Options Price Reporting Authority; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Amendment to the Plan for Reporting of Consolidated Options Last Sale Reports and Quotation Information To Adopt a New Hosted Solution Fee and Other Changes to the Fee Schedule, 40967-40969 [2011-17380]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is
designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge, thereby qualifying for
effectiveness on filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 10 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 11
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–063 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–063. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
10 15
11 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of CBOE.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2011–063 and
should be submitted on or before
August 2, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–17381 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64819; File No. SR–OPRA–
2011–02]
Options Price Reporting Authority;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Amendment
to the Plan for Reporting of
Consolidated Options Last Sale
Reports and Quotation Information To
Adopt a New Hosted Solution Fee and
Other Changes to the Fee Schedule
July 6, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 11A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 608 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 24,
2011, the Options Price Reporting
Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) an amendment to the
Plan for Reporting of Consolidated
Options Last Sale Reports and
Quotation Information (‘‘OPRA Plan’’).3
The proposed amendment would make
several change to the fees payable by
OPRA Vendors and to the terms that
describe when those fees are payable.
The Commission is publishing this
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78k–1.
2 17 CFR 242.608.
3 The OPRA Plan is a national market system plan
approved by the Commission pursuant to Section
11A of the Act and the Rule 608 thereunder
(formerly Rule 11Aa3–2). See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 17638 (March 18, 1981), 22 S.E.C.
Docket 484 (March 31, 1981). The full text of the
OPRA Plan is available at https://
www.opradata.com.
PO 00000
12 17
1 15
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40967
notice to solicit comments from
interested persons on the proposed
OPRA Plan amendment.
I. Description and Purpose of the Plan
Amendment
The purpose of this amendment is to
make several changes in the fees
payable by OPRA Vendors and in the
terms that describe when those fees are
payable.
The first change is to adopt a new fee
(referred to in this filing as the ‘‘Hosted
Solution Fee’’) that will be payable by
any OPRA Vendor that supplies OPRA
Data to a ‘‘Hosted Solution’’ sponsored
by a ‘‘Client Organization.’’ The terms
‘‘Hosted Solution’’ and ‘‘Client
Organization’’ are defined in a revised
Policy entitled ‘‘Policy with respect to
Hosted Solutions.’’ The revised Policy
replaces a Policy entitled ‘‘OPRA Policy
on Persons Providing Internet Access to
Real-Time OPRA Data.’’ The definitions
of the terms ‘‘Hosted Solution’’ and
‘‘Client Organization’’ are described
below.
The second change is to permit a
Client Organization that sponsors a
Hosted Solution that displays delayed
OPRA Data not to pay a Redistribution
Fee as a result of its sponsorship of the
Hosted Solution.
The third change is to add a new
footnote to OPRA’s Fee Schedule to
clarify the circumstances in which an
OPRA Vendor may pay OPRA’s
‘‘Internet Service Only’’ Redistribution
Fee ($650/month) instead of the
standard Redistribution Fee ($1500/
month).
(a) New Hosted Solution Fee; Revised
Policy
OPRA is proposing to adopt a new
fee, referred to in this filing as the
‘‘Hosted Solution Fee.’’ The fee will be
payable by OPRA Vendors that supply
OPRA Data to ‘‘Hosted Solutions.’’ A
‘‘Hosted Solution’’ is a market data
delivery vehicle, such as a Web site or
a page on a website, that satisfies certain
requirements: (i) The delivery vehicle
displays ‘‘current’’ or ‘‘delayed’’ OPRA
Data,4 and the OPRA Data is displayed
only on a ‘‘per inquiry’’ basis; 5 (ii) the
4 OPRA defines the term ‘‘current’’ to refer to
OPRA Data that has been transmitted to the Vendor
within the immediately preceding 15 minutes, and
the term ‘‘delayed’’ to refer to OPRA Data that is
no longer current. See paragraph 1(e) of the OPRA
form of Vendor Agreement, available on OPRA’s
website (https://www.opradata.com).
5 The requirement that the OPRA Data is
displayed only on a ‘‘per inquiry’’ basis means that
an offering of OPRA Data on a bulk data feed basis
does not qualify as a Hosted Solution. (A recipient
of OPRA Data on a bulk data feed basis has the
ability to select data for display on a continuous
basis and to format the display.)
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
40968
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
delivery vehicle is offered
(‘‘sponsored’’) by a second company (a
‘‘Client Organization’’); (iii) the delivery
vehicle is administered by the OPRA
Vendor; 6 and (iv) the delivery vehicle
clearly and prominently identifies the
OPRA Vendor that administers the
delivery vehicle.
The Hosted Solution Fee would be
payable by the OPRA Vendors that
administer Hosted Solutions, not the
Client Organizations that sponsor
Hosted Solutions. For current OPRA
Data the Hosted Solution Fee would be
$100 per month per Hosted Solution.
For delayed OPRA Data the Hosted
Solution Fee would be $50 per month
per Hosted Solution. The Hosted
Solution Fee would also include two
‘‘Enterprise Fee’’ alternatives: an OPRA
Vendor would be authorized to provide
delayed OPRA Data to an unlimited
number of Hosted Solutions for an
Enterprise Fee of $5,000 per month, or
would be authorized to provide current
and/or delayed OPRA Data to an
unlimited number of Hosted Solutions
for an Enterprise Fee of $10,000 per
month.7 The Hosted Solution fee would
be in addition to any other applicable
fees payable by the Vendor, including
the Redistribution Fee, Usage-based
Vendor Fees, Nonprofessional
Subscriber Fees and Direct Access Fee.8
The current Policy applies only to ‘‘an
Internet site on which there is a link or
a framed page through which OPRA
data provided by a person that is an
OPRA Vendor may be accessed.’’ OPRA
believes that ‘‘links’’ and ‘‘framed
pages’’ are now used relatively rarely,
and that the more common arrangement
is for the upstream Vendor to supply
data to the Web site of the downstream
client of the Vendor in response to
queries to the Web site.9 Accordingly,
OPRA believes that there is uncertainty
6 The delivery vehicle is ‘‘administered’’ by the
OPRA Vendor if the Vendor controls the OPRA Data
that is displayed or distributed via the delivery
vehicle. For current OPRA Data, this means that the
OPRA Vendor is responsible for assuring that each
person having access to the OPRA Data either has
a Subscriber Agreement in place with the Vendor
or has a Professional Subscriber Agreement in place
with OPRA. (This is stated in paragraph 3 of the
revised Policy.)
7 For example, if an OPRA Vendor were to
administer four Hosted Solutions, three of which
display current OPRA Data with two of those being
sponsored by one Client Organization and the third
being sponsored by another Client Organization,
and one of which displays delayed OPRA Data, the
Hosted Solution Fee payable by the OPRA Vendor
would be $350/month.
8 These fees are all described in OPRA’s Fee
Schedule.
9 The terms ‘‘upstream’’ and ‘‘downstream’’ are
used in this filing with reference to the ‘‘flow’’ of
OPRA Data; an entity is ‘‘upstream’’ from a second
entity if the first entity is supplying OPRA Data to
the second entity.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
under its current Policy as to the
circumstances in which the downstream
entity that sponsors a website must
itself become a Vendor and pay a
Redistribution Fee. The revised Policy
addresses this uncertainty by replacing
the references to ‘‘links’’ and ‘‘framed
pages’’ with the more general ‘‘Hosted
Solution’’ definition.
The revised Policy also differs from
the existing Policy in that it eliminates
an alternative arrangement that OPRA
believes has never been used. The
existing Policy contemplates, as an
alternative to the ordinary arrangement
in which the upstream Vendor controls
the entitlement process for persons who
have access to current OPRA Data via a
downstream client’s website, that the
downstream client may become a
‘‘Correspondent Subscriber’’ and control
the entitlement process. To become a
Correspondent Subscriber for a Vendor,
a person must enter into a
‘‘Correspondent Subscriber Agreement’’
with the Vendor and the Correspondent
Subscriber Agreement must be approved
by OPRA.10 No OPRA Vendor has ever
submitted a form of Correspondent
Subscriber Agreement to OPRA for
approval, and accordingly OPRA
believes that the Correspondent
Subscriber alternative has never been
used to comply with the existing Policy.
The revised Policy eliminates the
Correspondent Subscriber alternative.
(b) No Redistribution Fee for a Client
Organization That Sponsors a Hosted
Solution Displaying Delayed OPRA Data
In general, if a legal person
redistributes current or delayed OPRA
Data ‘‘externally’’ (i.e., outside its own
organization), OPRA classifies the
person as a ‘‘Vendor,’’ requires the
person to execute a Vendor Agreement
with OPRA and requires the person to
pay an OPRA Redistribution Fee. The
existing Policy entitled ‘‘OPRA Policy
on Persons Providing Internet Access to
Real-Time OPRA Data’’ states that
OPRA does not regard a person as a
Vendor if the person does no more than
sponsor a Web site on which real time
(i.e., current) OPRA Data is displayed,
and accordingly allows such a person
not to pay a Redistribution Fee.
The revised Policy extends these
concepts so that they apply to delayed
OPRA Data as well as current OPRA
Data. Accordingly, the revised Policy
provides that OPRA will not regard a
person as a Vendor if the person does
no more than sponsor a Hosted Solution
on which either current or delayed
10 OPRA’s requirements with respect to
Correspondent Subscriber Agreements are set out in
Section 7 of the OPRA Vendor Agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OPRA Data is displayed, and
accordingly allows such a person not to
pay a Redistribution Fee.
(c) Clarification of Circumstances in
Which an OPRA Vendor May Pay
OPRA’s ‘‘Internet Service Only’’
Redistribution Fee
OPRA has always referred to the basic
fee payable by each OPRA Vendor as the
‘‘Redistribution Fee.’’ The standard
Redistribution Fee has been $1500 per
month for many years. OPRA
implemented an ‘‘Internet service only’’
Redistribution Fee effective January 1,
1999, applicable in lieu of the standard
Redistribution Fee to any Vendor whose
redistribution of OPRA Data is made
solely by means of the Internet.11
When OPRA implemented the
‘‘Internet service only’’ Redistribution
Fee, an ‘‘Internet service only’’ was a
service that was generally for retail
customers and not for high traffic
volumes. More recently, Vendors have
occasionally asked OPRA if they qualify
for the ‘‘Internet service only’’
Redistribution Fee in circumstances in
which the Fee is not applicable, such as
where a Vendor is providing a data feed
to a downstream Vendor. OPRA is
proposing to add a footnote to its Fee
Schedule to provide additional
guidance as to the circumstances in
which a Vendor is eligible to pay the
‘‘Internet service only’’ Redistribution
Fee. The footnote would state that a
Vendor does not qualify for the
‘‘Internet service only’’ rate if the
Vendor redistributes OPRA Data via
dedicated lines or if the Vendor
redistributes OPRA Data to the systems
of one or more downstream Vendors or
to one or more Hosted Solutions.
(d) Rationale for the Changes to OPRA’s
Fees
OPRA anticipates that these changes
may result in a small incremental
increase in its revenues, with the Hosted
Solution Fees that it receives at least
partially offset by revenues that it will
not receive from firms that sponsor
Hosted Solutions as Client
Organizations rather than becoming
Vendors. OPRA believes that its overall
fee structure is appropriately adjusted
by requiring certain Vendors to pay
Hosted Solution Fees while providing
relief from paying the OPRA
Redistribution Fee to Client
Organizations that sponsor Hosted
Solutions. OPRA believes that the
amounts that it is proposing for the new
Hosted Solution Fees are reasonable in
11 The ‘‘Internet Service only’’ fee implemented
effective January 1, 1999 was $600 per month. The
fee was changed to its current $650/month in 2002.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Notices
terms of the value received by Vendors,
and will represent an appropriate
revenue contribution to covering the
overall costs of OPRA and its member
exchanges of collecting, consolidating,
processing, disseminating and assuring
the reliability and integrity of options
market information.
The text of the proposed amendment
to the OPRA Plan is available at OPRA,
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, https://opradata.com, and on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.sec.gov.
II. Implementation of the OPRA Plan
Amendment
OPRA designated this amendment as
qualified to be put into effect upon
filing with the Commission in
accordance with clause (i) of paragraph
(b)(3) of Rule 608 under the Act.12
OPRA intends to implement the
amendment effective as of the first day
of a calendar quarter after having given
OPRA Vendors at least 30-days notice of
the revised fees and the revised Policy.
The Commission may summarily
abrogate the amendment within sixty
days of its filing and require refiling and
approval of the amendment by
Commission order pursuant to Rule
608(b)(2) under the Act 13 if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a national
market system, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed OPRA
Plan amendment is consistent with the
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–OPRA–2011–02 on the subject
line.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OPRA–2011–02. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed plan
amendment that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed plan amendment between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of OPRA.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OPRA–2011–02 and should
be submitted on or before August 2,
2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–17380 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64826; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2011–090]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change by the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Regarding
Expansion of the Short Term Option
Series Program
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
July 6, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on June 29,
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(29).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
12 17
CFR 242.608(b)(3)(i).
13 17 CFR 242.608(b)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 11, 2011
1 15
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40969
2011, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NASDAQ’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by NASDAQ. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ is filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) a proposal for the
NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) to amend Chapter IV,
Section 6 (Series of Options Contracts
Open for Trading) and Chapter XIV,
Section 11 (Terms of Index Options
Contracts) to expand the Short Term
Option Series Program (‘‘STO Program’’
or ‘‘Program’’) 3 so that the Exchange
may select fifteen option classes on
which Short Term Option Series 4 may
be opened.
The Exchange requests that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay period contained in Exchange Act
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii).5
The text of the proposed rule change
is available from NASDAQ’s Web site at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/Filings,
at NASDAQ’s principal office, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and at the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
3 The STO Program was established about a year
ago on NASDAQ. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62297 (June 15, 2010), 75 FR 35111
(June 21, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ–2010–073) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness permanently
establishing Short Term Option Series Program on
NASDAQ). Other exchanges have also established
permanent short term option programs, including
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’), Chicago Board
Options Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’), International
Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’), NYSE Arca, NYSE
Amex, and NYSE OMX BX (‘‘BX’’).
4 Short Term Option Series are series in an option
class that is approved for listing and trading on the
Exchange in which the series is opened for trading
on any Thursday or Friday that is a business day
and that expires on the Friday of the next business
week. If a Thursday or Friday is not a business day,
the series may be opened (or shall expire) on the
first business day immediately prior to that
Thursday or Friday, respectively. NOM Chapter 1,
Section 1(a)(59) and Chapter XIV, Section 2(n).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40967-40969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17380]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-64819; File No. SR-OPRA-2011-02]
Options Price Reporting Authority; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Amendment to the Plan for Reporting of
Consolidated Options Last Sale Reports and Quotation Information To
Adopt a New Hosted Solution Fee and Other Changes to the Fee Schedule
July 6, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 608 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 24, 2011, the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'')
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') an
amendment to the Plan for Reporting of Consolidated Options Last Sale
Reports and Quotation Information (``OPRA Plan'').\3\ The proposed
amendment would make several change to the fees payable by OPRA Vendors
and to the terms that describe when those fees are payable. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from
interested persons on the proposed OPRA Plan amendment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
\2\ 17 CFR 242.608.
\3\ The OPRA Plan is a national market system plan approved by
the Commission pursuant to Section 11A of the Act and the Rule 608
thereunder (formerly Rule 11Aa3-2). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 17638 (March 18, 1981), 22 S.E.C. Docket 484 (March 31,
1981). The full text of the OPRA Plan is available at https://www.opradata.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Description and Purpose of the Plan Amendment
The purpose of this amendment is to make several changes in the
fees payable by OPRA Vendors and in the terms that describe when those
fees are payable.
The first change is to adopt a new fee (referred to in this filing
as the ``Hosted Solution Fee'') that will be payable by any OPRA Vendor
that supplies OPRA Data to a ``Hosted Solution'' sponsored by a
``Client Organization.'' The terms ``Hosted Solution'' and ``Client
Organization'' are defined in a revised Policy entitled ``Policy with
respect to Hosted Solutions.'' The revised Policy replaces a Policy
entitled ``OPRA Policy on Persons Providing Internet Access to Real-
Time OPRA Data.'' The definitions of the terms ``Hosted Solution'' and
``Client Organization'' are described below.
The second change is to permit a Client Organization that sponsors
a Hosted Solution that displays delayed OPRA Data not to pay a
Redistribution Fee as a result of its sponsorship of the Hosted
Solution.
The third change is to add a new footnote to OPRA's Fee Schedule to
clarify the circumstances in which an OPRA Vendor may pay OPRA's
``Internet Service Only'' Redistribution Fee ($650/month) instead of
the standard Redistribution Fee ($1500/month).
(a) New Hosted Solution Fee; Revised Policy
OPRA is proposing to adopt a new fee, referred to in this filing as
the ``Hosted Solution Fee.'' The fee will be payable by OPRA Vendors
that supply OPRA Data to ``Hosted Solutions.'' A ``Hosted Solution'' is
a market data delivery vehicle, such as a Web site or a page on a
website, that satisfies certain requirements: (i) The delivery vehicle
displays ``current'' or ``delayed'' OPRA Data,\4\ and the OPRA Data is
displayed only on a ``per inquiry'' basis; \5\ (ii) the
[[Page 40968]]
delivery vehicle is offered (``sponsored'') by a second company (a
``Client Organization''); (iii) the delivery vehicle is administered by
the OPRA Vendor; \6\ and (iv) the delivery vehicle clearly and
prominently identifies the OPRA Vendor that administers the delivery
vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ OPRA defines the term ``current'' to refer to OPRA Data that
has been transmitted to the Vendor within the immediately preceding
15 minutes, and the term ``delayed'' to refer to OPRA Data that is
no longer current. See paragraph 1(e) of the OPRA form of Vendor
Agreement, available on OPRA's website (https://www.opradata.com).
\5\ The requirement that the OPRA Data is displayed only on a
``per inquiry'' basis means that an offering of OPRA Data on a bulk
data feed basis does not qualify as a Hosted Solution. (A recipient
of OPRA Data on a bulk data feed basis has the ability to select
data for display on a continuous basis and to format the display.)
\6\ The delivery vehicle is ``administered'' by the OPRA Vendor
if the Vendor controls the OPRA Data that is displayed or
distributed via the delivery vehicle. For current OPRA Data, this
means that the OPRA Vendor is responsible for assuring that each
person having access to the OPRA Data either has a Subscriber
Agreement in place with the Vendor or has a Professional Subscriber
Agreement in place with OPRA. (This is stated in paragraph 3 of the
revised Policy.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hosted Solution Fee would be payable by the OPRA Vendors that
administer Hosted Solutions, not the Client Organizations that sponsor
Hosted Solutions. For current OPRA Data the Hosted Solution Fee would
be $100 per month per Hosted Solution. For delayed OPRA Data the Hosted
Solution Fee would be $50 per month per Hosted Solution. The Hosted
Solution Fee would also include two ``Enterprise Fee'' alternatives: an
OPRA Vendor would be authorized to provide delayed OPRA Data to an
unlimited number of Hosted Solutions for an Enterprise Fee of $5,000
per month, or would be authorized to provide current and/or delayed
OPRA Data to an unlimited number of Hosted Solutions for an Enterprise
Fee of $10,000 per month.\7\ The Hosted Solution fee would be in
addition to any other applicable fees payable by the Vendor, including
the Redistribution Fee, Usage-based Vendor Fees, Nonprofessional
Subscriber Fees and Direct Access Fee.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For example, if an OPRA Vendor were to administer four
Hosted Solutions, three of which display current OPRA Data with two
of those being sponsored by one Client Organization and the third
being sponsored by another Client Organization, and one of which
displays delayed OPRA Data, the Hosted Solution Fee payable by the
OPRA Vendor would be $350/month.
\8\ These fees are all described in OPRA's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current Policy applies only to ``an Internet site on which
there is a link or a framed page through which OPRA data provided by a
person that is an OPRA Vendor may be accessed.'' OPRA believes that
``links'' and ``framed pages'' are now used relatively rarely, and that
the more common arrangement is for the upstream Vendor to supply data
to the Web site of the downstream client of the Vendor in response to
queries to the Web site.\9\ Accordingly, OPRA believes that there is
uncertainty under its current Policy as to the circumstances in which
the downstream entity that sponsors a website must itself become a
Vendor and pay a Redistribution Fee. The revised Policy addresses this
uncertainty by replacing the references to ``links'' and ``framed
pages'' with the more general ``Hosted Solution'' definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The terms ``upstream'' and ``downstream'' are used in this
filing with reference to the ``flow'' of OPRA Data; an entity is
``upstream'' from a second entity if the first entity is supplying
OPRA Data to the second entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The revised Policy also differs from the existing Policy in that it
eliminates an alternative arrangement that OPRA believes has never been
used. The existing Policy contemplates, as an alternative to the
ordinary arrangement in which the upstream Vendor controls the
entitlement process for persons who have access to current OPRA Data
via a downstream client's website, that the downstream client may
become a ``Correspondent Subscriber'' and control the entitlement
process. To become a Correspondent Subscriber for a Vendor, a person
must enter into a ``Correspondent Subscriber Agreement'' with the
Vendor and the Correspondent Subscriber Agreement must be approved by
OPRA.\10\ No OPRA Vendor has ever submitted a form of Correspondent
Subscriber Agreement to OPRA for approval, and accordingly OPRA
believes that the Correspondent Subscriber alternative has never been
used to comply with the existing Policy. The revised Policy eliminates
the Correspondent Subscriber alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ OPRA's requirements with respect to Correspondent
Subscriber Agreements are set out in Section 7 of the OPRA Vendor
Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) No Redistribution Fee for a Client Organization That Sponsors a
Hosted Solution Displaying Delayed OPRA Data
In general, if a legal person redistributes current or delayed OPRA
Data ``externally'' (i.e., outside its own organization), OPRA
classifies the person as a ``Vendor,'' requires the person to execute a
Vendor Agreement with OPRA and requires the person to pay an OPRA
Redistribution Fee. The existing Policy entitled ``OPRA Policy on
Persons Providing Internet Access to Real-Time OPRA Data'' states that
OPRA does not regard a person as a Vendor if the person does no more
than sponsor a Web site on which real time (i.e., current) OPRA Data is
displayed, and accordingly allows such a person not to pay a
Redistribution Fee.
The revised Policy extends these concepts so that they apply to
delayed OPRA Data as well as current OPRA Data. Accordingly, the
revised Policy provides that OPRA will not regard a person as a Vendor
if the person does no more than sponsor a Hosted Solution on which
either current or delayed OPRA Data is displayed, and accordingly
allows such a person not to pay a Redistribution Fee.
(c) Clarification of Circumstances in Which an OPRA Vendor May Pay
OPRA's ``Internet Service Only'' Redistribution Fee
OPRA has always referred to the basic fee payable by each OPRA
Vendor as the ``Redistribution Fee.'' The standard Redistribution Fee
has been $1500 per month for many years. OPRA implemented an ``Internet
service only'' Redistribution Fee effective January 1, 1999, applicable
in lieu of the standard Redistribution Fee to any Vendor whose
redistribution of OPRA Data is made solely by means of the
Internet.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The ``Internet Service only'' fee implemented effective
January 1, 1999 was $600 per month. The fee was changed to its
current $650/month in 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When OPRA implemented the ``Internet service only'' Redistribution
Fee, an ``Internet service only'' was a service that was generally for
retail customers and not for high traffic volumes. More recently,
Vendors have occasionally asked OPRA if they qualify for the ``Internet
service only'' Redistribution Fee in circumstances in which the Fee is
not applicable, such as where a Vendor is providing a data feed to a
downstream Vendor. OPRA is proposing to add a footnote to its Fee
Schedule to provide additional guidance as to the circumstances in
which a Vendor is eligible to pay the ``Internet service only''
Redistribution Fee. The footnote would state that a Vendor does not
qualify for the ``Internet service only'' rate if the Vendor
redistributes OPRA Data via dedicated lines or if the Vendor
redistributes OPRA Data to the systems of one or more downstream
Vendors or to one or more Hosted Solutions.
(d) Rationale for the Changes to OPRA's Fees
OPRA anticipates that these changes may result in a small
incremental increase in its revenues, with the Hosted Solution Fees
that it receives at least partially offset by revenues that it will not
receive from firms that sponsor Hosted Solutions as Client
Organizations rather than becoming Vendors. OPRA believes that its
overall fee structure is appropriately adjusted by requiring certain
Vendors to pay Hosted Solution Fees while providing relief from paying
the OPRA Redistribution Fee to Client Organizations that sponsor Hosted
Solutions. OPRA believes that the amounts that it is proposing for the
new Hosted Solution Fees are reasonable in
[[Page 40969]]
terms of the value received by Vendors, and will represent an
appropriate revenue contribution to covering the overall costs of OPRA
and its member exchanges of collecting, consolidating, processing,
disseminating and assuring the reliability and integrity of options
market information.
The text of the proposed amendment to the OPRA Plan is available at
OPRA, the Commission's Public Reference Room, https://opradata.com, and
on the Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov.
II. Implementation of the OPRA Plan Amendment
OPRA designated this amendment as qualified to be put into effect
upon filing with the Commission in accordance with clause (i) of
paragraph (b)(3) of Rule 608 under the Act.\12\ OPRA intends to
implement the amendment effective as of the first day of a calendar
quarter after having given OPRA Vendors at least 30-days notice of the
revised fees and the revised Policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission may summarily abrogate the amendment within sixty
days of its filing and require refiling and approval of the amendment
by Commission order pursuant to Rule 608(b)(2) under the Act \13\ if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a national market system, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed OPRA
Plan amendment is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-OPRA-2011-02 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OPRA-2011-02. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed plan amendment that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed plan amendment between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of OPRA.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OPRA-2011-02
and should be submitted on or before August 2, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-17380 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P