Sulfanilic Acid From China and India, 50756-50757 [2011-20790]
Download as PDF
50756
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices
Secretary of Commerce on August 10,
2011. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4250
(August 2011), entitled Heavy Forged
Hand Tools From China: Investigation
Nos. 731–TA–457–A–D (Third Review).
Issued: August 10, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20731 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled In Re Certain Devices for
Improving Uniformity Used in a
Backlight Module and Products
Containing the Same, DN 2839; the
Commission is soliciting comments on
any public interest issues raised by the
complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
filed on behalf of Industrial Technology
Research Institute and ITRI
International on August 10, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Aug 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain devices for
improving uniformity used in a
backlight module and products
containing the same. The complaint
names as respondents LG Corporation of
South Korea; LG Electronics, Inc. of
South Korea; and LG Electronics,
U.S.A., Inc. of NJ.
The complainant, proposed
respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited
to file comments, not to exceed five
pages in length, on any public interest
issues raised by the complaint.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation would negatively affect the
public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production
of like or directly competitive articles in
the United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, five
business days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Submissions should
refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No.
2839’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. The
Commission’s rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means only to the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the
rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
documents/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10,
210.50(a)(4)).
Issued: August 10, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20762 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318, 731–TA–
538 and 561; Third Review]
Sulfanilic Acid From China and India
Scheduling of expedited five-year
reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order and antidumping duty orders
on sulfanilic acid from China and India.
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C.1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order and
antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic
acid from China and India would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: July 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On July 5, 2011, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (76
FR 18248, April 1, 2011) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on August 26,
2011, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the response
submitted by Nation Ford Chemical Co. to be
individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Aug 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
the Secretary on what determinations
the Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
August 31, 2011 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the reviews by
August 31, 2011. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its reviews, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination. The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the reviews period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: August 11, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20790 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50757
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree
Under the Clean Water Act
Notice is hereby given that on August
10, 2011 a proposed Consent Decree in
United States and the State of West
Virginia v. City of Elkins, Civil Action
No. 2:11cv61, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia. In
this action the United States and the
State seeks civil penalties and
injunctive relief for violations of the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.,
in connection with the City of Elkins’
operation of its municipal wastewater
and sewer system.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
Elkins is required to: (1) Implement
injunctive measures through a long term
control plan (‘‘LTCP’’) to eliminate dry
weather overflows (‘‘DWOs’’) and
reduce combined sewer overflows
(‘‘CSOs’’) by March 2023 by completing
sewer separation projects and upgrades
at an approximate cost of $4.2 million;
(2) pay the United States a civil penalty
of $32,400; (3) pay the State a civil
penalty of $32,400 and (3) establish and
operate a yard waste pick-up and
recycling program for Elkins’ residents
as a Supplemental Environmental
Project (‘‘SEP’’).
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the proposed Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States and West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection v. City of
Elkins, D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–09043. The
proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, Northern District of
West Virginia, Elkins Branch, Federal
Building, 300 Third Street, Suite 300,
Elkins, WV and at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 3, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may also
be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, to
https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
proposed consent decree may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50756-50757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20790]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-318, 731-TA-538 and 561; Third Review]
Sulfanilic Acid From China and India
Scheduling of expedited five-year reviews concerning the
countervailing duty order and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic
acid from China and India.
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C.1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of
the countervailing duty order and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic
acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general
[[Page 50757]]
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: July 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On July 5, 2011, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(76 FR 18248, April 1, 2011) of the subject five-year reviews was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on
August 26, 2011, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions. As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before August 31, 2011 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the
reviews by August 31, 2011. However, should the Department of Commerce
extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as
specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing
Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the response submitted by Nation
Ford Chemical Co. to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination. The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the reviews period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: August 11, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-20790 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P