In the Matter of Certain Video Analytics Software, Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 45859-45860 [2011-19357]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Notices
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2010 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the
U.S. port but not including antidumping
duties). If you are a trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms which
are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country(ies) after 2005, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Country(ies), and such merchandise
from other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–19315 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–795]
In the Matter of Certain Video Analytics
Software, Systems, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Institution of
Investigation; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
29, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of ObjectVideo, Inc. of
Reston, Virginia. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain video analytics software,
systems, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No 6,696,945 (‘‘the ’945 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,970,083 (‘‘the ’083
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,613,324 (‘‘the
’324 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,424,175
(‘‘the ’175 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,868,912 (‘‘the ’912 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 7,932,923 (‘‘the ’923 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45859
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at http:
//www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 26, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain video analytics
software, systems, components thereof,
and products containing same that
infringe one or more of claims 1–8, 11–
14, 17, and 24–37 of the ’945 patent;
claims 1–28 of the ’083 patent; claims
1–3, 6, and 7 of the ’324; claims 2 and
3 of the ’175 patent; claims 1–3 and 6–
22 of the ’912 patent; and claims 1–7,
9–13, and 15–28 of the ’923 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: ObjectVideo,
Inc., 11600 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite
290, Reston, VA 20191.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
45860
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Notices
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Postfach 106050,
D–70049 Stuttgart, Germany.
Bosch Security Systems, Inc., 130
Perinton Parkway, Fairpoint, NY
14450–9107.
Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd., 657–9,
Yeoksam-Dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul
135–080, Korea.
Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc.
(d/b/a Samsung Techwin America,
Inc.), 100 Challenger Road, Suite
700, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660.
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan.
Sony Electronics, Inc., 16530 Via
Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 27, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–19357 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–794]
In the Matter of Certain Electronic
Devices, Including Wireless
Communication Devices, Portable
Music and Data Processing Devices,
and Tablet Computers; Notice of
Institution of Investigation; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
28, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC of
Richardson, Texas. Supplements were
filed on July 7 and July 15, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain electronic
devices, including wireless
communication devices, portable music
and data processing devices, and tablet
computers by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
7,706,348 (‘‘the ‘348 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 7,486,644 (‘‘the ‘644 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,771,980 (‘‘the ‘980
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,879,843 (‘‘the
‘843 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
7,450,114 (‘‘the ‘114 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists or
is in the process of being established as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and
supplements, except for any
confidential information contained
therein, are available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 26, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain electronic
devices, including wireless
communication devices, portable music
and data processing devices, and tablet
computers that infringe one or more of
claims 75–78 and 82–84 of the ‘348
patent; claims 9–16 of the ‘644 patent;
claims 5–7 and 9–13 of the ‘980 patent;
claims 1–11 of the ‘843 patent; and
claims 1–5 of the ‘114 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 416
Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu,
Suwon-City, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
443–742;
Samsung Telecommunications America,
LLC, 1301 East Lookout Drive,
Richardson, TX 75082.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino,
CA 95014.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45859-45860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19357]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-795]
In the Matter of Certain Video Analytics Software, Systems,
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution
of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 29, 2011, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
ObjectVideo, Inc. of Reston, Virginia. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain video analytics software, systems, components
thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No 6,696,945 (``the '945 patent''); U.S.
Patent No. 6,970,083 (``the '083 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,613,324
(``the '324 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,424,175 (``the '175 patent'');
U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912 (``the '912 patent''); and U.S. Patent No.
7,932,923 (``the '923 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on July 26, 2011, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain video
analytics software, systems, components thereof, and products
containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1-8, 11-14, 17, and
24-37 of the '945 patent; claims 1-28 of the '083 patent; claims 1-3,
6, and 7 of the '324; claims 2 and 3 of the '175 patent; claims 1-3 and
6-22 of the '912 patent; and claims 1-7, 9-13, and 15-28 of the '923
patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: ObjectVideo, Inc., 11600 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Suite 290, Reston, VA 20191.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of
[[Page 45860]]
section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be
served:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Postfach 106050, D-70049 Stuttgart, Germany.
Bosch Security Systems, Inc., 130 Perinton Parkway, Fairpoint, NY
14450-9107.
Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd., 657-9, Yeoksam-Dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-
080, Korea.
Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. (d/b/a Samsung Techwin America,
Inc.), 100 Challenger Road, Suite 700, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660.
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan.
Sony Electronics, Inc., 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 27, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-19357 Filed 7-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
