Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 54208-54209 [2011-22327]
Download as PDF
54208
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Notices
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive.
Background
On June 2, 2010, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
orders on SSPC from Belgium, Italy,
Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See Initiation.
On July 20, 2011, the ITC determined,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
that revocation of this order would not
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time. See ITC
Final and Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
from Belgium, Italy, Korea, South
Africa, and Taiwan (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–
379 and 731–TA–788, 790–793 (Second
Review), USITC Publication 4248 (Aug.
2011).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0629 or
(202) 482–3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
As a result of the determination by the
ITC that revocation of the order is not
likely to lead to the continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department, pursuant to section 751(d)
of the Act, is revoking the antidumping
duty order on SSPC from Italy. Pursuant
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of
revocation is July 18, 2010 (i.e., the fifth
anniversary of the date of publication in
the Federal Register of the notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
order). The Department will notify U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
discontinue suspension of liquidation
and collection of cash deposits on
entries of SSPC from Italy entered or
withdrawn from warehouse on or after
July 18, 2010, the effective date of
revocation of the antidumping duty
order. The Department will further
instruct CBP to refund with interest any
cash deposits on entries made on or
after July 18, 2010.
This revocation and notice are issued
in accordance with section 751(d)(2) of
the Act and published pursuant to
section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2).
Scope of the Order
Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject plate products are
flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in
width and 4.75 mm or more in
thickness, in coils, and annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled. The subject plate
may also be further processed (e.g.,
cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that
it maintains the specified dimensions of
plate following such processing.
Excluded from the scope of the order are
the following: (1) Plate not in coils, (2)
plate that is not annealed or otherwise
heat treated and pickled or otherwise
descaled, (3) sheet and strip, and (4) flat
bars.
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheadings:
7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60,
7219.12.00.06, 7219.12.00.21,
7219.12.00.26, 7219.12.00.51,
7219.12.00.56, 7219.12.00.66,
7219.12.00.71, 7219.12.00.81,
7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10,
7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25,
7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80,
7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10,
7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60,
7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05,
7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15,
7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80,
7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15,
7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
Revocation
Dated: August 22, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–22153 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation
of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2011.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a
request for a new shipper review of the
antidumping duty order on wooden
bedroom furniture from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) meets the
statutory and regulatory requirements
for initiation. The period of review
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(‘‘POR’’) for the new shipper review is
January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick O’Connor or Rebecca Pandolph,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0989 or (202) 482–
3627 respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The antidumping duty order on
wooden bedroom furniture from the
PRC was published on January 4, 2005.
See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture
From the People’s Republic of China, 70
FR 329 (January 4, 2005). On August 1,
2011, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the ‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the
Department received a timely request
for a new shipper review from Marvin
Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
(‘‘Marvin’’). On August 11, 2011, and
August 19, 2011, the Department issued
supplemental questionnaires to Marvin.
On August 19, 2011, Marvin submitted
its response to the August 11, 2011
supplemental questionnaire. On August
19, 2011, the Department placed entry
data received from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) on the record
of this proceeding and provided
interested parties with an opportunity to
comment on the data. On August 24,
2011, Marvin commented on the CBP
data and requested an extension to file
its response to the August 19, 2011
supplemental questionnaire.
Marvin stated that it is both the
exporter and producer of the subject
merchandise upon which its request for
a new shipper review is based. Pursuant
to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Marvin
certified that it did not export wooden
bedroom furniture to the United States
during the period of investigation
(‘‘POI’’). In addition, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Marvin certified
that, since the initiation of the
investigation, it has never been affiliated
with any PRC exporter or producer who
exported wooden bedroom furniture to
the United States during the POI,
including those not individually
examined during the investigation. As
required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B),
Marvin also certified that its export
activities were not controlled by the
central government of the PRC. See
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
generally, Memorandum to the File
through Abdelali Elouaradia, Director,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4: Initiation
of Antidumping New Shipper Review of
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People’s Republic of China: Marvin
Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.:
(‘‘Initiation Checklist’’), dated
concurrently with this notice.
In addition to the certifications
described above, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iv), Marvin submitted
documentation establishing the
following: (1) The date on which it first
shipped wooden bedroom furniture for
export to the United States and the date
on which the wooden bedroom
furniture was first entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption; (2) the volume of its first
shipment; and (3) the date of its first
sale to an unaffiliated customer in the
United States. See generally, Initiation
Checklist.
The Department conducted a CBP
database query and confirmed by
examining the results of the CBP data
query that Marvin’s subject merchandise
entered the United States during the
POR specified by the Department’s
regulations. See 19 CFR
351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department will
publish the notice of initiation of a new
shipper review no later than the last day
of the month following the anniversary
or semiannual anniversary month of the
order.
review of the exporter will proceed if
the response provides sufficient
indication that the exporter is not
subject to either de jure or de facto
government control with respect to its
exports of wooden bedroom furniture.
We will instruct CBP to allow, at the
option of the importer, the posting, until
the completion of the review, of a bond
or security in lieu of a cash deposit for
certain entries of the subject
merchandise from Marvin in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.214(e). Because Marvin
stated that it both produces and exports
the subject merchandise, the sales of
which form the basis for its new shipper
review request, we will instruct CBP to
permit the use of a bond only for entries
of subject merchandise which the
respondent both produced and
exported.
Interested parties requiring access to
proprietary information in this new
shipper review should submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and notice are
published in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Initiation of New Shipper Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
Act, 19 CFR 351.214(b), and the
information on the record, the
Department finds that Marvin meets the
threshold requirements for initiation of
a new shipper review of its shipment(s)
of wooden bedroom furniture from the
PRC. See generally, Initiation Checklist.
The POR for the new shipper review of
Marvin is January 1, 2011, through June
30, 2011. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(B).
The Department intends to issue the
preliminary results of this review no
later than 180 days from the date of
initiation, and the final results of this
review no later than 270 days from the
date of initiation. See section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
It is the Department’s usual practice,
in cases involving non-market
economies, to require that a company
seeking to establish eligibility for an
antidumping duty rate separate from the
country-wide rate provide evidence of
de jure and de facto absence of
government control over the company’s
export activities. Accordingly, we will
issue a questionnaire to Marvin which
will include a separate rate section. The
[FR Doc. 2011–22327 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: August 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–818]
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat
products (CORE) from the Republic of
Korea (Korea) for the period of review
(POR) January 1, 2009, through
December 31, 2009. For information on
the net subsidy for Hyundai HYSCO
Ltd. (HYSCO), the company reviewed,
see the ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’
section of this notice. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54209
preliminary results. See the ‘‘Public
Comment’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, Room
4014, 14th Street and Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 17, 1993, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
CVD order on CORE from Korea. See
Countervailing Duty Orders and
Amendments of Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determinations:
Certain Steel Products from Korea, 58
FR 43752 (August 17, 1993). On August
2, 2010, the Department published a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of this CVD order.
See Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation: Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 45094
(August 2, 2010).
On August 31, 2010, we received
timely requests for review and partial
revocation of the countervailing duty
order from Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
(Dongbu) and Pohang Iron and Steel Co.,
Ltd. (POSCO); we also received a timely
request for review from Hyundai
HYSCO Ltd. On September 29, 2010, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of the administrative review of
the CVD order on CORE from Korea
covering the period January 1, 2009,
through December 31, 2009. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part (Initiation), 75 FR 60076
(September 29, 2010).
On September 27, 2010, and October
1, 2010, Dongbu and POSCO,
respectively, withdrew their requests for
review and partial revocation of the
CVD order on CORE from Korea. On
January 25, 2011, we rescinded, in part,
this review of the CVD order of CORE
from Korea with regard to Dongbu and
POSCO. See Corrosion-Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From the Republic of
Korea: Partial Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 76 FR 4291 (January 25, 2011).
On October 18, 2010, the Department
issued the initial questionnaire to
HYSCO, and the Government of Korea
(GOK). On December 15, 2010, the
Department received questionnaire
responses from HYSCO and the GOK.
On February 17, 2011, March 25, 2011,
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54208-54209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2011.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has determined
that a request for a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order
on wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC'') meets the statutory and regulatory requirements for
initiation. The period of review (``POR'') for the new shipper review
is January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor or Rebecca Pandolph,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0989 or (202) 482-3627 respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC
was published on January 4, 2005. See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China, 70
FR 329 (January 4, 2005). On August 1, 2011, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''),
and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the Department received a timely request for a
new shipper review from Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
(``Marvin''). On August 11, 2011, and August 19, 2011, the Department
issued supplemental questionnaires to Marvin. On August 19, 2011,
Marvin submitted its response to the August 11, 2011 supplemental
questionnaire. On August 19, 2011, the Department placed entry data
received from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') on the
record of this proceeding and provided interested parties with an
opportunity to comment on the data. On August 24, 2011, Marvin
commented on the CBP data and requested an extension to file its
response to the August 19, 2011 supplemental questionnaire.
Marvin stated that it is both the exporter and producer of the
subject merchandise upon which its request for a new shipper review is
based. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(i), Marvin certified that it did not export wooden
bedroom furniture to the United States during the period of
investigation (``POI''). In addition, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Marvin
certified that, since the initiation of the investigation, it has never
been affiliated with any PRC exporter or producer who exported wooden
bedroom furniture to the United States during the POI, including those
not individually examined during the investigation. As required by 19
CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), Marvin also certified that its export
activities were not controlled by the central government of the PRC.
See
[[Page 54209]]
generally, Memorandum to the File through Abdelali Elouaradia,
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4: Initiation of Antidumping New
Shipper Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic
of China: Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.: (``Initiation
Checklist''), dated concurrently with this notice.
In addition to the certifications described above, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv), Marvin submitted documentation establishing the
following: (1) The date on which it first shipped wooden bedroom
furniture for export to the United States and the date on which the
wooden bedroom furniture was first entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption; (2) the volume of its first shipment; and
(3) the date of its first sale to an unaffiliated customer in the
United States. See generally, Initiation Checklist.
The Department conducted a CBP database query and confirmed by
examining the results of the CBP data query that Marvin's subject
merchandise entered the United States during the POR specified by the
Department's regulations. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department will publish the notice of
initiation of a new shipper review no later than the last day of the
month following the anniversary or semiannual anniversary month of the
order.
Initiation of New Shipper Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.214(b), and
the information on the record, the Department finds that Marvin meets
the threshold requirements for initiation of a new shipper review of
its shipment(s) of wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC. See
generally, Initiation Checklist. The POR for the new shipper review of
Marvin is January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. See 19 CFR
351.214(g)(1)(i)(B). The Department intends to issue the preliminary
results of this review no later than 180 days from the date of
initiation, and the final results of this review no later than 270 days
from the date of initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
It is the Department's usual practice, in cases involving non-
market economies, to require that a company seeking to establish
eligibility for an antidumping duty rate separate from the country-wide
rate provide evidence of de jure and de facto absence of government
control over the company's export activities. Accordingly, we will
issue a questionnaire to Marvin which will include a separate rate
section. The review of the exporter will proceed if the response
provides sufficient indication that the exporter is not subject to
either de jure or de facto government control with respect to its
exports of wooden bedroom furniture.
We will instruct CBP to allow, at the option of the importer, the
posting, until the completion of the review, of a bond or security in
lieu of a cash deposit for certain entries of the subject merchandise
from Marvin in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.214(e). Because Marvin stated that it both produces and
exports the subject merchandise, the sales of which form the basis for
its new shipper review request, we will instruct CBP to permit the use
of a bond only for entries of subject merchandise which the respondent
both produced and exported.
Interested parties requiring access to proprietary information in
this new shipper review should submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and notice are published in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: August 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-22327 Filed 8-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P