Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Definition of “Professional” and Require That Professional Orders Be Appropriately Marked by BOX Options Participants, 49517-49520 [2011-20272]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2011–100 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Send paper comments in triplicate to
Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65036; File No. SR–BX–
2011–049]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a
Definition of ‘‘Professional’’ and
Require That Professional Orders Be
Appropriately Marked by BOX Options
Participants
August 4, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
All submissions should refer to File
notice is hereby given that on July 26,
Number SR–NASDAQ–2011–100. This
2011, NASDAQ OMX BX (the
file number should be included on the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
and Exchange Commission
Commission process and review your
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
comments more efficiently, please use
change as described in Items I, II, and
only one method. The Commission will III below, which Items have been
post all comments on the Commission’s prepared by the Exchange. The
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
Exchange has designated the proposed
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
rule change as constituting a nonsubmission, all subsequent
controversial rule change under Rule
amendments, all written statements
19b–4(f)(6) under the Act,3 which
with respect to the proposed rule
renders the proposal effective upon
change that are filed with the
filing with the Commission. The
Commission, and all written
Commission is publishing this notice to
communications relating to the
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
those that may be withheld from the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
public in accordance with the
the Proposed Rule Change
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
The Exchange proposes to amend
available for website viewing and
proposes to amend [sic] Chapter I,
printing in the Commission’s Public
Section 1 (Definitions) of the Trading
Reference Room on official business
Rules of the Boston Options Exchange
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and
Group, LLC (‘‘BOX’’) to adopt a
3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
definition of ‘‘Professional’’ on BOX and
available for inspection and copying at
require that all Professional orders be
the principal office of Nasdaq. All
appropriately marked by BOX Options
comments received will be posted
Participants. The text of the proposed
without change; the Commission does
rule change is available on the
not edit personal identifying
Exchange’s Web site at https://
information from submissions. You
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, on the
should submit only information that
Commission’s Web site at https://
you wish to make available publicly.
www.sec.gov, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2011–100 and
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
should be submitted on or before
Statement of the Purpose of, and
August 31, 2011.
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
In its filing with the Commission, the
authority.12
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
the proposed rule change and discussed
Secretary.
any comments it received on the
[FR Doc. 2011–20274 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
proposed rule change. The text of these
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
49517
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposal is to
amend Chapter I, Section 1 (Definitions)
to adopt a definition of ‘‘Professional’’
on BOX and require that all Professional
orders be appropriately marked.
This filing is similar to the recent
filings of the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (for the NASDAQ Options Market
(‘‘NOM’’), PHLX NASDAQ OMX, Inc.
(‘‘Phlx’’), the International Securities
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ISE’’), and Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated,
(‘‘CBOE’’), which dealt with establishing
a new definition of ‘‘Professional’’ as a
person or entity that places a certain
high volume of orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar
month in his or her own beneficial
account.4
Background
A BOX Options Participant
(‘‘Participant’’) is a firm or organization
that is registered with the Exchange
pursuant to Chapter II of the BOX
Trading Rules for purposes of
participating in options trading on BOX
as an ‘‘Order Flow Provider’’ or ‘‘Market
Maker.’’ 5
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63028
(October 1, 2010), 75 FR 62443 (October 8, 2010)
(SR–NASDAQ–2010–099) (approval order), 61802
(March 30, 2010), 75 FR 17193 (April 5, 2010) (SR–
Phlx-2010–05) (approval order); 61198 (December
17, 2009), 74 FR 68880 (December 29, 2009) (SR–
CBOE–2009–078) (approval order); and 59287
(January 23, 2009), 74 FR 5694 (January 30, 2009)
(SR–ISE–2006–26) (approval order). A filing by
NYSE Amex LLC (‘‘NYSE Amex’’) proposing a
similar Professional designation was based on the
Phlx, ISE, and CBOE proposals. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61818 (March 31, 2010),
75 FR 17457 (April 6, 2010) (SR–NYSEAmex–2010–
18) (approval order). The cited filings discuss,
among other things, the need for a Professional
designation to be applied by members of the
respective exchanges because the systems of such
exchanges differentiate for execution or processing
purposes based on order origin. BOX does not
similarly differentiate among orders based on their
origin.
5 See Chapter I, Section 1(a)(42) of the BOX Rules.
Many BOX Participants are also members of other
options exchanges such as, for example, ISE, CBOE,
or Phlx. Order Flow Provider (‘‘OFP’’) is defined in
Chapter I, Section 1(a)(48) as those Options
Participants representing as agent Customer Orders
on BOX and those non-Market Maker Participants
conducting proprietary trading. Market Maker is
defined in Chapter I, Section 1(a)(31) of the BOX
Rules as an Options Participant registered with the
Continued
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
49518
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Options traded by Participants (which
may include trades on behalf of Public
Customers) 6 on BOX, a wholly
electronic exchange, are electronically
executable and routable. The BOX
Trading Host 7 and the BOX Trading
Rules provide for the ranking, display,
and execution of all orders in price/time
priority without regard to the status of
the person or entity entering an order.8
The Exchange notes that BOX has,
similar to NOM and in contrast to
certain other options markets, a ‘‘flat’’
system that does not differentiate for
execution or processing purposes among
orders on the basis of who or what
entity enters an order on BOX.9 BOX
notes that no change to execution
priority, on the BOX Book or within the
BOX Price Improvement Period, is being
proposed as part of this rule change.10
BOX routes orders to other options
exchanges (‘‘Away Exchanges’’) under
certain circumstances through nonaffiliated third-party broker-dealers and
BOX’s general routing procedures are
set forth in Chapter XII, Section 5 (Order
Routing to Away Exchanges). These
procedures state in subsection (b)(ii)
that, among other things, once routed
away from BOX, an order becomes
subject to the rules and procedures of
the destination market.11
Exchange for the purpose of making markets in
options contracts traded on the Exchange and that
is vested with the rights and responsibilities
specified in Chapter VI of the BOX Rules.
6 Public Customer is defined in Chapter I, Section
1(a)(52) as a person that is not a broker or dealer
in securities.
7 Trading Host is defined in Chapter I, Section
1(a)(67) of the BOX Rules as the automated system
used by BOX for the trading of options contracts.
8 See Chapter V, Section 16(a)(iv) that discusses
BOX’s price/time execution priority and states, in
relevant part, that all options orders at the best
price are executed based on the time the order was
entered.
9 In contrast to BOX, hybrid options exchanges
such as, for example, Phlx and CBOE blend auction
and electronic market structures that differentiate
certain order priority and execution functions based
upon, among other things, the origin of the order
(e.g. whether the order was a customer, market
maker, broker or dealer, firm, or other type of
order); these exchanges also charge different fees
based on order origin. BOX does, like other
exchanges, charge differing fees based on order
origin (i.e. BOX trading fees for customers are
different than for market makers and broker-dealer
proprietary accounts). The Exchange is not
proposing any changes in respect of the BOX fee
structure and at this time, will continue to charge
Professionals under the category of Customer.
10 See Chapter V, Section 16 regarding execution
and price/time priority and Section 18 regarding the
Price Improvement Period.
11 Chapter XII, Section 5(b)(ii), ‘‘The Eligible
Order that is routed away shall remain outside BOX
for a period of time and may be executed in whole
or in part subject to the applicable trading rules of
the relevant Away Exchange. While an Eligible
Order remains outside BOX, it shall have no time
priority, relative to other orders received from
Options Participants at the same price which may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
Many other options exchanges,
namely the CBOE, ISE, NYSE AMEX,
NOM and Phlx, already have rules that
are similar to the Professional
designation rule proposed by the
Exchange (a ‘‘Professional’’ is a person
or entity that places 390 or more orders
in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month in his or her
own beneficial account). These above
noted exchanges make differentiations
based on whether an order is marked
Professional or otherwise. Some BOX
Options Participants, including its
routing broker-dealers are, as noted, also
members of other options exchanges
that have a Professional designation. As
members of these exchanges, such
Options Participants are subject to their
Professional designation rules. And, as
mentioned previously, exchange rules
indicate that orders routed by these
broker-dealers become subject to the
rules and procedures of the Away
Exchanges.12
The Exchange believes that disparate
rules with respect to Professional order
designation, and lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not
promote the best regulation and may, in
fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage.13
The Exchange believes that it is
therefore prudent and necessary to have
a Professional designation rule as is
commonplace in the industry,
particularly where BOX’s routing
broker-dealers (like other BOX Options
Participants) are members of several
exchanges that have rules requiring
Professional order designations.
The Proposal
The Exchange proposes new Chapter
I, Section 1(a)(52) to state that the term
‘‘Professional’’ means any person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer
in securities, and (ii) places more than
390 orders in listed options per day on
average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s).14 Moreover,
in order to properly represent orders
be executed against orders in the BOX Book.
Requests from Options Participants to cancel their
Eligible Orders while the order is routed away to
an Away Exchange and remains outside BOX shall
be processed, subject to the applicable trading rules
of the relevant Away Exchange.’’
12 Once routed away from BOX, an order becomes
subject to the rules and procedures of the
destination market including, but not limited to,
order cancellation. See Chapter XII, Section 5(b)(ii).
13 The Exchange believes that the risk of
regulatory arbitrage is heightened where not all
exchanges have Professional designation rules; and
there is a lack of uniformity regarding exchanges
marking orders as Professional when routing such
orders away.
14 Each remaining sub-section of Chapter I,
Section 1(a) is re-numbered by adding one to the
current number (e.g. 52 becomes 53, and 53
becomes 54).
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entered on BOX according to the new
definition, a Participant will be required
to appropriately mark all Professional
orders.15 To comply with this
requirement, Participants will be
required to review their Public
Customers’ activity on at least a
quarterly basis to determine whether
orders that are not for the account of a
broker-dealer should be represented as
Professional orders.16
The Professional definition proposed
is similar to the Professional designation
that has been adopted by NOM, Phlx,
ISE, CBOE, and NYSE Amex.17 Upon
publication of the notice regarding this
proposal, BOX will issue an Information
Circular to Participants providing them
at least ten business days notice of the
procedures for the implementation of
the proposal. As noted, the Professional
definition will not impact BOX’s price/
time order entry (priority) system.18
Instead, this proposal will ensure that
BOX Participants mark their
Professional orders properly, that is,
similarly in terms of Professional order
identification regardless of whether the
order is placed on BOX or another of the
options exchanges with a Professional
designation. Moreover, with the
proposed Professional designation in
place, BOX will be able to accept orders
that are marked Professional.19
15 BOX intends to require Participants to identify
Professional orders submitted electronically by
identifying them in the account type field, and will
notify Participants via an Information Circular
regarding this requirement.
16 Participants will be required to conduct a
quarterly review and make any appropriate changes
to the way in which they are representing orders
within five business days after the end of each
calendar quarter. While Participants will only be
required to review their accounts on a quarterly
basis, if during a quarter the Exchange identifies a
customer for which orders are being represented as
other than Professional orders but that has averaged
more than 390 orders per day during a month, the
Exchange will notify the Participant and the
Participant will be required to change the manner
in which it is representing the customer’s orders
within five business days. The Exchange will issue
a Regulatory Circular to Participants providing
more detailed information regarding the quarterly
review process. This is similar to the process of
other options exchanges that have adopted a
Professional designation. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 63028 (October 1, 2010)
75 FR 62443 (October 8, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ–
2010–099) (approval order) and 61802 (March 30,
2010), 75 FR 17193 (April 5, 2010) (SR–Phlx–2010–
05) (approval order).
17 See supra note 3 [sic].
18 For example, unlike the Phlx proposal, (which
among other things, discusses that Professional
order on Phlx will be treated in the same manner
as off-floor brokers in terms of certain priority
rules), BOX’s proposed rule change does not
address or impact any priority relationship for
Professional orders as opposed to other BOX orders.
19 As proposed, the Professional order
designation, may be used for customer orders only.
While BOX does not intend to differentiate among
Professional and other orders for priority purposes,
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
The designation of Professional or
Professional order would not result in
any different treatment of such orders
for purposes of the BOX Trading Rules
concerning order protection or routing
to away exchanges. That is, all non
broker or dealer orders, including those
that meet the definition of Professional
orders, would continue to be treated as
Public Customers for purposes of the
BOX Rules regarding order protection
and routing to away exchanges.20
BOX believes that identifying
Professional accounts based upon the
average number of orders entered in
qualified accounts is an appropriately
objective approach that will reasonably
distinguish such persons and entities
from retail investors or market
participants. BOX proposes the
threshold of 390 orders per day on
average over a calendar month, because
it believes that this number far exceeds
the number of orders that are entered by
retail investors in a single day.21
Moreover, the 390 orders per day
threshold proposed by BOX directly
corresponds to the daily order volume
recognized by NOM, ISE, and other
options exchanges that have, as
previously discussed, established
Professional order designations.22 In
addition, basing the standard on the
number of orders that are entered in
listed options for a qualified account(s)
assures that Professional account
holders cannot inappropriately avoid
the purpose of the rule by spreading
their trading over multiple exchanges,
and using an average number over a
calendar month will prevent gaming of
the 390 order threshold.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 23 in general, and furthers the
it may, in the future, feel that it is appropriate to
differentiate its routing or other fees in respect of
Professional orders as opposed to other orders; and
if so, the Exchange intends to file an appropriate
fee-related rule filing(s). This filing does not
address the current BOX fee structure.
20 See Chapter XII of the BOX Rules.
21 390 orders is equal to the total number of
orders that a person would place in a day if that
person entered one order every minute from market
open to market close. Many of the largest retailoriented electronic brokers offer lower commission
rates to customers they define as ‘‘active traders.’’
Publicly available information from the Web sites
of Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade and
OptionsXpress all define ‘‘active trader’’ as
someone who executes only a few options trades
per month. The highest required trading activity to
qualify as an active trader among these four firms
was 35 trades per quarter.
22 The similarity of BOX’s proposed Professional
definition to that of other options exchanges is
important from the regulatory perspective, that is,
from a desire to promote a national market system
that minimizes regulatory arbitrage.
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 24
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system, by
defining Professional and indicating
that all Professional orders shall be
appropriately marked by Participants.
Further, the Exchange believes that
disparate rules regarding Professional
order designation, and a lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not
promote the best regulation and may, in
fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. The
Exchange believes that it is therefore
prudent and necessary to have a
Professional designation rule as is
commonplace in the industry,
particularly where BOX’s routing
broker-dealers (like other BOX Options
Participants) are members of several
exchanges that have rules requiring
Professional order designations. The
designation of Professional or
Professional order would not result in
any different treatment of such orders
for purposes of the BOX Trading Rules
concerning order protection or routing
to away exchanges. That is, all non
broker or dealer orders, including those
that meet the definition of Professional
orders, would continue to be treated as
Public Customers for purposes of the
BOX Rules regarding order protection
and routing to away exchange. As such,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
(a) This proposed rule change is filed
pursuant to paragraph (A) of section
24 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49519
19(b)(3) of the Exchange Act 25 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.26
(b) This proposed rule change does
not significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on
competition, and, by its terms, does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of the filing, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.27 The
Exchange believes that uniform rules in
respect of Professional order designation
promotes the best regulation. The
Exchange believes that it is therefore
prudent and necessary to have a
Professional designation rule as is
commonplace in the industry,
particularly where BOX’s routing
broker-dealers (like other BOX Options
Participants) are members of several
exchanges that have rules requiring
Professional order designations.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
the proposed rule change does not
impact any priority relationship for
Professional orders as opposed to other
BOX orders, nor does it impact the
treatment of Professional orders under
the BOX Rules regarding order
protection or routing to away exchanges.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BX–2011–049 on the
subject line.
25 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
27 As required under Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the
Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change
along with a brief description and the text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission.
26 17
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
49520
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2011–049. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2011–049 and should be submitted on
or before August 31, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–20272 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–65035; File No. SR–CHX–
2011–20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Impose Certain Requirements on
Exchange-Registered Institutional
Broker Firms That Operate a Separate
Non-Institutional Broker Unit Within
the Firm
August 4, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 26,
2011, Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CHX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to add a rule
to impose certain requirements on
Exchange-registered Institutional Broker
firms which operate a separate, nonInstitutional Broker unit within the
firm. The text of this proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at (https://www.chx.com), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary and
in the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CHX included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received regarding the
proposal. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
1 15
28 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
2 17
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to add
Rule 5 to Article 17 to permit Exchangeregistered Institutional Broker
(‘‘Institutional Broker’’) firms to
establish and operate a separate, nonInstitutional Broker unit within the
firm. The Exchange proposes to add
information barrier requirements for
Institutional Brokers that wish to
operate a separate unit within the larger
firm to conduct business otherwise than
as an Institutional Broker. By this
proposal, the Exchange believes that it
will enable existing and new
Institutional Broker firms to engage in
trading activities through the nonInstitutional Broker unit in a manner
which better delineates the activity
occurring on and off the Exchange.
CHX-registered Institutional Brokers
are an elective sub-category of Exchange
Participants requiring registration with
the Exchange and are subject to the
obligations of Article 17 of the CHX
rules, in addition to the other provisions
of Exchange rules. Institutional Broker
firms typically provide order handling
and execution services for other brokerdealers or institutional clients, and are
the successors to the floor brokers under
the Exchange’s previous floor-based,
auction trading model.3 The
Commission’s order approving the
Exchange’s New Trading Model noted,
‘‘Institutional brokers would be deemed
to be participants operating on the
Exchange, although they would not
effect transactions from a physical
trading floor (since the Exchange will no
longer have a physical trading floor) and
could trade from any location. A
customer order would be deemed to be
on the Exchange when received by an
institutional broker, but would not have
priority in the Matching System until it
is entered into the system.’’ 4 Although
an Institutional Broker is deemed to be
operating on the Exchange, the CHX is
proposing to allow a separate unit
within the larger Institutional Broker
firm to execute orders otherwise than on
the Exchange.5
New Rule 5 proposes to establish new
conditions for an Institutional Broker
3 The Exchange replaced its traditional auction
marketplace with its New Trading Model beginning
in 2006. See Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 34–
54550 (Sept. 29, 2006), 71 FR 59563 (Oct. 10, 2006)
(SR–CHX–2006–05).
4 Id., Section II.C. Institutional Brokers.
5 See email from James Ongena, Vice President,
Associate General Counsel, CHX, to Christopher
Chow, Special Counsel, Commission, dated
August 3, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49517-49520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20272]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-65036; File No. SR-BX-2011-049]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a
Definition of ``Professional'' and Require That Professional Orders Be
Appropriately Marked by BOX Options Participants
August 4, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 26, 2011, NASDAQ OMX BX (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposed
rule change as constituting a non-controversial rule change under Rule
19b-4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend proposes to amend [sic] Chapter I,
Section 1 (Definitions) of the Trading Rules of the Boston Options
Exchange Group, LLC (``BOX'') to adopt a definition of ``Professional''
on BOX and require that all Professional orders be appropriately marked
by BOX Options Participants. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, on the Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposal is to amend Chapter I, Section 1
(Definitions) to adopt a definition of ``Professional'' on BOX and
require that all Professional orders be appropriately marked.
This filing is similar to the recent filings of the NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (for the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''), PHLX NASDAQ OMX,
Inc. (``Phlx''), the International Securities Exchange, Inc. (``ISE''),
and Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, (``CBOE''), which
dealt with establishing a new definition of ``Professional'' as a
person or entity that places a certain high volume of orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month in his or her own
beneficial account.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63028 (October 1,
2010), 75 FR 62443 (October 8, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-099) (approval
order), 61802 (March 30, 2010), 75 FR 17193 (April 5, 2010) (SR-
Phlx-2010-05) (approval order); 61198 (December 17, 2009), 74 FR
68880 (December 29, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2009-078) (approval order); and
59287 (January 23, 2009), 74 FR 5694 (January 30, 2009) (SR-ISE-
2006-26) (approval order). A filing by NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'')
proposing a similar Professional designation was based on the Phlx,
ISE, and CBOE proposals. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
61818 (March 31, 2010), 75 FR 17457 (April 6, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-
2010-18) (approval order). The cited filings discuss, among other
things, the need for a Professional designation to be applied by
members of the respective exchanges because the systems of such
exchanges differentiate for execution or processing purposes based
on order origin. BOX does not similarly differentiate among orders
based on their origin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
A BOX Options Participant (``Participant'') is a firm or
organization that is registered with the Exchange pursuant to Chapter
II of the BOX Trading Rules for purposes of participating in options
trading on BOX as an ``Order Flow Provider'' or ``Market Maker.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Chapter I, Section 1(a)(42) of the BOX Rules. Many BOX
Participants are also members of other options exchanges such as,
for example, ISE, CBOE, or Phlx. Order Flow Provider (``OFP'') is
defined in Chapter I, Section 1(a)(48) as those Options Participants
representing as agent Customer Orders on BOX and those non-Market
Maker Participants conducting proprietary trading. Market Maker is
defined in Chapter I, Section 1(a)(31) of the BOX Rules as an
Options Participant registered with the Exchange for the purpose of
making markets in options contracts traded on the Exchange and that
is vested with the rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter
VI of the BOX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 49518]]
Options traded by Participants (which may include trades on behalf
of Public Customers) \6\ on BOX, a wholly electronic exchange, are
electronically executable and routable. The BOX Trading Host \7\ and
the BOX Trading Rules provide for the ranking, display, and execution
of all orders in price/time priority without regard to the status of
the person or entity entering an order.\8\ The Exchange notes that BOX
has, similar to NOM and in contrast to certain other options markets, a
``flat'' system that does not differentiate for execution or processing
purposes among orders on the basis of who or what entity enters an
order on BOX.\9\ BOX notes that no change to execution priority, on the
BOX Book or within the BOX Price Improvement Period, is being proposed
as part of this rule change.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Public Customer is defined in Chapter I, Section 1(a)(52) as
a person that is not a broker or dealer in securities.
\7\ Trading Host is defined in Chapter I, Section 1(a)(67) of
the BOX Rules as the automated system used by BOX for the trading of
options contracts.
\8\ See Chapter V, Section 16(a)(iv) that discusses BOX's price/
time execution priority and states, in relevant part, that all
options orders at the best price are executed based on the time the
order was entered.
\9\ In contrast to BOX, hybrid options exchanges such as, for
example, Phlx and CBOE blend auction and electronic market
structures that differentiate certain order priority and execution
functions based upon, among other things, the origin of the order
(e.g. whether the order was a customer, market maker, broker or
dealer, firm, or other type of order); these exchanges also charge
different fees based on order origin. BOX does, like other
exchanges, charge differing fees based on order origin (i.e. BOX
trading fees for customers are different than for market makers and
broker-dealer proprietary accounts). The Exchange is not proposing
any changes in respect of the BOX fee structure and at this time,
will continue to charge Professionals under the category of
Customer.
\10\ See Chapter V, Section 16 regarding execution and price/
time priority and Section 18 regarding the Price Improvement Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOX routes orders to other options exchanges (``Away Exchanges'')
under certain circumstances through non-affiliated third-party broker-
dealers and BOX's general routing procedures are set forth in Chapter
XII, Section 5 (Order Routing to Away Exchanges). These procedures
state in subsection (b)(ii) that, among other things, once routed away
from BOX, an order becomes subject to the rules and procedures of the
destination market.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Chapter XII, Section 5(b)(ii), ``The Eligible Order that is
routed away shall remain outside BOX for a period of time and may be
executed in whole or in part subject to the applicable trading rules
of the relevant Away Exchange. While an Eligible Order remains
outside BOX, it shall have no time priority, relative to other
orders received from Options Participants at the same price which
may be executed against orders in the BOX Book. Requests from
Options Participants to cancel their Eligible Orders while the order
is routed away to an Away Exchange and remains outside BOX shall be
processed, subject to the applicable trading rules of the relevant
Away Exchange.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many other options exchanges, namely the CBOE, ISE, NYSE AMEX, NOM
and Phlx, already have rules that are similar to the Professional
designation rule proposed by the Exchange (a ``Professional'' is a
person or entity that places 390 or more orders in listed options per
day on average during a calendar month in his or her own beneficial
account). These above noted exchanges make differentiations based on
whether an order is marked Professional or otherwise. Some BOX Options
Participants, including its routing broker-dealers are, as noted, also
members of other options exchanges that have a Professional
designation. As members of these exchanges, such Options Participants
are subject to their Professional designation rules. And, as mentioned
previously, exchange rules indicate that orders routed by these broker-
dealers become subject to the rules and procedures of the Away
Exchanges.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Once routed away from BOX, an order becomes subject to the
rules and procedures of the destination market including, but not
limited to, order cancellation. See Chapter XII, Section 5(b)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that disparate rules with respect to
Professional order designation, and lack of uniform application of such
rules, do not promote the best regulation and may, in fact, encourage
regulatory arbitrage.\13\ The Exchange believes that it is therefore
prudent and necessary to have a Professional designation rule as is
commonplace in the industry, particularly where BOX's routing broker-
dealers (like other BOX Options Participants) are members of several
exchanges that have rules requiring Professional order designations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange believes that the risk of regulatory arbitrage
is heightened where not all exchanges have Professional designation
rules; and there is a lack of uniformity regarding exchanges marking
orders as Professional when routing such orders away.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposal
The Exchange proposes new Chapter I, Section 1(a)(52) to state that
the term ``Professional'' means any person or entity that (i) is not a
broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in
listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s).\14\ Moreover, in order to properly represent
orders entered on BOX according to the new definition, a Participant
will be required to appropriately mark all Professional orders.\15\ To
comply with this requirement, Participants will be required to review
their Public Customers' activity on at least a quarterly basis to
determine whether orders that are not for the account of a broker-
dealer should be represented as Professional orders.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Each remaining sub-section of Chapter I, Section 1(a) is
re-numbered by adding one to the current number (e.g. 52 becomes 53,
and 53 becomes 54).
\15\ BOX intends to require Participants to identify
Professional orders submitted electronically by identifying them in
the account type field, and will notify Participants via an
Information Circular regarding this requirement.
\16\ Participants will be required to conduct a quarterly review
and make any appropriate changes to the way in which they are
representing orders within five business days after the end of each
calendar quarter. While Participants will only be required to review
their accounts on a quarterly basis, if during a quarter the
Exchange identifies a customer for which orders are being
represented as other than Professional orders but that has averaged
more than 390 orders per day during a month, the Exchange will
notify the Participant and the Participant will be required to
change the manner in which it is representing the customer's orders
within five business days. The Exchange will issue a Regulatory
Circular to Participants providing more detailed information
regarding the quarterly review process. This is similar to the
process of other options exchanges that have adopted a Professional
designation. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63028
(October 1, 2010) 75 FR 62443 (October 8, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-099)
(approval order) and 61802 (March 30, 2010), 75 FR 17193 (April 5,
2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-05) (approval order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Professional definition proposed is similar to the Professional
designation that has been adopted by NOM, Phlx, ISE, CBOE, and NYSE
Amex.\17\ Upon publication of the notice regarding this proposal, BOX
will issue an Information Circular to Participants providing them at
least ten business days notice of the procedures for the implementation
of the proposal. As noted, the Professional definition will not impact
BOX's price/time order entry (priority) system.\18\ Instead, this
proposal will ensure that BOX Participants mark their Professional
orders properly, that is, similarly in terms of Professional order
identification regardless of whether the order is placed on BOX or
another of the options exchanges with a Professional designation.
Moreover, with the proposed Professional designation in place, BOX will
be able to accept orders that are marked Professional.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See supra note 3 [sic].
\18\ For example, unlike the Phlx proposal, (which among other
things, discusses that Professional order on Phlx will be treated in
the same manner as off-floor brokers in terms of certain priority
rules), BOX's proposed rule change does not address or impact any
priority relationship for Professional orders as opposed to other
BOX orders.
\19\ As proposed, the Professional order designation, may be
used for customer orders only. While BOX does not intend to
differentiate among Professional and other orders for priority
purposes, it may, in the future, feel that it is appropriate to
differentiate its routing or other fees in respect of Professional
orders as opposed to other orders; and if so, the Exchange intends
to file an appropriate fee-related rule filing(s). This filing does
not address the current BOX fee structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 49519]]
The designation of Professional or Professional order would not
result in any different treatment of such orders for purposes of the
BOX Trading Rules concerning order protection or routing to away
exchanges. That is, all non broker or dealer orders, including those
that meet the definition of Professional orders, would continue to be
treated as Public Customers for purposes of the BOX Rules regarding
order protection and routing to away exchanges.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Chapter XII of the BOX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOX believes that identifying Professional accounts based upon the
average number of orders entered in qualified accounts is an
appropriately objective approach that will reasonably distinguish such
persons and entities from retail investors or market participants. BOX
proposes the threshold of 390 orders per day on average over a calendar
month, because it believes that this number far exceeds the number of
orders that are entered by retail investors in a single day.\21\
Moreover, the 390 orders per day threshold proposed by BOX directly
corresponds to the daily order volume recognized by NOM, ISE, and other
options exchanges that have, as previously discussed, established
Professional order designations.\22\ In addition, basing the standard
on the number of orders that are entered in listed options for a
qualified account(s) assures that Professional account holders cannot
inappropriately avoid the purpose of the rule by spreading their
trading over multiple exchanges, and using an average number over a
calendar month will prevent gaming of the 390 order threshold.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 390 orders is equal to the total number of orders that a
person would place in a day if that person entered one order every
minute from market open to market close. Many of the largest retail-
oriented electronic brokers offer lower commission rates to
customers they define as ``active traders.'' Publicly available
information from the Web sites of Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD
Ameritrade and OptionsXpress all define ``active trader'' as someone
who executes only a few options trades per month. The highest
required trading activity to qualify as an active trader among these
four firms was 35 trades per quarter.
\22\ The similarity of BOX's proposed Professional definition to
that of other options exchanges is important from the regulatory
perspective, that is, from a desire to promote a national market
system that minimizes regulatory arbitrage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \23\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \24\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system, by defining
Professional and indicating that all Professional orders shall be
appropriately marked by Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange believes that disparate rules regarding
Professional order designation, and a lack of uniform application of
such rules, do not promote the best regulation and may, in fact,
encourage regulatory arbitrage. The Exchange believes that it is
therefore prudent and necessary to have a Professional designation rule
as is commonplace in the industry, particularly where BOX's routing
broker-dealers (like other BOX Options Participants) are members of
several exchanges that have rules requiring Professional order
designations. The designation of Professional or Professional order
would not result in any different treatment of such orders for purposes
of the BOX Trading Rules concerning order protection or routing to away
exchanges. That is, all non broker or dealer orders, including those
that meet the definition of Professional orders, would continue to be
treated as Public Customers for purposes of the BOX Rules regarding
order protection and routing to away exchange. As such, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
(a) This proposed rule change is filed pursuant to paragraph (A) of
section 19(b)(3) of the Exchange Act \25\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) This proposed rule change does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any
significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.\27\ The Exchange believes that
uniform rules in respect of Professional order designation promotes the
best regulation. The Exchange believes that it is therefore prudent and
necessary to have a Professional designation rule as is commonplace in
the industry, particularly where BOX's routing broker-dealers (like
other BOX Options Participants) are members of several exchanges that
have rules requiring Professional order designations. Additionally, the
Exchange notes that the proposed rule change does not impact any
priority relationship for Professional orders as opposed to other BOX
orders, nor does it impact the treatment of Professional orders under
the BOX Rules regarding order protection or routing to away exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ As required under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange
provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change along with a brief description and the text
of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to
the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2011-049 on the subject line.
[[Page 49520]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-049. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-049 and should be
submitted on or before August 31, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20272 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P