Notice of Random Assignment Study To Evaluate Workforce Investment Act Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs; Request for Comment, 43729-43731 [2011-18355]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
clear, concise description of all
elements and tasks of the project, with
sufficient and realistic timeframes
necessary to complete the tasks;
technical soundness of project design
and methodology; financial and
administrative integrity of the proposal,
including adherence to Federal financial
guidelines and processes; a sufficiently
detailed budget that shows
consideration of all contingencies for
this project and commitment to work
with the budget proposed; and
indication of availability work with NIC
staff.
Programmatic: 40 Points.
Are all of the elements and tasks as
outlined in the proposal fully and
clearly addressed? Is there a clear
description of how each project activity
will be accomplished, including major
tasks; the strategies to be employed;
required staffing; responsible parties,
and other required resources? Are there
any unique or exceptional approaches,
techniques, or design aspects proposed
that will enhance the project?
Project Management, Administration
and Budget: 30 Points.
Does the applicant identify reasonable
objectives, milestones, or measures to
track progress? Are the proposed
management and staffing plans clear,
realistic, and sufficient to carry out the
project? Is the applicant willing to meet
with NIC, at a minimum, as indicated in
the solicitation for this cooperative
agreement? Is the proposed budget
realistic, does it provide sufficient cost
detail/narrative, and does it represent
good value relative to the anticipated
results? Does the application include a
chart that aligns the budget with project
activities along a timeline with, at
minimum, quarterly benchmarks? In
terms of program value, is the estimated
cost reasonable in relation to work
performed and project products?
Organizational and Project Staff
Background: 30 Points.
Do the skills, knowledge, and
expertise of the organization and the
proposed project staff demonstrate a
high level of competency to carry out
the tasks? Does the applicant/
organization have the necessary
experience and organizational capacity
to carry out all goals of the project? If
consultants and/or partnerships are
proposed, is there a reasonable
justification for their inclusion in the
project and a clear structure to ensure
effective coordination?
Note: NIC will NOT award a cooperative
agreement to an applicant who does not have
a Dun and Bradstreet Database Universal
Number (DUNS) and is not registered in the
Central Contractor Registry (CCR). Applicants
can obtain a DUNS number at no cost by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
calling the dedicated toll-free request line at
800–333–0505. Applicants who are sole
proprietors should dial 866–705–5711 and
select option #1.
Applicants may register in the CCR
online at the CCR Web site: https://
www.ccr.gov. Applicants can also
review a CCR handbook and worksheet
at this Web site.
Number of Awards: One.
NIC Opportunity Number: 11AD04.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 16.601.
Executive Order 12372: This project is
not subject to the provisions of
Executive Order 12372.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2011–18409 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–36–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Random Assignment Study
To Evaluate Workforce Investment Act
Adult and Dislocated Worker
Programs; Request for Comment
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL or the Department) is prepared to
conduct an evaluation to provide
rigorous, nationally representative
estimates of the net impacts of intensive
services and training provided under
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs.
The Department has determined that it
is in the public interest to use a random
assignment impact methodology for the
study. In the local workforce investment
areas (LWIAs) randomly selected to
participate in this evaluation, all
applicants for intensive services and
training under the WIA Adult and
Dislocated Worker programs will be
required to participate in the study
during a 12–18 month period. The
Department is soliciting comments
concerning the Department’s plan to
carry out the study.
DATES: Written comments on the plan to
require consent to participate in the
study during the designated LWIAs’
study enrollment periods must be
received by the office listed in the
addresses section below on or before
August 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods:
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Please submit all written comments
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43729
(including disk and CD–ROM
submissions) to Eileen Pederson, U.S.
Department of Labor, Employment and
Training Administration, Office of
Policy Development and Research, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg., Room N–5641,
Washington, DC 20210. Commenters are
advised that mail delivery in the
Washington area may be delayed due to
security concerns. Hand-delivered
comments will be received at the above
address. All overnight mail will be
considered to be hand-delivered and
must be received at the designated place
by the date specified above.
• Facsimile: Please send comments to
Eileen Pederson’s attention, at fax
number (202) 693–2766.
• E-mail: Please send comments to
pederson.eileen@dol.gov.
Please submit your comments by only
one method. The Department will not
review comments received by means
other than those listed above or that are
received after the comment period has
closed.
Comments: All comments on this
notice will be retained by the
Department and released upon request
via e-mail to any member of the public.
The Department also will make all the
comments it received available for
public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at the
above address. If you need assistance to
review the comments, the Department
will provide you with appropriate aids
such as readers or print magnifiers. The
Department will make copies of this
notice available, upon request, in large
print, Braille and electronic file on
computer disk. The Department will
consider providing the notice in other
formats upon request. To schedule an
appointment to review the comments
and/or obtain the notice in an
alternative format, contact the Office of
Policy Development and Research at
(202) 693–3700 (this is not a toll-free
number). You may also contact this
office at the address listed above.
The Department will retain all
comments received without making any
changes to the comments, including any
personal information provided. If
requested, the comments will be
released to the public. The Department
cautions commenters not to include
their personal information such as
Social Security Numbers, personal
addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses in their comments as
such submitted information will be
released with the comment if the
comments are requested. It is the
commenter’s responsibility to safeguard
his or her information. If the comment
is submitted by e-mail, the e-mail
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
43730
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
addresses of the commenter will not be
released.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Pederson, U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of Policy
Development and Research, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
5641, Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone number: (202) 693–3647 (this
is not a toll-free number). Individuals
with hearing or speech impairments
may access the telephone number above
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–877–
889–5627 (TTY/TDD).
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Workforce Investment Act of
1998 (WIA) brought formerly
fragmented public and private
employment services together in a
single location within each community
and made them accessible to a wider
population than did prior employment
and training service delivery systems.
The recent recession, high
unemployment rate and limited Federal
resources serve as a reminder of the
importance of ensuring that the services
provided to people who are out of work
and desiring to transition to new
employment are as effective as possible.
In order to improve the management
and effectiveness of WIA services and
related activities, section 172 of the WIA
requires the Department to continually
evaluate WIA programs and activities.
These evaluations must ‘‘utilize
appropriate methodology and research
designs, including the use of control
groups chosen by scientific random
assignment methodologies.’’ Congress,
the Office of Management and Budget,
and the Government Accountability
Office have called on DOL to conduct an
evaluation now in order to learn if WIAfunded intensive services and training
are as effective as they can be.
Accordingly, ETA is conducting a
multisite control group evaluation to
provide rigorous, nationally
representative estimates of the net
impacts of WIA intensive services and
training provided under the Adult and
Dislocated Worker Programs.
Generally speaking, intensive services
are services that involve staff assistance
and include assessments, counseling,
and job placement. Training includes
education and occupational skills
building. This evaluation will offer
policymakers, program administrators,
and service providers information about
the relative effectiveness of Adult and
Dislocated Worker intensive services
and training, how the effectiveness
varies by target population, and how the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
services and training are implemented.
The study will also produce estimates of
the benefits and costs of these services
and training. The study’s key goal is to
generate findings that are applicable to
the national WIA Adult and Dislocated
Worker programs.
To obtain rigorous, nationally
representative estimates of WIA’s
effectiveness for adults and dislocated
workers, the Department plans to use a
random assignment impact
methodology for the evaluation. The
evaluation will take place in
approximately 30 randomly selected
LWIAs. WIA applicants in the selected
LWIAs who are eligible for intensive
services will be randomly assigned to
one of three groups. The three research
groups to which they will be assigned
are: (1) The full-WIA group—adults and
dislocated workers in this group can
receive any WIA services and training
for which they are eligible, (2) the coreand-intensive group—adults and
dislocated workers in this group can
receive any WIA services for which they
are eligible other than training, and (3)
the core-only group—adults and
dislocated workers in this group can
receive only WIA core services but no
intensive services or training. Overall,
94 percent of all WIA applicants in the
participating LWIAs who are eligible for
and interested in intensive services or
training will be assigned to the full-WIA
group.
In the LWIAs randomly selected to
participate in the evaluation, all
applicants for intensive services and/or
training under the WIA Adult and
Dislocated Worker programs will be
asked to participate in the study during
the 12–18 month study enrollment
period. They will be informed of the
evaluation, provided an opportunity to
ask questions or seek clarification of
their role and responsibilities should
they agree to participate, and then
required to give their consent to
participate. Applicants who do not
consent to participate in the study will
be allowed to receive core services only.
The sample intake period will range
between 12 and 18 months at each site.
A total of about 68,000 WIA adult and
dislocated worker program applicants
will be randomly assigned to the
evaluation.
The Department has determined that
it is in the public interest to use a
random assignment impact
methodology. Random assignment is
generally viewed as the best and most
feasible design for credibly and reliably
answering questions about the
effectiveness of social programs and
policy interventions. This is because
when implemented carefully, random
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assignment creates groups that are, on
average, identical in their characteristics
before the intervention. Hence, any
differences in the employment
outcomes of customers in the three
research groups can be confidently
attributed to differences in the service
intervention. Moreover, because of
funding limitations, not all people who
are eligible for, and could benefit from,
WIA services can receive them. As a
result, the total number of people who
are served will not be affected by the
study.
The Department recognizes that this
design will assign some applicants to
groups that limit their access to WIA
services. However, the study was
designed to balance two objectives: (1)
To fulfill the mandate for a rigorous
evaluation of WIA and (2) to maximize
the number of customers in the study
who have access to the full set of WIAfunded services. Since the three
research groups will be identical except
for their ability to access different levels
of WIA-funded assistance, any
differences in outcomes between the
groups will be attributable to the WIA
services. To meet the second objective,
the study design allows most adult and
dislocated worker customers to have
access to the full set of WIA-funded
assistance. Only a small percentage of
customers will be restricted to receiving
core services or core-and-intensive
services. Those customers who are
assigned to either the core only or coreand-intensive only research groups will
be eligible to apply for intensive
services and training 15 months after
enrollment into the study.
To protect the rights and welfare of
One-Stop Career Center customers who
agree to participate in the evaluation,
the evaluation team, consisting of
researchers from Mathematica Policy
Research and MDRC, submitted the WIA
Evaluation design to MDRC’s
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for
concurrence. On June 17, 2010, the IRB
determined this study to be of minimal
risk and unanimously approved it.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments
concerning the Department’s intent to
carry out the random assignment study
described above: for the limited
enrollment period, applicants for WIA
intensive and training services would be
required to consent to participate in the
study, where they would be randomly
assigned to one of the three research
groups. Applicants who do not consent
to participate would receive core
services. This requirement would apply
only to applicants for intensive services
and training provided in the limited
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
number of LWIAs selected to participate
in this evaluation.
The Department seeks comments
focused on whether there is a
methodology that would yield as
credible and reliable an evaluation of
the WIA program as random
assignment, but avoids adverse affect on
the study participants. The Department
also welcomes comments that suggest
ways to more effectively minimize any
adverse impact on the study
participants who participate in the
study described above.
III. Current Actions
Following receipt of comments in
response to this request, ETA will
adjust, as appropriate, the approach for
temporarily requiring applicants for
WIA intensive services and training at
selected LWIAs to participate in random
assignment. Comments submitted in
response to this request will also
become a matter of public record.
Signed: at Washington, DC this 15th day of
July, 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–18355 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permit Emergency Provision
Under the Antarctic Conservation Act
of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541)
National Science Foundation.
Notice of permit emergency
provision for hazardous waste stored in
Antarctica at a location other than a
permanent station for more than 12
months due to an emergency, as
specified by § 671.17.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Program of Environment
Health and Safety (PEHS) in the Office
of Polar Programs (OD/OPP), in
accordance with § 671.17, is giving
notice that an emergency relating to
considerations of human health and
safety caused hazardous waste to be
stored in a location other than a
permanent station for more than 12
months.
Hazardous waste in the form of
batteries and contaminated snow from
small glycol and oil spills has been
stored at the Antarctica’s Gamburtsev
Province Project South camp (AGAP)
since the late 2009 camp closeout. The
waste was packaged into 42 sealed
containers, with lithium and lead acid
batteries filling 21 of the containers. The
remaining 21 containers were filled
with waste oil, soiled absorbents,
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
contaminated snow from small spills,
and approximately 5 gallons of glycol in
a 55 gallon drum. The waste was
strapped to plastic air force pallets and
placed in a storage berm. At the time of
packing, all containers were sound and
there was no evidence of leaks. No one
has been back to AGAP since the waste
was stored.
The South Pole Traverse (SPoT) was
scheduled to remove this waste during
the 2010–2011 season. The trip to AGAP
was scheduled as a side trip between
arriving at South Pole and starting the
return trip to McMurdo. SPoT
encountered bad storms on the way to
South Pole. It arrived more than 1 week
late, with one tractor incapacitated.
With one less tractor to pull the load,
the vehicles were travelling much more
slowly. Despite this, SPoT set out for
AGAP. However, 50 miles into the trip,
a second tractor became incapacitated;
further slowing progress and limiting
the ability of SPoT to self rescue should
they have further problems.
If SPoT proceeded as planned they
would have been in the field late in the
season when many of the planes have
left and Search and Rescue (SAR)
capabilities are significantly reduced.
There was concern that SPoT would not
arrive in McMurdo before the last plane
left the continent for the season. To
avoid this potentially dangerous
situation, the trip to AGAP to collect the
hazardous waste was cancelled.
In the 2011–2012 season SPoT’s
priority will be to collect the waste at
AGAP. Spot will depart McMurdo for
South Pole one week earlier than this
past season to allow a greater buffer for
weather and other delays. Further, SPoT
will travel to AGAP with an extra tractor
and driver to accommodate any
breakdowns and help speed progress.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Polly A. Penhale at (703) 292–7420.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–18372 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2011–0092]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43731
Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
ACTION:
The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The NRC published a Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
May 6, 2011.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 536, ‘‘Operator
Licensing Examination Data.’’
3. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0131.
4. The form number if applicable:
NRC Form 536.
5. How often the collection is
required: Annually.
6. Who will be required or asked to
report: All holders of operating licenses
for nuclear power reactors under the
provision of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50,
‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and
Utilization Facilities,’’ except those who
have permanently ceased operations
and have certified that fuel has been
permanently removed from the reactor
vessel, and all holders of or applicants
for a limited work authorization, early
site permits, or combined license issued
under 10 CFR Part 52, ‘‘Licenses,
Certifications and Approval for Nuclear
Power Plants.’’
7. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 110.
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 110.
9. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 110.
10. Abstract: The NRC is requesting
renewal of its clearance to annually
request all commercial power reactor
licensees and applicants for an
operating license to voluntarily send to
the NRC: (1) Their projected number of
candidates for initial operator licensing
examinations; (2) the estimated dates of
the examinations; (3) if the
examinations will be facility developed
or NRC developed; and (4) the estimated
number of individuals that will
participate in the Generic Fundamentals
Examination (GFE) for that calendar
year. Except for the GFE, this
information is used to plan budgets and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43729-43731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18355]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Random Assignment Study To Evaluate Workforce
Investment Act Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs; Request for
Comment
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL or the Department) is prepared to
conduct an evaluation to provide rigorous, nationally representative
estimates of the net impacts of intensive services and training
provided under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Adult and Dislocated
Worker Programs. The Department has determined that it is in the public
interest to use a random assignment impact methodology for the study.
In the local workforce investment areas (LWIAs) randomly selected to
participate in this evaluation, all applicants for intensive services
and training under the WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker programs will be
required to participate in the study during a 12-18 month period. The
Department is soliciting comments concerning the Department's plan to
carry out the study.
DATES: Written comments on the plan to require consent to participate
in the study during the designated LWIAs' study enrollment periods must
be received by the office listed in the addresses section below on or
before August 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of the following methods:
Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: Please submit all written
comments (including disk and CD-ROM submissions) to Eileen Pederson,
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration,
Office of Policy Development and Research, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room N-5641, Washington, DC 20210.
Commenters are advised that mail delivery in the Washington area may be
delayed due to security concerns. Hand-delivered comments will be
received at the above address. All overnight mail will be considered to
be hand-delivered and must be received at the designated place by the
date specified above.
Facsimile: Please send comments to Eileen Pederson's
attention, at fax number (202) 693-2766.
E-mail: Please send comments to pederson.eileen@dol.gov.
Please submit your comments by only one method. The Department will
not review comments received by means other than those listed above or
that are received after the comment period has closed.
Comments: All comments on this notice will be retained by the
Department and released upon request via e-mail to any member of the
public. The Department also will make all the comments it received
available for public inspection by appointment during normal business
hours at the above address. If you need assistance to review the
comments, the Department will provide you with appropriate aids such as
readers or print magnifiers. The Department will make copies of this
notice available, upon request, in large print, Braille and electronic
file on computer disk. The Department will consider providing the
notice in other formats upon request. To schedule an appointment to
review the comments and/or obtain the notice in an alternative format,
contact the Office of Policy Development and Research at (202) 693-3700
(this is not a toll-free number). You may also contact this office at
the address listed above.
The Department will retain all comments received without making any
changes to the comments, including any personal information provided.
If requested, the comments will be released to the public. The
Department cautions commenters not to include their personal
information such as Social Security Numbers, personal addresses,
telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses in their comments as such
submitted information will be released with the comment if the comments
are requested. It is the commenter's responsibility to safeguard his or
her information. If the comment is submitted by e-mail, the e-mail
[[Page 43730]]
addresses of the commenter will not be released.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Pederson, U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Policy
Development and Research, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-5641,
Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number: (202) 693-3647 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may
access the telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-877-889-5627 (TTY/TDD).
I. Background
The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) brought formerly
fragmented public and private employment services together in a single
location within each community and made them accessible to a wider
population than did prior employment and training service delivery
systems. The recent recession, high unemployment rate and limited
Federal resources serve as a reminder of the importance of ensuring
that the services provided to people who are out of work and desiring
to transition to new employment are as effective as possible. In order
to improve the management and effectiveness of WIA services and related
activities, section 172 of the WIA requires the Department to
continually evaluate WIA programs and activities. These evaluations
must ``utilize appropriate methodology and research designs, including
the use of control groups chosen by scientific random assignment
methodologies.'' Congress, the Office of Management and Budget, and the
Government Accountability Office have called on DOL to conduct an
evaluation now in order to learn if WIA-funded intensive services and
training are as effective as they can be. Accordingly, ETA is
conducting a multisite control group evaluation to provide rigorous,
nationally representative estimates of the net impacts of WIA intensive
services and training provided under the Adult and Dislocated Worker
Programs.
Generally speaking, intensive services are services that involve
staff assistance and include assessments, counseling, and job
placement. Training includes education and occupational skills
building. This evaluation will offer policymakers, program
administrators, and service providers information about the relative
effectiveness of Adult and Dislocated Worker intensive services and
training, how the effectiveness varies by target population, and how
the services and training are implemented. The study will also produce
estimates of the benefits and costs of these services and training. The
study's key goal is to generate findings that are applicable to the
national WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker programs.
To obtain rigorous, nationally representative estimates of WIA's
effectiveness for adults and dislocated workers, the Department plans
to use a random assignment impact methodology for the evaluation. The
evaluation will take place in approximately 30 randomly selected LWIAs.
WIA applicants in the selected LWIAs who are eligible for intensive
services will be randomly assigned to one of three groups. The three
research groups to which they will be assigned are: (1) The full-WIA
group--adults and dislocated workers in this group can receive any WIA
services and training for which they are eligible, (2) the core-and-
intensive group--adults and dislocated workers in this group can
receive any WIA services for which they are eligible other than
training, and (3) the core-only group--adults and dislocated workers in
this group can receive only WIA core services but no intensive services
or training. Overall, 94 percent of all WIA applicants in the
participating LWIAs who are eligible for and interested in intensive
services or training will be assigned to the full-WIA group.
In the LWIAs randomly selected to participate in the evaluation,
all applicants for intensive services and/or training under the WIA
Adult and Dislocated Worker programs will be asked to participate in
the study during the 12-18 month study enrollment period. They will be
informed of the evaluation, provided an opportunity to ask questions or
seek clarification of their role and responsibilities should they agree
to participate, and then required to give their consent to participate.
Applicants who do not consent to participate in the study will be
allowed to receive core services only. The sample intake period will
range between 12 and 18 months at each site. A total of about 68,000
WIA adult and dislocated worker program applicants will be randomly
assigned to the evaluation.
The Department has determined that it is in the public interest to
use a random assignment impact methodology. Random assignment is
generally viewed as the best and most feasible design for credibly and
reliably answering questions about the effectiveness of social programs
and policy interventions. This is because when implemented carefully,
random assignment creates groups that are, on average, identical in
their characteristics before the intervention. Hence, any differences
in the employment outcomes of customers in the three research groups
can be confidently attributed to differences in the service
intervention. Moreover, because of funding limitations, not all people
who are eligible for, and could benefit from, WIA services can receive
them. As a result, the total number of people who are served will not
be affected by the study.
The Department recognizes that this design will assign some
applicants to groups that limit their access to WIA services. However,
the study was designed to balance two objectives: (1) To fulfill the
mandate for a rigorous evaluation of WIA and (2) to maximize the number
of customers in the study who have access to the full set of WIA-funded
services. Since the three research groups will be identical except for
their ability to access different levels of WIA-funded assistance, any
differences in outcomes between the groups will be attributable to the
WIA services. To meet the second objective, the study design allows
most adult and dislocated worker customers to have access to the full
set of WIA-funded assistance. Only a small percentage of customers will
be restricted to receiving core services or core-and-intensive
services. Those customers who are assigned to either the core only or
core-and-intensive only research groups will be eligible to apply for
intensive services and training 15 months after enrollment into the
study.
To protect the rights and welfare of One-Stop Career Center
customers who agree to participate in the evaluation, the evaluation
team, consisting of researchers from Mathematica Policy Research and
MDRC, submitted the WIA Evaluation design to MDRC's Institutional
Review Board (IRB) for concurrence. On June 17, 2010, the IRB
determined this study to be of minimal risk and unanimously approved
it.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the Department's
intent to carry out the random assignment study described above: for
the limited enrollment period, applicants for WIA intensive and
training services would be required to consent to participate in the
study, where they would be randomly assigned to one of the three
research groups. Applicants who do not consent to participate would
receive core services. This requirement would apply only to applicants
for intensive services and training provided in the limited
[[Page 43731]]
number of LWIAs selected to participate in this evaluation.
The Department seeks comments focused on whether there is a
methodology that would yield as credible and reliable an evaluation of
the WIA program as random assignment, but avoids adverse affect on the
study participants. The Department also welcomes comments that suggest
ways to more effectively minimize any adverse impact on the study
participants who participate in the study described above.
III. Current Actions
Following receipt of comments in response to this request, ETA will
adjust, as appropriate, the approach for temporarily requiring
applicants for WIA intensive services and training at selected LWIAs to
participate in random assignment. Comments submitted in response to
this request will also become a matter of public record.
Signed: at Washington, DC this 15th day of July, 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-18355 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P