Antidumping Duty Investigation and Countervailing Duty Investigation of Hard Red Spring Wheat From Canada: Notice of Court Decision and Amended Revocation of Countervailing and Antidumping Duty Orders, 44574-44575 [2011-18882]
Download as PDF
44574
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Yavapai County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Yavapai County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Prescott, Arizona. The committee is
meeting as authorized under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343)
and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the meeting is to orientate new
committee members to the Secural Rural
Schools Act, roles of members,
guidelines for Title II, and the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
DATES: The meeting will be held August
11, 2011; 9 a.m to 2 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Prescott Public Library, Founders
Suite A, 215 E. Goodwin Street,
Prescott, AZ 86303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debbie Maneely, RAC Coordinator,
Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez,
Prescott, AZ 86301; (928) 443–8130 or
dmaneely@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. The
following business will be conducted:
(1) Welcome and introductions; (2)
Project Discussion, Questions-Answers;
(3) review and ranking of projects
submitted for Round 2; (4) next meeting
agenda, location, and date.
SUMMARY:
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Pete Gordon,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–18811 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Yavapai County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
The
meeting is open to the public. The
following business will be conducted:
(1) Welcome and introductions; (2)
Project Discussion, Questions-Answers;
(3) review and ranking of projects
submitted for Round 2; (4) next meeting
agenda, location, and date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Pete Gordon,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–18814 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Sabine Resource Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Sabine Resource
Advisory Committee will meet in
Hemphill, Texas. The committee is
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343)
(the Act) and operates in compliance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act. The purpose of the committee is to
improve collaborative relationships and
to provide advice and recommendations
to the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with the title II
of the Act. The meeting is open to the
public. The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss New Title II Project Proposals.
DATES: The meeting will be held
Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 3:30
p.m.
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held at
the Sabine NF Office, 5050 State Hwy
21 East, Hemphill, TX 75948. Written
comments may be submitted as
described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at 5050 State
ADDRESSES:
The Yavapai County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Prescott, Arizona. The committee is
meeting as authorized under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343)
and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the meeting is to orientate new
committee members to the Secural Rural
SUMMARY:
Schools Act, roles of members,
guidelines for Title II, and the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
DATES: The meeting will be held August
24, 2011; 9 a.m to 2 pm.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Highland Center, 1375 S. Walker
Road, Prescott, AZ 86303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debbie Maneely, RAC Coordinator,
Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez,
Prescott, AZ 86301; (928) 443–8130 or
dmaneely@fs.fed.us.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Hwy 21 East, Hemphill, TX 75948.
Please call ahead to (409) 625–1940 to
facilitate entry into the building to view
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William E. Taylor, Jr., Designated
Federal Officer, Sabine National Forest,
5050 State Hwy. 21 E., Hemphill, TX
75948: Telephone: 936–639–8501 or email: etaylor @fs.fed.us
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
Requests for reasonable accomodation
for access to the facility or procedings
may be made by contacting the person
listed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following business will be conducted:
The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss/approve New Title II Project
Proposals. Anyone who would like to
bring related matters to the attention of
the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. The agenda
will include time for people to make
oral statements of three minutes or less.
Individuals wishing to make an oral
statement should request in writing by
September 1, 2011 to be scheduled on
the agenda. Written comments and
requests for time for oral comments
must be sent to 5050 State Hwy 21 East,
Hemphill, TX 75948 or by e-mail to
etaylor@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to
409–625–1953.
Dated: July 20, 2011.FR
William E. Taylor, Jr.
Designated Federal Officer, Sabine National
Forest RAC.
[FR Doc. 2011–18803 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–847; C–122–848]
Antidumping Duty Investigation and
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Hard Red Spring Wheat From Canada:
Notice of Court Decision and Amended
Revocation of Countervailing and
Antidumping Duty Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 19, 2011, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’), in Canadian Wheat
Board v. United States, 2010–1083 (Fed.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cir. 2011) (‘‘Wheat Board (CAFC)’’),
held that the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) was required by law
to instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to liquidate all
unliquidated entries of hard red spring
wheat from Canada without regard to
antidumping and countervailing duties.
The CAFC’s holding is now final and
conclusive. Consistent with that
holding, we are amending the
revocation of these orders and
instructing CBP to liquidate all
unliquidated entries pursuant to the
CAFC decision in Wheat Board (CAFC).
DATES: Effective Date: July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Taylor or Nancy Decker, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–8319 and (202)
482–0196, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Canadian Wheat Board and
Canadian government challenged the
International Trade Commission’s
(‘‘ITC’’) final determination that the
United States industry was being
materially injured by reason of imports
from Canada of hard red spring wheat
before a North American Free Trade
Agreement (‘‘NAFTA’’) Panel. As a
result of that litigation, the ITC issued
a remand redetermination that
concluded that a domestic industry was
not materially injured or threatened
with material injury by reasons of
imports of Canadian hard red spring
wheat, and the NAFTA Panel affirmed
that remand redetermination. North
American Free-Trade Agreement,
Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews;
Completion of Panel Review, 71 FR 4896
(Jan. 30, 2006). The Department
therefore revoked the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders of hard red
spring wheat from Canada, effective
January 2, 2006. See Antidumping Duty
Investigation and Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Hard Red Spring Wheat
from Canada: Notice of Panel Decision,
Revocation of Countervailing and
Antidumping Duty Orders and
Termination of Suspension of
Liquidation, 71 FR 8275 (Feb. 16, 2006).
The Department’s revocation stated,
however, that the revocation did not
‘‘affect the liquidation of entries made
prior to January 2, 2006’’ See Id.
The Canadian Wheat Board and
Canadian government challenged the
Department’s determination that its
revocation did not apply to pre-January
2, 2006, entries at the Court of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
International Trade (‘‘CIT’’). On
September 1, 2009, the CIT held that the
Department must direct CBP to liquidate
all pre-January 2, 2006, entries without
regard to antidumping and
countervailing duties. See Canadian
Wheat Board v. United States, 637 F.
Supp. 2d 1329 (Sept. 1, 2009). The
Department appealed the CIT’s holding
and, on April 19, 2011, in Wheat Board
(CAFC), the CAFC reached the same
conclusion as the CIT. See Wheat Board
(CAFC), 2010–1083 at *18.
Accordingly, the Department is now
amending its February 16, 2006,
revocation of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders covering
hard red spring wheat from Canada, and
will instruct CBP to: (1) Release any
cash deposits or bonds, and proceed
with liquidation of all unliquidated
entries of hard red spring wheat from
Canada without regard to antidumping
duties and countervailing duties; and (2)
refund, with interest, antidumping and
countervailing duty cash deposits
collected pursuant to the revoked
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders.
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–18882 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–826]
Paper Clips From the People’s
Republic of China: Continuation of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on paper clips from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
order.
DATES: Effective Date: July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krisha Hill or Charles Riggle, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44575
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482–
0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 3, 2011, the Department
initiated the third sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on paper clips
from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(‘‘Act’’). See Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76 FR 89 (January 3,
2011).
As a result of its review, the
Department determined that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on paper
clips from the PRC would likely lead to
a continuation or recurrence of dumping
and, therefore, notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the order be revoked. See
Paper Clips From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of Expedited
Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty
Order, 76 FR 26242 (May 6, 2011). On
June 29, 2011, the ITC determined,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on paper clips from the PRC
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time. See USITC
Publication 4242 (July 2011), Paper
Clips from China: Investigation No.
731–TA–663 (Third Review), and Paper
Clips from China, 76 FR 42730 (July 19,
2011).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
certain paper clips, wholly of wire of
base metal, whether or not galvanized,
whether or not plated with nickel or
other base metal (e.g., copper), with a
wire diameter between 0.025 inches and
0.075 inches (0.64 to 1.91 millimeters),
regardless of physical configuration,
except as specifically excluded. The
products subject to the order may have
a rectangular or ring-like shape and
include, but are not limited to, clips
commercially referred to as No. 1 clips,
No. 3 clips, Jumbo or Giant clips, Gem
clips, Frictioned clips, Perfect Gems,
Marcel Gems, Universal clips, Nifty
clips, Peerless clips, Ring clips, and
Glide-On clips. The products subject to
the order are currently classifiable
under subheading 8305.90.3010 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).
Specifically excluded from the scope
of the order are plastic and vinyl
covered paper clips, butterfly clips,
binder clips, or other paper fasteners
that are not made wholly of wire of base
metal and are covered under a separate
subheading of the HTSUS.
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44574-44575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18882]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-847; C-122-848]
Antidumping Duty Investigation and Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Hard Red Spring Wheat From Canada: Notice of Court
Decision and Amended Revocation of Countervailing and Antidumping Duty
Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 19, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (``CAFC''), in Canadian Wheat Board v. United States,
2010-1083 (Fed.
[[Page 44575]]
Cir. 2011) (``Wheat Board (CAFC)''), held that the Department of
Commerce (``the Department'') was required by law to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to liquidate all unliquidated
entries of hard red spring wheat from Canada without regard to
antidumping and countervailing duties. The CAFC's holding is now final
and conclusive. Consistent with that holding, we are amending the
revocation of these orders and instructing CBP to liquidate all
unliquidated entries pursuant to the CAFC decision in Wheat Board
(CAFC).
DATES: Effective Date: July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Taylor or Nancy Decker, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone (202) 482-8319 and (202) 482-0196, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Canadian Wheat Board and Canadian government challenged the
International Trade Commission's (``ITC'') final determination that the
United States industry was being materially injured by reason of
imports from Canada of hard red spring wheat before a North American
Free Trade Agreement (``NAFTA'') Panel. As a result of that litigation,
the ITC issued a remand redetermination that concluded that a domestic
industry was not materially injured or threatened with material injury
by reasons of imports of Canadian hard red spring wheat, and the NAFTA
Panel affirmed that remand redetermination. North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews; Completion of Panel
Review, 71 FR 4896 (Jan. 30, 2006). The Department therefore revoked
the antidumping and countervailing duty orders of hard red spring wheat
from Canada, effective January 2, 2006. See Antidumping Duty
Investigation and Countervailing Duty Investigation of Hard Red Spring
Wheat from Canada: Notice of Panel Decision, Revocation of
Countervailing and Antidumping Duty Orders and Termination of
Suspension of Liquidation, 71 FR 8275 (Feb. 16, 2006). The Department's
revocation stated, however, that the revocation did not ``affect the
liquidation of entries made prior to January 2, 2006'' See Id.
The Canadian Wheat Board and Canadian government challenged the
Department's determination that its revocation did not apply to pre-
January 2, 2006, entries at the Court of International Trade (``CIT'').
On September 1, 2009, the CIT held that the Department must direct CBP
to liquidate all pre-January 2, 2006, entries without regard to
antidumping and countervailing duties. See Canadian Wheat Board v.
United States, 637 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (Sept. 1, 2009). The Department
appealed the CIT's holding and, on April 19, 2011, in Wheat Board
(CAFC), the CAFC reached the same conclusion as the CIT. See Wheat
Board (CAFC), 2010-1083 at *18.
Accordingly, the Department is now amending its February 16, 2006,
revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders covering
hard red spring wheat from Canada, and will instruct CBP to: (1)
Release any cash deposits or bonds, and proceed with liquidation of all
unliquidated entries of hard red spring wheat from Canada without
regard to antidumping duties and countervailing duties; and (2) refund,
with interest, antidumping and countervailing duty cash deposits
collected pursuant to the revoked antidumping and countervailing duty
orders.
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-18882 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P