Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and Methods of Making Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 42729-42730 [2011-18070]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Notices
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 13, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain digital television
and components thereof that infringe
one or more of claims 22–25 of the ‘096
patent; claim 11 of the ‘761 patent;
claims 22 and 23 of the ‘887 patent;
claims 1–15 of the ‘522 patent; and
claim 1 of the ‘082 patent, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
or is in the process of being established
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Vizio, Inc., 39
Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Coby Electronics Corp., 1991 Marcus
Avenue, Suite 301, Lake Success, NY
11042;
Curtis International Ltd., 315 Attwell
Drive, Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 5C1,
Canada;
E&S International Enterprises, Inc., d/b/
a Viore, 7801 Hayvenhurst Avenue,
Van Nuys, CA 91406;
MStar Semiconductor, Inc., 4F–1, No.
26, Tai-Yuan St., ChuPei Hsinchu
Hsien, Taiwan 302;
ON Corp US, Inc., 4370 La Jolla Village
Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, CA
92122;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Jul 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Renesas Electronics Corporation, 1753
Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku,
Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211–8668,
Japan;
Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 2880
Scott Boulevard, Santa Clara, CA
95050–2554;
Sceptre, Inc., 16800 East Gale Avenue,
City of Industry, CA 91745;
Westinghouse Digital, LLC, 500 North
State College Boulevard, Suite 1300,
Orange, CA 92868.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 13, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–18047 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42729
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–790]
Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and
Methods of Making Same; Notice of
Institution of Investigation; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
17, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Kaneka Corporation
of Japan. Supplementary materials were
filed on June 24 and 27, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain coenzyme
Q10 products and methods of making
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
7,910,340 (‘‘the ‘340 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
42730
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 13, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain coenzyme Q10
products and methods of making same
that infringe one or more of claims 1–
45 of the ‘340 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Kaneka
Corporation, 3–2–4 Nakanoshima, Kitaku, Osaka 530–8288, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd., No. 268
Dengyun Road, Gongshu District,
Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310011, China.
ZMC–USA, L.L.C., 1776 Woodstead
Court Suite 215, The Woodlands, TX
77380.
Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company,
No. 33–35 Xinchang Road, Haicang,
Xiamen 361022, China.
Pacific Rainbow International Inc.,
19905 Harrison Avenue, City of
Industry, CA 91789.
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,
Inc., Mitsubishi Building, 5–2,
Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo 100–8324, Japan.
Maypro Industries, Inc., 2975
Westchester Avenue, Purchase, NY
10577.
Shenzhou Biology & Technology Co.,
Ltd., No. 61 Zhichun Road, Haidian
District, Beijing, 100190, China.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Jul 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 14, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–18070 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–663 (Third
Review)]
Paper Clips From China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on paper clips from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on January 3, 2011 (76 F.R. 171)
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and determined on April 8, 2011, that
it would conduct an expedited review.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on July 12, 2011.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4242
(July 2011), entitled Paper Clips from
China: Investigation No. 731–TA–663
(Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 14, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–18087 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–788]
In the Matter of Certain Univeral Serial
Bus (‘‘USB’’) Portable Storage Devices,
Including USB Flash Drives and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Institution of Investigation; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
14, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Trek 2000
International Ltd., of Singapore; Trek
Technology (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; and S–Com System (S) Pte.
Ltd. of Singapore. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain universal serial bus (‘‘USB’’)
portable storage devices, including USB
flash drives and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent No. 6,880,054 (‘‘the ‘054
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,039,759 (‘‘the
‘759 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. D463,426
(‘‘the ‘426 patent’’) and U.S. Patent No.
7,549,161 (‘‘the ‘161 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42729-42730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-790]
Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and Methods of Making Same; Notice
of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 17, 2011, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Kaneka Corporation of Japan. Supplementary materials were filed on June
24 and 27, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
coenzyme Q10 products and methods of making same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 (``the `340
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
[[Page 42730]]
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on July 13, 2011, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain coenzyme Q10
products and methods of making same that infringe one or more of claims
1-45 of the `340 patent, and whether an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Kaneka Corporation, 3-2-4 Nakanoshima,
Kita-ku, Osaka 530-8288, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd., No. 268 Dengyun Road, Gongshu District,
Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310011, China.
ZMC-USA, L.L.C., 1776 Woodstead Court Suite 215, The Woodlands, TX
77380.
Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company, No. 33-35 Xinchang Road, Haicang,
Xiamen 361022, China.
Pacific Rainbow International Inc., 19905 Harrison Avenue, City of
Industry, CA 91789.
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc., Mitsubishi Building, 5-2,
Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8324, Japan.
Maypro Industries, Inc., 2975 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, NY 10577.
Shenzhou Biology & Technology Co., Ltd., No. 61 Zhichun Road, Haidian
District, Beijing, 100190, China.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 14, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-18070 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
