Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico, 45509-45510 [2011-19292]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2011 / Notices
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261
and (202) 482–1396, respectively.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On December 28, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the initiation of
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from the United Arab Emirates
(UAE) for the period November 01,
2009, through October 31, 2010. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 75 FR 81565, 81570 (December 28,
2010). This review covers one producer
and/or exporter of the subject
merchandise to the United States: JBF
RAK LLC (JBF).
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations require the
Department to issue the preliminary
results of a review within 245 days after
the last day of the anniversary month of
the order or suspension agreement for
which the administrative review was
requested, and final results of the
review within 120 days after the date on
which the notice of the preliminary
results is published in the Federal
Register. However, if the Department
determines that it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
aforementioned specified time limits,
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations allow the
Department to extend the 245-day
period to 365 days and to extend the
120-day period to 180 days.
The Department requires additional
time to evaluate the questionnaire
responses from JBF in order to conduct
a thorough analysis of all information
on the record, in particular the claimed
sample sales and JBF’s product
matching issues. Therefore, the
Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review by the original
deadline of August 2, 2011, and is
extending the deadline for completion
of the preliminary results of this
administrative review from 245 days to
365 days. The revised deadline for the
preliminary results of this
administrative review is now no later
than November 30, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jul 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 21, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–19266 Filed 7–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–830]
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From Mexico
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Mexico.
AGENCY:
On November 3, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (Department)
published its Notice of Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Mexico, 75 FR 67685
(November 3, 2010) (Initiation and
Preliminary Results Notice) and
preliminarily determined that
ArcelorMittal las Truchas, S.A. de C.V.
(AMLT) operated as the same business
entity as Siderurgica lazaro Cardenas las
Truchas S.A. de C.V. (Sicartsa) for
purposes of determining antidumping
duty liability. We received comments
from interested parties. Based on our
analysis, we are now affirming our
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Conniff, Office of AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009.
SUMMARY:
Background
On November 3, 2010, the Department
published its Initiation and Preliminary
Results Notice. On April 29, 2011, the
Department received case briefs from
Nucor Corporation (Nucor) and Gerdau
Ameristeel US Inc. and Evraz Rocky
Mountain Steel (petitioners) and AMLT.
On May 6, 2011, the Department
received a rebuttal brief from Nucor and
on May 9, 2011, AMLT filed a rebuttal
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45509
brief as well. Petitioners did not submit
a rebuttal brief.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain hot-rolled products of carbon
steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above-noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and
(e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods.
Also excluded are (f) free machining
steel products (i.e., products that
contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. This grade 1080 tire cord quality
rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire
cord quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm
or more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non-deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
This grade 1080 tire bead quality rod
is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or
more but not more than 7.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non-deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
45510
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2011 / Notices
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5
or fewer breaks per ton; and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of soluble aluminum,
(3) 0.040 percent or less, in the
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4)
0.008 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5)
either not more than 0.15 percent, in the
aggregate, of copper, nickel and
chromium (if chromium is not
specified), or not more than 0.10 percent
in the aggregate of copper and nickel
and a chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30
percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of the grade 1080 tire
cord quality wire rod and the grade
1080 tire bead quality wire rod, an
inclusion will be considered to be
deformable if its ratio of length
(measured along the axis—that is, the
direction of rolling—of the rod) over
thickness (measured on the same
inclusion in a direction perpendicular
to the axis of the rod) is equal to or
greater than three. The size of an
inclusion for purposes of the 20 microns
and 35 microns limitations is the
measurement of the largest dimension
observed on a longitudinal section
measured in a direction perpendicular
to the axis of the rod. This measurement
methodology applies only to inclusions
on certain grade 1080 tire cord quality
wire rod and certain grade 1080 tire
bead quality wire rod that are entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after July 24, 2003.
See Notice of Final Result of Changed
Circumstances Review of the
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Orders, and Intent To Revoke
Orders in Part, 68 FR 64079 (November
12, 2003).
The designation of the products as
‘‘tire cord quality’’ or ‘‘tire bead quality’’
indicates the acceptability of the
product for use in the production of tire
cord, tire bead, or wire for use in other
rubber reinforcement applications such
as hose wire. These quality designations
are presumed to indicate that these
products are being used in tire cord, tire
bead, and other rubber reinforcement
applications, and such merchandise
intended for the tire cord, tire bead, or
other rubber reinforcement applications
is not included in the scope. However,
should the petitioners or other
interested parties provide a reasonable
basis to believe or suspect that there
exists a pattern of importation of such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jul 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
products for other than those
applications; end-use certification for
the importation of such products may be
required. Under such circumstances,
only the importers of record would
normally be required to certify the end
use of the imported merchandise.
All products meeting the physical
description of subject merchandise that
are not specifically excluded are
included in this scope.
The products subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015,
7213.91.3092, 7213.91.4500,
7213.91.6000, 7213.99.0030,
7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000,
7227.90.6010, and 7227.90.6080 of the
HTSUS. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
Notification
Analysis of Comments Received
Comment 1
Comment 2
Comment 3
Comment 4
Comment 5
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this changed
circumstances review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues which parties have
raised, and to which we have responded
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as an Appendix. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is available in
the Central Records Unit, room 7046, of
the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(i), we have determined
that AMLT is the successor-in-interest
to Sicartsa and should be accorded the
same antidumping treatment as Sicartsa.
We will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection that a cash deposit
rate of 1.26 percent will be effective for
AMLT’s shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdraw from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication of these final
results. For the cash deposit rate
calculated for Sicartsa, see Notice of
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From
Mexico, 71 FR 27989 (May 15, 2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216
and 351.221.
Dated: July 22, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX
Date of Sicartsa’s Acquisition
Management
Supplier Base
Customer Base
Production Facilities
[FR Doc. 2011–19292 Filed 7–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–806, A–570–815]
Sulfanilic Acid From India and the
People’s Republic of China; Final
Results of Third Expedited Sunset
Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 1, 2011, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the third sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on sulfanilic acid from India and the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘the PRC’’),
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On
the basis of a notice of intent to
participate and adequate substantive
responses filed on behalf of domestic
interested parties, as well as lack of
response from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted
expedited (120-day) sunset reviews. As
a result of these sunset reviews, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping. The dumping
margins are identified in the Final
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45509-45510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19292]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-830]
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 3, 2010, the Department of Commerce (Department)
published its Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Mexico, 75 FR 67685 (November 3, 2010) (Initiation
and Preliminary Results Notice) and preliminarily determined that
ArcelorMittal las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT) operated as the same
business entity as Siderurgica lazaro Cardenas las Truchas S.A. de C.V.
(Sicartsa) for purposes of determining antidumping duty liability. We
received comments from interested parties. Based on our analysis, we
are now affirming our preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1009.
Background
On November 3, 2010, the Department published its Initiation and
Preliminary Results Notice. On April 29, 2011, the Department received
case briefs from Nucor Corporation (Nucor) and Gerdau Ameristeel US
Inc. and Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel (petitioners) and AMLT. On May 6,
2011, the Department received a rebuttal brief from Nucor and on May 9,
2011, AMLT filed a rebuttal brief as well. Petitioners did not submit a
rebuttal brief.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order is certain hot-rolled
products of carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately
round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm in solid
cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel products possessing the above-noted
physical characteristics and meeting the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool
steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and (e) concrete
reinforcing bars and rods. Also excluded are (f) free machining steel
products (i.e., products that contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent or more
of bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of
phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or more than 0.01
percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are 1080 grade tire cord quality wire
rod and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire rod. This grade 1080 tire
cord quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire cord quality wire
rod measuring 5.0 mm or more but not more than 6.0 mm in cross-
sectional diameter; (ii) with an average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth (maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non-deformable inclusions greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or better using European Method NFA
04-114; (v) having a surface quality with no surface defects of a
length greater than 0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to a diameter
of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or fewer breaks per ton, and (vii) containing
by weight the following elements in the proportions shown: (1) 0.78
percent or more of carbon, (2) less than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4)
0.006 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not more than 0.15 percent,
in the aggregate, of copper, nickel and chromium.
This grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080
tire bead quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or more but not more than
7.0 mm in cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an average partial
decarburization of no more than 70 microns in depth (maximum individual
200 microns); (iii) having no non-deformable inclusions greater than 20
microns and no deformable inclusions greater than 35
[[Page 45510]]
microns; (iv) having a carbon segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04-114; (v) having a surface quality
with no surface defects of a length greater than 0.2 mm; (vi) capable
of being drawn to a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5 or fewer
breaks per ton; and (vii) containing by weight the following elements
in the proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of soluble aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or less, in
the aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.008 percent or less of
nitrogen, and (5) either not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium (if chromium is not specified), or not
more than 0.10 percent in the aggregate of copper and nickel and a
chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30 percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of the grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod and the
grade 1080 tire bead quality wire rod, an inclusion will be considered
to be deformable if its ratio of length (measured along the axis--that
is, the direction of rolling--of the rod) over thickness (measured on
the same inclusion in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod)
is equal to or greater than three. The size of an inclusion for
purposes of the 20 microns and 35 microns limitations is the
measurement of the largest dimension observed on a longitudinal section
measured in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod. This
measurement methodology applies only to inclusions on certain grade
1080 tire cord quality wire rod and certain grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after July 24, 2003. See Notice of Final Result of
Changed Circumstances Review of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Orders, and Intent To Revoke Orders in Part, 68 FR 64079 (November
12, 2003).
The designation of the products as ``tire cord quality'' or ``tire
bead quality'' indicates the acceptability of the product for use in
the production of tire cord, tire bead, or wire for use in other rubber
reinforcement applications such as hose wire. These quality
designations are presumed to indicate that these products are being
used in tire cord, tire bead, and other rubber reinforcement
applications, and such merchandise intended for the tire cord, tire
bead, or other rubber reinforcement applications is not included in the
scope. However, should the petitioners or other interested parties
provide a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that there exists a
pattern of importation of such products for other than those
applications; end-use certification for the importation of such
products may be required. Under such circumstances, only the importers
of record would normally be required to certify the end use of the
imported merchandise.
All products meeting the physical description of subject
merchandise that are not specifically excluded are included in this
scope.
The products subject to this order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.4500,
7213.91.6000, 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000, 7227.90.6010,
and 7227.90.6080 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this changed circumstances review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the issues which parties have raised, and to which we have responded in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an
Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is available in the
Central Records Unit, room 7046, of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i), we have determined that
AMLT is the successor-in-interest to Sicartsa and should be accorded
the same antidumping treatment as Sicartsa. We will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection that a cash deposit rate of 1.26 percent
will be effective for AMLT's shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdraw from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication of these final results. For the cash deposit rate
calculated for Sicartsa, see Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
From Mexico, 71 FR 27989 (May 15, 2006).
Notification
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written notification of
the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective
order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221.
Dated: July 22, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
APPENDIX
Comment 1 Date of Sicartsa's Acquisition
Comment 2 Management
Comment 3 Supplier Base
Comment 4 Customer Base
Comment 5 Production Facilities
[FR Doc. 2011-19292 Filed 7-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P