In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant the Consent Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of Settlement; Termination of Investigation, 40931 [2011-17460]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Notices Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission has determined to grant the joint motion to terminate the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21 and 210.50 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21 and 210.50). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 7, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–17459 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–685] In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant the Consent Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of Settlement; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to GRANT the consent motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based upon settlement. The investigation is terminated. SUMMARY: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:14 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–685 on September 2, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co. (‘‘Samsung’’) of Suwon City, South Korea on July 31, 2009. 74 FR 45469 (Sept. 2, 2009). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain flash memory and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,930,050 (‘‘the ‘050 patent’’) and 5,740,065 (‘‘the ‘065 patent’’). The ‘050 patent was subsequently terminated from the investigation. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Spansion Japan Limited of Kanagawa, Japan (‘‘Spansion Japan’’); Alpine Electronics, Inc. of Fukushima, Japan and Alpine Electronic of America, Inc. of Torrance, California; Slacker, Inc. of San Diego, California; Synology Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan and Synology North America Corp. of Redmond, Washington; Egreat USA of Fairfax, California; Appro International, Inc. of Milpitas, California; Shenzhen Egreat Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China (‘‘Shenzhen Egreat’’); and Spansion and D-Link as respondents. Many of these respondents were later terminated from the investigation based on consent orders, for cause, or withdrawal of the complaint. Shenzen Egreat was found in default. Comm’n Notice (Jan. 31, 2011). Spansion and D-Link, hereinafter ‘‘Respondents,’’ are the only remaining participating respondents. On February 28, 2008, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding a violation of Section 337 by Respondents. On March 14, 2011, Respondents and the Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed separate petitions seeking review of the ALJ’s determination concerning the ALJ’s findings on claim construction, infringement, invalidity, and domestic industry. On April 29, 2011, the Commission issued a Notice of its determination to review several aspects of the final ID and to pose certain questions to the parties. 76 FR 25707–9 (May 5, 2011). On June 16, 2011, Samsung filed a consent motion for termination of the investigation in its entirety based on a settlement agreement. On June 20, 2011, Samsung filed a corrected motion, clarifying that the settlement agreement, which is between it and Spansion, is intended to terminate the investigation also with respect to D-Link and Shenzen Egreat. On June 22, 2011, the Commission extended the target date of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 40931 the investigation by one month to July 28, 2011, to accommodate the schedule for addressing the motion for termination. Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission has determined to grant the consent motion to terminate the investigation. Section 337(c) provides, in relevant part, that the Commission may terminate an investigation ‘‘on the basis of an agreement between the private parties to the investigation.’’ When the investigation is before the Commission, as is the case here, the Commission may act on a motion to terminate on the basis of settlement. See Certain Insect Traps, Inv. No. 337–TA–498, Notice of Commission Determination To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 69 FR 63176 (Oct. 29, 2004). Commission Rule 210.21(b), which implements Section 337(c), requires that a motion for termination based upon a settlement contain a copy of that settlement agreement, as well as a statement that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation. The corrected motion complies with these requirements. The Commission also considers the public interest when terminating an investigation based upon a settlement agreement. 19 CFR 210.50(b)(2). We find no evidence that termination of the investigation will prejudice the public interest or that settlement will adversely impact the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the products of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. Moreover, the public interest favors settlement to avoid needless litigation and to conserve public and private resources. Accordingly, the Commission hereby GRANTS the consent motion to terminate this investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 7, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–17460 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 40931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [Inv. No. 337-TA-685]


 In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory and Products Containing 
Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant the Consent Motion To 
Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of Settlement; Termination of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to GRANT the consent motion to terminate the 
above-captioned investigation based upon settlement. The investigation 
is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
685 on September 2, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Samsung 
Electronics Co. (``Samsung'') of Suwon City, South Korea on July 31, 
2009. 74 FR 45469 (Sept. 2, 2009). The complaint, as amended, alleged 
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain flash 
memory and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,930,050 (``the `050 patent'') and 
5,740,065 (``the `065 patent''). The `050 patent was subsequently 
terminated from the investigation. The Commission's notice of 
investigation named Spansion Japan Limited of Kanagawa, Japan 
(``Spansion Japan''); Alpine Electronics, Inc. of Fukushima, Japan and 
Alpine Electronic of America, Inc. of Torrance, California; Slacker, 
Inc. of San Diego, California; Synology Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan and 
Synology North America Corp. of Redmond, Washington; Egreat USA of 
Fairfax, California; Appro International, Inc. of Milpitas, California; 
Shenzhen Egreat Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China (``Shenzhen Egreat''); and 
Spansion and D-Link as respondents. Many of these respondents were 
later terminated from the investigation based on consent orders, for 
cause, or withdrawal of the complaint. Shenzen Egreat was found in 
default. Comm'n Notice (Jan. 31, 2011). Spansion and D-Link, 
hereinafter ``Respondents,'' are the only remaining participating 
respondents.
    On February 28, 2008, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding a 
violation of Section 337 by Respondents. On March 14, 2011, Respondents 
and the Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') filed separate 
petitions seeking review of the ALJ's determination concerning the 
ALJ's findings on claim construction, infringement, invalidity, and 
domestic industry. On April 29, 2011, the Commission issued a Notice of 
its determination to review several aspects of the final ID and to pose 
certain questions to the parties. 76 FR 25707-9 (May 5, 2011).
    On June 16, 2011, Samsung filed a consent motion for termination of 
the investigation in its entirety based on a settlement agreement. On 
June 20, 2011, Samsung filed a corrected motion, clarifying that the 
settlement agreement, which is between it and Spansion, is intended to 
terminate the investigation also with respect to D-Link and Shenzen 
Egreat. On June 22, 2011, the Commission extended the target date of 
the investigation by one month to July 28, 2011, to accommodate the 
schedule for addressing the motion for termination.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission 
has determined to grant the consent motion to terminate the 
investigation. Section 337(c) provides, in relevant part, that the 
Commission may terminate an investigation ``on the basis of an 
agreement between the private parties to the investigation.'' When the 
investigation is before the Commission, as is the case here, the 
Commission may act on a motion to terminate on the basis of settlement. 
See Certain Insect Traps, Inv. No. 337-TA-498, Notice of Commission 
Determination To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety on the 
Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 69 FR 63176 (Oct. 29, 2004). 
Commission Rule 210.21(b), which implements Section 337(c), requires 
that a motion for termination based upon a settlement contain a copy of 
that settlement agreement, as well as a statement that there are no 
other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between the 
parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation. The 
corrected motion complies with these requirements.
    The Commission also considers the public interest when terminating 
an investigation based upon a settlement agreement. 19 CFR 
210.50(b)(2). We find no evidence that termination of the investigation 
will prejudice the public interest or that settlement will adversely 
impact the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the 
United States economy, the products of like or directly competitive 
articles in the United States, or United States consumers. Moreover, 
the public interest favors settlement to avoid needless litigation and 
to conserve public and private resources.
    Accordingly, the Commission hereby GRANTS the consent motion to 
terminate this investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.21 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.21).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: July 7, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-17460 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P