Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 44304-44305 [2011-18713]

Download as PDF 44304 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2011 / Notices Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to Nicholas Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, Fax number (202) 395–7258 or via e-mail at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. Dated: July 20, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2011–18672 Filed 7–22–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–BP–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: Implantation and Recovery of Archival Tags. OMB Control Number: 0648–0338. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a current information collection). Number of Respondents: 35. Average Hours per Response: Tag recovery information, 30 minutes; exempted fishing (scientific research) permit application and annual report, 40 minutes; interim reports, 1 hour. Burden Hours: 47. Needs and Uses: This request is for an extension of a currently approved information collection. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) allows scientists to implant archival tags in, or affix archival tags to, selected Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (tunas, sharks, swordfish, and billfish). Archival tags collect location, temperature, and water depth data that is useful for scientists researching the movements and behavior of individual fish. It is often necessary to retrieve the tags in order to obtain the collected data; therefore, persons catching tagged fish are exempted from other normally applicable regulations (i.e., immediate release of the fish, minimum size, prohibited species, retention limits). These participants must notify NOAA, return the archival tag or make it available to NOAA personnel, and provide information about the location and method of capture if they harvest a VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:15 Jul 22, 2011 Jkt 223001 fish that has an archival tag. The information obtained is used by NOAA in the formation of international and domestic fisheries policy and regulations. Scientists outside of NOAA who affix or implant archival tags must obtain prior authorization from NOAA and submit subsequent reports about the tagging of fish. NOAA needs that information to evaluate the effectiveness of archival tag programs, to assess the likely impact of regulatory allowances for tag recovery, and to ensure that the research does not produce excessive mortality. Affected Public: Individuals or households; not-for-profit organizations. Frequency: Annually and on occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Dated: July 20, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2011–18673 Filed 7–22–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–809 ] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 21, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published its final results of review covering the period November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2009. See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 36089 (June 21, 2011) (‘‘Final Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Hyundai HYSCO alleged that the Department made a ministerial error in those Final Results. Based on our analysis of the allegation, we have made changes to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Hyundai HYSCO. DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Morris or Matthew Jordan, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1779 or (202) 482– 1540, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 16, 2011, Hyundai HYSCO, a producer/exporter not selected for individual examination in this review, alleged that the Department made a ministerial error in the cash deposit rate assigned to the company. No rebuttal comments were received. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily concluded that Hyundai HYSCO had no knowledge that entries ascribed to it were destined for or entered into the United States during the period of review. See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 77838 (December 14, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). We also noted that a dumping margin had been calculated for Hyundai HYSCO in a prior segment of this proceeding. In the Final Results, we failed to address these preliminary conclusions and, instead, assigned to Hyundai HYSCO the cash deposit rate for other companies not selected for individual examination. We are now amending the Final Results to reflect the Department’s determination that Hyundai HYSCO had no reviewable U.S. sales. See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated July 19, 2011, RE: ‘‘Ministerial Error for Final Results of Review.’’ The Department no longer rescinds reviews of companies with no entries. Instead, we complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) based on the final results of the review (see, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2011 / Notices Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010)). Specifically, when the company has an individual cash deposit rate from the most recent segment of the proceeding in which the company had shipments and sales, we do not assign that company a new cash deposit rate. Additionally, when the company had no entries, we instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by the company and exported by other parties at the all-others rate. Amended Margins for the Final Results of Review We continue to determine that a weighted-average dumping margin exists for the three mandatory respondents, SeAH Steel Corporation (‘‘SeAH’’), Husteel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Husteel’’), and Nexteel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nexteel’’), for the period November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2009. Respondents other than mandatory respondents and Hyundai HYSCO continue to receive the weighted-average of the margins calculated for SeAH, Husteel, and Nexteel. Manufacturer/exporter Weightedaverage margin percent jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SeAH Steel Corporation ........... Husteel Co., Ltd ........................ Nexteel Co., Ltd ........................ Hyundai HYSCO ....................... Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd ..... A–JU Besteel Co., Ltd .............. days after the date of publication of these amended final results of review. As explained above, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any entries at the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation if there is no assessment rate for the intermediate companies involved in the transaction. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea, 57 FR 42942, 42945 (September 17, 1992); see also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties 4.99 2.25 12.90 * 8.17 8.17 This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information * No entries or sales subject to this review. disclosed under APO in accordance The firm has an individual dumping margin with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely from a previous segment of the proceeding in written notification of return/ which the firm had entries and sales. destruction of APO materials or Cash Deposit Requirements for conversion to judicial protective order is Hyundai HYSCO hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an The cash deposit rate for Hyundai HYSCO will be revised to reflect the rate APO is a sanctionable violation. it was assigned in the most recent These amended final results of review review in which it participated and had are issued and published in accordance sales and entries of subject with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of merchandise. This cash deposit the Act. requirement will be in effect until Dated: July 19, 2011. further notice. This cash deposit Ronald K. Lorentzen, requirement will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import produced by Hyundai HYSCO and Administration. entered or withdrawn from warehouse [FR Doc. 2011–18713 Filed 7–22–11; 8:45 am] for consumption on or after the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P publication of the Final Results, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. Assessment Rate for Hyundai HYSCO The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions for Hyundai HYSCO directly to CBP 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:15 Jul 22, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 44305 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–357–812] Honey From Argentina: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Edwards or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–8029 or (202) 482– 3019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 31, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the initiation a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina, covering the period of December 1, 2009, through November 30, 2010, and a single exporter of Argentine honey, Villamora S.A. (Villamora). See Honey from Argentina: Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 5332 (January 31, 2011). The current deadline for the preliminary results of this review is July 24, 2011. Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results of Review Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), requires the Department to complete the preliminary results of a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order within 180 days after the date on which the review is initiated. However, the Department may extend the deadline for completion of the preliminary results to 300 days if it determines the case is extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The Department finds that this new shipper review is extraordinarily complicated and, therefore, it requires additional time to complete the preliminary results. Specifically, the Department requires additional time to analyze certain data and information regarding the Argentine honey market and the nature of Villamora’s relationship with affiliated parties. Accordingly, the Department is E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44304-44305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18713]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE



International Trade Administration



[A-580-809 ]




Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: 

Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review



AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 21, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the 

``Department'') published its final results of review covering the 

period November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2009. See Circular Welded 

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 36089 (June 21, 2011) 

(``Final Results''). Hyundai HYSCO alleged that the Department made a 

ministerial error in those Final Results. Based on our analysis of the 

allegation, we have made changes to the weighted-average dumping margin 

assigned to Hyundai HYSCO.



DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2011.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Morris or Matthew Jordan, AD/

CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-

1779 or (202) 482-1540, respectively.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 



Background



    On June 16, 2011, Hyundai HYSCO, a producer/exporter not selected 

for individual examination in this review, alleged that the Department 

made a ministerial error in the cash deposit rate assigned to the 

company. No rebuttal comments were received.



Final Determination of No Shipments



    In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily concluded 

that Hyundai HYSCO had no knowledge that entries ascribed to it were 

destined for or entered into the United States during the period of 

review. See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of 

Korea: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 77838 (December 14, 2010) (``Preliminary Results''). We 

also noted that a dumping margin had been calculated for Hyundai HYSCO 

in a prior segment of this proceeding. In the Final Results, we failed 

to address these preliminary conclusions and, instead, assigned to 

Hyundai HYSCO the cash deposit rate for other companies not selected 

for individual examination.

    We are now amending the Final Results to reflect the Department's 

determination that Hyundai HYSCO had no reviewable U.S. sales. See 

Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated 

July 19, 2011, RE: ``Ministerial Error for Final Results of Review.''

    The Department no longer rescinds reviews of companies with no 

entries. Instead, we complete the review and issue appropriate 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') based on 

the final results of the review (see, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the



[[Page 44305]]



Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010)). Specifically, when the 

company has an individual cash deposit rate from the most recent 

segment of the proceeding in which the company had shipments and sales, 

we do not assign that company a new cash deposit rate. Additionally, 

when the company had no entries, we instruct CBP to liquidate any 

existing entries of merchandise produced by the company and exported by 

other parties at the all-others rate.



Amended Margins for the Final Results of Review



    We continue to determine that a weighted-average dumping margin 

exists for the three mandatory respondents, SeAH Steel Corporation 

(``SeAH''), Husteel Co., Ltd. (``Husteel''), and Nexteel Co., Ltd. 

(``Nexteel''), for the period November 1, 2008, through October 31, 

2009. Respondents other than mandatory respondents and Hyundai HYSCO 

continue to receive the weighted-average of the margins calculated for 

SeAH, Husteel, and Nexteel.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                              Weighted-

                                                               average

                   Manufacturer/exporter                        margin

                                                               percent

------------------------------------------------------------------------

SeAH Steel Corporation.....................................         4.99

Husteel Co., Ltd...........................................         2.25

Nexteel Co., Ltd...........................................        12.90

Hyundai HYSCO..............................................            *

Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd................................         8.17

A-JU Besteel Co., Ltd......................................        8.17

------------------------------------------------------------------------

* No entries or sales subject to this review. The firm has an individual

  dumping margin from a previous segment of the proceeding in which the

  firm had entries and sales.



Cash Deposit Requirements for Hyundai HYSCO



    The cash deposit rate for Hyundai HYSCO will be revised to reflect 

the rate it was assigned in the most recent review in which it 

participated and had sales and entries of subject merchandise. This 

cash deposit requirement will be in effect until further notice. This 

cash deposit requirement will be effective for all shipments of subject 

merchandise produced by Hyundai HYSCO and entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse for consumption on or after the publication of the Final 

Results, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.



Assessment Rate for Hyundai HYSCO



    The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions for 

Hyundai HYSCO directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 

these amended final results of review. As explained above, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate any entries at the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value (``LTFV'') investigation if 

there is no assessment rate for the intermediate companies involved in 

the transaction. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value; Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea, 

57 FR 42942, 42945 (September 17, 1992); see also Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).



Notification to Importers



    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 

with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping duties.



Notification to Interested Parties



    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 

concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 

the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

    These amended final results of review are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.



    Dated: July 19, 2011.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-18713 Filed 7-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P