Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest, 45615-45616 [2011-19225]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2011 / Notices
increasing complexity of the project, the
level of controversy related to the
project, and the level of public
involvement during the scoping process.
On July 16, 2010, the Notice of
Availability for the Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register (75
FR 41517) and a 45-day Draft EIS public
comment period began. During this
time, the BLM hosted 4 public meetings
˜
in Canon City, Cotopaxi, Salida, and
Denver, Colorado. Based on public
comments received, the BLM extended
the comment period by 15 days, ending
on September 14, 2010. The responses
to comments are presented in the Over
the River Final EIS.
Public comments focused on concerns
with emergency response and safety,
cleanup and restoration, impacts to the
special values of the Arkansas
Canyonlands ACEC, wildlife, threatened
and endangered species, recreation,
transportation, and socioeconomics.
These comments have been addressed
within the range of alternatives in the
Final EIS where applicable.
Additional Final EIS Inspection
Addresses: Additional copies of the
Over the River Final EIS are available at
the BLM Colorado State Office, 2850
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado;
˜
Canon City Public Library, 516 Macon
˜
Ave., Canon City, Colorado; Salida
Regional Library, 405 E. Street, Salida,
Colorado; Arkansas Headwaters
Recreation Area office, 307 West Sackett
Ave., Salida, Colorado; Denver Public
Library, 10 W. Fourteenth Ave.
Parkway, Denver, Colorado; and the
Cotopaxi Store, 20204 U.S. Highway 50,
Cotopaxi, Colorado.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment on the Final EIS, you should
be aware that your entire comment—
including your personal identifying
information—may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask
us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10.
Helen M. Hankins,
Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–19092 Filed 7–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jul 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled In Re Certain Wireless Devices
with 3G Capabilities and Components
Thereof, DN 2835; the Commission is
soliciting comments on any public
interest issues raised by the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
filed on behalf of InterDigital
Communications LLC, InterDigital
Technology Corporation, and IPR
Licensing Inc. on July 26, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain wireless devices
with 3g capabilities and components
thereof. The complaint names as
respondents Huawei Technologies Co.,
Ltd. of China; FutureWei Technologies,
Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA)
of TX; Nokia Corporation of Finland;
Nokia Inc. of NY; ZTE Corporation of
China; and ZTE (USA) Inc. of TX.
The complainant, proposed
respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45615
to file comments, not to exceed five
pages in length, on any public interest
issues raised by the complaint.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation would negatively affect the
public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production
of like or directly competitive articles in
the United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, five
business days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Submissions should
refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No.
2835’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. The
Commission’s rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means only to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the
rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
documents/handbook_on_electronic_
filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding electronic filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
45616
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2011 / Notices
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10,
210.50(a)(4)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–19225 Filed 7–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–712]
Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review a Final Initial Determination;
Affirming-in-Part ALJ Order No. 33
Granting Summary Determination That
Complainant Satisfied the Economic
Prong of the Domestic Industry
Requirement Under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3); Schedule for Filing Written
Submissions on Remedy, the Public
Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has
determined not to review the final
initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) on May 20, 2011, in the abovecaptioned investigation; the
Commission has also determined to
affirm-in-part ALJ Order No. 33 granting
summary determination that
complainant satisfies the economic
prong of the domestic industry
requirement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3116. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jul 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on April 21,
2010, based on a complaint filed by
Verizon Communications Inc. and
Verizon Services Corp. (collectively,
‘‘Verizon’’), alleging a violation of
section 337 in the importation, sale for
importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain digital
set-top boxes and components thereof,
that infringe one or more of claim 14 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,635,979; claim 38 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,666,293; claim 13 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,381,748 (‘‘the ’748
patent’’); claim 14 of U.S. Patent No.
6,367,078; and claim 5 of U.S. Patent
No. 7,561,214. 75 FR 20861 (2010).
Complainant named Cablevision
Systems Corp. of Bethpage, New York
(‘‘Cablevision’’) as the only respondent.
Id.
On September 7, 2010, Verizon
moved for summary determination that
its activities in the United States
concerning its FiOS TV services satisfy
the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3). On September 24, 2010,
Cablevision filed an opposition to
Verizon’s motion. Also on September
24, 2010, the Commission investigative
attorney (‘‘the IA’’) filed a response in
support of Verizon’s motion. On January
11, 2010, the ALJ issued an ID (Order
No. 33) granting Verizon’s motion. On
January 20, 2011, respondent
Cablevision filed a petition for review of
the Summary ID. On January 27, 2011,
Verizon and the IA each filed a response
to the petition for review. On February
11, 2011, the Commission determined to
review the Summary ID and requested
written submissions from the parties on
the issues under review. All of the
parties timely submitted their respective
initial and reply submissions.
The evidentiary hearing on violation
of Section 337 was held from January
24, 2011 through February 1, 2011. On
May 20, 2011, the ALJ issued his final
ID finding a violation of section 337 as
to the ’748 patent only. The ID included
the ALJ’s recommended determination
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on remedy and bonding. All the parties
to the investigation filed timely
petitions for review of various portions
of the final ID, as well as timely
responses to the petitions. On July 1,
2011, Cablevision filed an unopposed
motion for leave to file a supplemental
submission regarding a district court
proceeding. ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.
v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., Civil Action
No. 2:10cv248. The motion is hereby
granted.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
ID, the petitions for review, and the
responses thereto, the Commission has
determined not to review the final ID.
The Commission has also determined to
affirm-in-part the ALJ’s Order No. 33,
granting Verizon’s motion for summary
determination that it has satisfied the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3)(C). In particular, the
Commission affirms that Verizon has
satisfied the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement based on
its investment in the software
development and testing, installation,
and support associated with the set-top
boxes that were alleged to practice the
asserted claims of the patents-in-suit
because Verizon’s investments in those
activities are ‘‘substantial’’ within the
meaning of Section 337(a)(3)(C). The
Commission takes no position on the
remainder of the summary
determination ID. Specifically, the
Commission takes no position on
whether Verizon’s investments in the
FiOS network satisfy the economic
prong.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in the respondent being required
to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale
of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving
written submissions that address the
form of remedy, if any, that should be
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
article from entry into the United States
for purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or are likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45615-45616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19225]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating
to the Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint entitled In Re Certain Wireless
Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof, DN 2835; the
Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised
by the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. The public version of
the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has received a complaint
filed on behalf of InterDigital Communications LLC, InterDigital
Technology Corporation, and IPR Licensing Inc. on July 26, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain wireless devices with 3g capabilities and
components thereof. The complaint names as respondents Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. of China; FutureWei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a
Huawei Technologies (USA) of TX; Nokia Corporation of Finland; Nokia
Inc. of NY; ZTE Corporation of China; and ZTE (USA) Inc. of TX.
The complainant, proposed respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed
five pages in length, on any public interest issues raised by the
complaint. Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion
order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would
negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United
States consumers.
In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are
used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject
to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of
business, five business days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for
comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial
determination in this investigation.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with
the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket
number (``Docket No. 2835'') in a prominent place on the cover page
and/or the first page. The Commission's rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for
Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/documents/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons
with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary
(202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the
[[Page 45616]]
Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for
which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will
be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10
and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-19225 Filed 7-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P