North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews; Request for Panel Review, 42115 [2011-18005]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2011 / Notices
Department determined that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on PTFE
resin from Italy would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and, therefore, notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the order be revoked. See
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Italy: Final Results of Expedited
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order, 76 FR 12939 (March 9, 2011).
On July 7, 2011, the ITC published its
determination in the Federal Register,
pursuant to section 751(c)(1) of the Act,
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on PTFE resin from Italy would
likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time. See
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Italy, 76 FR 39896 (July 7, 2011),
and USITC Publication 4240 (June
2011), Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene
Resin From Italy, Investigation No. 731–
TA–385, Third Review (Expedited).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
PTFE resin, filled or unfilled. The order
also covers PTFE wet raw polymer
exported from Italy to the United States.
See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene
Resin From Italy; Final Affirmative
Determination of Circumvention of
Antidumping Duty Order, 58 FR 26100
(April 30, 1993). The order excludes
PTFE dispersions in water and fine
powders. During the period covered by
this review, such merchandise was
classified under item number
3904.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). We are providing this
HTSUS number for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope remains
dispositive.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the
antidumping order on PTFE resin from
Italy. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection will continue to collect
antidumping duty cash deposits at the
rates in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise. The
effective date of the continuation of the
order will be the date of publication in
the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to sections
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jul 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of the order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
This five-year (sunset) review and this
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–18039 Filed 7–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel
Review.
AGENCY:
On July 8, 2011,
Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. filed a First
Request for Panel Review with the
United States Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of
the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Panel Review was requested
of the Final Results of the 2008–2009
and 2009–2010 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, made by the
International Trade Administration,
respecting Citric Acid and Certain
Citrate Salts from Canada. This
determination was published in the
Federal Register (76 FR 34,044), on June
10, 2011. The NAFTA Secretariat has
assigned Case Number USA–CDA–
2011–1904–03 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen M. Bohon, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–
5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) established a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42115
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada, and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was
filed with the United States Section of
the NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to
Article 1904 of the Agreement, on July
8, 2011, requesting a panel review of the
determination and order described
above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 39 within 30
days after the filing of the first Request
for Panel Review (the deadline for filing
a Complaint is August 8, 2011);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or
interested person that does not file a
Complaint but that intends to appear in
support of any reviewable portion of the
final determination may participate in
the panel review by filing a Notice of
Appearance in accordance with Rule 40
within 45 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Notice of Appearance is
August 22, 2011); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including the jurisdiction of the
investigating authority, that are set out
in the Complaints filed in panel review
and the procedural and substantive
defenses raised in the panel review.
Dated: July 13, 2011
Ellen M. Bohon,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011–18005 Filed 7–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA574
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18005]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel Review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 8, 2011, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. filed a First
Request for Panel Review with the United States Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Panel Review was requested of the Final Results of the 2008-
2009 and 2009-2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, made by the
International Trade Administration, respecting Citric Acid and Certain
Citrate Salts from Canada. This determination was published in the
Federal Register (76 FR 34,044), on June 10, 2011. The NAFTA
Secretariat has assigned Case Number USA-CDA-2011-1904-03 to this
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Bohon, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement (``Agreement'') established a mechanism to replace domestic
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of
the country that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada, and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was filed with the United States
Section of the NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article 1904 of the
Agreement, on July 8, 2011, requesting a panel review of the
determination and order described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final
determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance
with Rule 39 within 30 days after the filing of the first Request for
Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is August 8, 2011);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or interested person that does
not file a Complaint but that intends to appear in support of any
reviewable portion of the final determination may participate in the
panel review by filing a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule
40 within 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is August 22,
2011); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited to the allegations of error
of fact or law, including the jurisdiction of the investigating
authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in panel review and
the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review.
Dated: July 13, 2011
Ellen M. Bohon,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-18005 Filed 7-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P