Matthews International Corporation, Bronze Division, Kingwood, WV; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 40402-40403 [2011-17091]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
40402
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices
TA–W–80,060; Valspar Corporation,
High Point, NC: June 21, 2010.
TA–W–80,060A; Valspar Corporation,
High Point, NC: March 16, 2010.
TA–W–80,227; BOS Automotive
Products, Inc., Morristown, TN:
January 13, 2011.
TA–W–80,233; Ellison Educational
Equipment, Inc., Lake Forest, CA:
June 13, 2010.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–80,205; Nidec Motor
Corporation, Frankfort, IN: October
28, 2010.
TA–W–80,205A: Leased Workers from
Manpower, Frankfort, IN: May 26,
2010.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–80,054; W.M. Glenn
Construction, Durham, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–80,041; Quad/Graphics, Depew,
NY.
TA–W–80,068; New Enterprise Stone
and Lime Company, Inc. (NESL),
Erie, PA.
TA–W–80,074; AES Westover, LLC,
Johnson City, NY.
TA–W–80,103; HiRel Systems, LLC,
Duluth, MN.
TA–W–80,163; Dentsply International,
Inc., GAC, Bohemia, NY.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–80,026; Computer Task Group,
Inc., Mechanicsburg, PA.
TA–W–80,031; Thomson Reuters, Creve
Coeur, MO.
TA–W–80,118; PSC Industrial
Outsourcing, LP, Kelso, WA.
TA–W–80,126; Ryder Integrated
Logistics, Highland Park, MI.
TA–W–80,213; Healthlink, St. Louis,
MO.
TA–W–80,219; Beacon Medical Services,
LLC, Aurora, CO.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
TA–W–80,042; Capstar Drilling,
Wooster, OH.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–80,131; Invensys Operations
Management, Irvine, CA.
TA–W–80,170; Getty Images, Los Angles,
CA.
TA–W–80,206; West Clermont School,
Cincinnati, OH.
TA–W–80,214; California Newspaper
Limited Partnership, Callejo, CA.
TA–W–80,221; International
Netherlands Group, ING, Windsor,
CT.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning group of
workers are covered by Active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
no purpose since the petition group of
workers cannot be covered by more than
one certification at a time.
TA–W–75,255; Cooper Standard
Automotive, Bowling Green, OH.
TA–W–80,106; Delphi Corporation, El
Paso, TX.
TA–W–80,124; Bestway, Inc., Saint
Marys, PA.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of June 13,
2011 through June 24, 2011. Copies of
these determinations may be requested
under the Freedom of Information Act.
Requests may be submitted by fax,
courier services, or mail to FOIA
Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or
tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: June 29, 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–17090 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
TA–W–72,953
Matthews International Corporation,
Bronze Division, Kingwood, WV;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On January 28, 2011, the Department
of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for workers and
former workers of Matthews
International Corporation, Bronze
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices
Division, Kingwood, West Virginia
(subject firm). The Department’s Notice
of determination was published in the
Federal Register on February 10, 2011
(76 FR 7584). Workers were engaged in
the production of cast bronze memorial
products.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that, during the relevant
period, the subject firm did not import
articles like or directly competitive with
those produced at the subject firm, or
shift to/acquire from a foreign country
the production of these articles. The
Department’s survey of the subject
firm’s major declining customers
regarding their purchases of cast bronze
memorial products (and like or directly
competitive articles) in 2007, 2008,
2009, and during January through
February 2010 revealed no imports.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleged that, during the
relevant time period, the subject firm
had transferred equipment from the
subject facility to Mexico and that the
subject worker group was impacted by
customer imports.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department requested
the subject firm to submit a new
Confidential Data Request form,
collected new information to address
the allegations, and obtained
clarification of previously-submitted
information. The Department also
obtained additional U.S. aggregate
import data of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by the
subject worker group.
Based on a careful review of
information obtained during the initial
and reconsideration investigations, the
Department determines that imports of
articles like or directly competitive with
the cast bronze memorial products
manufactured at the subject firm did not
contribute importantly to worker group
separations and to subject firm sales/
production declines. Therefore, the
criteria set forth in Section 222(a) have
not been met.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
Matthews International Corporation,
Bronze Division, Kingwood, West
Virginia.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–17091 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–75,162]
Pisgah Yarn and Dyeing Company
Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Manpower, Inc., Old Fort, NC;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On May 16, 2011, the Department
issued a Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Pisgah Yarn & Dyeing
Company, Old Fort, North Carolina
(subject firm) to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance. The
Department’s Notice was published in
the Federal Register on May 25, 2011
(76 FR 30392). Workers are engaged in
employment related to the production of
cotton yarn. The worker group includes
on-site leased workers from Manpower,
Inc.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department received
new information that revealed that there
has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers’ firm of
production of like or directly
competitive articles.
Criterion I has been met because a
significant number or proportion of
workers at the subject firm have become
totally or partially separated or are
threatened with such separation.
Criterion II has been met because
there has been an acquisition from a
foreign country by the workers’ firm of
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced by the subject firm.
Criterion III has been met because the
acquisition of cotton yarn contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation at the subject
firm.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
determine that workers and former
workers of the subject firm, who are
engaged in employment related to the
production of cotton yarn, meet the
worker group certification criteria under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40403
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the
following certification:
’’All workers of Pisgah Yarn & Dyeing
Company, including on-site leased workers
from Manpower, Inc., Old Fort, North
Carolina, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
January 28, 2010, through two years from the
date of this revised certification, and all
workers in the group threatened with total or
partial separation from employment on date
of certification through two years from the
date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.’’
Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
June, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–17092 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–244; Docket No. 72–67]
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, R.E.
Ginna Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation; Notice of Consideration of
Approval of Application Regarding
Proposed Corporate Merger, and
Opportunity for a Hearing
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of request for license
transfer, opportunity to comment,
opportunity to request a hearing.
AGENCY:
Comments must be filed by
August 8, 2011. A request for a hearing
must be filed by July 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2009–0192 in the subject line of
your comments. Comments submitted in
writing or in electronic form will be
posted on the NRC Web site and on the
Federal rulemaking Web site https://
www.regulations.gov. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40402-40403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17091]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-72,953
Matthews International Corporation, Bronze Division, Kingwood,
WV; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration
On January 28, 2011, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and
former workers of Matthews International Corporation, Bronze
[[Page 40403]]
Division, Kingwood, West Virginia (subject firm). The Department's
Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on
February 10, 2011 (76 FR 7584). Workers were engaged in the production
of cast bronze memorial products.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that, during the relevant period, the subject
firm did not import articles like or directly competitive with those
produced at the subject firm, or shift to/acquire from a foreign
country the production of these articles. The Department's survey of
the subject firm's major declining customers regarding their purchases
of cast bronze memorial products (and like or directly competitive
articles) in 2007, 2008, 2009, and during January through February 2010
revealed no imports.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that,
during the relevant time period, the subject firm had transferred
equipment from the subject facility to Mexico and that the subject
worker group was impacted by customer imports.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department requested
the subject firm to submit a new Confidential Data Request form,
collected new information to address the allegations, and obtained
clarification of previously-submitted information. The Department also
obtained additional U.S. aggregate import data of articles like or
directly competitive with those produced by the subject worker group.
Based on a careful review of information obtained during the
initial and reconsideration investigations, the Department determines
that imports of articles like or directly competitive with the cast
bronze memorial products manufactured at the subject firm did not
contribute importantly to worker group separations and to subject firm
sales/production declines. Therefore, the criteria set forth in Section
222(a) have not been met.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance for workers and former workers of Matthews International
Corporation, Bronze Division, Kingwood, West Virginia.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of June, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-17091 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
