Petition for Approval of Alternate; Odometer Disclosure Requirements, 48101-48116 [2011-19920]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
confidential location information on a
separate sheet from the other Tier II
information (which will be disclosed to
the public), and attach the Confidential
Location Information Sheet to the other
Tier II information. Indicate any
attachments you are including.
4. Section 370.43 is revised as
follows:
§ 370.43 What codes are used to report
Tier I and Tier II inventory information?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(d) of this section, you must use the
following codes to report the maximum
amount and average daily amount when
reporting Tier I or Tier II inventory
information:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
Range
codes
From
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
0
100
500
1,000
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
500,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
99.
499.
999.
4,999.
9,999.
24,999.
49,999.
74,999.
99,999.
499,999.
999,999.
9,999,999.
Greater than 10
million.
Note to paragraph (a): To convert gas or
liquid volume to weight in pounds, multiply
by an appropriate density factor.
(b) Your SERC or LEPC may provide
other range codes for reporting
maximum amount and average daily
amount, or may require reporting of
specific amounts. You may use your
SERC’s or LEPC’s range codes (or
specific amounts) provided the ranges
are not broader than the ranges in
paragraph (a) of this section.
[FR Doc. 2011–19900 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Implementation of the Amendments to
the International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification
and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978,
and Changes to Domestic
Endorsements
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of public meetings;
request for comments; Correction.
AGENCY:
On August 2, 2011 (76 FR
46217), the Coast Guard published a
notice of public meetings and request
for comments on a supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
entitled ‘‘Implementation of the
Amendments to the International
Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for
Seafarers, 1978, and Changes to
Domestic Endorsements.’’ The incorrect
publication date of the SNPRM was
cited. This notice corrects that error.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rogers Henderson, Maritime Personnel
Qualification Division, U.S. Coast
Guard, telephone 202–372–1408, e-mail
Rogers.W.Henderson@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
2, 2011 (76 FR 46217), the Coast Guard
published a notice of public meetings
and request for comments on a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled
‘‘Implementation of the Amendments to
the International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, and
Changes to Domestic Endorsements.’’
Subsequent to the publication of that
notice, the Coast Guard discovered that
the publication date of the SNPRM on
page 46217 was incorrect.
Correction
In the notice (FR Doc. 2011–19459)
published on August 2, 2011 (76 FR
46217) make the following correction.
On page 46217, in the first sentence of
the second paragraph in the third
column, the date should read ‘‘August 1,
2011’’ instead of ‘‘August 1, 2001.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–19985 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIN 1625–AA16
SUMMARY:
To
Dated: August 2, 2011.
Erin Ledford,
LCDR, Deputy, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[Docket No. USCG–2004–17914]
ACTION:
Weight range in
pounds
48101
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 580
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0109; Notice 1]
Petition for Approval of Alternate;
Odometer Disclosure Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of initial determination.
AGENCY:
The State of Florida has
petitioned for approval of alternate
odometer requirements to certain
requirements under Federal odometer
law. NHTSA preliminarily grants
Florida’s petition regarding proposed
alternate disclosure requirements for
vehicle transfers involving casual or
private sales. NHTSA preliminarily
denies Florida’s petition regarding
proposed alternate disclosure
requirements for sales involving
licensed dealers. NHTSA preliminarily
denies Florida’s petition regarding
proposed alternate disclosure
requirements for sales of leased
vehicles.
SUMMARY:
Comments are due no later than
September 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2010–####] by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. E.T., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
48102
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otto
Matheke, Office of the Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building W41–227,
Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone:
202–366–5263) (Fax: 202–366–3820).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Federal odometer law, which is
largely based on the Motor Vehicle
Information and Cost Savings Act (Cost
Savings Act) 1 and Truth in Mileage Act
of 1986, as amended (TIMA),2 contains
a number of provisions to limit
odometer fraud and assure that the
buyer of a motor vehicle knows the true
mileage of the vehicle. The Cost Savings
Act requires the Secretary of
Transportation to promulgate
regulations requiring the transferor
(seller) of a motor vehicle to provide a
written statement of the vehicle’s
mileage registered on the odometer to
the transferee (buyer) in connection
with the transfer of ownership. This
written statement is generally referred to
as the odometer disclosure statement.
Further, under TIMA, vehicle titles
themselves must have a space for the
odometer disclosure statement and
States are prohibited from licensing
vehicles unless a valid odometer
disclosure statement on the title is
signed and dated by the transferor.
Titles must also be printed by a secure
process. With respect to leased vehicles,
TIMA provides that the regulations
promulgated by the Secretary require
written mileage disclosures be made by
lessees to lessors upon the lessor’s
transfer of the ownership of the leased
vehicle. Lessors must also provide
1 Public
2 Public
Law 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, 961 (1972).
Law 99–579, 100 Stat. 3309 (1986).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
written notice to lessees about odometer
disclosure requirements and the
penalties for not complying with them.
Federal law also contains document
retention requirements for odometer
disclosure statements.
TIMA’s motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements apply in a State
unless the State has alternate
requirements approved by the Secretary.
The Secretary has delegated
administration of the odometer program
to NHTSA. Therefore, a State may
petition NHTSA for approval of such
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements.
Seeking to implement an electronic
vehicle title transfer system, the State of
Florida has petitioned for approval of
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements. In 2009, NHTSA
reviewed certain requirements for
alternative state programs and approved
the Commonwealth of Virginia’s
alternate odometer disclosure program.
74 FR 643, 650 (January 7, 2009).
Florida’s program is similar to Virginia’s
program in some respects and appears
broader in scope than Virginia’s in
others. Like Virginia’s program, the
scope of Florida’s proposed program
does not include transactions involving
an out-of-state party. Unlike Virginia’s
program, Florida’s proposed program
encompasses transactions involving
leased vehicles and odometer
disclosures by power of attorney. In
addition, Florida’s proposed program
would use different mechanisms to
document mileage than Virginia’s.
As discussed below, NHTSA’s initial
assessment is that the portions of
Florida’s proposed program involving
private sales satisfy the requirements for
approval under Federal odometer law,
while other portions involving transfers
between individual owners and dealers,
transfers of leased vehicles and transfers
in which a power of attorney is used for
purposes of mileage disclosure, do not.
II. Statutory Background
NHTSA recently reviewed the
statutory background of Federal
odometer law in its consideration and
approval of Virginia’s petition for
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements. See 73 FR 35617 (June 24,
2008) and 74 FR 643 (January 7, 2009).
The statutory background of the Cost
Savings Act and TIMA and the purposes
behind TIMA, as they relate to odometer
disclosure, other than in the transfer of
leased vehicles and vehicles subject to
liens where a power of attorney is used
in the disclosure, are discussed at length
in NHTSA’s Final Determination
granting Virginia’s petition. 74 FR 643,
647–48. A brief summary of the
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
statutory background of Federal
odometer law and the purposes of
TIMA, including odometer disclosure
requirements for leased vehicles,
follows.
In 1972, Congress enacted the Cost
Savings Act, among other things, to
prohibit tampering with odometers on
motor vehicles and to establish certain
safeguards for the protection of buyers
with respect to the sale of motor
vehicles having altered or reset
odometers. See Public Law 92–513,
§ 401, 86 Stat. 947, 961–63 (1972). The
Cost Savings Act required that, under
regulations to be published by the
Secretary, the transferor of a motor
vehicle provide a written vehicle
mileage disclosure to the transferee,
prohibited odometer tampering and
provided for enforcement. See id,
§ 408.3 In general, the purpose for the
disclosure was to assist buyers to know
the true mileage of a motor vehicle.
A major shortcoming of the odometer
provisions of the Cost Savings Act was
their failure to require that the odometer
disclosure statement be on the vehicle’s
title. In a number of States, the
disclosures were on separate documents
that could be easily altered or discarded
and did not travel with the title. See 74
FR 644. Consequently, the disclosure
statements did not necessarily deter
odometer fraud employing altered
documents, discarded titles, and title
washing. Id.
Another significant shortcoming
involved leased vehicles. The lessor is
considered the transferor of the vehicle
in leased vehicle sales. Titles to leased
vehicles are often transferred without
the lessor obtaining possession of the
vehicle. Lessors without direct access to
their vehicles had to rely solely on their
lessees to provide actual mileage
information. However, lessees had no
obligation to provide actual mileage
information to lessors upon vehicle
transfer. This environment facilitated
roll backs of odometers.
3 Section
408 stated:
(a) Not later than 90 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe
rules requiring any transferor to give the following
written disclosure to the transferee in connection
with the transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle:
(1) Disclosure of the cumulative mileage
registered on the odometer.
(2) Disclosure that the actual mileage is unknown,
if the odometer reading is known to the transferor
to be different from the number of miles the vehicle
has actually traveled.
Such rules shall prescribe the manner in which
information shall be disclosed under this section
and in which such information shall be retained.
(b) It shall be a violation of this section for any
transferor to violate any rules under this section or
to knowingly give a false statement to a transferee
in making any disclosure required by such rules.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Congress enacted TIMA in 1986 to
address the Cost Savings Act’s
shortcomings. It amended the Cost
Savings Act by adding section 408(d) to
prohibit States from licensing vehicles
unless the new owner (transferee)
submitted a title from the seller
(transferor) containing the seller’s
signed and dated vehicle mileage
statement. See Public Law 99–579, 100
Stat. 3309 (1986); 74 FR 644 (Jan. 7,
2009). TIMA also prohibits the licensing
of vehicles, for use in any State, unless
the title issued to the transferee is
printed using a secure printing process
or other secure process, indicates the
vehicle mileage at the time of transfer
and contains additional space for a
subsequent mileage disclosure by the
transferee when it is sold again. Id.
TIMA also added section 408(e) to the
Cost Savings Act to require the
Secretary to issue regulations regarding
odometer disclosures for leased
vehicles.4 The regulations promulgated
by the Secretary were to require written
mileage disclosures by lessees to lessors
upon the lessor’s transfer of the
ownership of the leased vehicle. Lessors
must also provide written notice to
lessees about the odometer disclosure
requirements and the penalties for not
complying with them. Federal law also
contains document retention
requirements for odometer disclosure
statements. TIMA required lessors to
retain disclosures made by lessees for at
least four years following the date that
the lessor transfers that vehicle.5 Id.
TIMA added a provision to the Cost
Savings Act allowing States to have
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements with the approval of the
4 TIMA amended the Cost Savings Act to add
section 408(e):
(e)(1) In the case of any leased motor vehicle, the
rules under subsection (a) shall require written
disclosure regarding mileage to be made by the
lessee to the lessor upon the lessor’s transfer of
ownership of the leased motor vehicle.
(2) Under such rules, the lessor of a leased motor
vehicle shall provide written notice to the lessee
regarding
(A) Such mileage disclosure requirements, and
(B) The penalties for failure to comply with them.
(3) The lessor shall retain the disclosure made by
any lessee with respect to any motor vehicle under
paragraph (1) For a period of at least 4 years
following the date the lessor transfers that vehicle.
(4) For purposes of this section, if the lessor
transfers ownership of any leased motor vehicle
without obtaining possession of such vehicle, the
lessor may, in making the disclosure required by
subsection (a), Indicate on the title the mileage
disclosed by the lessee under paragraph (1) Unless
the lessor has reason to believe that such disclosure
by the lessee does not reflect the actual mileage of
the vehicle.
5 Regulations implementing TIMA were
published on August 5, 1988. 53 FR 29864. Federal
regulations require lessors to retain odometer
disclosure statements received from lessees for a
period of five years. 49 CFR 580.8(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Secretary of Transportation. Section
408(f) of the Cost Savings Act states that
the odometer disclosure requirements of
subsections (d) and (e)(1) shall apply in
a State unless the State has in effect
alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements approved by
the Secretary. Section 408(f)(2) further
states that the Secretary shall approve
alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a
State unless the Secretary determines
that such requirements are not
consistent with the purpose of the
disclosure required by subsection (d) or
(e), as the case may be.
In 1988, Congress amended section
408(d)(1) of the Cost Savings Act to
permit the use of a secure power of
attorney for purposes of odometer
mileage disclosure in circumstances
where the title was held by a lienholder,
if allowed by state law. Public Law 100–
561 § 40, 102 Stat. 2805, 2817 (1988).
Congress required NHTSA to issue a
rule ensuring that disclosures be made
on the power of attorney document of
the actual mileage at the time of transfer
and that the mileage be restated exactly
by the person exercising power of
attorney on the title in the space
therefor. Id. The rule, consistent with
the purposes of the Act and the need to
facilitate enforcement thereof, was to
prescribe that the power of attorney
form be issued by the State to the
transferee using a secure process, as
provided for titles, and provide for
retention of a copy with the original
submitted back to the State. Id. In 1989,
NHTSA implemented the 1988 statutory
amendments by promulgating
amendments to the odometer disclosure
regulations, providing that a transferor
may give a secure power of attorney to
a transferee for the purpose of mileage
disclosure in two circumstances—when
the transferor’s title is physically held
by a lienholder or when the title is lost.
In either instance, use of a power of
attorney document for mileage
disclosure is permissible only if
otherwise permitted by State law.6
In 1990, Congress again amended
section 408(d) of the Cost Savings Act.7
The amendment provided that the rule
6 Regulations implementing the amendment were
published on August 30, 1989. 54 FR 35879. The
regulations addressed numerous aspects of
disclosure by power of attorney, including the form,
certification by the person exercising the power of
attorney, and access of the transferee to prior title
and power of attorney documents.
7 Section 7(a) of Public Law 101–641 directed that
the third sentence of subsection (d)(2)(C) be
amended. However, there was no subsection
(d)(2)(C) in section 408. The amendment was
restated as amending the third sentence of
subsection (d)(1)(C) as the probable intent of
Congress. This amendment is currently codified at
49 U.S.C. 32705(b)(2)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48103
adopted under the 1988 amendment not
require that a vehicle be titled in the
State in which the power of attorney
was issued and addressed retention of
powers of attorneys by States. See
Public Law 101–641 § 7(a), 104 Stat.
4654, 4657 (1990).8
In 1994, in the course of the
recodification of various laws pertaining
to the Department of Transportation, the
Cost Savings Act, as amended, was
repealed, reenacted and recodified
without substantive change. See Public
Law 103–272, 108 Stat. 745, 1048–1056,
1379, 1387 (1994). The odometer statute
is now codified at 49 U.S.C. 32701 et
seq. In particular, Section 408(a) of the
Cost Savings Act was recodified at 49
U.S.C. 32705(a). Sections 408(d) and (e),
which were added by TIMA (and later
amended), were recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32705(b) and (c). The provisions
pertaining to approval of State alternate
motor vehicle mileage disclosure
requirements were recodified at 49
U.S.C. 32705(d).
III. Statutory Purposes
As discussed above, the Cost Savings
Act, as amended by TIMA in 1986,
states that NHTSA ‘‘shall approve
alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a
State unless the [NHTSA] determines
that such requirements are not
consistent with the purpose of the
disclosure required by subsection (d) or
(e) as the case may be.’’ (Subsections
408(d), (e) of the Cost Savings Act were
recodified to 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and
(c)). In light of this provision, we now
turn to our interpretation of the
purposes of these subsections, as
germane to Florida’s petition.9
Our Final Determination granting
Virginia’s petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements
identified the purposes of TIMA
germane to petitions for approval of
odometer disclosure requirements that
did not include disclosures involving
reassignment documents, leased
vehicles, or disclosures by power of
attorney.10 74 FR 643, 647–48 (January
8 Regulations implementing this amendment were
published on September 20, 1991. 56 FR 47681.
9 Florida petitioned NHTSA requesting approval
of alternate odometer disclosure requirements.
Florida’s initial petition, dated December 21, 2009,
set forth Florida’s initial request. Florida submitted
a second, supplemental petition to NHTSA on
October 5, 2010, that restated Florida’s request in
greater detail and provided more specific
information on Florida’s current e-Title and
odometer disclosure program and its proposed
program. Together, the petitions are identified
herein as ‘‘petition’’ or ‘‘the petition.’’
10 Since Virginia’s program did not cover
disclosures involving leased vehicles or disclosures
by power of attorney, the purposes of Sections
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
Continued
08AUP1
48104
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
7, 2009). In addition, because the
Florida proposal encompasses
reassignment documents, transfers of
leased vehicles, and disclosures by
power of attorney, we identify the
purposes of TIMA relevant to odometer
disclosures for leased vehicles (see
Initial Determination on Wisconsin’s
petition for alternate odometer
disclosure requirements, 75 FR 20965,
20972–73 (Apr. 22, 2010)) and purposes
of allowing for disclosures by power of
attorney in limited circumstances.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. TIMA’s Purposes Relevant to Vehicle
Transfers in the Absence of a Lease
Agreement
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that
the form of the odometer disclosure
precludes odometer fraud. 74 FR 647.
To prevent odometer fraud facilitated by
disclosure statements that were separate
from titles, TIMA required mileage
disclosures to be on a secure vehicle
title instead of a separate document.
These titles also had to contain space for
the seller’s attested mileage disclosure
and a new disclosure by the buyer when
the vehicle was sold again. This
discouraged mileage alterations on titles
and limited opportunities for obtaining
new titles with lower mileage than the
actual mileage. Id. This concern applies
to reassignment documents.11
A second purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making odometer
mileage disclosures on the title a
condition of any application for a title,
and a requirement for any title issued by
a State. 74 FR 647. This provision was
intended to eliminate or significantly
reduce abuses associated with lack of
control of the titling process. Id.
Third, TIMA sought to prevent
alterations of disclosures on titles and to
preclude counterfeit titles through
secure processes. 74 FR 648. In
furtherance of these purposes, paper
titles (incorporating the disclosure
statement) must be produced using a
secure printing process or protected by
‘‘other secure process.’’ 12 Id.
408(d)(2)(C) and 408(e) of the Cost Savings Act, as
amended, were not germane and were not
addressed in the notice approving the Virginia
program. See 74 FR 647 n. 12.
11 NHTSA amended 49 CFR 580.5(c) to preclude
use of a separate reassignment form at the time of
the first transfer, by a titled owner. See 56 FR
47684–85 (Sep. 20, 1991).
12 Congress intended to encourage new
technologies by including the language ‘‘other
secure process.’’ The House Report accompanying
TIMA noted that ‘‘ ‘other secure process’ is intended
to describe means other than printing which could
securely provide for the storage and transmittal of
title and mileage information.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 99–
833, at 33 (1986). ‘‘In adopting this language, the
Committee intends to encourage new technologies
which will provide increased levels of security for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
A fourth purpose is to create a record
of vehicle mileage and a paper trail. 74
FR 648. The underlying purposes of this
record and paper trail were to better
inform consumers and provide
mechanisms for tracing odometer
tampering and prosecuting violators.
TIMA’s requirement that new
applications for titles include signed
mileage disclosure statements on the
titles from the prior owners creates a
permanent record that is easily checked
by subsequent owners or law
enforcement officials. This record
provides critical snapshots of vehicle
mileage at every transfer, which are the
fundamental links of this paper trail.
Finally, the general purpose of TIMA
is to protect consumers by assuring that
they receive valid representations of the
vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer based on odometer disclosures.
74 FR 648.
B. TIMA’s Purposes Relevant to Leased
Vehicles
TIMA recognized that additional
mechanisms were needed to assure
accurate odometer disclosures for leased
vehicles. In vehicle leases, the lessor
typically retains ownership of the
vehicle, but does not possess it. The
lessor, as a transferor, must comply with
Federal odometer disclosure
requirements when it subsequently
transfers title to a leased vehicle.
However, prior to TIMA, lessees were
not obligated by Federal odometer law
to provide lessors with accurate
odometer disclosure statements. TIMA
addressed this issue, as discussed
above. A number of purposes can be
derived from TIMA’s provisions,
discussed above, relating to the transfer
of ownership of leased vehicles.
One purpose of TIMA’s leased vehicle
provisions is to assure that lessors have
the vehicle’s actual odometer mileage at
the time of transfer.
A second purpose of TIMA’s leased
vehicle provisions is to assure that
lessees provide lessors with an
odometer disclosure statement.
A related purpose is to assure that
lessees are formally notified of their
odometer disclosure obligations and the
penalties for failing to comply by not
providing complete and truthful
information.
A fourth purpose is to set the ground
rules for the lessors, providing for
lessors to indicate the mileage provided
by the lessee on the title, unless the
lessor has reason to believe that the
disclosure by the lessee does not reflect
the actual mileage of the vehicle.
titles.’’ Id. See also Cost Savings Act, as amended
by TIMA, § 408(d), recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A fifth purpose of TIMA’s leased
vehicle provisions is to create records
and a paper trail. This is an expansion
of the fourth general purpose of TIMA
stated above. The paper trail includes
the written, dated and signed odometer
disclosure statement by the lessee.
Unlike odometer disclosure statements
on vehicle titles that are filed with the
State, a lessee’s odometer disclosure
statement is separate from the title and
not filed with the State. Instead, the
disclosure statement is sent to the
lessor, who must retain a copy for at
least five years. The retention of lessee
odometer disclosure statements by
lessors permits law enforcement
officials to trace fraudulent disclosure
statements back to lessees, if necessary.
Last, the overall purpose of TIMA’s
leased vehicle provisions, consistent
with the general purposes of TIMA, is
to ensure that there are valid
representations of the vehicle’s actual
mileage at the time of transfer. See H.R.
Rep. No. 99–833, at 33 (1986).
C. Mileage Disclosures by Power of
Attorney
NHTSA’s rule implementing TIMA
provided that ‘‘[n]o person shall sign an
odometer disclosure statement as both
the transferor and the transferee in the
same transaction.’’ 13 In general, this
provision, which was intended to limit
fraud, was not questioned. However, in
instances when a lienholder holds title
to a vehicle being sold this, as a
practical matter, presented a
considerable regulatory burden, because
when a dealer bought a used vehicle, it
would be required to go to the
lienholder and obtain the title, and then
go back to the seller so that the seller
could record the mileage on the title.
The last step often was difficult and
could be avoided if the seller executes
a power of attorney to the buyer
authorizing the buyer to record the
mileage upon receipt of the title.14
In 1988, Congress amended TIMA to
provide for the limited use of powers of
attorney for recording mileage, when the
title is physically held by a lienholder
at the time of the transfer and is
authorized by State law. See Pipeline
Safety Reauthorization Act of 1988
(PSRA) § 401, 15 U.S.C. 1988(d)(1)
(1988). (Section 401 of the PSRA, as
amended in 1990 (see below), was
recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b)(2)(A).)
The amendment required NHTSA to
issue a rule. The rule, which was to
address the form and reasonable
13 49 CFR 580.5(h); 53 FR 29464, 29477 (Aug. 5,
1988).
14 See 134 Cong. Rec. H10079 (daily ed. Oct. 12,
1988).
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
conditions of the limited power of
attorney, was to ensure disclosure on
the power of attorney document of the
actual mileage at the time of transfer
and ensure that such mileage will be
restated exactly by the person exercising
the power of attorney in the space
referred to in TIMA. Further, consistent
with the purposes of the Cost Savings
Act as amended and the need to
facilitate enforcement thereof, the rule
was to prescribe the form of the power
of attorney to be issued by the State to
the transferee and for retention of a copy
of such power of attorney. As amended
in 1990, this statutory provision
provided that the rule promulgated by
NHTSA must require the person granted
the power of attorney to retain a copy
of the power of attorney form and
submit the original form to the State
along with a copy of the title showing
the restatement of the mileage. The
statute also permitted the agency to
prescribe that the State retain the power
of attorney and copy of the title for an
appropriate period or that the State
adopt alternative measures consistent
with the purposes of the statute. The
statute mandated that the rule not
require that a vehicle be titled in the
State in which the power of attorney
was issued. Public Law 101–641, 104
Stat. 4654, 57 (Nov. 28, 1990).
In 1989, NHTSA implemented the
PSRA by promulgating amendments to
the odometer disclosure regulations.15
The rule provides that a transferor may
give a secure power of attorney to a
transferee for the purpose of mileage
disclosure in two circumstances—when
the transferor’s title is physically held
by a lienholder or when the title is
lost.16 In either instance, use of a power
of attorney document for mileage
disclosure is permissible only if
otherwise permitted by State law. In this
rule, NHTSA narrowly amended its
earlier rule prohibiting any party from
signing an odometer disclosure
statement as both the transferor and
transferee in the same transaction to add
an exception. The amendment allowed
the same person to so sign the odometer
disclosure statement if he or she
satisfied the detailed, specific
provisions on powers of attorney added
to the regulations in 49 CFR 580.13 or
14. These provisions state the form and
conditions of the power of attorney.
Also, the power of attorney document
must be issued by the State and be set
forth by a secure process.17 While
15 NHTSA issued an interim final rule on March
8, 1989 (54 FR 9809) and a final rule on August 30,
1989 (54 FR 35879).
16 54 FR 35879 (Aug. 30, 1989).
17 See 49 CFR 580.4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
providing for powers of attorney,
NHTSA expressed concern that powers
of attorney that allow a person to sign
a disclosure as both the transferor and
transferee result in only one party to the
transaction being aware of the previous
mileage disclosures, which could
jeopardize the integrity of the paper
trail—the evidence of rollbacks that
Congress intended to enhance by
enacting TIMA.18
A number of purposes can be derived
from the statute directing NHTSA to
issue a rule and the implementing rule.
One purpose was to provide limited
exception(s) to a rule prohibiting a
person from signing an odometer
disclosure statement as both the
transferor and transferee in the same
transaction, which had the effect of
prohibiting the use of powers of
attorney for purposes of recording
mileage on titles of motor vehicles.19
More particularly, a purpose was to
permit a power of attorney for
disclosure of the odometer reading at
the time of sale of a vehicle to be given
by the seller to the buyer, in the limited
situation when the owner’s title is
physically held by a lienholder at the
time of the transaction and the power of
attorney is allowed by State law.20
Another limited situation in which a
power of attorney may be used, as
recognized in the implementing
regulation, is where the title is not
present because it has been lost by the
person to whom it was issued by the
State, if permitted by State law.21 In
order for a power of attorney to be used
in the lost title situation, the transferee
(e.g., the dealer) must apply for the
duplicate title on behalf of the
transferor. Under these circumstances, a
power of attorney is available to
facilitate consumer vehicle sales
transactions, but is not available in
other than consumer sales transactions,
18 54 FR 9809, 9810 (March 8, 1989). As is self
evident, ordinarily such a practice provides
opportunities for fraud. See 54 FR 9812; 54 FR
35882.
19 As Congressman Whittaker noted, ‘‘we have
drafted the amendment in a very narrow fashion.’’
134 Cong. Rec. H10079 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 1988).
20 This does not include the practice of floor
planning. Floor planning is a practice by which a
financial institution will physically hold a title as
security for financing, without formally filing or
recording a security interest, on a vehicle offered for
sale by a dealer. 54 FR 35885–35886. This also does
not include a situation in which the lending
institution that financed the vehicle’s purchase is
located in a state that requires the lienholder to
hold the title as security, but the vehicle is
registered in a different state, which allows the
owner, rather than the lienholder to hold the title.
Under the 1991 amendment to the Cost Savings Act,
NHTSA considers the creation of another category
of exempted transferors inappropriate.
21 49 CFR 580.13, 54 FR 35883.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48105
where the risk of fraud is considerably
greater.22
A second purpose was to assure that
the form of the power of attorney
document issued by a State precluded
odometer fraud. While under the
limited circumstances discussed above
and if allowed under State law, with use
of a power of attorney one person may
sign the odometer disclosure on the title
as both the transferor and transferee, to
limit fraud, the power of attorney form
must meet certain minimum
requirements.23 Congress specified that
NHTSA would prescribe a form by rule.
Under the rule, the form must be
separated into part A, and if permitted
by State law, B and C.24
The transferor’s power of attorney to
the transferee for mileage disclosure
must be on part A of a secure form
issued by the State to the transferee.25
Using this form, the transferor appoints
the transferee his/her attorney-in-fact for
the purpose of mileage disclosure. The
form provides for written disclosure by
the transferor to the transferee of the
information that is stated on a vehicle
title under 49 CFR 580.5 when
ownership of the vehicle is
transferred.26 Among other things, there
must be a space in part A for the
transferor and transferee to sign the
power of attorney form and print their
names and a space for the transferor to
disclose the mileage. Part A must also
contain a reference to the Federal
odometer law and state that providing
false information or the failure of the
person granted the power of attorney to
submit the form to the State may result
in fines and/or imprisonment. The
disclosure on part A of the power of
attorney form is commonly made by the
22 The 1988 amendments did not modify the
TIMA provisions relating to leased vehicles.
23 Among these are the requirements of NHTSA’s
rule, 49 CFR 580.13 and 580.14.
24 49 CFR 580.13; see 54 FR 9812.
25 49 CFR 580.13; see 54 FR 9812.
26 49 CFR 580.13 requires the form to contain, in
part A, a space for: (1) The odometer reading at the
time of transfer; (2) the date of transfer; (3) the
transferor’s name and current address; (4) the
transferee’s name and current address; and (5) the
vehicle make, model, year, body type, and vehicle
identification number (VIN). Part A shall also
contain a space for the transferor to certify that to
the best of his knowledge either: (1) The odometer
reading reflects the actual mileage; or (2) if the
transferor knows that the odometer reading reflects
mileage in excess of the designed mechanical
odometer limit, he shall include a statement to that
effect; or (3) if the transferor knows that the
odometer reading differs from the mileage and the
difference is greater than that caused by a
calibration error, he shall include a statement that
the odometer reading does not reflect the actual
mileage and should not be relied upon with a
warning notice to alert the transferee that a
discrepancy exists between the odometer reading
and the actual mileage.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
48106
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
seller when he or she trades-in a vehicle
at a dealer.
After part A of the power of attorney
form has been used, part B may be
executed when a vehicle addressed on
part A is resold.27 Part B of the secure
power of attorney form, if permitted by
State law, allows a subsequent
transferee to give a power of attorney to
his transferor to review the title and any
reassignment documents for mileage
discrepancies, and if no discrepancies
are found, to acknowledge disclosure on
the title, while maintaining the integrity
of the first seller’s disclosure. The
disclosure required to be made by the
transferor to the transferee for this
transaction on part B of the power of
attorney form tracks information
required to be made by the transferor to
the transferee on the title when
ownership of a vehicle is transferred on
a title under 49 CFR 580.5.28 Among
other things, the power of attorney must
contain a space for the transferor to
disclose the mileage to the transferee
and sign and date the form, and a space
for the transferee to sign and date the
form.
Commonly, part B is used in the sale
of a trade-in vehicle by a dealer. If for
example, a dealer does not have
possession of the title, because the
vehicle was a trade-in and the
lienholder has not yet released the title,
or because the title was lost and the
dealer has not yet obtained a duplicate
title on behalf of the transferor who sold
the vehicle to the dealer, the subsequent
buyer of the used vehicle (the
transferee) is permitted to give a power
of attorney to the transferor/selling
dealer to acknowledge the mileage
disclosure on their behalf. This power of
27 49
CFR 580.14.
CFR 580.14 requires part B of the form to
contain a space for the mileage disclosure from the
transferor to the transferee, and contain space for
the following information: (1) The odometer reading
at the time of the transfer; (2) the date of the
transfer; (3) the transferor’s name and current
address; (4) the transferee’s name and current
address; and (5) the vehicle make, model year, body
type, and VIN. Part B shall also contain a reference
to the Federal odometer law and state that
providing false information or the failure of the
person granted the power of attorney to submit the
form to the State may result in fines and/or
imprisonment. Part B shall also contain a space for
the transferor to certify that to the best of his
knowledge either: (1) The odometer reading reflects
the actual mileage; or (2) if the transferor knows
that the odometer reading reflects mileage in excess
of the designed mechanical odometer limit, he shall
include a statement to that effect; or (3) if the
transferor knows that the odometer reading differs
from the mileage and the difference is greater than
that caused by a calibration error, he shall include
a statement that the odometer reading does not
reflect the actual mileage and should not be relied
upon, with a warning notice to alert the transferee
that a discrepancy exists between the odometer
reading and the actual mileage.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
28 49
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
attorney from the transferee to the
transferor allows the transferor (who is
the original seller’s attorney in fact
under Part A) to sign the title as both the
transferor and transferee in the same
transaction.29 In addition, because the
same person signs the title as the
transferor and transferee, the
appointment of the transferor as the
transferee’s attorney-in-fact must be
made on part B of the same secure
power of attorney form, issued by a
State, upon which the transferor was
appointed the attorney-in-fact by the
original transferor on part A.30 This
form enables purchasers to examine the
previously issued power of attorney for
alterations, erasures, and other marks,
and to learn the name of the prior owner
without the additional cost of a title
search. This is the same information
that purchasers would receive if the title
was not held by a lienholder since,
under TIMA, the transferor is required
to disclose mileage on the vehicle’s title.
The secure power of attorney form
with a part B must contain a
certification in part C.31 To ensure that
a person exercising a power of attorney
under both sections 580.13 and 580.14
(parts A and B) is fully aware of his/her
obligation and their liability for any
action that is inconsistent with the
power of attorney, the rule (§ 580.15)
requires the completion, on part C, of a
certification attesting that the signer has
disclosed the mileage on the title
document consistent with the mileage
disclosed on the power of attorney form.
The signer of part C also attests that he
or she has examined the title, and that
the mileage disclosure made on the title
executed under the power of attorney is
greater than the mileage previously
stated on the title and any reassignment
form.32
The part C certification requirement
need only apply to the subsequent sale
situation (typically a trade-in) where the
second purchaser’s only link to the title
will be the transferor (dealer). Thus,
section 580.15 provides that the
certification requirement applies only
when the transferor is exercising a
power of attorney for both the first sale
and second sale customers, as provided
29 49
CFR 580.14.
is done pursuant to 49 CFR 580.13.
31 The part C certification shall include space for:
(1) The signature and printed name of the person
exercising the power of attorney; (2) the address of
the person exercising the power of attorney; and (3)
the date of the certification.
32 As a practical matter, the mileage entered by
the dealer could never be lower than the mileage
already on the title, since if the power of attorney
set forth a lower mileage, it would void the power
of attorney as discussed above, and the dealer
would not be authorized to sign the disclosure on
behalf of the transferor.
30 This
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for in sections 580.13 and 580.14. If the
title is present at the time of the second
sale, the purchaser will be able to
review the title himself/herself to assure
that the mileage is entered in
accordance with the initial transferor’s
power of attorney and is higher than the
mileage appearing on the title and
reassignment documents.
Finally, the State itself must issue the
power of attorney form.33
A third purpose was to set ground
rules for transferors and transferees,
providing that both parties provide all
of the information and signatures
required in parts A, and as applicable B,
and C of the secure power of attorney
form. This ensures that upon receipt of
the first transferor’s title, the transferee
(typically a dealer) must complete the
space for mileage disclosure on the title
exactly as the mileage was disclosed by
the first transferor on the power of
attorney form.
A fourth purpose was to prevent
odometer fraud by establishing
processes, mechanisms and conditions
calculated to result in the disclosure of
the actual mileage on the title.34 As
provided in the PSRA of 1988, NHTSA’s
rule is to ensure that transferors disclose
the actual mileage at the time of the
transfer on the power of attorney
document and that persons exercising
the power of attorney restate that
mileage exactly on the title in the space
provided. Toward these ends, one
condition, required by the
implementing rule, is inclusion of the
printed names and signatures of the first
transferor and the first transferee
(typically a dealer) accompanying the
mileage disclosure, as well as a
statement of liability for fines for false
statements. The transferor shall also
certify on the power of attorney form
that to the best of the transferor’s
knowledge, either: (1) The odometer
reading reflects the actual mileage; or
(2) if the transferor knows that the
odometer reading reflects mileage in
excess of the designed odometer limit,
he shall include a statement to that
effect; or (3) if the transferor knows that
the odometer reading differs from the
mileage and the difference is greater
than that caused by a calibration error,
he shall include a statement that the
odometer reading does not reflect the
actual mileage and should not be relied
upon, and a warning notice to alert the
transferee that a discrepancy exists
33 54
FR 9812.
course, other purposes of TIMA apply,
including processes and mechanisms making the
disclosure of an odometer’s mileage on the title a
condition of the application for a title and a
requirement for the title issued by the state.
34 Of
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
between the odometer reading and the
actual mileage.
There are additional mechanisms
employed in the power of attorney
regulations to ensure accurate
disclosures of the odometer reading and
to limit fraud. As provided in the rule,
upon receipt of the first transferor’s title,
the transferee has a duty to complete the
space for mileage disclosure on the title
exactly as the mileage was disclosed by
the first transferor on the power of
attorney form.35 Further, the
certification provision discussed above
provides a mechanism applicable to the
second sale. As provided by section
580.15, the person completing part C of
the secure power of attorney form
issued by the State certifies that he or
she has disclosed the mileage on the
title document consistent with the
mileage disclosed to him or her on the
power of attorney form, that he or she
examined the title and the mileage
disclosure on that title and the mileage
disclosure he or she is making on the
power of attorney is greater than the
mileage previously stated on the title.
In addition, the PSRA, as amended in
1990, provided another process to
ensure accurate disclosure of the
odometer reading. It required that the
rule ensure that the person granted a
power of attorney must submit the
completed original power of attorney to
the state along with a copy of the title
(showing the restatement of mileage)
and must also retain a copy. As
directed, NHTSA issued implementing
regulations providing that the transferee
must submit the completed original
power of attorney form to the State that
issued it along with either a copy or the
actual transferor’s title when submitting
a new title application. This allowed for
review of the mileage on the power of
attorney form and corresponding title.
NHTSA’s regulations provide an
additional mechanism facilitating
verification of previous mileage
statements by affording subsequent
purchasers access to previous title and
power of attorney documents. Under
section 580.16(a), if the second-sale
transferee applies for title in his own
name (in other words, if the second-sale
transferee does not give power of
attorney to his transferor to review the
title and reassignment documents), then
that transferor must show him, upon his
request, a copy of the power of attorney
form completed by the previous owner.
In any event, under section 580.16(b) of
the rule, a transferor who was given
power of attorney by his transferor and
who holds title to the vehicle in his
name, must, upon request of the
35 49
CFR 580.13(f).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
purchaser (second-sale transferee), show
his/her purchaser a copy of the previous
owner’s title and a copy of the power of
attorney form completed by the
previous owner.
A further mechanism in the rule was
its voiding mechanism. As provided by
the rule, 49 CFR 580.15(b), any mileage
discrepancies void the power of
attorney. NHTSA has characterized this
provision as vital; 36 if the mileage
reflected by the transferor on the power
of attorney is less than that previously
stated on the title and any reassignment
documents, the power of attorney shall
be void. The power of attorney is voided
by the existence of a discrepancy, not by
an action causing a discrepancy.
A fifth purpose is to prevent
alterations on odometer disclosures by
powers of attorney and to preclude
counterfeit powers of attorney through
secure processes. In furtherance of these
purposes, the power of attorney
(incorporating the disclosure statement)
must be on a form issued by the State
that is set forth by means of a secure
printing process or other secure process.
It has to be no less secure than the title
document itself.
A sixth purpose is to create a record
of the mileage on vehicles and a paper
trail. The PSRA referred to the need to
facilitate enforcement. In addition, and
more specifically, the amended statute
provided ‘‘the person granted such
power of attorney * * * shall submit
the original back to the State with a
copy of the title showing a restatement
of the mileage.’’ 37 This paper trail
includes the written, signed (by both the
transferor and transferee), and dated
odometer disclosure statement on the
secure power of attorney form, and the
corresponding entry on the vehicle title,
which, as discussed above, must read
exactly as it was disclosed by the
transferor on the power of attorney
document. The transferee is required to
file the original power of attorney form
with the State that issued it, with a copy
of the transferor’s title or with the actual
title when the transferee submits a new
title application at the same time. The
transferee is required to return a copy of
the power of attorney form to the
transferor. The State shall retain the
original power of attorney form for the
shorter of (a) Three years or (b) a period
equal to the State titling record retention
period. As stated in the rulemaking, the
State may retain the copy in any
medium by which such information
36 54
FR 35885 (Aug. 30, 1989).
definition of ‘‘original power of attorney’’
permits a secure copy of the power of attorney to
be considered an ‘‘original.’’ This is implemented
in part in 40 CFR 580.13(f).
37 The
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48107
may be stored, provided there is no loss
of information. States are not limited to
retaining the records in paper form.
The retention of the power of attorney
form by the State permits law
enforcement officials to trace fraudulent
disclosure statements back to
transferors, if necessary.
Moreover, Section 401 of the PSRA, as
amended in 1991, requires NHTSA’s
rules to provide for the retention of the
power of attorney form. The rule added
section 580.8(c), which concerns
odometer disclosure statement
retention. Under this paragraph, motor
vehicle dealers and distributors who are
assigned a power of attorney by their
transferors are required to retain, for five
years, a copy of each power of attorney
they receive. These documents must be
retained at the primary place of business
of the dealer or distributor in an order
that is appropriate with business
requirements and that permits
systematic retrieval.
Seventh, the overall purpose is to
protect consumers by assuring that they
receive valid representations of a
vehicle’s actual mileage at a time of
transfer. This includes the ground rules
for transferors and transferees,
providing that both parties provide all
of the information and signatures
required in parts A, B, and C of the
secure power of attorney form. This
ensures that upon receipt of the
transferor’s title, the transferee shall
complete the space for mileage
disclosure on the title exactly as the
mileage was disclosed by the transferor
on the power of attorney form.
IV. The Florida Petition
Florida, which is in the process of
implementing an electronic title transfer
system (e-title), petitions for approval of
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements.38 Florida requests
alternate disclosure requirements for
transfers of motor vehicles in
transactions between private parties
(casual sales) and transfers of motor
vehicles, whether subject to a lien 39 or
38 We note that Florida’s petition differs markedly
from other petitions for alternate odometer
disclosure requirements NHTSA has received from
other states. Florida’s proposal relies on tag agents,
rather than an online system, to verify the identity
of the transferor and transferee in casual sales.
These tag agents also verify chain of ownership and
odometer disclosure in all transfers before title can
be issued. Identity verification in transactions other
than casual sales (for which identity of the parties
is verified by a tag agent) is left to the parties to
the transaction(s). Florida’s proposal encompasses a
wide variety of transactions and relies on paper
forms for a number of these transactions.
39 Under Florida law, a lienholder physically
possesses the title to the vehicle. Thus, Florida
permits odometer disclosure by power of attorney
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
Continued
08AUP1
48108
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
not subject to a lien, between private
parties and motor vehicle dealers.
Florida also requests alternate
disclosure requirements for transactions
involving leased vehicles.
Florida law authorizes the Florida
Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles (the Department) to
accept any application for vehicle title
by electronic means. See Fla. Stat. Ann.
§ 319.40 (1997). The Department is
proposing amendments to the Florida
statutes to allow the continuation of an
electronic certificate of title in lieu of a
paper certificate of title for transfers of
motor vehicles. With electronic titling
there would not be a paper certificate of
title on which to disclose the vehicle’s
mileage at the time of transfer of
ownership.
A. Overview of Florida’s Electronic
Titling System
Currently Florida stores its titling and
registration information (including
images of all supporting title
documentation) in a secure database
referred to as the Florida Real-time
Vehicle Information System, or FRVIS.
According to Florida’s petition, either a
Department employee or an authorized
tag agent at a state-authorized tag office
enters information into this database.
Only a Department employee or tag
agent can change FRVIS title
information, including owner
information and the odometer
disclosure. For title images (scanned,
electronic copies of vehicle title
documents), FRVIS stores all applicable
data and stores images of documents
that remain in the title history for the
vehicle. Florida law also requires that
the Department retain all documents
regarding applications for, and issuance
of, certificates of title—including titles,
manufacturers’ statements of origin,
applications, and supporting documents
submitted with the application such as
odometer statements, VIN verifications,
bills of sale, indicia of ownership,
dealer reassignments, photographs, and
any personal identification, affidavits,
or documents required by or submitted
to the Department—for a period of at
least 10 years. Fla. Stat. Ann.
§ 319.23(11). The title resides as an
electronic record in FRVIS; however,
secure paper copies of the title can be
generated from FRVIS if needed.
Florida intends to use a secure
reassignment form in lieu of a paper
title to capture odometer disclosure and
transfer of e-titles. Florida law currently
allows licensed dealers to use a secure
when title is held by a lienholder and now petitions
for alternate requirements regarding odometer
disclosure by power of attorney.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
reassignment form when making dealer
reassignments and odometer disclosures
after all reassignment and odometer
disclosure spaces on the reverse side of
the Certificate of Title have been used.
The form links the vehicle to the title
record by the VIN and includes the
required odometer disclosure
statements. The Department scans the
form and stores it in the title history for
the vehicle. Florida proposes to use a
similar form for odometer disclosure in
its e-title program.
In Florida, lienholders hold the title
to the vehicles securing the loan.
Florida began its electronic title and lien
(ELT) program in 2001. Under the
current process, the Department
contracts with vendors who provide
secure electronic interface with
Florida’s titling system to participating
lienholders. The vendors then contract
with financial institutions who wish to
participate in Florida’s electronic title
and lien program. The participating
lienholders allow their titles to remain
electronic. Electronic liens are satisfied
through the secure electronic interface
and the title is retained electronically
until a paper copy is requested.40
B. Florida’s Proposed e-Odometer
Program
Florida’s proposed e-Odometer
program can be divided into three
transaction types: (1) Casual or private
sales; (2) sales involving licensed motor
vehicle dealers (including sales from
private owners to licensed dealers, sales
between licensed dealers, and sales
from licensed dealers to private buyers);
and (3) sales involving leased vehicles.
The Agency understands that the
program, as proposed, applies only
when the transferred vehicle is
electronically titled at the time of
transfer of the vehicle.
1. Casual or Private Sales
Currently, a Florida resident wishing
to sell his/her vehicle in a casual or
private sale needs to have a paper title.
The seller signs the paper title and
discloses the odometer reading to the
buyer on the title. The buyer then signs
the paper title verifying the odometer
reading. (The odometer disclosure is
made on the title and signed by the
buyer and seller at the time of transfer,
in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 32705 and
49 CFR 580.5.) The buyer takes the
paper title to a tag office, which
processes the transfer of ownership and
prints a new paper title in the buyer’s
40 Approximately 24 percent of the more than ten
million vehicle lien records Florida has are
electronic. Additionally, almost 50 percent of all
new transactions with liens are maintained
electronically under ELT.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
name, or, if the buyer so elects, creates
an e-title to be held by the
Department.41 Whether the buyer elects
to maintain the title electronically or in
paper form, the tag office sends the old
paper title and any other supporting
documentation to the Department for
scanning into FRVIS.
Under Florida’s proposed e-title
program,42 if a seller of a vehicle has an
electronic title and wants to transfer that
title, the seller and buyer would visit an
authorized tag office together. After
providing adequate identification to the
tag agent, the buyer and seller would
sign, in the presence of the tag agent, a
secure reassignment form transferring
ownership and disclosing the odometer
reading. A title is then issued in the
buyer’s name and is stored
electronically, or the buyer may choose
to have a paper title issued. The secure
reassignment form and copies of the
identification are scanned into the title
record in FRVIS.43 Florida maintains
that these would travel with the title.
2. Sales Involving Licensed Motor
Vehicle Dealers
a. Retail Sales of Vehicles With an
e-Title But Not Subject to a Lien
Currently, when a licensed motor
vehicle dealer is involved, the process
for transferring a title to a vehicle with
an e-title and not subject to a lien is as
follows. The seller with e-title brings the
vehicle to a dealership. The seller and
dealer complete a secure power of
attorney with odometer disclosure. The
dealer obtains the paper title from a tag
agency or online from the Department.
The dealer transfers the odometer
disclosure information from the secure
power of attorney to the title and signs
the title as buyer and seller. When the
dealer sells the vehicle to another buyer,
the dealer and buyer complete the
reassignment on the paper title with an
41 The buyer can request a paper title from the tag
agent and pay a $10 fee, or request a paper title
online and pay a $2.50 fee. The fee is intended to
encourage buyers to maintain vehicle title
electronically. This fee applies to any paper title
request under Florida’s current system and under
the State’s proposed program.
42 Florida’s proposed program does not apply in
a casual vehicle sale by a seller holding a paper
title, only those with e-title. A seller holding a
paper title must follow the current procedures to
transfer the vehicle—the buyer and seller sign and
make the required odometer disclosure on the back
of the paper title. The buyer then can bring the
signed title containing the required odometer
disclosure statement to an authorized tag agent and
elect at that time to have the title maintained by the
State electronically. If the buyer elects e-Title and
later sells the vehicle in a casual sale, he can do
so by following the procedures for transferring etitle.
43 The Agency understands that the electronic
documents are linked to the vehicle title history by
title number and VIN.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
odometer disclosure. The dealer takes
both the secure power of attorney and
the paper title to a tag agency. The title
is then transferred to the buyer and a
receipt is provided. The buyer has the
option to obtain a new paper title or
have the Department hold the title
electronically. The secure power of
attorney and old paper title are scanned
and stored with title history in FRVIS.
Under Florida’s proposed program, a
seller with e-title would bring the
vehicle to a dealership. The seller and
dealer complete a secure reassignment
form with odometer disclosure. When
the dealer sells the vehicle to another
buyer, the dealer and buyer complete
another secure reassignment form with
odometer disclosure. The dealer takes
both of the secure reassignment forms to
a tag agency. The vehicle title is then
transferred to the buyer and a receipt is
provided. The buyer has the option to
obtain a paper title or have the
Department hold the title electronically.
The secure reassignment forms are
scanned and stored with the vehicle
title history in FRVIS.
b. Sales of Vehicles With e-Title Subject
to a Lien (e-lien in Florida)
Currently, when a licensed motor
vehicle dealer is involved, the process
for transferring a vehicle subject to an
e-lien with e-title is as follows. A seller
with e-title/e-lien brings the vehicle to
a dealership. The seller and dealer
complete a secure power of attorney
with odometer disclosure. The dealer
pays off the lien and the lienholder
electronically releases the lien via a
secure electronic interface with the
Department (ELT). The dealer then
obtains the paper title from a tag agency
or online from the Department. The
dealer transfers the odometer
information from the secure power of
attorney to the title and signs the title
as buyer and seller. When the dealer
sells the vehicle to another buyer, the
dealer and buyer complete the
reassignment on the title with odometer
disclosure. The dealer takes both the
secure power of attorney and the paper
title to the tag agency. The vehicle title
is transferred to the buyer and a receipt
is provided. The buyer has the option to
obtain a new paper title or have the
Department hold the title electronically.
The secure power of attorney and old
paper title are scanned and stored with
title history in FRVIS.
Under Florida’s proposed program, a
seller with e-title would bring the
vehicle to a dealership. The seller and
dealer complete a secure reassignment
form with an odometer disclosure. The
dealer pays off the lien and the
lienholder electronically releases the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
lien via secure electronic interface with
the Department (ELT). When the dealer
sells the vehicle to another buyer, the
dealer and buyer complete another
secure reassignment form with an
odometer disclosure. The dealer then
takes both secure reassignment forms to
a tag agency, where the title is
transferred to the buyer and a receipt is
provided. The buyer has the option to
obtain a paper title or have the
Department hold the title electronically.
The secure reassignment forms are
scanned and stored with the vehicle
title history in FRVIS.
c. Dealer Reassignments
Florida currently does not allow for
an e-title in the dealer reassignment
process. A dealer must obtain a paper
title prior to being able to resell the
vehicle. Once there is a paper title, the
dealer uses the current paper process.
The dealer uses the back of the title to
include reassignments, including
odometer disclosure. Once this form is
full (Florida allows for three
reassignments on the title), the dealer
will use a secure title reassignment
supplement (HSMV 82994). This form
also includes the required odometer
disclosures. When a vehicle is
ultimately sold to a customer, the paper
title and all secure title reassignment
supplements are provided to the tag
agency and forwarded to the
Department for scanning and storing in
the title record.
For an e-title, the Department is
proposing that the dealer use a secure
reassignment supplement instead of
having to obtain a paper title. Any
subsequent reassignments would also
use the secure reassignment
supplement. When the vehicle is
ultimately sold to a retail customer, all
secure reassignment supplements would
be provided to the tag agency for
verification of the chain of ownership
and verification of the odometer
disclosure. All documents would be
forwarded to the Department for
scanning and storing in FRVIS.
3. Sales Involving Leased Vehicles
In the case of leased vehicles, the
lessor typically retains ownership of the
vehicle, but does not possess it. The
lessor, as a transferor, must comply with
the federal odometer disclosure
requirements when it subsequently
transfers title of a leased vehicle. As
noted by Florida, Federal laws require
written mileage disclosures be made by
lessees to lessors upon the lessor’s
transfer of the ownership of the leased
vehicle.
Currently, Florida’s process for
transferring leased vehicles is as
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48109
follows. The lessor holds the vehicle’s
paper title. When the lease ends (for
example, in a trade-in or buyout
situation), the lessee brings the vehicle
to a dealership. The lessee signs an
odometer disclosure Statement. The
lessor then transfers the odometer
reading to the title. The lessor signs title
over to the dealer (or other party) along
with the odometer disclosure statement.
When the dealer sells the vehicle to a
buyer, the dealer and buyer complete
the reassignment on the paper title with
the odometer disclosure. The
documents are then sent to an
authorized tag agency, where the title is
transferred to the buyer and a receipt is
provided. The buyer has the option to
obtain a new paper title or have the
Department hold the title electronically.
The old paper title and supporting
documentation are scanned and stored
with the vehicle title history in FRVIS.
Under Florida’s proposal, the lessor
holds an e-title. When the lease ends,
the lessee would bring the vehicle to a
dealership. The lessee signs an
odometer disclosure statement. The
lessor then signs a secure power of
attorney to the dealer which includes
the odometer disclosure. The dealer
signs a secure reassignment form
agreeing with the odometer disclosure.
When the dealer sells the vehicle to
another buyer, the dealer takes the
documents (bill of sale, reassignment
document, and power of attorney) to the
tag agency, where the title is transferred
to the buyer and a receipt is provided.
The buyer has the option to obtain a
new paper title or have the Department
hold the vehicle title electronically. All
documents are sent to Department and
scanned into the vehicle title history in
FRVIS.
C. Florida e-Odometer Implementation
Schedule
Florida is implementing its electronic
title or ‘‘e-title’’ system in three phases.
Under the first phase, which Florida
states is complete, participating
lienholders are allowed, but not
required, to have their titles and liens
held electronically by the Department.
This option allows lienholders to avoid
maintaining paper lien portfolios. The
Department and the lienholders
encourage owners who satisfy their
liens to continue to maintain the title
electronically.
Under the second phase of the e-title
project, dealers would be allowed to buy
and sell e-title vehicles and take e-title
vehicles in on trade without acquiring a
paper title. It is the Agency’s
understanding that the program will
extend to leased vehicles, including
end-of-lease vehicles coming back to the
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
48110
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
dealer and vehicles being traded in prior
to the end of the lease. Lessors will give
the dealer power of attorney to disclose
the vehicle mileage, as indicated by the
lessee on an odometer disclosure
statement, on a secure reassignment
form, which will then be used to
transfer title from the Lessor to a
subsequent purchaser. This process will
obviate the need for the dealer to obtain
a paper title.
The third phase of the project would
extend e-title capability to private or
casual sales. Under the proposal, the
seller (transferor) and buyer (transferee)
will have two options for completing a
motor vehicle sale. Currently, the
vehicle’s title is either held physically
by the vehicle owner or the vehicle is
titled electronically. If the vehicle is
titled electronically, the owner now
must acquire a secure paper copy of the
title prior to transferring the vehicle.
The transferor makes the required
odometer disclosure on the title and
both parties sign the title, effectuating
transfer of the vehicle. Under Florida’s
proposed program, if the vehicle has an
e-title, the transferor would not be
required to obtain a paper title to
transfer it. The transferor and transferee
will have the option to go to a tag agent
or tax collector’s office and, after
providing adequate identification to the
agent, execute a secure reassignment
form to transfer title from the transferor
to the transferee without the need to
first acquire a paper title.44
D. Florida’s Position on Meeting the
Purposes of TIMA
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Florida submits that its e-Odometer
program meets the purposes of TIMA as
described by NHTSA summarized above
and described more fully in the
Agency’s Final Determination on the
Commonwealth of Virginia’s petition for
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements. See 74 FR 643, 647–48
(January 7, 2009). The petition
identified the purposes of TIMA and the
State’s assessment on how its proposed
program would comply with each
purpose.
44 The secure reassignment form contains an
odometer disclosure statement that is required to
transfer the vehicle title. Sellers would accurately
disclose vehicle mileage in the presence of both the
buyer as well as a tag agent. The tag agent will
verify that the buyer agrees to the mileage being
disclosed and will require proper identification
from both the buyer and the seller. (Currently, a
vehicle owner with an e-title who wants to transfer
or sell the vehicle must acquire a paper title from
the State to process the transaction.)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
1. Vehicle Transfers in the Absence of
a Lease Agreement
b. Sales Involving Licensed Dealers
(With and Without a Lien)
a. Casual or Private Sales
One purpose is to assure that the form
of the odometer disclosure precludes
odometer fraud. Florida asserts that the
secure reassignment form will have the
same security features currently
included on title paper and will travel
with the title record in FRVIS; both
parties will be present together in a tag
agency with identification in order to
process the title transfer, which
includes execution of the odometer
disclosure statement on the secure
reassignment form.
A second purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making the disclosure
of an odometer’s mileage on the title
both a condition of the application for
a title and a requirement for title
issuance by a state. Florida states that
under its proposal, odometer disclosure
would remain a required data input for
application of a title and a required
output on the title. By having both
parties present with required
identification, Florida states the process
would be more secure than the current
process, which allows the owner to sign
the title over to the buyer who then
produces the document when obtaining
title without the seller present.
A third purpose is to prevent
alterations of disclosures on title and to
preclude counterfeit titles through
secure processes. Florida states in its
petition that, with both parties present
at a tag agency with identification, this
process will prevent alterations and
preclude counterfeit titles. If changes
are necessary, a new secure document
will be signed by both parties present in
front of an authorized tag agent.
A fourth purpose is to create a record
of the mileage on vehicles and a paper
trail. Florida states that under its
proposal, the secure document, whether
a secure reassignment form or secure
paper title, signed by both the buyer and
seller will be scanned and stored as
evidence of the agreement by both the
buyer and seller of the odometer
reading. This creates a permanent
record that is easily checked by
subsequent owners or law enforcement
officials.
A fifth purpose is to protect
consumers by assuring that they
received valid representations of the
vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer based on odometer disclosures.
Under its proposal, Florida states this
purpose is served because consumers
(buyers) will be present with sellers at
the time the title is transferred
(currently this is not usually the case).
One purpose is to assure that the form
of the odometer disclosure precludes
odometer fraud. Florida states its
proposal would meet this purpose
because the secure reassignment form
will have the same security features
currently included on title paper. The
dealer will use secure reassignment
forms, which will travel with the title,
which the dealer would sign with the
previous owner and with the new buyer.
A second purpose is to prevent
odometer fraud by processes and
mechanisms making the disclosure of an
odometer’s mileage on the title a
condition of the application for a title
and a requirement for the title issued by
the State. Florida states that the e-title
process requires disclosure of an
odometer’s mileage on a secure
document. The secure reassignment
forms would have the same security
features currently included on title
paper and would travel with the title
record.
A third purpose is to prevent
alterations of disclosures on a title and
to preclude counterfeit titles through
secure processes. Florida states that a
title would not be issued to a buyer if
the chain of ownership cannot be
established. The submission of all
secure reassignment forms would
establish the chain of ownership.
Odometer disclosures would be part of
those forms.
A fourth purpose is to create a record
of the mileage on vehicles and a paper
trail. Florida notes that the secure
document signed by the previous
owner, the dealer, and the buyer would
be scanned and stored as evidence of
the agreement by both the buyer and
seller of the odometer reading.
A fifth purpose is to protect
consumers by assuring that they
received valid representations of the
vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer based on odometer disclosures.
According to Florida, the secure
reassignment forms would allow for
valid representation of the odometer
during both transactions (the original
owner to dealer transaction and the
subsequent dealer to buyer transaction).
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Transfers Involving Leased Vehicles
One purpose is to assure that lessors
have the vehicle’s actual odometer
mileage at the time of transfer. Florida
states that the only change proposed by
its e-title proposal from the current
process is that, instead of signing an
actual paper title, the lessor would sign
a power of attorney and disclose the
odometer reading as provided to it by
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
the lessee. This power of attorney would
then transfer this odometer information
to the dealer to sell the vehicle.
A second purpose is to assure that
lessees provide lessors with an
odometer disclosure statement. Florida
states that its proposed e-title process
would not affect this requirement.
A third purpose is to assure that
lessees are formally notified of their
odometer disclosure obligations and the
penalties for failing to comply by not
providing complete and truthful
information. Florida states that its
proposed e-title process would not
affect this requirement.
A fourth purpose is to set rules for
accurate disclosure by lessors, directing
them to indicate on the title the mileage
provided by the lessee, unless the lessor
has reason to believe that the disclosure
by the lessee does not reflect the actual
mileage of the vehicle. Florida states
that its proposal would satisfy this
purpose by allowing the lessor to
indicate the mileage on a secure
reassignment form that would travel
with the title.
A fifth purpose is to create records
and a paper trail, including the written,
dated and signed odometer disclosure
statement by the lessee. Florida states
that its proposal would not change this
requirement. The title would remain in
electronic form; however, the secure
reassignment form with the lessor’s
odometer disclosure, the power of
attorney form and bill of sale would all
be scanned into the title history. The
Department’s database would store
these documents with the title.
3. Mileage Disclosures by Power of
Attorney
Florida’s proposed program
incorporates mileage disclosure by
power of attorney in one circumstance—
when a lessee brings a leased vehicle to
a dealer, the lessor would give a power
of attorney to the dealer for the purpose
of mileage disclosure on the secure
reassignment form to effect transfer of
the vehicle from the lessor to a third
party. NHTSA has not previously had
occasion to identify and discuss these
purposes when addressing prior
petitions for alternate odometer
disclosure requirements from other
states because other states’ proposals
did not encompass the use of powers of
attorney for mileage disclosure.
V. Analysis
Under TIMA, NHTSA ‘‘shall approve
alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a
State unless the [NHTSA] determines
that such requirements are not
consistent with the purpose of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
disclosure required by subsection (d) or
(e) as the case may be.’’ The purposes
are discussed above, as is Florida’s
proposed program. We now provide our
initial assessment whether Florida’s
proposal satisfies TIMA’s purposes as
relevant to its petition.45 We first
address casual or private sales, followed
by sales involving a licensed dealer of
vehicles with and without a lien, sales
of leased vehicles, and finally sales
using a power of attorney for purposes
of odometer disclosure.
A. Florida’s Proposal in Light of TIMA’s
Purposes Regarding Vehicle Transfers in
the Absence of a Lease Agreement
1. Casual or Private Sales
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that
the form of the odometer disclosure
precludes odometer fraud. In this
regard, NHTSA has initially determined
that Florida’s proposed alternate
disclosure requirements satisfy this
purpose as the proposal relates to casual
or private sales. Under Florida’s
proposal, there would be an e-title. A
required part of the data to be entered
in the transfer of title would be the
vehicle’s odometer reading. In casual/
private sales, the seller and buyer would
visit a tag office together, provide
identification to the tag agent, and sign
a secure reassignment form transferring
ownership and disclosing the odometer
reading. This is one document and it
would be signed before a tag agent. The
secure reassignment form including the
required odometer disclosure statement
would be scanned and reside as an
electronic record within the
Department’s database that would be
linked to the vehicle’s title through title
number and VIN. If a hard copy of the
title is needed or desired, Florida can
generate a paper title with the odometer
disclosure statement on the title using a
secure printing process. As to the form
of the title containing a space for the
transferor to disclose the vehicle’s
mileage, the proposed Florida program
would provide an electronic equivalent
to these requirements for use in a
subsequent sale of the vehicle, as
transfers would be effected
electronically on secure reassignment
forms or paper titles that provide space
for the required odometer disclosure in
keeping with TIMA and current
practice.46
45 Florida would continue to be subject to all
Federal requirements that are not based on Section
408(d) and (e) of the Cost Savings Act as amended,
recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and (c).
46 Florida notes that paper titles will still be
necessary for title transactions involving at least
one out of state party. For instance, if a vehicle
enters Florida with an out of state title, Florida
cannot recognize another state’s e-title. The buyer
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48111
Another purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making the disclosure
of odometer mileage on the title a
condition of the application for a title
and a requirement for the title issued by
the State. NHTSA has initially
determined that Florida’s proposed
electronic process satisfies this purpose
as it relates to casual or private sales.
Florida’s proposed electronic title
transfer process would require proper
identification of the seller and buyer
and disclosure and acceptance of
odometer information on a secure
reassignment form in front of a tag agent
before the transaction can be completed.
While the form is referred to as a
reassignment form, viewed from a e-title
transactional standpoint, it appears to
be an information entry form used in the
context where the buyer and seller both
appear before the tag agent and simply
use the document to convey odometer
information, with their signatures, for
the tag agent to record in the e-title
system. We note that Florida’s use of the
term ‘‘secure reassignment form’’ in this
situation appears to be a misnomer. The
transfer of title in casual or private sales
is not a reassignment as there is no prior
assignment. The document is more
accurately described as a secure State
title transfer form for use when a vehicle
has e-title and the title cannot be
physically signed.
Another purpose of TIMA is to
prevent alterations of disclosures on
titles and to preclude counterfeit titles
through secure processes. The Agency
has initially determined that Florida’s
proposed program satisfies this purpose
as it relates to casual or private sales.
Florida’s alternate disclosure
requirements appear to be as secure as
current paper titles in casual or private
sales. As we understand Florida’s
proposal, the odometer statement would
be disclosed initially on secure paper—
either on the paper title itself or on a
secure reassignment form at one of
Florida’s authorized tag agency offices.
First, both buyer and seller would sign
the reassignment form in front of a tag
agent, which would ensure the security
of that aspect of the proposed process.
Second, Florida’s reassignment form
would be secure; it would be set forth
by means of a secure printing process or
other secure process in compliance with
49 CFR 580.4. On subsequent title
transfers in casual or private sales, the
transferor and transferee would have to
will need to obtain a signed paper title from the
seller. Conversely, if an owner sells a Florida titled
vehicle to someone who will title it in another state,
the owner will need to obtain the paper title to
allow the buyer to obtain a title in the other state.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
48112
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
complete the odometer disclosure and
acceptance—either on a secure paper
title issued in a conventional manner by
the Department or on a secure
reassignment form in front of a tag agent
for the transaction to be completed.
Another purpose of TIMA is to create
a record of the mileage on vehicles and
a paper trail. The underlying purposes
of this record and paper trail are to
enable consumers to be better informed
and provide a mechanism through
which odometer tampering can be
traced and violators prosecuted. In
NHTSA’s preliminary view, Florida’s
proposed program relating to casual or
private sales satisfies this purpose. It
would create a scheme of records
equivalent to the current ‘‘paper trail’’
that assists law enforcement in
identifying and prosecuting odometer
fraud. Under the Florida proposal,
creation of a paper trail would start with
the requirement that a title cannot be
transferred until and unless both the
transferor and transferee execute a
secure paper title consistent with the
Federal regulations or a secure
reassignment form, including the
required odometer disclosure statement
in front of a tag agent. Scanned copies
of the title and secure reassignment
form(s) would be stored in the vehicle’s
title record in FRVIS. If a paper title is
requested, the odometer disclosure
statement would be provided on the
secure paper title.
The Department would retain an
electronic copy of the prior titles
(including the prior odometer disclosure
statements) and any supporting
documentation, including secure
reassignment forms. The Department
would scan these documents and store
them with the vehicle’s electronic title
history. For title images, the Department
would store all applicable data and
images of documents in the title history
for the vehicle in FRVIS. Furthermore,
Florida requires that all documents used
to issue a title be retained for a period
of at least ten (10) years. These
electronic records would create the
electronic equivalent to a paper trail in
a paper-based system that would be
readily available to law enforcement.
Additionally, the vehicle mileage would
be available for public view via an
online motor vehicle check available to
Florida customers.
Whether Florida’s program as it
relates to casual or private sales
conforms to TIMA’s overall purpose is
discussed in subpart D below.
2. Sales Involving Licensed Dealers
(Vehicles Without and With a Lien)
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that
the form of the odometer disclosure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
precludes odometer fraud. As discussed
above, to prevent odometer fraud
facilitated by disclosure statements that
were separate from titles, TIMA
required mileage disclosures to be on a
secure vehicle title, containing space for
the seller’s attested mileage disclosure
and a new disclosure by the buyer when
the vehicle was sold again, instead of a
separate document.47 NHTSA has
initially determined that the form of
disclosure in Florida’s proposal for
retail vehicle sales to dealers of vehicles
without or with a lien would not satisfy
this purpose, for the reasons discussed
below.48
In instances when a private seller
sells a vehicle to a dealer, Florida
proposes that the seller and dealer
complete a secure reassignment form to
make the odometer disclosure. Florida’s
assessment of its proposal in light of the
purposes of TIMA states that the
reassignment forms will travel with the
title. But from a TIMA perspective,
when there is a transfer involving a
transferor in whose name the vehicle is
titled, the transferor must disclose the
mileage on a title, and not on a separate
reassignment document such as one that
is supposed to travel with the title.
Thus, Florida’s proposed program is not
consistent with a purpose of the
disclosure required by TIMA pertaining
to the form of the disclosure.
Another purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making odometer
mileage disclosure on the title a
condition for the application for a title
and a requirement for the title issued by
the State. As explained above, a major
shortcoming of the odometer provisions
of the Cost Savings Act prior to TIMA,
was the absence of a requirement that
the odometer disclosure statement be on
the vehicle’s title that, following the sale
of the vehicle, was presented to the
State for retitling. NHTSA has initially
determined that Florida’s proposed
alternate disclosure requirements for
vehicles transferred from a private
owner to a licensed dealer, do not
satisfy this purpose. We have initially
47 We note that Florida’s proposal addresses
vehicles subject to liens. In amendments to TIMA
pertaining to titles in the possession of a lienholder
when the transferor transfers ownership of the
vehicle, Congress maintained the requirement that
the disclosure be on the title itself. It did provide
for the use of a secure power of attorney under
restrictive conditions, as an exception to the
prohibition that a person may not sign an odometer
disclosure statement as both the transferor and
transferee.
48 If, however, the transfer from the titled seller
to a dealer was on a title, NHTSA’s initial decision
would be that Florida’s proposal insofar as it
concerns subsequent transfers of the vehicle among
licensed Florida dealers meets the purposes of
TIMA.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determined that Florida’s proposed
alternate disclosure requirements for
subsequent vehicle transfers between
licensed dealers satisfy this purpose.
As discussed above, Florida’s
proposal for sales to dealers provides for
disclosure and acceptance of odometer
information on a secure reassignment
form, not on a title. Following the
ultimate re-sale of a vehicle to a
consumer by a dealer (possibly not the
same dealer that took the vehicle as a
trade-in), that dealer would take secure
reassignment forms to the tag agency for
titling. In this respect, Florida does not
propose making the disclosure of
odometer mileage on the title in the
initial transaction involving a transferor
in whose name the vehicle is titled a
condition for the application for a title
and a requirement for the title issued by
the State. Florida would provide for
issuance of a new title based on secure
reassignment forms. Such a form can be
easily discarded and another secure
reassignment form bearing an inaccurate
odometer disclosure could be created by
an unscrupulous dealer somewhere in
the chain of transfers. We have
tentatively concluded that, in order for
the proposed program to be consistent
with a purpose of TIMA, in the first
transfer of title of a vehicle from a
private seller to a dealer Florida may not
provide for a mileage disclosure on a
secure reassignment form.
A third purpose of TIMA is to prevent
alterations of disclosures on titles and to
preclude counterfeit titles through
secure processes. In view of the
shortcomings of Florida’s proposed
program regarding the use of secure
reassignment forms instead of titles in
sales between private parties and
dealers discussed above, NHTSA
believes that it is inappropriate to reach
a conclusion regarding the security
aspects of those forms in that context.
The Agency has initially determined
that Florida’s proposed alternate
disclosure requirements for the
subsequent transfer of vehicles between
dealers satisfy this purpose. As we
understand Florida’s proposal, the
secure reassignment form would be
produced by the State and would be
comparable to reassignment forms now
in use in transfers between dealers.
A fourth purpose of TIMA is to create
a record of the mileage on vehicles and
a paper trail. The underlying purposes
of this record and paper trail are to
inform consumers and provide a
mechanism to trace and prosecute
odometer tampering. NHTSA’s initial
determination is that Florida’s proposed
alternative scheme would not, in one
critical respect, create a scheme of
records equivalent to the current ‘‘paper
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
trail’’ used for identifying and
prosecuting odometer fraud. Florida
proposes widespread use of secure
reassignment forms in transfers from
private parties to dealers. In particular,
Florida proposes that, instead of a title,
a reassignment form would be used to
create the record of the mileage on the
odometer in the case of a transferor in
whose name the vehicle is titled. This
recorded mileage figure establishes a
critical benchmark for evaluating the
remaining mileage declarations that will
follow. NHTSA has initially determined
that in these circumstances use of
reassignment documents would not
create the records and paper trail
contemplated by TIMA. Our concerns
about odometer disclosures on these
forms in lieu of disclosure on the title
itself are described above.
NHTSA tentatively concludes the
remainder of Florida’s proposal would
otherwise meet the record creation
purposes of TIMA. Regardless of
whether the buyer requests a paper title
or surrenders the title to the Department
to maintain electronically, the
Department would retain an electronic
copy of the prior titles (including the
prior odometer disclosure statements)
and any supporting documentation,
including secure reassignment forms
and powers of attorney. The Department
would scan these documents and store
them in FRVIS with the vehicle’s
electronic title history. For title images,
FRVIS would store all applicable data
and stores images of documents that
remain in the title history for the
vehicle. Furthermore, Florida requires
that all documents used to issue a title
be retained for a period of at least ten
(10) years. These electronic records
would create the electronic equivalent
of a paper based system that would be
readily available to law enforcement.
Additionally, the vehicle mileage would
be available for public view via an
online motor vehicle check available to
Florida customers.
Whether Florida’s program as it
relates to sales involving licensed
dealers conforms to TIMA’s overall
purpose is discussed in subpart D
below.
B. Florida’s Proposal in Light of TIMA’s
Purposes Relevant to Leased Vehicles
One purpose of TIMA’s leased vehicle
provisions is to assure that the lessor
has the vehicle’s actual odometer
mileage at the time the lessor transfers
ownership. The Agency has initially
determined that Florida’s proposed
program requirements satisfy this
purpose. As we understand Florida’s
proposal, the State proposes to require
vehicle lessees to sign an odometer
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
disclosure statement that would be
provided to the buyer by the lessor.
A second purpose of TIMA’s leased
vehicle provisions is to assure that the
lessee provides the lessor with an
odometer disclosure statement regarding
the mileage of the vehicle at the time of
transfer. The Agency has initially
determined that Florida’s proposed
program requirements satisfy this
purpose. As discussed above, the lessee
would provide this to the lessor via an
odometer disclosure statement when the
lessee surrenders the leased vehicle to
the dealer, and the lessor would provide
this statement to the buyer.
A related purpose is to assure that
lessees are formally notified of their
odometer disclosure obligations and the
penalties for failing to comply by not
providing complete and truthful
information. We have initially
determined that Florida’s proposal does
not satisfy this purpose. As described in
the petition, Florida’s alternate
disclosure requirements do not address
this purpose other than a statement in
the petition that the e-title process does
not change the current requirement. We
recognize that Florida’s odometer
disclosure law requires lessors to
conform to Federal disclosure
regulations under 49 CFR 580.7. Fla.
Stat. Ann. § 319.225(4) (2010). Florida
law also provides that State statutes
regarding vehicle transfer and
reassignment forms and odometer
disclosure statements be construed to
conform to 49 CFR part 580. Fla. Stat.
Ann. § 319.225(9) (2010). Further,
according to Florida, the requirement
that the lessee provide the lessor with
an odometer disclosure statement when
the lessee surrenders the vehicle
typically is part of the lease agreement,
which provides notice of the
requirement and the penalties for failing
to comply. But this is not a formal
requirement. Underlying the adoption of
the leased vehicles provisions of TIMA,
there was significant concern about
considerable understatements of
mileage on leased vehicles that were
turned-in and resold. Our initial
determination is that this reliance on
what is typically in a lease is not
sufficient to assure that lessees are
formally notified of their odometer
disclosure obligations and the penalties
for failing to comply by not providing
complete and truthful information.
A fourth purpose is to set the ground
rules for the lessors, providing for
lessors to indicate the mileage provided
by the lessee on the title, unless the
lessor has reason to believe that the
disclosure by the lessee does not reflect
the actual mileage of the vehicle. We
have initially determined that Florida’s
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48113
proposal does not satisfy this purpose.
A lessee would make an odometer
disclosure by executing an odometer
disclosure statement upon relinquishing
the leased vehicle. The lessor may
transfer the odometer disclosure
statement from the lessee’s statement to
a secure power of attorney unless the
lessor has reason to believe that the
lessee’s statement does not reflect the
vehicle’s actual mileage, in which case
the lessor would be required to indicate
on the title ‘‘true mileage unknown’’ or
words to that effect.49 As explained in
the discussion on powers of attorney
above, odometer disclosure can be made
using a secure power of attorney
document only in the limited
circumstances when the transferor’s title
is physically held by a lienholder at the
time of the transfer or the transferor to
whom the title was issued by the State
has lost the title and the transferee
obtains a duplicate title on behalf of the
transferor. These limited circumstances
do not include lessors giving power of
attorney to dealers for purposes of
odometer disclosure. Under Florida’s
proposal, the vehicle title is not
unavailable to the lessor—the lessor, as
the titled owner of the vehicle in
Florida, can simply request a paper
copy of the title from the State and
effect transfer of the vehicle on the
secure paper title.
A fifth purpose of TIMA’s leased
vehicle provisions is to create records
and a paper trail. The paper trail
includes the signed odometer disclosure
statement by the lessee. The Agency has
initially determined that Florida’s
proposed alternate disclosure
requirements do not satisfy this
purpose. Under Florida’s proposal as we
understand it, the lessee would be
required to sign an odometer disclosure
statement when the vehicle is
surrendered. The lessor would not be
required to sign this document. The
lessor would execute a power of
attorney to the dealer that would
include the odometer disclosure
statement as provided by the lessee. The
dealer then would sign the secure
reassignment form (apparently for the
transferor/lessor and as transferee),
providing an odometer disclosure
provided by the lessor on the secure
power of attorney. When the dealer sells
the vehicle to another buyer, the dealer
would take the documents (bill of sale,
reassignment form, and power of
49 Florida recognizes that the electronic process
must incorporate the brand (actual mileage, exceeds
mechanical limits, or true mileage unknown)
requirement, and Florida would continue to show
the odometer reading and brand on paper titles and
maintain an electronic record of the odometer
reading and the brand.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
48114
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
attorney) to the tag agency. The title
would be transferred to the buyer.
Whether the buyer elects a new paper
title or e-title, the related documents—
including the old title and any
supporting documentation—would be
scanned and stored with the vehicle
title history by the Department. Florida
does not state whether the lessee’s
odometer disclosure statement to the
lessor would be scanned. The electronic
documents would be associated with
the vehicle title history by title number
and VIN.
Florida’s proposed program for leased
vehicle transactions would not create a
scheme of records equivalent to the
current ‘‘paper trail’’ now assisting
consumers and law enforcement. Under
TIMA as implemented, dealers and
lessors are required to retain all
odometer disclosure statements that
they issue and receive. However,
Florida’s proposed program does not
specify that the dealer and lessor would
be required to maintain a copy of the
lessee’s odometer disclosure statement,
and does not provide an alternative
mechanism such as a provision that the
statement would be forwarded to either
a tag agent for mileage verification or
the Department for scanning and
maintaining as part of the vehicle’s title
history. We have tentatively concluded
that, in the transfer of title of vehicles
subject to a lease agreement, Florida’s
proposed program does not satisfy the
purposes of TIMA because it does not
require dealers and lessors to retain
odometer disclosure statements from
lessees.
The overall purpose of TIMA’s leased
vehicle provisions is to ensure that
vehicles subject to leases have adequate
odometer disclosure statements
executed on titles at the time of transfer.
The Agency has initially determined
that Florida’s proposed program does
not meet TIMA’s overall requirement.
Under Florida’s proposal, upon the
termination of the lease, a lessee would
sign an odometer disclosure statement.
This is an important document that the
lessor must sign. But under Florida’s
proposal, the lessor signs a separate
secure power of attorney to the dealer
which only assumedly includes the
odometer reading. In any event, the
lessor’s power of attorney to a dealer for
purposes of odometer disclosure allows
the same person to sign an odometer
disclosure for both parties. That is
fraught with potential problems of
incorrect odometer statements. Congress
did not extend the use of power of
attorney to this circumstance.
Florida’s proposal provides for
odometer disclosure in transfer of leased
vehicles to be made on a secure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
reassignment form. Lessors (transferors)
are titled owners in Florida. But as
explained above, in the case of a
transferor in whose name the vehicle is
titled, the transferor shall disclose the
mileage on the title, and not on a
reassignment document. Florida’s
proposal runs counter to this
requirement.
The dealer would take the documents
(bill of sale, reassignment document,
and power of attorney) to the tag agency;
thereafter, the documents would be sent
to the Department and scanned into the
title history. However, Florida’s
proposal does not require the odometer
disclosure statement made by the lessee
to be co-signed by the lessor, submitted
with title documents, or to be retained
by any party. In the Agency’s view, this
is an important link in the chain of
odometer disclosure for a leased
vehicle. This link should be preserved
as much as any other.
Because of the above-identified
problems, the Agency tentatively
concludes that Florida’s proposed
program on leased vehicles does not
meet TIMA’s overall purpose of
ensuring that vehicles subject to leases
have adequate odometer disclosure
statements executed on titles at the time
of transfer.
C. Florida’s Proposal in Light of the
Purposes of TIMA as Amended Relevant
to Odometer Disclosure by Power of
Attorney
One purpose of the power of attorney
provision in TIMA as amended was to
provide limited exception(s) to a rule
prohibiting a person from signing an
odometer disclosure statement as both
the transferor and transferee in the same
transaction, which had the effect of
prohibiting the use of powers of
attorney for purposes of recording
mileage on titles of motor vehicles.
Florida’s proposal does not fit within
the narrow confines of this exception.
Under Florida’s proposed program, a
lessor (not a lienholder) would execute
a power of attorney. No lienholder
would be involved nor is there a
requirement that the title be lost. The
overall purposes of TIMA as amended
are not preserved by this proposed
expansion of the Congressional
amendment of TIMA. We have initially
determined that Florida’s proposed
program is not consistent with a
purpose of the disclosure required by
TIMA, including amendments thereto.50
50 We again note that Florida’s proposal for leased
vehicles would not comply with Federal odometer
disclosure statutes and regulations regarding use of
a power of attorney to facilitate odometer
disclosure. Under the proposal, a lessor would sign
a secure power of attorney to the dealer that
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A second purpose was to assure that
the form of the power of attorney
document issued by a State precluded
odometer fraud. We have not made a
determination as to whether Florida’s
proposal meets this purpose. Florida’s
proposal does not address the form of
the secure power of attorney documents
it would use. The requirements for form
are discussed in section III.C above.
A third purpose is to set the ground
rules for transferors and transferees,
providing that both parties provide all
of the information and signatures
required in parts A, and as applicable B
and C of the secure power of attorney
form. We have not made a
determination as to whether Florida’s
proposal meets this purpose. Florida’s
proposal does not address this purpose.
A fourth purpose was to prevent
odometer fraud by processes,
mechanisms, and conditions calculated
to result in the disclosure of the actual
mileage on the title. We have not made
a determination as to whether Florida’s
proposal meets this purpose. Florida’s
proposal does not address the processes,
mechanisms and conditions related to
use of the secure power of attorney for
the purposes of odometer disclosure.
A fifth purpose is to prevent
alterations of odometer disclosures by
powers of attorney and to preclude
counterfeit powers of attorney through
secure processes. NHTSA has initially
concluded that Florida’s proposed
process does not satisfy this purpose.
Under NHTSA regulations, power of
attorney forms shall be issued by the
State and shall be set forth by a secure
process. 49 CFR 580.13(a). As we
understand Florida’s proposal, the
power of attorney document used by the
lessor would not be State-issued and
would not be secure. As noted above,
TIMA was written in part to prevent
alterations of disclosures on titles and
precludes counterfeit titles by requiring
secure processes. In furtherance of these
purposes, paper titles (incorporating the
disclosure statement) must be produced
using a secure printing process or
protected by ‘‘other secure process.’’
Allowing lessors to transfer title and
make the required odometer disclosure
includes the odometer disclosure. The dealer would
then sign the secure reassignment form agreeing
with the odometer disclosure. In this scenario, the
dealer would sign the secure reassignment form as
both transferor/lessor and transferee/buyer. This
practice is not consistent with TIMA as amended
which precludes execution by one person except in
specifically identified circumstances, which do not
include transfers of leased vehicles and the
associated odometer disclosure statement based on
a lessee odometer disclosure statement that may or
may not have been retained by the dealer and/or
lessor and a non-secure power of attorney
document from the lessor to the dealer.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
through a non-secure power of attorney
directly contradicts odometer disclosure
requirements. While this process may
add convenience to the process of
transferring leased vehicles, it does so at
the expense of the security requirements
that are a foundation of TIMA. We have
tentatively determined that Florida’s
proposed program does not meet this
purpose. The power of attorney form—
and any document used to reassign a
vehicle title— must be issued by the
State and produced by a secure process.
A sixth purpose is to create a record
on the mileage on vehicles and a paper
trail. We have not made a determination
as to whether Florida’s proposal meets
this purpose. Florida’s proposal does
not address this purpose.
Seventh, the overall purpose is to
protect consumers by assuring that they
receive valid representations of a
vehicle’s actual mileage at a time of
transfer. To the extent Florida’s
proposal addresses this purpose—
providing for secure powers of attorney
for purposes of mileage disclosure in the
transfer of leased vehicles—NHTSA has
initially concluded that Florida’s
proposed process does not satisfy it.
We note that Florida’s proposed
program would eliminate a current
practice by Florida that does not
comport with Federal odometer
disclosure statutes and associated
regulations. Florida’s petition indicates
that when an owner transfers a vehicle
not subject to a lien to a dealer, the
owner and dealer would execute a
secure power of attorney, including an
odometer disclosure statement, granting
the dealer the power to make the
odometer disclosure on the vehicle’s
paper title (which it needs to procure
from the State before transfer of title can
occur) and sign the title as transferor
and transferee. Presumably, this practice
would facilitate title transfer when the
vehicle title is maintained electronically
and neither the transferor nor dealer has
immediate access to the paper title.
Under TIMA and Agency regulations, a
power of attorney may be used in
making the odometer disclosure
statement only if the title is lost or is in
the possession of a lienholder when the
transferor transfers ownership of the
vehicle.51 A party may not sign an
odometer disclosure statement as
transferor and transferee except as set
forth in 49 CFR 580.13 or 580.14.52
51 49 U.S.C. 32705(b)(2)(A); 49 CFR 580.13.
Regulations require that this power of attorney be
set forth by means of a secure printing process or
other secure process. 49 CFR 580.4.
52 49 CFR 580.5(h). Under § 580.13, a transferor
may give a power of attorney to his transferee for
the purpose of mileage disclosure if the transferor’s
title is physically held by a lienholder or the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
These regulations do not allow
transferring vehicles not subject to a lien
by power of attorney as is the current
Florida practice. The Agency
encourages Florida to discontinue its
current practice of using a secure power
of attorney to transfer title and disclose
mileage for vehicles not subject to a lien
without lost titles and require title
transfer in these situations in a manner
complying with current Federal statutes
and regulations.
D. Florida’s Proposal in Light of TIMA’s
Overall Purpose
TIMA’s overall purpose is to protect
consumers by assuring that they receive
valid odometer disclosures representing
a vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer. In Florida in casual or private
sales, the transferor and transferee
currently sign the title, disclosing the
odometer and effecting transfer of title.
The transferee then goes to a tag agent
and presents the title for processing and
printing of a new paper title in the
transferee’s name (or the transferee
elects e-title and the new title, the old
title, and any supporting documentation
is scanned and maintained
electronically by the Department). This
comports with Federal law. Under
Florida’s proposal, both parties would
meet at a tag office, provide
identification information to the tag
agent, and execute a secure
reassignment form transferring
ownership and disclosing the odometer
reading, which is witnessed by the tag
agent. The representation of a vehicle’s
mileage on the secure reassignment
form in the presence of a tag agent
would be at least as valid as that in the
current paper title transfer—there would
be an identification requirement and the
disclosure would be made in the
presence of a tag agent who has
confirmed the identification of the
transferor and transferee.53 Further,
copies of the identification documents,
the prior title, supporting documents,
transferor has lost his title and the transferee
obtains a duplicate title on behalf of the transferor
(and if otherwise permitted by State law). Under
§ 580.14, if part A of a secure power of attorney
form has been used pursuant to § 508.13, and if
otherwise permitted by State law, a transferee may
give a power of attorney to his transferor to review
the title and any reassignment documents for
mileage discrepancies and if none are found, to
acknowledge disclosure on the title.
53 NHTSA observes that the use of a reassignment
document in the fashion proposed here eliminates
the concerns normally associated with the use of
these documents in lieu of the actual title. As we
understand the Florida proposal, the reassignment
document is employed only to provide information
to the tag agent entering data into the e-title. As the
parties must provide adequate identification to the
tag agent and complete the transaction in the
agent’s presence, the opportunities for fraud are
greatly reduced.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48115
and (when elected by the transferee) the
new title, would be maintained
electronically by the Department. This
process likely would provide more (and
provides no less) assurance of the
validity of the odometer disclosure than
a paper process. In addition, Florida’s
proposal would offer the public the
opportunity to view the most recent
odometer reading and date of that
reading through an Internet application.
A prospective buyer would be able to
access the public e-Odometer
information using the vehicle’s VIN to
assess a vehicle’s true value by
comparing the vehicle’s current
odometer reading to the electronic
record stored with the Department.54
In sales involving licensed dealers
(vehicles subject to a lien or not subject
to a lien), as discussed above, Florida’s
proposed program relies on
reassignment documents. Except in
transactions following the first sale by
the transferor in whose name the
vehicle is titled, this is problematic, as
discussed above. In view of this
fundamental concern, which needs to be
addressed by Florida, at this juncture,
NHTSA is unable to further address the
Florida program.
As discussed above, Florida’s
proposed program involving sales of
leased vehicles, does not satisfy the
overall purpose of TIMA protecting
consumers by assuring that they receive
valid odometer disclosures representing
a vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer.
VI. NHTSA’s Initial Determination
For the foregoing reasons, NHTSA
preliminarily grants Florida’s petition
regarding proposed alternate disclosure
requirements for vehicle transfers
involving casual or private sales.
NHTSA preliminarily denies Florida’s
petition regarding proposed alternate
disclosure requirements for sales
involving licensed dealers. NHTSA
preliminarily denies Florida’s petition
regarding proposed alternate disclosure
requirements for sales of leased
vehicles.
This is not a final agency action.
NHTSA invites comments within the
scope of this notice from the public
including Florida.
Request for Comments
How do I prepare and submit
comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are filed correctly in the
54 This would appear to provide the odometer
reading upon which a CARFAX Vehicle History
Report is based.
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
48116
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long (see 49 CFR 553.21).
We established this limit to encourage
you to write your primary comments in
a concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address
given under ADDRESSES.
You may also submit your comments
to the docket electronically by logging
onto the Dockets Management System
Web site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help & Information,’’ or ‘‘Help/Info’’ to
obtain instructions for filing the
document electronically.
How can I be sure that my comments
were received?
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, you should
submit two copies, from which you
have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to Docket
Management at the address given above
under ADDRESSES. When you send a
comment containing information
claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR part
512).
Will the agency consider late
comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we also
will consider comments that Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Management receives after that date. If
Docket Management receives a comment
too late for us to consider it in
developing the final rule, we will
consider that comment as an informal
suggestion for future rulemaking action.
How can I read the comments submitted
by other people?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given under ADDRESSES. The hours of
the Docket are indicated above in the
same location.
You also may see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, go to https://www.
regulations.gov, and follow the
instructions for accessing the Docket.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Issued on: August 2, 2011.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–19920 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM
08AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48101-48116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19920]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 580
[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0109; Notice 1]
Petition for Approval of Alternate; Odometer Disclosure
Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of initial determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Florida has petitioned for approval of alternate
odometer requirements to certain requirements under Federal odometer
law. NHTSA preliminarily grants Florida's petition regarding proposed
alternate disclosure requirements for vehicle transfers involving
casual or private sales. NHTSA preliminarily denies Florida's petition
regarding proposed alternate disclosure requirements for sales
involving licensed dealers. NHTSA preliminarily denies Florida's
petition regarding proposed alternate disclosure requirements for sales
of leased vehicles.
DATES: Comments are due no later than September 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2010-] by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. E.T.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted
[[Page 48102]]
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otto Matheke, Office of the Chief
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building W41-227, Washington, DC 20590
(Telephone: 202-366-5263) (Fax: 202-366-3820).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Federal odometer law, which is largely based on the Motor Vehicle
Information and Cost Savings Act (Cost Savings Act) \1\ and Truth in
Mileage Act of 1986, as amended (TIMA),\2\ contains a number of
provisions to limit odometer fraud and assure that the buyer of a motor
vehicle knows the true mileage of the vehicle. The Cost Savings Act
requires the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations
requiring the transferor (seller) of a motor vehicle to provide a
written statement of the vehicle's mileage registered on the odometer
to the transferee (buyer) in connection with the transfer of ownership.
This written statement is generally referred to as the odometer
disclosure statement. Further, under TIMA, vehicle titles themselves
must have a space for the odometer disclosure statement and States are
prohibited from licensing vehicles unless a valid odometer disclosure
statement on the title is signed and dated by the transferor. Titles
must also be printed by a secure process. With respect to leased
vehicles, TIMA provides that the regulations promulgated by the
Secretary require written mileage disclosures be made by lessees to
lessors upon the lessor's transfer of the ownership of the leased
vehicle. Lessors must also provide written notice to lessees about
odometer disclosure requirements and the penalties for not complying
with them. Federal law also contains document retention requirements
for odometer disclosure statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 92-513, 86 Stat. 947, 961 (1972).
\2\ Public Law 99-579, 100 Stat. 3309 (1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIMA's motor vehicle mileage disclosure requirements apply in a
State unless the State has alternate requirements approved by the
Secretary. The Secretary has delegated administration of the odometer
program to NHTSA. Therefore, a State may petition NHTSA for approval of
such alternate odometer disclosure requirements.
Seeking to implement an electronic vehicle title transfer system,
the State of Florida has petitioned for approval of alternate odometer
disclosure requirements. In 2009, NHTSA reviewed certain requirements
for alternative state programs and approved the Commonwealth of
Virginia's alternate odometer disclosure program. 74 FR 643, 650
(January 7, 2009). Florida's program is similar to Virginia's program
in some respects and appears broader in scope than Virginia's in
others. Like Virginia's program, the scope of Florida's proposed
program does not include transactions involving an out-of-state party.
Unlike Virginia's program, Florida's proposed program encompasses
transactions involving leased vehicles and odometer disclosures by
power of attorney. In addition, Florida's proposed program would use
different mechanisms to document mileage than Virginia's.
As discussed below, NHTSA's initial assessment is that the portions
of Florida's proposed program involving private sales satisfy the
requirements for approval under Federal odometer law, while other
portions involving transfers between individual owners and dealers,
transfers of leased vehicles and transfers in which a power of attorney
is used for purposes of mileage disclosure, do not.
II. Statutory Background
NHTSA recently reviewed the statutory background of Federal
odometer law in its consideration and approval of Virginia's petition
for alternate odometer disclosure requirements. See 73 FR 35617 (June
24, 2008) and 74 FR 643 (January 7, 2009). The statutory background of
the Cost Savings Act and TIMA and the purposes behind TIMA, as they
relate to odometer disclosure, other than in the transfer of leased
vehicles and vehicles subject to liens where a power of attorney is
used in the disclosure, are discussed at length in NHTSA's Final
Determination granting Virginia's petition. 74 FR 643, 647-48. A brief
summary of the statutory background of Federal odometer law and the
purposes of TIMA, including odometer disclosure requirements for leased
vehicles, follows.
In 1972, Congress enacted the Cost Savings Act, among other things,
to prohibit tampering with odometers on motor vehicles and to establish
certain safeguards for the protection of buyers with respect to the
sale of motor vehicles having altered or reset odometers. See Public
Law 92-513, Sec. 401, 86 Stat. 947, 961-63 (1972). The Cost Savings
Act required that, under regulations to be published by the Secretary,
the transferor of a motor vehicle provide a written vehicle mileage
disclosure to the transferee, prohibited odometer tampering and
provided for enforcement. See id, Sec. 408.\3\ In general, the purpose
for the disclosure was to assist buyers to know the true mileage of a
motor vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Section 408 stated:
(a) Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Secretary shall prescribe rules requiring any transferor to
give the following written disclosure to the transferee in
connection with the transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle:
(1) Disclosure of the cumulative mileage registered on the
odometer.
(2) Disclosure that the actual mileage is unknown, if the
odometer reading is known to the transferor to be different from the
number of miles the vehicle has actually traveled.
Such rules shall prescribe the manner in which information shall
be disclosed under this section and in which such information shall
be retained.
(b) It shall be a violation of this section for any transferor
to violate any rules under this section or to knowingly give a false
statement to a transferee in making any disclosure required by such
rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A major shortcoming of the odometer provisions of the Cost Savings
Act was their failure to require that the odometer disclosure statement
be on the vehicle's title. In a number of States, the disclosures were
on separate documents that could be easily altered or discarded and did
not travel with the title. See 74 FR 644. Consequently, the disclosure
statements did not necessarily deter odometer fraud employing altered
documents, discarded titles, and title washing. Id.
Another significant shortcoming involved leased vehicles. The
lessor is considered the transferor of the vehicle in leased vehicle
sales. Titles to leased vehicles are often transferred without the
lessor obtaining possession of the vehicle. Lessors without direct
access to their vehicles had to rely solely on their lessees to provide
actual mileage information. However, lessees had no obligation to
provide actual mileage information to lessors upon vehicle transfer.
This environment facilitated roll backs of odometers.
[[Page 48103]]
Congress enacted TIMA in 1986 to address the Cost Savings Act's
shortcomings. It amended the Cost Savings Act by adding section 408(d)
to prohibit States from licensing vehicles unless the new owner
(transferee) submitted a title from the seller (transferor) containing
the seller's signed and dated vehicle mileage statement. See Public Law
99-579, 100 Stat. 3309 (1986); 74 FR 644 (Jan. 7, 2009). TIMA also
prohibits the licensing of vehicles, for use in any State, unless the
title issued to the transferee is printed using a secure printing
process or other secure process, indicates the vehicle mileage at the
time of transfer and contains additional space for a subsequent mileage
disclosure by the transferee when it is sold again. Id.
TIMA also added section 408(e) to the Cost Savings Act to require
the Secretary to issue regulations regarding odometer disclosures for
leased vehicles.\4\ The regulations promulgated by the Secretary were
to require written mileage disclosures by lessees to lessors upon the
lessor's transfer of the ownership of the leased vehicle. Lessors must
also provide written notice to lessees about the odometer disclosure
requirements and the penalties for not complying with them. Federal law
also contains document retention requirements for odometer disclosure
statements. TIMA required lessors to retain disclosures made by lessees
for at least four years following the date that the lessor transfers
that vehicle.\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ TIMA amended the Cost Savings Act to add section 408(e):
(e)(1) In the case of any leased motor vehicle, the rules under
subsection (a) shall require written disclosure regarding mileage to
be made by the lessee to the lessor upon the lessor's transfer of
ownership of the leased motor vehicle.
(2) Under such rules, the lessor of a leased motor vehicle shall
provide written notice to the lessee regarding
(A) Such mileage disclosure requirements, and
(B) The penalties for failure to comply with them.
(3) The lessor shall retain the disclosure made by any lessee
with respect to any motor vehicle under paragraph (1) For a period
of at least 4 years following the date the lessor transfers that
vehicle.
(4) For purposes of this section, if the lessor transfers
ownership of any leased motor vehicle without obtaining possession
of such vehicle, the lessor may, in making the disclosure required
by subsection (a), Indicate on the title the mileage disclosed by
the lessee under paragraph (1) Unless the lessor has reason to
believe that such disclosure by the lessee does not reflect the
actual mileage of the vehicle.
\5\ Regulations implementing TIMA were published on August 5,
1988. 53 FR 29864. Federal regulations require lessors to retain
odometer disclosure statements received from lessees for a period of
five years. 49 CFR 580.8(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIMA added a provision to the Cost Savings Act allowing States to
have alternate odometer disclosure requirements with the approval of
the Secretary of Transportation. Section 408(f) of the Cost Savings Act
states that the odometer disclosure requirements of subsections (d) and
(e)(1) shall apply in a State unless the State has in effect alternate
motor vehicle mileage disclosure requirements approved by the
Secretary. Section 408(f)(2) further states that the Secretary shall
approve alternate motor vehicle mileage disclosure requirements
submitted by a State unless the Secretary determines that such
requirements are not consistent with the purpose of the disclosure
required by subsection (d) or (e), as the case may be.
In 1988, Congress amended section 408(d)(1) of the Cost Savings Act
to permit the use of a secure power of attorney for purposes of
odometer mileage disclosure in circumstances where the title was held
by a lienholder, if allowed by state law. Public Law 100-561 Sec. 40,
102 Stat. 2805, 2817 (1988). Congress required NHTSA to issue a rule
ensuring that disclosures be made on the power of attorney document of
the actual mileage at the time of transfer and that the mileage be
restated exactly by the person exercising power of attorney on the
title in the space therefor. Id. The rule, consistent with the purposes
of the Act and the need to facilitate enforcement thereof, was to
prescribe that the power of attorney form be issued by the State to the
transferee using a secure process, as provided for titles, and provide
for retention of a copy with the original submitted back to the State.
Id. In 1989, NHTSA implemented the 1988 statutory amendments by
promulgating amendments to the odometer disclosure regulations,
providing that a transferor may give a secure power of attorney to a
transferee for the purpose of mileage disclosure in two circumstances--
when the transferor's title is physically held by a lienholder or when
the title is lost. In either instance, use of a power of attorney
document for mileage disclosure is permissible only if otherwise
permitted by State law.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Regulations implementing the amendment were published on
August 30, 1989. 54 FR 35879. The regulations addressed numerous
aspects of disclosure by power of attorney, including the form,
certification by the person exercising the power of attorney, and
access of the transferee to prior title and power of attorney
documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1990, Congress again amended section 408(d) of the Cost Savings
Act.\7\ The amendment provided that the rule adopted under the 1988
amendment not require that a vehicle be titled in the State in which
the power of attorney was issued and addressed retention of powers of
attorneys by States. See Public Law 101-641 Sec. 7(a), 104 Stat. 4654,
4657 (1990).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Section 7(a) of Public Law 101-641 directed that the third
sentence of subsection (d)(2)(C) be amended. However, there was no
subsection (d)(2)(C) in section 408. The amendment was restated as
amending the third sentence of subsection (d)(1)(C) as the probable
intent of Congress. This amendment is currently codified at 49
U.S.C. 32705(b)(2)(A).
\8\ Regulations implementing this amendment were published on
September 20, 1991. 56 FR 47681.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1994, in the course of the recodification of various laws
pertaining to the Department of Transportation, the Cost Savings Act,
as amended, was repealed, reenacted and recodified without substantive
change. See Public Law 103-272, 108 Stat. 745, 1048-1056, 1379, 1387
(1994). The odometer statute is now codified at 49 U.S.C. 32701 et seq.
In particular, Section 408(a) of the Cost Savings Act was recodified at
49 U.S.C. 32705(a). Sections 408(d) and (e), which were added by TIMA
(and later amended), were recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and (c). The
provisions pertaining to approval of State alternate motor vehicle
mileage disclosure requirements were recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(d).
III. Statutory Purposes
As discussed above, the Cost Savings Act, as amended by TIMA in
1986, states that NHTSA ``shall approve alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a State unless the [NHTSA]
determines that such requirements are not consistent with the purpose
of the disclosure required by subsection (d) or (e) as the case may
be.'' (Subsections 408(d), (e) of the Cost Savings Act were recodified
to 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and (c)). In light of this provision, we now turn
to our interpretation of the purposes of these subsections, as germane
to Florida's petition.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Florida petitioned NHTSA requesting approval of alternate
odometer disclosure requirements. Florida's initial petition, dated
December 21, 2009, set forth Florida's initial request. Florida
submitted a second, supplemental petition to NHTSA on October 5,
2010, that restated Florida's request in greater detail and provided
more specific information on Florida's current e-Title and odometer
disclosure program and its proposed program. Together, the petitions
are identified herein as ``petition'' or ``the petition.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Final Determination granting Virginia's petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements identified the purposes of TIMA
germane to petitions for approval of odometer disclosure requirements
that did not include disclosures involving reassignment documents,
leased vehicles, or disclosures by power of attorney.\10\ 74 FR 643,
647-48 (January
[[Page 48104]]
7, 2009). In addition, because the Florida proposal encompasses
reassignment documents, transfers of leased vehicles, and disclosures
by power of attorney, we identify the purposes of TIMA relevant to
odometer disclosures for leased vehicles (see Initial Determination on
Wisconsin's petition for alternate odometer disclosure requirements, 75
FR 20965, 20972-73 (Apr. 22, 2010)) and purposes of allowing for
disclosures by power of attorney in limited circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Since Virginia's program did not cover disclosures
involving leased vehicles or disclosures by power of attorney, the
purposes of Sections 408(d)(2)(C) and 408(e) of the Cost Savings
Act, as amended, were not germane and were not addressed in the
notice approving the Virginia program. See 74 FR 647 n. 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. TIMA's Purposes Relevant to Vehicle Transfers in the Absence of a
Lease Agreement
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that the form of the odometer
disclosure precludes odometer fraud. 74 FR 647. To prevent odometer
fraud facilitated by disclosure statements that were separate from
titles, TIMA required mileage disclosures to be on a secure vehicle
title instead of a separate document. These titles also had to contain
space for the seller's attested mileage disclosure and a new disclosure
by the buyer when the vehicle was sold again. This discouraged mileage
alterations on titles and limited opportunities for obtaining new
titles with lower mileage than the actual mileage. Id. This concern
applies to reassignment documents.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ NHTSA amended 49 CFR 580.5(c) to preclude use of a separate
reassignment form at the time of the first transfer, by a titled
owner. See 56 FR 47684-85 (Sep. 20, 1991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A second purpose of TIMA is to prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making odometer mileage disclosures on the title a
condition of any application for a title, and a requirement for any
title issued by a State. 74 FR 647. This provision was intended to
eliminate or significantly reduce abuses associated with lack of
control of the titling process. Id.
Third, TIMA sought to prevent alterations of disclosures on titles
and to preclude counterfeit titles through secure processes. 74 FR 648.
In furtherance of these purposes, paper titles (incorporating the
disclosure statement) must be produced using a secure printing process
or protected by ``other secure process.'' \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Congress intended to encourage new technologies by
including the language ``other secure process.'' The House Report
accompanying TIMA noted that `` `other secure process' is intended
to describe means other than printing which could securely provide
for the storage and transmittal of title and mileage information.''
H.R. Rep. No. 99-833, at 33 (1986). ``In adopting this language, the
Committee intends to encourage new technologies which will provide
increased levels of security for titles.'' Id. See also Cost Savings
Act, as amended by TIMA, Sec. 408(d), recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32705(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A fourth purpose is to create a record of vehicle mileage and a
paper trail. 74 FR 648. The underlying purposes of this record and
paper trail were to better inform consumers and provide mechanisms for
tracing odometer tampering and prosecuting violators. TIMA's
requirement that new applications for titles include signed mileage
disclosure statements on the titles from the prior owners creates a
permanent record that is easily checked by subsequent owners or law
enforcement officials. This record provides critical snapshots of
vehicle mileage at every transfer, which are the fundamental links of
this paper trail.
Finally, the general purpose of TIMA is to protect consumers by
assuring that they receive valid representations of the vehicle's
actual mileage at the time of transfer based on odometer disclosures.
74 FR 648.
B. TIMA's Purposes Relevant to Leased Vehicles
TIMA recognized that additional mechanisms were needed to assure
accurate odometer disclosures for leased vehicles. In vehicle leases,
the lessor typically retains ownership of the vehicle, but does not
possess it. The lessor, as a transferor, must comply with Federal
odometer disclosure requirements when it subsequently transfers title
to a leased vehicle. However, prior to TIMA, lessees were not obligated
by Federal odometer law to provide lessors with accurate odometer
disclosure statements. TIMA addressed this issue, as discussed above. A
number of purposes can be derived from TIMA's provisions, discussed
above, relating to the transfer of ownership of leased vehicles.
One purpose of TIMA's leased vehicle provisions is to assure that
lessors have the vehicle's actual odometer mileage at the time of
transfer.
A second purpose of TIMA's leased vehicle provisions is to assure
that lessees provide lessors with an odometer disclosure statement.
A related purpose is to assure that lessees are formally notified
of their odometer disclosure obligations and the penalties for failing
to comply by not providing complete and truthful information.
A fourth purpose is to set the ground rules for the lessors,
providing for lessors to indicate the mileage provided by the lessee on
the title, unless the lessor has reason to believe that the disclosure
by the lessee does not reflect the actual mileage of the vehicle.
A fifth purpose of TIMA's leased vehicle provisions is to create
records and a paper trail. This is an expansion of the fourth general
purpose of TIMA stated above. The paper trail includes the written,
dated and signed odometer disclosure statement by the lessee. Unlike
odometer disclosure statements on vehicle titles that are filed with
the State, a lessee's odometer disclosure statement is separate from
the title and not filed with the State. Instead, the disclosure
statement is sent to the lessor, who must retain a copy for at least
five years. The retention of lessee odometer disclosure statements by
lessors permits law enforcement officials to trace fraudulent
disclosure statements back to lessees, if necessary.
Last, the overall purpose of TIMA's leased vehicle provisions,
consistent with the general purposes of TIMA, is to ensure that there
are valid representations of the vehicle's actual mileage at the time
of transfer. See H.R. Rep. No. 99-833, at 33 (1986).
C. Mileage Disclosures by Power of Attorney
NHTSA's rule implementing TIMA provided that ``[n]o person shall
sign an odometer disclosure statement as both the transferor and the
transferee in the same transaction.'' \13\ In general, this provision,
which was intended to limit fraud, was not questioned. However, in
instances when a lienholder holds title to a vehicle being sold this,
as a practical matter, presented a considerable regulatory burden,
because when a dealer bought a used vehicle, it would be required to go
to the lienholder and obtain the title, and then go back to the seller
so that the seller could record the mileage on the title. The last step
often was difficult and could be avoided if the seller executes a power
of attorney to the buyer authorizing the buyer to record the mileage
upon receipt of the title.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 49 CFR 580.5(h); 53 FR 29464, 29477 (Aug. 5, 1988).
\14\ See 134 Cong. Rec. H10079 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 1988).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1988, Congress amended TIMA to provide for the limited use of
powers of attorney for recording mileage, when the title is physically
held by a lienholder at the time of the transfer and is authorized by
State law. See Pipeline Safety Reauthorization Act of 1988 (PSRA) Sec.
401, 15 U.S.C. 1988(d)(1) (1988). (Section 401 of the PSRA, as amended
in 1990 (see below), was recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b)(2)(A).) The
amendment required NHTSA to issue a rule. The rule, which was to
address the form and reasonable
[[Page 48105]]
conditions of the limited power of attorney, was to ensure disclosure
on the power of attorney document of the actual mileage at the time of
transfer and ensure that such mileage will be restated exactly by the
person exercising the power of attorney in the space referred to in
TIMA. Further, consistent with the purposes of the Cost Savings Act as
amended and the need to facilitate enforcement thereof, the rule was to
prescribe the form of the power of attorney to be issued by the State
to the transferee and for retention of a copy of such power of
attorney. As amended in 1990, this statutory provision provided that
the rule promulgated by NHTSA must require the person granted the power
of attorney to retain a copy of the power of attorney form and submit
the original form to the State along with a copy of the title showing
the restatement of the mileage. The statute also permitted the agency
to prescribe that the State retain the power of attorney and copy of
the title for an appropriate period or that the State adopt alternative
measures consistent with the purposes of the statute. The statute
mandated that the rule not require that a vehicle be titled in the
State in which the power of attorney was issued. Public Law 101-641,
104 Stat. 4654, 57 (Nov. 28, 1990).
In 1989, NHTSA implemented the PSRA by promulgating amendments to
the odometer disclosure regulations.\15\ The rule provides that a
transferor may give a secure power of attorney to a transferee for the
purpose of mileage disclosure in two circumstances--when the
transferor's title is physically held by a lienholder or when the title
is lost.\16\ In either instance, use of a power of attorney document
for mileage disclosure is permissible only if otherwise permitted by
State law. In this rule, NHTSA narrowly amended its earlier rule
prohibiting any party from signing an odometer disclosure statement as
both the transferor and transferee in the same transaction to add an
exception. The amendment allowed the same person to so sign the
odometer disclosure statement if he or she satisfied the detailed,
specific provisions on powers of attorney added to the regulations in
49 CFR 580.13 or 14. These provisions state the form and conditions of
the power of attorney. Also, the power of attorney document must be
issued by the State and be set forth by a secure process.\17\ While
providing for powers of attorney, NHTSA expressed concern that powers
of attorney that allow a person to sign a disclosure as both the
transferor and transferee result in only one party to the transaction
being aware of the previous mileage disclosures, which could jeopardize
the integrity of the paper trail--the evidence of rollbacks that
Congress intended to enhance by enacting TIMA.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ NHTSA issued an interim final rule on March 8, 1989 (54 FR
9809) and a final rule on August 30, 1989 (54 FR 35879).
\16\ 54 FR 35879 (Aug. 30, 1989).
\17\ See 49 CFR 580.4.
\18\ 54 FR 9809, 9810 (March 8, 1989). As is self evident,
ordinarily such a practice provides opportunities for fraud. See 54
FR 9812; 54 FR 35882.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of purposes can be derived from the statute directing
NHTSA to issue a rule and the implementing rule.
One purpose was to provide limited exception(s) to a rule
prohibiting a person from signing an odometer disclosure statement as
both the transferor and transferee in the same transaction, which had
the effect of prohibiting the use of powers of attorney for purposes of
recording mileage on titles of motor vehicles.\19\ More particularly, a
purpose was to permit a power of attorney for disclosure of the
odometer reading at the time of sale of a vehicle to be given by the
seller to the buyer, in the limited situation when the owner's title is
physically held by a lienholder at the time of the transaction and the
power of attorney is allowed by State law.\20\ Another limited
situation in which a power of attorney may be used, as recognized in
the implementing regulation, is where the title is not present because
it has been lost by the person to whom it was issued by the State, if
permitted by State law.\21\ In order for a power of attorney to be used
in the lost title situation, the transferee (e.g., the dealer) must
apply for the duplicate title on behalf of the transferor. Under these
circumstances, a power of attorney is available to facilitate consumer
vehicle sales transactions, but is not available in other than consumer
sales transactions, where the risk of fraud is considerably
greater.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ As Congressman Whittaker noted, ``we have drafted the
amendment in a very narrow fashion.'' 134 Cong. Rec. H10079 (daily
ed. Oct. 12, 1988).
\20\ This does not include the practice of floor planning. Floor
planning is a practice by which a financial institution will
physically hold a title as security for financing, without formally
filing or recording a security interest, on a vehicle offered for
sale by a dealer. 54 FR 35885-35886. This also does not include a
situation in which the lending institution that financed the
vehicle's purchase is located in a state that requires the
lienholder to hold the title as security, but the vehicle is
registered in a different state, which allows the owner, rather than
the lienholder to hold the title. Under the 1991 amendment to the
Cost Savings Act, NHTSA considers the creation of another category
of exempted transferors inappropriate.
\21\ 49 CFR 580.13, 54 FR 35883.
\22\ The 1988 amendments did not modify the TIMA provisions
relating to leased vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A second purpose was to assure that the form of the power of
attorney document issued by a State precluded odometer fraud. While
under the limited circumstances discussed above and if allowed under
State law, with use of a power of attorney one person may sign the
odometer disclosure on the title as both the transferor and transferee,
to limit fraud, the power of attorney form must meet certain minimum
requirements.\23\ Congress specified that NHTSA would prescribe a form
by rule. Under the rule, the form must be separated into part A, and if
permitted by State law, B and C.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Among these are the requirements of NHTSA's rule, 49 CFR
580.13 and 580.14.
\24\ 49 CFR 580.13; see 54 FR 9812.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The transferor's power of attorney to the transferee for mileage
disclosure must be on part A of a secure form issued by the State to
the transferee.\25\ Using this form, the transferor appoints the
transferee his/her attorney-in-fact for the purpose of mileage
disclosure. The form provides for written disclosure by the transferor
to the transferee of the information that is stated on a vehicle title
under 49 CFR 580.5 when ownership of the vehicle is transferred.\26\
Among other things, there must be a space in part A for the transferor
and transferee to sign the power of attorney form and print their names
and a space for the transferor to disclose the mileage. Part A must
also contain a reference to the Federal odometer law and state that
providing false information or the failure of the person granted the
power of attorney to submit the form to the State may result in fines
and/or imprisonment. The disclosure on part A of the power of attorney
form is commonly made by the
[[Page 48106]]
seller when he or she trades-in a vehicle at a dealer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 49 CFR 580.13; see 54 FR 9812.
\26\ 49 CFR 580.13 requires the form to contain, in part A, a
space for: (1) The odometer reading at the time of transfer; (2) the
date of transfer; (3) the transferor's name and current address; (4)
the transferee's name and current address; and (5) the vehicle make,
model, year, body type, and vehicle identification number (VIN).
Part A shall also contain a space for the transferor to certify that
to the best of his knowledge either: (1) The odometer reading
reflects the actual mileage; or (2) if the transferor knows that the
odometer reading reflects mileage in excess of the designed
mechanical odometer limit, he shall include a statement to that
effect; or (3) if the transferor knows that the odometer reading
differs from the mileage and the difference is greater than that
caused by a calibration error, he shall include a statement that the
odometer reading does not reflect the actual mileage and should not
be relied upon with a warning notice to alert the transferee that a
discrepancy exists between the odometer reading and the actual
mileage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After part A of the power of attorney form has been used, part B
may be executed when a vehicle addressed on part A is resold.\27\ Part
B of the secure power of attorney form, if permitted by State law,
allows a subsequent transferee to give a power of attorney to his
transferor to review the title and any reassignment documents for
mileage discrepancies, and if no discrepancies are found, to
acknowledge disclosure on the title, while maintaining the integrity of
the first seller's disclosure. The disclosure required to be made by
the transferor to the transferee for this transaction on part B of the
power of attorney form tracks information required to be made by the
transferor to the transferee on the title when ownership of a vehicle
is transferred on a title under 49 CFR 580.5.\28\ Among other things,
the power of attorney must contain a space for the transferor to
disclose the mileage to the transferee and sign and date the form, and
a space for the transferee to sign and date the form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 49 CFR 580.14.
\28\ 49 CFR 580.14 requires part B of the form to contain a
space for the mileage disclosure from the transferor to the
transferee, and contain space for the following information: (1) The
odometer reading at the time of the transfer; (2) the date of the
transfer; (3) the transferor's name and current address; (4) the
transferee's name and current address; and (5) the vehicle make,
model year, body type, and VIN. Part B shall also contain a
reference to the Federal odometer law and state that providing false
information or the failure of the person granted the power of
attorney to submit the form to the State may result in fines and/or
imprisonment. Part B shall also contain a space for the transferor
to certify that to the best of his knowledge either: (1) The
odometer reading reflects the actual mileage; or (2) if the
transferor knows that the odometer reading reflects mileage in
excess of the designed mechanical odometer limit, he shall include a
statement to that effect; or (3) if the transferor knows that the
odometer reading differs from the mileage and the difference is
greater than that caused by a calibration error, he shall include a
statement that the odometer reading does not reflect the actual
mileage and should not be relied upon, with a warning notice to
alert the transferee that a discrepancy exists between the odometer
reading and the actual mileage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commonly, part B is used in the sale of a trade-in vehicle by a
dealer. If for example, a dealer does not have possession of the title,
because the vehicle was a trade-in and the lienholder has not yet
released the title, or because the title was lost and the dealer has
not yet obtained a duplicate title on behalf of the transferor who sold
the vehicle to the dealer, the subsequent buyer of the used vehicle
(the transferee) is permitted to give a power of attorney to the
transferor/selling dealer to acknowledge the mileage disclosure on
their behalf. This power of attorney from the transferee to the
transferor allows the transferor (who is the original seller's attorney
in fact under Part A) to sign the title as both the transferor and
transferee in the same transaction.\29\ In addition, because the same
person signs the title as the transferor and transferee, the
appointment of the transferor as the transferee's attorney-in-fact must
be made on part B of the same secure power of attorney form, issued by
a State, upon which the transferor was appointed the attorney-in-fact
by the original transferor on part A.\30\ This form enables purchasers
to examine the previously issued power of attorney for alterations,
erasures, and other marks, and to learn the name of the prior owner
without the additional cost of a title search. This is the same
information that purchasers would receive if the title was not held by
a lienholder since, under TIMA, the transferor is required to disclose
mileage on the vehicle's title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 49 CFR 580.14.
\30\ This is done pursuant to 49 CFR 580.13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The secure power of attorney form with a part B must contain a
certification in part C.\31\ To ensure that a person exercising a power
of attorney under both sections 580.13 and 580.14 (parts A and B) is
fully aware of his/her obligation and their liability for any action
that is inconsistent with the power of attorney, the rule (Sec.
580.15) requires the completion, on part C, of a certification
attesting that the signer has disclosed the mileage on the title
document consistent with the mileage disclosed on the power of attorney
form. The signer of part C also attests that he or she has examined the
title, and that the mileage disclosure made on the title executed under
the power of attorney is greater than the mileage previously stated on
the title and any reassignment form.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ The part C certification shall include space for: (1) The
signature and printed name of the person exercising the power of
attorney; (2) the address of the person exercising the power of
attorney; and (3) the date of the certification.
\32\ As a practical matter, the mileage entered by the dealer
could never be lower than the mileage already on the title, since if
the power of attorney set forth a lower mileage, it would void the
power of attorney as discussed above, and the dealer would not be
authorized to sign the disclosure on behalf of the transferor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The part C certification requirement need only apply to the
subsequent sale situation (typically a trade-in) where the second
purchaser's only link to the title will be the transferor (dealer).
Thus, section 580.15 provides that the certification requirement
applies only when the transferor is exercising a power of attorney for
both the first sale and second sale customers, as provided for in
sections 580.13 and 580.14. If the title is present at the time of the
second sale, the purchaser will be able to review the title himself/
herself to assure that the mileage is entered in accordance with the
initial transferor's power of attorney and is higher than the mileage
appearing on the title and reassignment documents.
Finally, the State itself must issue the power of attorney
form.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 54 FR 9812.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A third purpose was to set ground rules for transferors and
transferees, providing that both parties provide all of the information
and signatures required in parts A, and as applicable B, and C of the
secure power of attorney form. This ensures that upon receipt of the
first transferor's title, the transferee (typically a dealer) must
complete the space for mileage disclosure on the title exactly as the
mileage was disclosed by the first transferor on the power of attorney
form.
A fourth purpose was to prevent odometer fraud by establishing
processes, mechanisms and conditions calculated to result in the
disclosure of the actual mileage on the title.\34\ As provided in the
PSRA of 1988, NHTSA's rule is to ensure that transferors disclose the
actual mileage at the time of the transfer on the power of attorney
document and that persons exercising the power of attorney restate that
mileage exactly on the title in the space provided. Toward these ends,
one condition, required by the implementing rule, is inclusion of the
printed names and signatures of the first transferor and the first
transferee (typically a dealer) accompanying the mileage disclosure, as
well as a statement of liability for fines for false statements. The
transferor shall also certify on the power of attorney form that to the
best of the transferor's knowledge, either: (1) The odometer reading
reflects the actual mileage; or (2) if the transferor knows that the
odometer reading reflects mileage in excess of the designed odometer
limit, he shall include a statement to that effect; or (3) if the
transferor knows that the odometer reading differs from the mileage and
the difference is greater than that caused by a calibration error, he
shall include a statement that the odometer reading does not reflect
the actual mileage and should not be relied upon, and a warning notice
to alert the transferee that a discrepancy exists
[[Page 48107]]
between the odometer reading and the actual mileage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Of course, other purposes of TIMA apply, including
processes and mechanisms making the disclosure of an odometer's
mileage on the title a condition of the application for a title and
a requirement for the title issued by the state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are additional mechanisms employed in the power of attorney
regulations to ensure accurate disclosures of the odometer reading and
to limit fraud. As provided in the rule, upon receipt of the first
transferor's title, the transferee has a duty to complete the space for
mileage disclosure on the title exactly as the mileage was disclosed by
the first transferor on the power of attorney form.\35\ Further, the
certification provision discussed above provides a mechanism applicable
to the second sale. As provided by section 580.15, the person
completing part C of the secure power of attorney form issued by the
State certifies that he or she has disclosed the mileage on the title
document consistent with the mileage disclosed to him or her on the
power of attorney form, that he or she examined the title and the
mileage disclosure on that title and the mileage disclosure he or she
is making on the power of attorney is greater than the mileage
previously stated on the title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 49 CFR 580.13(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the PSRA, as amended in 1990, provided another process
to ensure accurate disclosure of the odometer reading. It required that
the rule ensure that the person granted a power of attorney must submit
the completed original power of attorney to the state along with a copy
of the title (showing the restatement of mileage) and must also retain
a copy. As directed, NHTSA issued implementing regulations providing
that the transferee must submit the completed original power of
attorney form to the State that issued it along with either a copy or
the actual transferor's title when submitting a new title application.
This allowed for review of the mileage on the power of attorney form
and corresponding title.
NHTSA's regulations provide an additional mechanism facilitating
verification of previous mileage statements by affording subsequent
purchasers access to previous title and power of attorney documents.
Under section 580.16(a), if the second-sale transferee applies for
title in his own name (in other words, if the second-sale transferee
does not give power of attorney to his transferor to review the title
and reassignment documents), then that transferor must show him, upon
his request, a copy of the power of attorney form completed by the
previous owner. In any event, under section 580.16(b) of the rule, a
transferor who was given power of attorney by his transferor and who
holds title to the vehicle in his name, must, upon request of the
purchaser (second-sale transferee), show his/her purchaser a copy of
the previous owner's title and a copy of the power of attorney form
completed by the previous owner.
A further mechanism in the rule was its voiding mechanism. As
provided by the rule, 49 CFR 580.15(b), any mileage discrepancies void
the power of attorney. NHTSA has characterized this provision as vital;
\36\ if the mileage reflected by the transferor on the power of
attorney is less than that previously stated on the title and any
reassignment documents, the power of attorney shall be void. The power
of attorney is voided by the existence of a discrepancy, not by an
action causing a discrepancy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 54 FR 35885 (Aug. 30, 1989).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A fifth purpose is to prevent alterations on odometer disclosures
by powers of attorney and to preclude counterfeit powers of attorney
through secure processes. In furtherance of these purposes, the power
of attorney (incorporating the disclosure statement) must be on a form
issued by the State that is set forth by means of a secure printing
process or other secure process. It has to be no less secure than the
title document itself.
A sixth purpose is to create a record of the mileage on vehicles
and a paper trail. The PSRA referred to the need to facilitate
enforcement. In addition, and more specifically, the amended statute
provided ``the person granted such power of attorney * * * shall submit
the original back to the State with a copy of the title showing a
restatement of the mileage.'' \37\ This paper trail includes the
written, signed (by both the transferor and transferee), and dated
odometer disclosure statement on the secure power of attorney form, and
the corresponding entry on the vehicle title, which, as discussed
above, must read exactly as it was disclosed by the transferor on the
power of attorney document. The transferee is required to file the
original power of attorney form with the State that issued it, with a
copy of the transferor's title or with the actual title when the
transferee submits a new title application at the same time. The
transferee is required to return a copy of the power of attorney form
to the transferor. The State shall retain the original power of
attorney form for the shorter of (a) Three years or (b) a period equal
to the State titling record retention period. As stated in the
rulemaking, the State may retain the copy in any medium by which such
information may be stored, provided there is no loss of information.
States are not limited to retaining the records in paper form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ The definition of ``original power of attorney'' permits a
secure copy of the power of attorney to be considered an
``original.'' This is implemented in part in 40 CFR 580.13(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The retention of the power of attorney form by the State permits
law enforcement officials to trace fraudulent disclosure statements
back to transferors, if necessary.
Moreover, Section 401 of the PSRA, as amended in 1991, requires
NHTSA's rules to provide for the retention of the power of attorney
form. The rule added section 580.8(c), which concerns odometer
disclosure statement retention. Under this paragraph, motor vehicle
dealers and distributors who are assigned a power of attorney by their
transferors are required to retain, for five years, a copy of each
power of attorney they receive. These documents must be retained at the
primary place of business of the dealer or distributor in an order that
is appropriate with business requirements and that permits systematic
retrieval.
Seventh, the overall purpose is to protect consumers by assuring
that they receive valid representations of a vehicle's actual mileage
at a time of transfer. This includes the ground rules for transferors
and transferees, providing that both parties provide all of the
information and signatures required in parts A, B, and C of the secure
power of attorney form. This ensures that upon receipt of the
transferor's title, the transferee shall complete the space for mileage
disclosure on the title exactly as the mileage was disclosed by the
transferor on the power of attorney form.
IV. The Florida Petition
Florida, which is in the process of implementing an electronic
title transfer system (e-title), petitions for approval of alternate
odometer disclosure requirements.\38\ Florida requests alternate
disclosure requirements for transfers of motor vehicles in transactions
between private parties (casual sales) and transfers of motor vehicles,
whether subject to a lien \39\ or
[[Page 48108]]
not subject to a lien, between private parties and motor vehicle
dealers. Florida also requests alternate disclosure requirements for
transactions involving leased vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ We note that Florida's petition differs markedly from other
petitions for alternate odometer disclosure requirements NHTSA has
received from other states. Florida's proposal relies on tag agents,
rather than an online system, to verify the identity of the
transferor and transferee in casual sales. These tag agents also
verify chain of ownership and odometer disclosure in all transfers
before title can be issued. Identity verification in transactions
other than casual sales (for which identity of the parties is
verified by a tag agent) is left to the parties to the
transaction(s). Florida's proposal encompasses a wide variety of
transactions and relies on paper forms for a number of these
transactions.
\39\ Under Florida law, a lienholder physically possesses the
title to the vehicle. Thus, Florida permits odometer disclosure by
power of attorney when title is held by a lienholder and now
petitions for alternate requirements regarding odometer disclosure
by power of attorney.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida law authorizes the Florida Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles (the Department) to accept any application for vehicle
title by electronic means. See Fla. Stat. Ann. Sec. 319.40 (1997). The
Department is proposing amendments to the Florida statutes to allow the
continuation of an electronic certificate of title in lieu of a paper
certificate of title for transfers of motor vehicles. With electronic
titling there would not be a paper certificate of title on which to
disclose the vehicle's mileage at the time of transfer of ownership.
A. Overview of Florida's Electronic Titling System
Currently Florida stores its titling and registration information
(including images of all supporting title documentation) in a secure
database referred to as the Florida Real-time Vehicle Information
System, or FRVIS. According to Florida's petition, either a Department
employee or an authorized tag agent at a state-authorized tag office
enters information into this database. Only a Department employee or
tag agent can change FRVIS title information, including owner
information and the odometer disclosure. For title images (scanned,
electronic copies of vehicle title documents), FRVIS stores all
applicable data and stores images of documents that remain in the title
history for the vehicle. Florida law also requires that the Department
retain all documents regarding applications for, and issuance of,
certificates of title--including titles, manufacturers' statements of
origin, applications, and supporting documents submitted with the
application such as odometer statements, VIN verifications, bills of
sale, indicia of ownership, dealer reassignments, photographs, and any
personal identification, affidavits, or documents required by or
submitted to the Department--for a period of at least 10 years. Fla.
Stat. Ann. Sec. 319.23(11). The title resides as an electronic record
in FRVIS; however, secure paper copies of the title can be generated
from FRVIS if needed.
Florida intends to use a secure reassignment form in lieu of a
paper title to capture odometer disclosure and transfer of e-titles.
Florida law currently allows licensed dealers to use a secure
reassignment form when making dealer reassignments and odometer
disclosures after all reassignment and odometer disclosure spaces on
the reverse side of the Certificate of Title have been used. The form
links the vehicle to the title record by the VIN and includes the
required odometer disclosure statements. The Department scans the form
and stores it in the title history for the vehicle. Florida proposes to
use a similar form for odometer disclosure in its e-title program.
In Florida, lienholders hold the title to the vehicles securing the
loan. Florida began its electronic title and lien (ELT) program in
2001. Under the current process, the Department contracts with vendors
who provide secure electronic interface with Florida's titling system
to participating lienholders. The vendors then contract with financial
institutions who wish to participate in Florida's electronic title and
lien program. The participating lienholders allow their titles to
remain electronic. Electronic liens are satisfied through the secure
electronic interface and the title is retained electronically until a
paper copy is requested.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Approximately 24 percent of the more than ten million
vehicle lien records Florida has are electronic. Additionally,
almost 50 percent of all new transactions with liens are maintained
electronically under ELT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Florida's Proposed e-Odometer Program
Florida's proposed e-Odometer program can be divided into three
transaction types: (1) Casual or private sales; (2) sales involving
licensed motor vehicle dealers (including sales from private owners to
licensed dealers, sales between licensed dealers, and sales from
licensed dealers to private buyers); and (3) sales involving leased
vehicles. The Agency understands that the program, as proposed, applies
only when the transferred vehicle is electronically titled at the time
of transfer of the vehicle.
1. Casual or Private Sales
Currently, a Florida resident wishing to sell his/her vehicle in a
casual or private sale needs to have a paper title. The seller signs
the paper title and discloses the odometer reading to the buyer on the
title. The buyer then signs the paper title verifying the odometer
reading. (The odometer disclosure is made on the title and signed by
the buyer and seller at the time of transfer, in accordance with 49
U.S.C. 32705 and 49 CFR 580.5.) The buyer takes the paper title to a
tag office, which processes the transfer of ownership and prints a new
paper title in the buyer's name, or, if the buyer so elects, creates an
e-title to be held by the Department.\41\ Whether the buyer elects to
maintain the title electronically or in paper form, the tag office
sends the old paper title and any other supporting documentation to the
Department for scanning into FRVIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ The buyer can request a paper title from the tag agent and
pay a $10 fee, or request a paper title online and pay a $2.50 fee.
The fee is intended to encourage buyers to maintain vehicle title
electronically. This fee applies to any paper title request under
Florida's current system and under the State's proposed program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Florida's proposed e-title program,\42\ if a seller of a
vehicle has an electronic title and wants to transfer that title, the
seller and buyer would visit an authorized tag office together. After
providing adequate identification to the tag agent, the buyer and
seller would sign, in the presence of the tag agent, a secure
reassignment form transferring ownership and disclosing the odometer
reading. A title is then issued in the buyer's name and is stored
electronically, or the buyer may choose to have a paper title issued.
The secure reassignment form and copies of the identification are
scanned into the title record in FRVIS.\43\ Florida maintains that
these would travel with the title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ Florida's proposed program does not apply in a casual
vehicle sale by a seller holding a paper title, only those with e-
title. A seller holding a paper title must follow the current
procedures to transfer the vehicle--the buyer and seller sign and
make the required odometer disclosure on the back of the paper
title. The buyer then can bring the signed title containing the
required odometer disclosure statement to an authorized tag agent
and elect at that time to have the title maintained by the State
electronically. If the buyer elects e-Title and later sells the
vehicle in a casual sale, he can do so by following the procedures
for transferring e-title.
\43\ The Agency understands that the electronic documents are
linked to the vehicle title history by title number and VIN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sales Involving Licensed Motor Vehicle Dealers
a. Retail Sales of Vehicles With an e-Title But Not Subject to a Lien
Currently, when a licensed motor vehicle dealer is involved, the
process for transferring a title to a vehicle with an e-title and not
subject to a lien is as follows. The seller with e-title brings the
vehicle to a dealership. The seller and dealer complete a secure power
of attorney with odometer disclosure. The dealer obtains the paper
title from a tag agency or online from the Department. The dealer
transfers the odometer disclosure information from the secure power of
attorney to the title and signs the title as buyer and seller. When the
dealer sells the vehicle to another buyer, the dealer and buyer
complete the reassignment on the paper title with an
[[Page 48109]]
odometer disclosure. The dealer takes both the secure power of attorney
and the paper title to a tag agency. The title is then transferred to
the buyer and a receipt is provided. The buyer has the option to obtain
a new paper title or have the Department hold the title electronically.
The secure power of attorney and old paper title are scanned and stored
with title history in FRVIS.
Under Florida's proposed program, a seller with e-title would bring
the vehicle to a dealership. The seller and dealer complete a secure
reassignment form with odometer disclosure. When the dealer sells the
vehicle to another buyer, the dealer and buyer complete another secure
reassignment form with odometer disclosure. The dealer takes both of
the secure reassignment forms to a tag agency. The vehicle title is
then transferred to the buyer and a receipt is provided. The buyer has
the option to obtain a paper title or have the Department hold the
title electronically. The secure reassignment forms are scanned and
stored with the vehicle title history in FRVIS.
b. Sales of Vehicles With e-Title Subject to a Lien (e-lien in Florida)
Currently, when a licensed motor vehicle dealer is involved, the
process for transferring a vehicle subject to an e-lien with e-title is
as follows. A seller with e-title/e-lien brings the vehicle to a
dealership. The seller and dealer