Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 51432-51434 [2011-21055]

Download as PDF 51432 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–21054 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–70,520; TA–W–70,520A] The Boeing Company; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In The Matter of: TA–W–70,520; The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group; Including OnSite Leased Workers From Comforce Corporation, Adecco, Multax, Inconen, CTS, Hi-Tec, Woods, Ciber, Kelly Services, Analysts Internatinal Corp, Comsys, Filter LLC, Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian Martin, Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX Solutions (NWCAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, Volt, PDS, CDI Corp, Teksystems, Innovative Systems, Inc., Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI Tech, RMS and PSC Industrial Services, Inc.; Puget Sound, Washington. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES In the matter of; TA–W–70,520A; The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group; Including On-Site Leased Workers From Comforce Corporation, Adecco, Multax, Inconen, CTS, Hi-Tec, Woods, Ciber, Kelly Services, Analysts Internatinal Corp, Comsys, Filter LLC, Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian Martin, Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX Solutions (NWCAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, Volt, PDS, CDI Corp, Teksystems, Innovative Systems, Inc., Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI Tech, RMS And PSC Industrial Services, Inc., Portland, Oregon; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance. In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 19, 2009, applicable to workers of The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group, Puget Sound, Washington, (TA–W–70,520), and The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group, Portland, Oregon (TA– W–70,520A). The notice was published in the Federal Register on December 11, 2009 (74 FR 65794–65795). The notice was amended on January 8, 2010 and March 26, 2010 to include on-site leased workers. The notices were published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2010 (75 FR 3250–3251) and on April VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 17, 2011 Jkt 223001 19, 2010 (75 FR 20385–20386), respectively. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of large commercial aircraft. The company reports that on-site leased workers from PSC Industrial Services, Inc. were employed on-site at both the Puget Sound, Washington and Portland, Oregon locations of The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending the certification to include leased workers from PSC Industrial Services, Inc. working on-site at the Puget Sound, Washington and Portland, Oregon locations of The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group. The amended notice applicable to the TA–W–70,520 and TA–W 70,520A are hereby issued as follows: All workers of The Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft Group, including on-site leased workers from Comforce Corporation, Adecco, Multax, Inconen, CTS, Hi-Tec, Woods, Ciber, Kelly Services, Analysts International Corp, Comsys, Filter LLC, Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian Martin, Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX Solutions (NW CAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, Volt, PDS, CDI Corp, Teksystems, Innovative Systems, Inc., Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI Tech, RMS and PSC Industrial Services, Inc., Puget Sound, Washington (TA–W–70,520), and Portland, Oregon (TA–W–70,520A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 22, 2008, through October 19, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2011. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–21057 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of July 25, 2011 through July 29, 2011. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,093; The Pearlson Company, LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: March 7, 2010. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 17, 2011 Jkt 223001 Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,002; Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., Barberton, Ohio: February 15, 2010 TA–W–80,046; General Aluminum, Rome, Georgia: March 14, 2010 TA–W–80,226; Camco Cedar, Tacoma, Washington: June 28, 2010 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,107; Muller Martini Manufacturing Corp., Newport News, Virginia: April 13, 2010 TA–W–80,149; Doral Manufacturing, Inc., Doral, Florida: July 1, 2011 TA–W–80,158; Flextronics, San Diego, California: May 3, 2010 TA–W–80,169; Boardman Molded Products, Kessler Marketing Group, Youngstown, Ohio: April 30, 2010 TA–W–80,181; L’Oreal, USA Products, Clark, New Jersey: May 9, 2010 TA–W–80,237; Inteva Products, LLC, Gadsden, Alabama: June 15, 2010 TA–W–80,255; Technicolor Business Group, Camarillo, California: October 3, 2011 TA–W–80,259; Welded Tube of Canada, Inc., Delta, Ohio: June 15, 2010 Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. TA–W–80,093; The Pearlson Company, LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: Negative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51433 Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–208; General Motors Components Holdings, LLC, Rochester, New York TA–W–80,247; DMAX Ltd., LLC, Moraine, Ohio The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–80,015; ACS Commercial Solutions, Inc., Liberty, Kentucky TA–W–80,028; Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Hillsboro, Oregon TA–W–80,052; Lancaster Eagle-Gazette, Lancaster, Ohio TA–W–80,053; Shiloh Steel Fabricators, Bethel Heights, Arkansas TA–W–80,057; Orchard Brands, Athens, Georgia TA–W–80,266; BAE Systems, Survivability Systems, LLC, Fairfield, Ohio The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–80,013; Robb & Stucky Limited, LLP, Fort Myers, Florida Determinations Terminating Investigations Of Petitions For Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA–W–80,012; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern PA TA–W–80,171; Panasonic Corporation of North America, Rolling Meadow, Illinois I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of July 25, 2011 through July 29, 2011. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1 51434 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: August 5, 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office, Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–21055 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of August 1, 2011 through August 5, 2011. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 17, 2011 Jkt 223001 B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,081; SuperMedia, LLC, Los Alamitos, Texas; March 29, 2010. TA–W–80,130; Oak Patch Gifts, LLC, Eugene, Oregon: April 19, 2010. TA–W–80,133; Nevion USA, Inc., Oxnard, California; April 26, 2010. TA–W–80,276; Foster Needle Co., Inc., Manitowoc, Wisconsin; June 30, 2010. TA–W–80,296; B&H Flowers, Inc., Watsonville, California; July 31, 2010. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,254; PI. US Holding, Inc., Fort Smith, Arkansas; June 24, 2010. TA–W–80,277; Vermont Transformer, Inc., Saint Albans, Vermont; July 7, 2010. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,210; United Solar Ovonic, Greenville, Michigan; June 1, 2010. TA–W–80,283; Craftwood, Inc., High Point, North Carolina; February 7, 2011. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51432-51434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of July 25, 
2011 through July 29, 2011.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding

[[Page 51433]]

eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the 
group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be 
met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements 
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-80,093; The Pearlson Company, LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: March 7, 
2010.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-80,002; Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., Barberton, 
Ohio: February 15, 2010
TA-W-80,046; General Aluminum, Rome, Georgia: March 14, 2010
TA-W-80,226; Camco Cedar, Tacoma, Washington: June 28, 2010

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-80,107; Muller Martini Manufacturing Corp., Newport News, 
Virginia: April 13, 2010
TA-W-80,149; Doral Manufacturing, Inc., Doral, Florida: July 1, 2011
TA-W-80,158; Flextronics, San Diego, California: May 3, 2010
TA-W-80,169; Boardman Molded Products, Kessler Marketing Group, 
Youngstown, Ohio: April 30, 2010
TA-W-80,181; L'Oreal, USA Products, Clark, New Jersey: May 9, 2010
TA-W-80,237; Inteva Products, LLC, Gadsden, Alabama: June 15, 2010
TA-W-80,255; Technicolor Business Group, Camarillo, California: October 
3, 2011
TA-W-80,259; Welded Tube of Canada, Inc., Delta, Ohio: June 15, 2010

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 
years of age or older.

TA-W-80,093; The Pearlson Company, LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: Negative 
Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance And Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance
    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

TA-W-208; General Motors Components Holdings, LLC, Rochester, New York
TA-W-80,247; DMAX Ltd., LLC, Moraine, Ohio

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-80,015; ACS Commercial Solutions, Inc., Liberty, Kentucky
TA-W-80,028; Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Hillsboro, Oregon
TA-W-80,052; Lancaster Eagle-Gazette, Lancaster, Ohio
TA-W-80,053; Shiloh Steel Fabricators, Bethel Heights, Arkansas
TA-W-80,057; Orchard Brands, Athens, Georgia
TA-W-80,266; BAE Systems, Survivability Systems, LLC, Fairfield, Ohio

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-80,013; Robb & Stucky Limited, LLP, Fort Myers, Florida

Determinations Terminating Investigations Of Petitions For Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W-80,012; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern PA
TA-W-80,171; Panasonic Corporation of North America, Rolling Meadow, 
Illinois

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were 
issued during the period of July 25, 2011 through July 29, 2011. 
Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of 
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, 
or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ETA),

[[Page 51434]]

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are 
available on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

     Dated: August 5, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office, Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-21055 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.