In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Mobile Tablets, Portable Music Players, and Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 41522-41523 [2011-17677]

Download as PDF 41522 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Notices The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuits, chipsets, and products containing same including televisions by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No 5,467,455 (‘‘the ‘455 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. ADDRESSES: wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on July 7, 2011, Ordered That – (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuits, chipsets, and products VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:55 Jul 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 containing same including televisions that infringe one or more of claims 9 and 10 of the ‘455 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 William Cannon Drive West, Austin, TX 78735. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Funai Electric Co., Ltd., 7–7–1 Nakagaito, Daito, Osaka 574–0013, Japan. Funai Corporation, Inc., 201 Route 17, Suite 903, Rutherford, NJ 07070. MediaTek Inc., No. 1 Dusing Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City, Taiwan 30078. Zoran Corporation, 1390 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94086. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Commission notes that issues regarding whether Complainant may be precluded from asserting its complaint in light of a Commission decision in a prior investigation involving the same patent may be present here. In instituting this investigation, the Commission has not made any determination as to whether Complainant is so precluded. Accordingly, the presiding administrative law judge may wish to consider this issue at an early date. Any such decision should be issued in the form of an initial determination (ID) under Rule 210.42(c), 19 CFR 210.42(c). The ID will become the Commission’s final determination 45 days after the date of service of the ID unless the Commission determines to review the ID. Any such review will be conducted in accordance with Commission Rules 210.43, 210.44 and 210.45, 19 CFR 210.43, 210.44, and 210.45. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Issued: July 8, 2011. By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–17685 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–771] In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Mobile Tablets, Portable Music Players, and Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Notices inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION The Commission instituted this investigation on April 29, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Nokia Corporation of Finland; Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York; and Intellisync Corporation of White Plains, New York (collectively ‘‘Nokia’’), alleging a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation and sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile phones, mobile tablets, portable music players, and computers. 76 FR 24051 (Apr. 29, 2011). The complaint named as the respondent Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’). The complaint alleges that certain Apple products infringe various claims of seven patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,209,911; 6,212,529; 6,141,664; 7,558,696; 6,445,932; 5,898,740; and 7,319,874. On June 16, 2011, Nokia and Apple filed their Joint Motion to Terminate Investigation No. 337–TA–771 on the Basis of Settlement Agreement. On June 17, 2011, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response that recommended that the Commission grant the motion. That same day, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order No. 8). No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). SUMMARY: wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. Issued: July 8, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–17677 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:55 Jul 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 [Investigation No. 337–TA–704] In the Matter of Certain Mobile Communications and Computer Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 73) granting a joint motion by complainant Apple Inc., f/k/ a Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’) and respondents Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland and Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York (collectively ‘‘Nokia’’) to terminate in its entirety Inv. No. 337–TA–704, Certain Mobile Communications and Computer Devices and Components Thereof based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 24, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Apple. 75 FR 8399– 400. The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 41523 importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile communications and computer devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,379,431; 5,455,599; 5,519,867; 5,915,131; 5,920,726; 5,969,705; 6,343,263; 6,424,354; and RE39,486. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Nokia as respondent. On June 16, 2011, Apple and Nokia jointly moved to terminate this investigation in its entirety in view of a settlement agreement and a license agreement between the parties. On June 17, 2011, the Commission Investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. On June 24, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)) the joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 11, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–17699 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–75,120A] Steelcase, Inc., North America Division, Including Workers From Steelcase University Also Known as Steelcase Learning Center, a Subsidiary of Steelcase, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From Manower, Inc., Grand Rapids, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 4, 2011, E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 135 (Thursday, July 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41522-41523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-771]


In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile 
Phones, Mobile Tablets, Portable Music Players, and Computers, and 
Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a 
Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 8) 
granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for

[[Page 41523]]

inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in 
the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General 
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 29, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Nokia Corporation of 
Finland; Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York; and Intellisync 
Corporation of White Plains, New York (collectively ``Nokia''), 
alleging a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation and 
sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile 
phones, mobile tablets, portable music players, and computers. 76 FR 
24051 (Apr. 29, 2011). The complaint named as the respondent Apple Inc. 
of Cupertino, California (``Apple''). The complaint alleges that 
certain Apple products infringe various claims of seven patents: U.S. 
Patent Nos. 7,209,911; 6,212,529; 6,141,664; 7,558,696; 6,445,932; 
5,898,740; and 7,319,874.
    On June 16, 2011, Nokia and Apple filed their Joint Motion to 
Terminate Investigation No. 337-TA-771 on the Basis of Settlement 
Agreement. On June 17, 2011, the Commission investigative attorney 
filed a response that recommended that the Commission grant the motion. 
That same day, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order No. 8).
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 8, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-17677 Filed 7-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.