In the Matter of Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 42728-42729 [2011-18047]

Download as PDF sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 42728 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Notices work cooperatively with neighboring jurisdictions related to rehabilitation of the historic scene. In addition, plans detailing how the various landscapes will be managed will be developed prior to the implementation of any rehabilitation activities. The following rehabilitation activities have been identified; the highest priority tasks are listed first: • Approximately 45 acres of woods along the west side of Chinn Ridge will be cleared and replaced with open fields and grasslands to reestablish the view between the ridge and the site of the New York Monuments. • Approximately 35 acres of trees will be removed from Matthews Hill and the open fields will be rehabilitated. • Trees will be thinned at the top of the slope along the east side of the Chinn Ridge to reestablish the view between Chinn Ridge and Henry Hill while minimizing the amount of vegetation removed. The riparian buffer along Chinn Branch will be retained. • Approximately 15 acres of land on Stuart’s Hill that is currently open space will be reforested. • Approximately 20 acres of land that is currently open space south of Stuart’s Hill will be reforested. • Approximately 20 acres along the north-central portion of Dogan Ridge will be reforested, and a small area of 3 acres along the curve of the SudleyManassas Road will be cleared and managed as open fields. • To the north of the Matthews Hill area, an area of approximately 25 acres will be reforested. • An additional 5 acres of land along Bull Run to the west of Poplar Ford will be reforested. • The current Stuart’s Hill clearing will be expanded by approximately 30 acres to the east. The clearing will restore the view from General Lee’s headquarters toward Centreville during the Second Battle of Manassas. • The historic landscape around the Cundiff House will be rehabilitated to wartime conditions. Approximately 40 acres of trees will be removed and converted to grassland and/or scrubland. The NPS will continue to preserve historic structures and features, including those that date from the battles, such as Stone House, L. Dogan House, Thornberry House, and the Unfinished Railroad. Buildings and structures that do not date from the battles, but are historic or mark the site of wartime structures, will be stabilized and rehabilitated to function as important interpretive sites or will be maintained for park uses. These structures include the Brawner Farm VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:20 Jul 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 House, Henry House, J. Dogan House, Pringle House, and Stone Bridge. In addition to continuing to protect these structures, the NPS will initiate several actions: • Complete work necessary to support year round visitation of the Brawner Farm House as part of the Second Battle of Manassas tour route. • Explore a range of options to support interpretation of the Robinson House ruins from the Civil War period. • Preserve and stabilize the J. Dogan House. This preservation effort will include removing nonconforming structural elements such as siding, and removing the nonconforming modern garage. • As part of the Bypass, the existing U.S. Route 29 Bridge over Bull Run will be removed to eliminate modern intrusions from the battlefield landscape and to return the site to a more historic appearance. In addition, a new bridge will be constructed to allow continued access along U.S. Route 29. The new location will be chosen so there will be fewer impacts to the cultural landscape. In the selected alternative, a boundary adjustment to the park will be necessary to include the four tracts of land; the Davis Tract, the Stonewall Memory Garden Tract, the Conservation Trust Parcel, and the Dunklin Monument. These tracts are described in detail in the FEIS and in the Record of Decision. This adjustment will require Congressional action to amend the existing boundary. Implementation of each of these specific actions will require additional site-specific planning and compliance with NHPA and NEPA. The Preferred Alternative and two other alternatives were analyzed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the General Management Plan (DEIS/ GMP) and FEIS/GMP. The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate mitigating measures were identified. The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to minimize environmental harm, an overview of public involvement in the decision-making process, and comments received on the DEIS/GMP. Copies of the Record of Decision may be obtained from the contact listed above or online at https:// parkplanning.nps.gov/MANA. PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: April 19, 2011. Woody Smeck, Acting Regional Director, National Capital Region. [FR Doc. 2011–18149 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–49–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–789] In the Matter of Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 16, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Vizio, Inc. of Irvine, California. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on June 29 and July 6, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital televisions and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,511,096 (‘‘the ‘096 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 5,621,761 (‘‘the ‘761 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 5,703,887 (‘‘the ‘887 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 5,745,522 (‘‘the ‘522 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 5,511,082 (‘‘the ‘082 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Notices need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on July 13, 2011, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital television and components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 22–25 of the ‘096 patent; claim 11 of the ‘761 patent; claims 22 and 23 of the ‘887 patent; claims 1–15 of the ‘522 patent; and claim 1 of the ‘082 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Coby Electronics Corp., 1991 Marcus Avenue, Suite 301, Lake Success, NY 11042; Curtis International Ltd., 315 Attwell Drive, Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 5C1, Canada; E&S International Enterprises, Inc., d/b/ a Viore, 7801 Hayvenhurst Avenue, Van Nuys, CA 91406; MStar Semiconductor, Inc., 4F–1, No. 26, Tai-Yuan St., ChuPei Hsinchu Hsien, Taiwan 302; ON Corp US, Inc., 4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92122; VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:20 Jul 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 Renesas Electronics Corporation, 1753 Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211–8668, Japan; Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 2880 Scott Boulevard, Santa Clara, CA 95050–2554; Sceptre, Inc., 16800 East Gale Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91745; Westinghouse Digital, LLC, 500 North State College Boulevard, Suite 1300, Orange, CA 92868. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: July 13, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–18047 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42729 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–790] Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and Methods of Making Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 17, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Kaneka Corporation of Japan. Supplementary materials were filed on June 24 and 27, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain coenzyme Q10 products and methods of making same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 (‘‘the ‘340 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42728-42729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [Inv. No. 337-TA-789]


 In the Matter of Certain Digital Televisions and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation Institution of 
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 16, 2011, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Vizio, Inc. of Irvine, California. Letters supplementing the complaint 
were filed on June 29 and July 6, 2011. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain digital televisions and components thereof 
by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
5,511,096 (``the `096 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 5,621,761 (``the `761 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 5,703,887 (``the `887 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 5,745,522 (``the `522 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 5,511,082 
(``the `082 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists or is in the process of being established 
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will

[[Page 42729]]

need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should 
contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. General 
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on July 13, 2011, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital 
television and components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 
22-25 of the `096 patent; claim 11 of the `761 patent; claims 22 and 23 
of the `887 patent; claims 1-15 of the `522 patent; and claim 1 of the 
`082 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is 
in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of 
section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Coby Electronics Corp., 1991 Marcus Avenue, Suite 301, Lake Success, NY 
11042;
Curtis International Ltd., 315 Attwell Drive, Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 
5C1, Canada;
E&S International Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Viore, 7801 Hayvenhurst 
Avenue, Van Nuys, CA 91406;
MStar Semiconductor, Inc., 4F-1, No. 26, Tai-Yuan St., ChuPei Hsinchu 
Hsien, Taiwan 302;
ON Corp US, Inc., 4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 
92122;
Renesas Electronics Corporation, 1753 Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211-8668, Japan;
Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 2880 Scott Boulevard, Santa Clara, 
CA 95050-2554;
Sceptre, Inc., 16800 East Gale Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91745;
Westinghouse Digital, LLC, 500 North State College Boulevard, Suite 
1300, Orange, CA 92868.

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: July 13, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-18047 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.