of Government Ethics.
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR § 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation was pending when they
were Commission employees. For
further ethics advice on this matter,
contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205–
3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in this review available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the review, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C.
§ 1677(9), who are parties to the review.
A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with this
review must certify that the information
is accurate and complete to the best of
the submitter’s knowledge. In making
the certification, the submitter will be
deemed to consent, unless otherwise
specified, for the Commission, its
employees, and contract personnel to
use the information provided in any
other reviews or investigations of the
same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is October 3, 2011.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct an
expedited or full review. The deadline
for filing such comments is November
10, 2011. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of sections
201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission’s
rules and any submissions that contain
BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and
207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The
Commission’s rules do not authorize
filing of submissions with the Secretary
by facsimile or electronic means, except
to the extent permitted by section 201.8
of the Commission’s rules, as amended,
67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also,
in accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by
either the public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the review you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determination in the review.
Information To Be Provided in
Response to This Notice of Institution:
As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes
any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and e-mail address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in this review by providing information
requested by the Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
§ 1675a(a)) including the likely volume
of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
§ 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
May 2005.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54489
number, fax number, and e-mail address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during crop
year 2011 (June 2010–May 2011), except
as noted (report quantity data in pounds
and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b.
plant). If you are a union/worker group
or trade/business association, provide
the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms in which your workers are
employed/which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e.,
the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) The quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s);
(d) The quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(e) The value of (i) Net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during crop
year 2011 (June 2010–May 2011) (report
quantity data in pounds and value data
in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54490
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports
and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’)
imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject
Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during crop year 2011 (June
2010–May 2011) (report quantity data in
pounds and value data in U.S. dollars,
landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port
but not including antidumping duties).
If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members
of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) The quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country after May 2005, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 25, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–22275 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–702; Third
Review]
Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium
From Russia; Institution of a Five-Year
Review Concerning the Antidumping
Duty Order on Ferrovanadium and
Nitrided Vanadium From Russia
United States International
Trade Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the
Act) to determine whether revocation of
the antidumping duty order on
ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium
from Russia would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of
the Act, interested parties are requested
to respond to this notice by submitting
the information specified below to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission; 1 to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for
responses is October 3, 2011. Comments
on the adequacy of responses may be
filed with the Commission by November
10, 2011. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207), as most recently amended at 74 FR
2847 (January 16, 2009).
DATES: Effective Date: September 1,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On July 10, 1995, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’)
issued an antidumping duty order on
imports of ferrovanadium and nitrided
vanadium from Russia (60 FR 35550).
Following first five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective June 7, 2001, Commerce issued
a continuation of the antidumping duty
order on imports of ferrovanadium and
nitrided vanadium from Russia (66 FR
30694). Following second five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective October 13, 2006,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium
from Russia (71 FR 60475). The
Commission is now conducting a third
review to determine whether revocation
of the order would be likely to lead to
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–256,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54487-54490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22275]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-683; Third Review]
Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic From China
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a
review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
Sec. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to
the Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for
responses is October 3, 2011. Comments on the adequacy of responses may
be filed with the Commission by
[[Page 54488]]
November 10, 2011. For further information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR
part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207), as
most recently amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 11-5-257,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: September 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On November 16, 1994, the Department of Commerce
(``Commerce'') issued an antidumping duty order on imports of fresh
garlic from China (59 FR 59209). Following first five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission, effective March 13, 2001, Commerce issued
a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh garlic
from China (66 FR 14544). Following second five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission, effective October 19, 2006, Commerce
issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh
garlic from China (71 FR 61708). The Commission is now conducting a
third review to determine whether revocation of the order would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess
the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an
expedited review. The Commission's determination in any expedited
review will be based on the facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination, the Commission found three separate Domestic Like
Products consisting of fresh garlic, dehydrated garlic, and seed garlic
corresponding with the broader scope of the original investigation.
However, the Commission found that the domestic industries producing
garlic for dehydration and seed garlic were neither materially injured
nor threatened with material injury by reason of the subject imports
from China. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Like Product
differently in the original determination. In its full first five-year
review determination, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product
as all fresh garlic. Consistent with its Domestic Like Product
definition in the original investigation and first five-year review,
the Commission found in its expedited second five-year review
determination a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all fresh
garlic, coextensive with Commerce's scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the
Commission found three Domestic Industries consisting of the domestic
producers of fresh garlic, the domestic producers of dehydrated garlic,
and the domestic producers of seed garlic to coincide with the three
Domestic Like Products. The Commission also found that crop tenders
were not members of the Domestic Industry. One Commissioner defined the
Domestic Industry differently in the original determination. In its
full first five-year review determination, consistent with Commerce's
narrower scope and the Commission's Domestic Like Product definition of
a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all fresh garlic, the
Commission found a single Domestic Industry consisting of all producers
of fresh garlic. In its expedited second five-year review
determination, the Commission once again found a single Domestic
Industry consisting of all domestic producers of fresh garlic.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the review and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the review as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the review.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The Commission's designated agency
ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not considered
the ``same particular matter'' as the corresponding underlying original
investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR
Sec. 201.15(b)), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was developed
in consultation with the Office of Government Ethics. Consequently,
former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear
in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR Sec. 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original investigation was pending when they
were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter,
contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at 202-
205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in this review available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the review, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1677(9), who are
parties to the review. A separate service list will be maintained by
the Secretary for those
[[Page 54489]]
parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with this review must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent,
unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews
or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the
Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is October 3, 2011. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing
such comments is November 10, 2011. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the
Commission's rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except
to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as
amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with
sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to
the review (as identified by either the public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document
(if you are not a party to the review you do not need to serve your
response).
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its determination
in the review.
Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of
Institution: As used below, the term ``firm'' includes any related
firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in this review by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. Sec.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price
effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject
Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. Sec. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after May 2005.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and e-mail address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during crop year 2011 (June 2010-May 2011), except as noted
(report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b.
plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which
your workers are employed/which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could
reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready
to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year),
time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix);
(c) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
(d) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
and
(e) The value of (i) Net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country,
provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that
product during crop year 2011 (June 2010-May 2011) (report quantity
data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
[[Page 54490]]
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the
Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported
from the Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during crop year 2011 (June 2010-May 2011)
(report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed
and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties).
If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that
your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during
the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and
machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels
(hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance,
repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and
(c) The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country after May 2005, and significant
changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology;
production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production facilities used for other products
and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production);
and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets
or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of
substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic
Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other
countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 25, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-22275 Filed 8-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P